Ramified rectilinear polygons: coordinatization by dendrons

Simple rectilinear polygons (i.e. rectilinear polygons without holes or cutpoints) can be regarded as finite rectangular cell complexes coordinatized by two finite dendrons. The intrinsic $l_1$-metric is thus inherited from the product of the two finite dendrons via an isometric embedding. The rectangular cell complexes that share this same embedding property are called ramified rectilinear polygons. The links of vertices in these cell complexes may be arbitrary bipartite graphs, in contrast to simple rectilinear polygons where the links of points are either 4-cycles or paths of length at most 3. Ramified rectilinear polygons are particular instances of rectangular complexes obtained from cube-free median graphs, or equivalently simply connected rectangular complexes with triangle-free links. The underlying graphs of finite ramified rectilinear polygons can be recognized among graphs in linear time by a Lexicographic Breadth-First-Search. Whereas the symmetry of a simple rectilinear polygon is very restricted (with automorphism group being a subgroup of the dihedral group $D_4$), ramified rectilinear polygons are universal: every finite group is the automorphism group of some ramified rectilinear polygon.Comment: 27 pages, 6 figure

On the connectivity and restricted edge-connectivity of 3-arc graphs

A 3−arc of a graph G is a 4-tuple (y, a, b, x) of vertices such that both (y, a, b) and (a, b, x) are paths of length two in G. Let ←→G denote the symmetric digraph of a graph G. The 3-arc graph X(G) of a given graph G is defined to have vertices the arcs of ←→G. Two vertices (ay), (bx) are adjacent in X(G) if and only if (y, a, b, x) is a 3-arc of G. The purpose of this work is to study the edge-connectivity and restricted edge-connectivity of 3-arc graphs.We prove that the 3-arc graph X(G) of every connected graph G of minimum degree δ(G) ≥ 3 has edge-connectivity λ(X(G)) ≥ (δ(G) − 1)2; and restricted edge- connectivity λ(2)(X(G)) ≥ 2(δ(G) − 1)2 − 2 if κ(G) ≥ 2. We also provide examples showing that all these bounds are sharp.Peer Reviewe

Robust Detection of Dynamical Change in Scalp EEG

We present a robust, model-independent technique for measuring changes in the dynamics underlying nonlinear time-serial data. We define indicators of dynamical change by comparing distribution functions on the attractor via L{sub 1}-distance and X{sup 2} statistics. We apply the measures to scalp EEG data with the objective of capturing the transition between non-seizure and epileptic brain activity in a timely, accurate, and non-invasive manner. We find a clear superiority of the new metrics in comparison to traditional nonlinear measures as discriminators of dynamical change

Cover Time and Broadcast Time

We introduce a new technique for bounding the cover time of random walks by relating it to the runtime of randomized broadcast. In particular, we strongly confirm for dense graphs the intuition of Chandra et al. (1997) that ``the cover time of the graph is an appropriate metric for the performance of certain kinds of randomized broadcast algorithms\u27\u27. In more detail, our results are as follows: begin{itemize} item For any graph $G=(V,E)$ of size $n$ and minimum degree $delta$, we have $mathcal{R}(G)= mathcal{O}(frac{|E|}{delta} cdot log n)$, where $mathcal{R}(G)$ denotes the quotient of the cover time and broadcast time. This bound is tight for binary trees and tight up to logarithmic factors for many graphs including hypercubes, expanders and lollipop graphs. item For any $delta$-regular (or almost $delta$-regular) graph $G$ it holds that $mathcal{R}(G) = Omega(frac{delta^2}{n} cdot frac{1}{log n})$. Together with our upper bound on $mathcal{R}(G)$, this lower bound strongly confirms the intuition of Chandra et al.~for graphs with minimum degree $Theta(n)$, since then the cover time equals the broadcast time multiplied by $n$ (neglecting logarithmic factors). item Conversely, for any $delta$ we construct almost $delta$-regular graphs that satisfy $mathcal{R}(G) = mathcal{O}(max { sqrt{n},delta } cdot log^2 n)$. Since any regular expander satisfies $mathcal{R}(G) = Theta(n)$, the strong relationship given above does not hold if $delta$ is polynomially smaller than $n$. end{itemize} Our bounds also demonstrate that the relationship between cover time and broadcast time is much stronger than the known relationships between any of them and the mixing time (or the closely related spectral gap)