218 research outputs found

    THE APPLICATION OF SMARTWATCH IN MANAGING EMPLOYEE HEALTH MONITORING

    Get PDF
    ABSTRACTWorkplace health issues have continued to increase, and this has caused problems such as increasing medical cost and medical leaves. In response to these issues, employers are starting to adopt health technology to overcome the problem such as smartwatch. Smartwatch technology is a wrist-worn device provided with a variety of sensors that are available for collecting physical activity and location data in real time. This paper aims to explore the future drivers of the smartwatch application in monitoring and managing employeesโ€™ health. The research study used exploratory research design utilizing the foresight methods. STEEPV analysis was used to identify the key drivers of smartwatch application and to develop a descriptive survey for assessing the impact and uncertainty of each driver. The survey was distributed to human resources managers of medium-sized companies in Malaysia. Technology readiness of smart watch adoption was evaluated using Technology Readiness Index (TRI). Thirty-five respondents took part in online survey. From the data analysis, top two drivers had been identified which are โ€œsocial interactionโ€ and โ€œdata transparencyโ€. These drivers were used for developing future scenario of the smartwatch application in monitoring and managing employee health in the next 5 to 10 years. Four scenarios had been discussed in this paper which are healthy workplace environment, unattainable technology adoption, inefficient technology, and low adoption of smartwatch. This research would provide additional information about the future scenario of smartwatch application in managing employee health monitoring in Malaysia. Keywords: Smartwatch; Employee Health Monitoring; Technological Readines

    General Practitioners' Perceptions of the Use of Wearable Electronic Health Monitoring Devices: Qualitative Analysis of Risks and Benefits.

    Get PDF
    The rapid diffusion of wearable electronic health monitoring devices (wearable devices or wearables) among lay populations shows that self-tracking and self-monitoring are pervasively expanding, while influencing health-related practices. General practitioners are confronted with this phenomenon, since they often are the expert-voice that patients will seek. This article aims to explore general practitioners' perceptions of the role of wearable devices in family medicine and of their benefits, risks, and challenges associated with their use. It also explores their perceptions of the future development of these devices. Data were collected during a medical conference among 19 Swiss general practitioners through mind maps. Maps were first sketched at the conference and their content was later compared with notes and reports written during the conference, which allowed for further integration of information. This tool represents an innovative methodology in qualitative research that allows for time-efficient data collection and data analysis. Data analysis highlighted that wearable devices were described as user-friendly, adaptable devices that could enable performance monitoring and support medical research. Benefits included support for patients' empowerment and education, behavior change facilitation, better awareness of personal medical history and body functioning, efficient information transmission, and connection with the patient's medical network; however, general practitioners were concerned by a lack of scientific validation, lack of clarity over data protection, and the risk of stakeholder-associated financial interests. Other perceived risks included the promotion of an overly medicalized health culture and the risk of supporting patients' self-diagnosis and self-medication. General practitioners also feared increased pressure on their workload and a compromised doctor-patient relationship. Finally, they raised important questions that can guide wearables' future design and development, highlighting a need for general practitioners and medical professionals to be involved in the process. Wearables play an increasingly central role in daily health-related practices, and general practitioners expressed a desire to become more involved in the development of such technologies. Described as useful information providers, wearables were generally positively perceived and did not seem to pose a threat to the doctor-patient relationship. However, general practitioners expressed their concern that wearables may fuel a self-monitoring logic, to the detriment of patients' autonomy and overall well-being. While wearables can contribute to health promotion, it is crucial to clarify the logic underpinning the design of such devices. Through the analysis of group discussions, this study contributes to the existing literature by presenting general practitioners' perceptions of wearable devices. This paper provides insight on general practitioners' perception to be considered in the context of product development and marketing

    Practice Theory Approach to Wearable Technology. Implications for Sustainability

    Get PDF

    Understanding how to design health data visualizations for Chilean older adults on mobile devices

    Get PDF
    Mobile devices, including activity trackers and smartwatches, can help older adults monitor health parameters passively and unobtrusively. Most user interactions with small devices consist of brief glances at the time or notifications. Consuming information from small displays poses challenges, which have been seldom studied from the perspective of older users. In this paper, we worked with older adults towards creating health data visualizations for them for small devices. We conducted a mixed-methods study with 30 older adults, in which we (1) conducted group discussions to understand participantsโ€™ opinions, (2) measured times taken to interpret health data visualizations with and without progress information, (3) measured how much information they could manage to see during brief glances. When data was visualized without progress indicators, participants took less time to understand the data and made fewer errors. Participants preferred health data visualizations that featured peaceful, and positive pictorial representations. We present design opportunities for older adultsโ€™ data visualizations in small devices

    Levels of digital identity for older-adults learners. A validated scale for their digital inclusion

    Get PDF
    [EN] This paper presents outcomes of a research program on the validation of a scale based on a theoretical proposal of three levels for the digital identity construction and development for older-adult learners. Age barriers for learning in our hyperconnected societies involve several gaps for the adults' lifelong learning and their full inclusion. Digital gaps include the motives and uses of older-adult learners for using digital platforms and resources, for this reason, in this paper the analysis of digital identity is associated with their Internet activity performances, aiming to analyze the relationship among the digital uses with their level of digital identity and digital inclusion. The scale was validated with a sample of senior learners (N = 659) aged 55 years old and over who already are involved in active aging programs of Adult Education in Spain. Twenty Likert-type items were used to measure the agreement with the relevance of the digital identity factors for the three levels, along with two other validated scales for the evaluation of their Internet uses and motivations. Exploratory and confirmatory analysis confirmed a factorial structure of three levels based on the location, access, and significance of digital identity. Results showed that uses and motives correlated with the digital identity of the older-adult learners, with key considerations for the design of digital literacy proposals in Lifelong Learning Programs

