31,933 research outputs found
MCMAS-SLK: A Model Checker for the Verification of Strategy Logic Specifications
We introduce MCMAS-SLK, a BDD-based model checker for the verification of
systems against specifications expressed in a novel, epistemic variant of
strategy logic. We give syntax and semantics of the specification language and
introduce a labelling algorithm for epistemic and strategy logic modalities. We
provide details of the checker which can also be used for synthesising agents'
strategies so that a specification is satisfied by the system. We evaluate the
efficiency of the implementation by discussing the results obtained for the
dining cryptographers protocol and a variant of the cake-cutting problem
A Backward-traversal-based Approach for Symbolic Model Checking of Uniform Strategies for Constrained Reachability
Since the introduction of Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL), many logics
have been proposed to reason about different strategic capabilities of the
agents of a system. In particular, some logics have been designed to reason
about the uniform memoryless strategies of such agents. These strategies are
the ones the agents can effectively play by only looking at what they observe
from the current state. ATL_ir can be seen as the core logic to reason about
such uniform strategies. Nevertheless, its model-checking problem is difficult
(it requires a polynomial number of calls to an NP oracle), and practical
algorithms to solve it appeared only recently.
This paper proposes a technique for model checking uniform memoryless
strategies. Existing techniques build the strategies from the states of
interest, such as the initial states, through a forward traversal of the
system. On the other hand, the proposed approach builds the winning strategies
from the target states through a backward traversal, making sure that only
uniform strategies are explored. Nevertheless, building the strategies from the
ground up limits its applicability to constrained reachability objectives only.
This paper describes the approach in details and compares it experimentally
with existing approaches implemented into a BDD-based framework. These
experiments show that the technique is competitive on the cases it can handle.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2017, arXiv:1709.0176
Strategy Logic with Imperfect Information
We introduce an extension of Strategy Logic for the imperfect-information
setting, called SLii, and study its model-checking problem. As this logic
naturally captures multi-player games with imperfect information, the problem
turns out to be undecidable. We introduce a syntactical class of "hierarchical
instances" for which, intuitively, as one goes down the syntactic tree of the
formula, strategy quantifications are concerned with finer observations of the
model. We prove that model-checking SLii restricted to hierarchical instances
is decidable. This result, because it allows for complex patterns of
existential and universal quantification on strategies, greatly generalises
previous ones, such as decidability of multi-player games with imperfect
information and hierarchical observations, and decidability of distributed
synthesis for hierarchical systems. To establish the decidability result, we
introduce and study QCTL*ii, an extension of QCTL* (itself an extension of CTL*
with second-order quantification over atomic propositions) by parameterising
its quantifiers with observations. The simple syntax of QCTL* ii allows us to
provide a conceptually neat reduction of SLii to QCTL*ii that separates
concerns, allowing one to forget about strategies and players and focus solely
on second-order quantification. While the model-checking problem of QCTL*ii is,
in general, undecidable, we identify a syntactic fragment of hierarchical
formulas and prove, using an automata-theoretic approach, that it is decidable.
The decidability result for SLii follows since the reduction maps hierarchical
instances of SLii to hierarchical formulas of QCTL*ii
Possibilistic Boolean games: strategic reasoning under incomplete information
Boolean games offer a compact alternative to normal-form games, by encoding the goal of each agent as a propositional formula. In this paper, we show how this framework can be naturally extended to model situations in which agents are uncertain about other agents' goals. We first use uncertainty measures from possibility theory to semantically define (solution concepts to) Boolean games with incomplete information. Then we present a syntactic characterization of these semantics, which can readily be implemented, and we characterize the computational complexity
Simple Coalitional Games with Beliefs
We introduce coalitional games with beliefs (CGBs), a natural generalization of coalitional games to environments where agents possess private beliefs regarding the capabilities (or types) of others. We put forward a model to capture such agent-type uncertainty, and study coalitional stability in this setting. Specifically, we introduce a notion of the core for CGBs, both with and without coalition structures. For simple games without coalition structures, we then provide a characterization of the core that matches the one for the full information case, and use it to derive a polynomial-time algorithm to check core nonemptiness. In contrast, we demonstrate that in games with coalition structures allowing beliefs increases the computational complexity of stability-related problems. In doing so, we introduce and analyze weighted voting games with beliefs, which may be of independent interest. Finally, we discuss connections between our model and other classes of coalitional games
Reasoning about Knowledge and Strategies under Hierarchical Information
Two distinct semantics have been considered for knowledge in the context of
strategic reasoning, depending on whether players know each other's strategy or
not. The problem of distributed synthesis for epistemic temporal specifications
is known to be undecidable for the latter semantics, already on systems with
hierarchical information. However, for the other, uninformed semantics, the
problem is decidable on such systems. In this work we generalise this result by
introducing an epistemic extension of Strategy Logic with imperfect
information. The semantics of knowledge operators is uninformed, and captures
agents that can change observation power when they change strategies. We solve
the model-checking problem on a class of "hierarchical instances", which
provides a solution to a vast class of strategic problems with epistemic
temporal specifications on hierarchical systems, such as distributed synthesis
or rational synthesis
Infinite games with finite knowledge gaps
Infinite games where several players seek to coordinate under imperfect
information are deemed to be undecidable, unless the information is
hierarchically ordered among the players.
We identify a class of games for which joint winning strategies can be
constructed effectively without restricting the direction of information flow.
Instead, our condition requires that the players attain common knowledge about
the actual state of the game over and over again along every play.
We show that it is decidable whether a given game satisfies the condition,
and prove tight complexity bounds for the strategy synthesis problem under
-regular winning conditions given by parity automata.Comment: 39 pages; 2nd revision; submitted to Information and Computatio
The Complexity of Synthesizing Uniform Strategies
We investigate uniformity properties of strategies. These properties involve
sets of plays in order to express useful constraints on strategies that are not
\mu-calculus definable. Typically, we can state that a strategy is
observation-based. We propose a formal language to specify uniformity
properties, interpreted over two-player turn-based arenas equipped with a
binary relation between plays. This way, we capture e.g. games with winning
conditions expressible in epistemic temporal logic, whose underlying
equivalence relation between plays reflects the observational capabilities of
agents (for example, synchronous perfect recall). Our framework naturally
generalizes many other situations from the literature. We establish that the
problem of synthesizing strategies under uniformity constraints based on
regular binary relations between plays is non-elementary complete.Comment: In Proceedings SR 2013, arXiv:1303.007
- …