On external presentations of infinite graphs

The vertices of a finite state system are usually a subset of the natural numbers. Most algorithms relative to these systems only use this fact to select vertices. For infinite state systems, however, the situation is different: in particular, for such systems having a finite description, each state of the system is a configuration of some machine. Then most algorithmic approaches rely on the structure of these configurations. Such characterisations are said internal. In order to apply algorithms detecting a structural property (like identifying connected components) one may have first to transform the system in order to fit the description needed for the algorithm. The problem of internal characterisation is that it hides structural properties, and each solution becomes ad hoc relatively to the form of the configurations. On the contrary, external characterisations avoid explicit naming of the vertices. Such characterisation are mostly defined via graph transformations. In this paper we present two kind of external characterisations: deterministic graph rewriting, which in turn characterise regular graphs, deterministic context-free languages, and rational graphs. Inverse substitution from a generator (like the complete binary tree) provides characterisation for prefix-recognizable graphs, the Caucal Hierarchy and rational graphs. We illustrate how these characterisation provide an efficient tool for the representation of infinite state systems

The logical strength of Büchi's decidability theorem

We study the strength of axioms needed to prove various results related to automata on infinite words and Büchi's theorem on the decidability of the MSO theory of (N, less_or_equal). We prove that the following are equivalent over the weak second-order arithmetic theory RCA: 1. Büchi's complementation theorem for nondeterministic automata on infinite words, 2. the decidability of the depth-n fragment of the MSO theory of (N, less_or_equal), for each n greater than 5, 3. the induction scheme for Sigma^0_2 formulae of arithmetic. Moreover, each of (1)-(3) is equivalent to the additive version of Ramsey's Theorem for pairs, often used in proofs of (1); each of (1)-(3) implies McNaughton's determinisation theorem for automata on infinite words; and each of (1)-(3) implies the "bounded-width" version of König's Lemma, often used in proofs of McNaughton's theorem

On Generalizing Decidable Standard Prefix Classes of First-Order Logic

Recently, the separated fragment (SF) of first-order logic has been introduced. Its defining principle is that universally and existentially quantified variables may not occur together in atoms. SF properly generalizes both the Bernays-Sch\"onfinkel-Ramsey (BSR) fragment and the relational monadic fragment. In this paper the restrictions on variable occurrences in SF sentences are relaxed such that universally and existentially quantified variables may occur together in the same atom under certain conditions. Still, satisfiability can be decided. This result is established in two ways: firstly, by an effective equivalence-preserving translation into the BSR fragment, and, secondly, by a model-theoretic argument. Slight modifications to the described concepts facilitate the definition of other decidable classes of first-order sentences. The paper presents a second fragment which is novel, has a decidable satisfiability problem, and properly contains the Ackermann fragment and---once more---the relational monadic fragment. The definition is again characterized by restrictions on the occurrences of variables in atoms. More precisely, after certain transformations, Skolemization yields only unary functions and constants, and every atom contains at most one universally quantified variable. An effective satisfiability-preserving translation into the monadic fragment is devised and employed to prove decidability of the associated satisfiability problem.Comment: 34 page

Covering of ordinals

The paper focuses on the structure of fundamental sequences of ordinals smaller than $\epsilon_0$. A first result is the construction of a monadic second-order formula identifying a given structure, whereas such a formula cannot exist for ordinals themselves. The structures are precisely classified in the pushdown hierarchy. Ordinals are also located in the hierarchy, and a direct presentation is given.Comment: Accepted at FSTTCS'0

The First-Order Theory of Sets with Cardinality Constraints is Decidable

We show that the decidability of the first-order theory of the language that combines Boolean algebras of sets of uninterpreted elements with Presburger arithmetic operations. We thereby disprove a recent conjecture that this theory is undecidable. Our language allows relating the cardinalities of sets to the values of integer variables, and can distinguish finite and infinite sets. We use quantifier elimination to show the decidability and obtain an elementary upper bound on the complexity. Precise program analyses can use our decidability result to verify representation invariants of data structures that use an integer field to represent the number of stored elements.Comment: 18 page

