213 research outputs found

    Matching-based preprocessing algorithms to the solution of saddle-point problems in large-scale nonconvex interior-point optimization

    Get PDF
    Interior-point methods are among the most efficient approaches for solving large-scale nonlinear programming problems. At the core of these methods, highly ill-conditioned symmetric saddle-point problems have to be solved. We present combinatorial methods to preprocess these matrices in order to establish more favorable numerical properties for the subsequent factorization. Our approach is based on symmetric weighted matchings and is used in a sparse direct LDL T factorization method where the pivoting is restricted to static supernode data structures. In addition, we will dynamically expand the supernode data structure in cases where additional fill-in helps to select better numerical pivot elements. This technique can be seen as an alternative to the more traditional threshold pivoting techniques. We demonstrate the competitiveness of this approach within an interior-point method on a large set of test problems from the CUTE and COPS sets, as well as large optimal control problems based on partial differential equations. The largest nonlinear optimization problem solved has more than 12 million variables and 6 million constraint

    Linear solvers for power grid optimization problems: a review of GPU-accelerated linear solvers

    Full text link
    The linear equations that arise in interior methods for constrained optimization are sparse symmetric indefinite and become extremely ill-conditioned as the interior method converges. These linear systems present a challenge for existing solver frameworks based on sparse LU or LDL^T decompositions. We benchmark five well known direct linear solver packages using matrices extracted from power grid optimization problems. The achieved solution accuracy varies greatly among the packages. None of the tested packages delivers significant GPU acceleration for our test cases

    Interior-point methods for PDE-constrained optimization

    Get PDF
    In applied sciences PDEs model an extensive variety of phenomena. Typically the final goal of simulations is a system which is optimal in a certain sense. For instance optimal control problems identify a control to steer a system towards a desired state. Inverse problems seek PDE parameters which are most consistent with measurements. In these optimization problems PDEs appear as equality constraints. PDE-constrained optimization problems are large-scale and often nonconvex. Their numerical solution leads to large ill-conditioned linear systems. In many practical problems inequality constraints implement technical limitations or prior knowledge. In this thesis interior-point (IP) methods are considered to solve nonconvex large-scale PDE-constrained optimization problems with inequality constraints. To cope with enormous fill-in of direct linear solvers, inexact search directions are allowed in an inexact interior-point (IIP) method. This thesis builds upon the IIP method proposed in [Curtis, Schenk, Wächter, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2010]. SMART tests cope with the lack of inertia information to control Hessian modification and also specify termination tests for the iterative linear solver. The original IIP method needs to solve two sparse large-scale linear systems in each optimization step. This is improved to only a single linear system solution in most optimization steps. Within this improved IIP framework, two iterative linear solvers are evaluated: A general purpose algebraic multilevel incomplete L D L^T preconditioned SQMR method is applied to PDE-constrained optimization problems for optimal server room cooling in three space dimensions and to compute an ambient temperature for optimal cooling. The results show robustness and efficiency of the IIP method when compared with the exact IP method. These advantages are even more evident for a reduced-space preconditioned (RSP) GMRES solver which takes advantage of the linear system's structure. This RSP-IIP method is studied on the basis of distributed and boundary control problems originating from superconductivity and from two-dimensional and three-dimensional parameter estimation problems in groundwater modeling. The numerical results exhibit the improved efficiency especially for multiple PDE constraints. An inverse medium problem for the Helmholtz equation with pointwise box constraints is solved by IP methods. The ill-posedness of the problem is explored numerically and different regularization strategies are compared. The impact of box constraints and the importance of Hessian modification on the optimization algorithm is demonstrated. A real world seismic imaging problem is solved successfully by the RSP-IIP method

    Numerically-aware orderings for sparse symmetric indefinite linear systems

    Get PDF
    Sparse symmetric indefinite problems arise in a large number of important application areas; they are often solved through the use of an LDLT factorization via a sparse direct solver. Whilst for many problems, prescaling the system matrix A is sufficient to maintain stability of the factorization, for a small but important fraction of problems numerical pivoting is required. Pivoting often incurs a significant overhead and consequently a number of techniques have been proposed to try and limit the need for pivoting. In particular, numerically-aware ordering algorithms may be used, that is, orderings that depend not only on the sparsity pattern of A but also on the values of its (scaled) entries. Current approaches identify large entries of A and symmetrically permute them onto the subdiagonal where they can be used as part of a 2x2 pivot. This is numerically effective, but the fill in the factor L and hence the runtime of the factorization and subsequent triangular solves may be significantly increased over a standard ordering if no pivoting is required. We present a new algorithm that combines a matching-based approach with a numerically-aware nested dissection ordering. Numerical comparisons with current approaches for some tough symmetric indefinite problems are given
    corecore