On the Monadic Second-Order Transduction Hierarchy

We compare classes of finite relational structures via monadic second-order transductions. More precisely, we study the preorder where we set C \subseteq K if, and only if, there exists a transduction {\tau} such that C\subseteq{\tau}(K). If we only consider classes of incidence structures we can completely describe the resulting hierarchy. It is linear of order type {\omega}+3. Each level can be characterised in terms of a suitable variant of tree-width. Canonical representatives of the various levels are: the class of all trees of height n, for each n \in N, of all paths, of all trees, and of all grids

Automata for branching and layered temporal structures: An investigation into regularities of infinite transition systems

This manuscript is a revised version of the PhD Thesis I wrote under the supervision of Prof. Angelo Montanari at Udine University. The leitmotif underlying the results herein provided is that, given any infinite complex system (e.g., a computer program) to be verified against a finite set of properties, there often exists a simpler system that satisfies the same properties and, in addition, presents strong regularities (e.g., periodicity) in its structure. Those regularities can then be exploited to decide, in an effective way, which property is satisfied by the system and which is not. Perhaps the most natural and effective way to deal with inherent regularities of infinite systems is through the notion of finite-state automaton. Intuitively, a finite-state automaton is an abstract machine with only a bounded amount of memory at its disposal, which processes an input (e.g., a sequence of symbols) and eventually outputs true or false, depending on the way the machine was designed and on the input itself. The present book focuses precisely on automaton-based approaches that ease the representation of and the reasoning on properties of infinite complex systems. The most simple notion of finite-state automaton, is that of single-string automaton. Such a device outputs true on a single (finite or infinite) sequence of symbols and false on any other sequence. We will show how single-string automata processing infinite sequences of symbols can be successfully applied in various frameworks for temporal representation and reasoning. In particular, we will use them to model single ultimately periodic time granularities, namely, temporal structures that are left-bounded and that, ultimately, periodically group instants of the underlying temporal domain (a simple example of such a structure is given by the partitioning of the temporal domain of days into weeks). The notion of single-string automaton can be further refined by introducing counters in order to compactly represent repeated occurrences of the same subsequence in the given input. By introducing restricted policies of counter update and by exploiting suitable abstractions of the configuration space for the resulting class of automata, we will devise efficient algorithms for reasoning on quasi-periodic time granularities (e.g., the partitioning of the temporal domain of days into years). Similar abstractions can be used when reasoning on infinite branching (temporal) structures. In such a case, one has to consider a generalized notion of automaton, which is able to process labeled branching structures (hereafter called trees), rather than linear sequences of symbols. We will show that sets of trees featuring the same properties can be identified with the equivalence classes induced by a suitable automaton. More precisely, given a property to be verified, one can first define a corresponding automaton that accepts all and only the trees satisfying that property, then introduce a suitable equivalence relation that refines the standard language equivalence and groups all trees being indistinguishable by the automaton, and, finally, exploit such an equivalence to reduce several instances of the verification problem to equivalent simpler instances, which can be eventually decided

A Decidable Class of Nested Iterated Schemata (extended version)

Many problems can be specified by patterns of propositional formulae depending on a parameter, e.g. the specification of a circuit usually depends on the number of bits of its input. We define a logic whose formulae, called "iterated schemata", allow to express such patterns. Schemata extend propositional logic with indexed propositions, e.g. P_i, P_i+1, P_1, and with generalized connectives, e.g. /\i=1..n or i=1..n (called "iterations") where n is an (unbound) integer variable called a "parameter". The expressive power of iterated schemata is strictly greater than propositional logic: it is even out of the scope of first-order logic. We define a proof procedure, called DPLL*, that can prove that a schema is satisfiable for at least one value of its parameter, in the spirit of the DPLL procedure. However the converse problem, i.e. proving that a schema is unsatisfiable for every value of the parameter, is undecidable so DPLL* does not terminate in general. Still, we prove that it terminates for schemata of a syntactic subclass called "regularly nested". This is the first non trivial class for which DPLL* is proved to terminate. Furthermore the class of regularly nested schemata is the first decidable class to allow nesting of iterations, i.e. to allow schemata of the form /\i=1..n (/\j=1..n ...).Comment: 43 pages, extended version of "A Decidable Class of Nested Iterated Schemata", submitted to IJCAR 200