    Measuring work and workers: Wearables and digital assistance systems in manufacturing and logistics

    Full text link
    The smart glove or smart data glasses: Digitalization of work means that technology is moving closer to the bodies of employees. It can make movements, vital signs and even emotions visible. Technologies which many people use privately to monitor their sporting activities or health opens up a new dimension of control in the workplace, but also the possibility of supporting employees in complex work processes. Based on case studies of companies in manufacturing and logistics as well as a survey of employees, this study provides insights into operational use cases of wearables and the assessments of employees. It reveals contradictory experiences and a high importance of co-determination and co-design of new technologies by employees and works councils as a condition for using new technologies for improving work quality

    ํ˜„์žฅ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํ™•์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ž์œ ๋„ ๋†’์€ ์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋””์ž์ธ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ์„œ์ง„์šฑ.Collecting and tracking data in everyday contexts is a common practice for both individual self-trackers and researchers. The increase in wearable and mobile technologies for self-tracking encourages people to gain personal insights from the data about themselves. Also, researchers exploit self-tracking to gather data in situ or to foster behavioral change. Despite a diverse set of available tracking tools, however, it is still challenging to find ones that suit unique tracking needs, preferences, and commitments. Individual self-tracking practices are constrained by the tracking tools' initial design, because it is difficult to modify, extend, or mash up existing tools. Limited tool support also impedes researchers' efforts to conduct in situ data collection studies. Many researchers still build their own study instruments due to the mismatch between their research goals and the capabilities of existing toolkits. The goal of this dissertation is to design flexible self-tracking technologies that are generative and adaptive to cover diverse tracking contexts, ranging from personal tracking to research contexts. Specifically, this dissertation proposes OmniTrack, a flexible self-tracking approach leveraging a semi-automated tracking concept that combines manual and automated tracking methods to generate an arbitrary tracker design. OmniTrack was implemented as a mobile app for individuals. The OmniTrack app enables self-trackers to construct their own trackers and customize tracking items to meet their individual needs. A usability study and a field development study were conducted with the goal of assessing how people adopt and adapt OmniTrack to fulfill their needs. The studies revealed that participants actively used OmniTrack to create, revise, and appropriate trackers, ranging from a simple mood tracker to a sophisticated daily activity tracker with multiple fields. Furthermore, OmniTrack was extended to cover research contexts that enclose manifold personal tracking contexts. As part of the research, this dissertation presents OmniTrack Research Kit, a research platform that allows researchers without programming expertise to configure and conduct in situ data collection studies by deploying the OmniTrack app on participants' smartphones. A case study in deploying the research kit for conducting a diary study demonstrated how OmniTrack Research Kit could support researchers who manage study participants' self-tracking process. This work makes artifacts contributions to the fields of human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing, as well as expanding empirical understanding of how flexible self-tracking tools can enhance the practices of individual self-trackers and researchers. Moreover, this dissertation discusses design challenges for flexible self-tracking technologies, opportunities for further improving the proposed systems, and future research agenda for reaching the audiences not covered in this research.์ผ์ƒ์˜ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์—์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์œผ๋Š” ํ™œ๋™์ธ ์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น(self-tracking)์€ ๊ฐœ์ธ๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ํ™œ๋ฐœํžˆ ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์›จ์–ด๋Ÿฌ๋ธ” ๋””๋ฐ”์ด์Šค์™€ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ์ž์˜ ์‚ถ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋งํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋” ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๊ณ , ํ†ต์ฐฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ํ˜„์žฅ(in situ) ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ํ–‰๋™ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐ์— ์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋น„๋ก ์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋„๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ™”๋œ ์š”๊ตฌ์™€ ์ทจํ–ฅ์„ ์™„๋ฒฝํžˆ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋“ค์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์‰ฝ์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น ๋„๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด๋ฏธ ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ™•์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์ œํ•œ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ ‡๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์˜ ์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์œ ๋„๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ๋„๊ตฌ๋“ค์˜ ๋””์ž์ธ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ œ์•ฝ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฐ–์— ์—†๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ, ํ˜„์žฅ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค๋„ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋ด‰์ฐฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์งˆ๋ฌธ(research question)์€ ๋ถ„์•ผ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ „ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ์„ธ๋ถ„๋˜๊ณ , ์น˜๋ฐ€ํ•ด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณ ์œ ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜„์กดํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์šฉ ์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น ํ”Œ๋žซํผ๋“ค์€ ์ด์— ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ž์œ ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ„๊ทน์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ๊ฐ์ž์˜ ํ˜„์žฅ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ๋„๊ตฌ๋“ค์„ ์ง์ ‘ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ์ž์œ ๋„ ๋†’์€---์—ฐ๊ตฌ์  ๋งฅ๋ฝ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ์ธ์  ๋งฅ๋ฝ์„ ์•„์šฐ๋ฅด๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”---์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๋””์ž์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ๊ณ ์—์„œ๋Š” ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™(OmniTrack)์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋””์ž์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™์€ ์ž์œ ๋„ ๋†’์€ ์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ˜์ž๋™ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น(semi-automated tracking)์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ปจ์…‰์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋™ ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ ์ž๋™ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ž„์˜์˜ ํŠธ๋ž˜์ปค๋ฅผ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™์„ ๊ฐœ์ธ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ์•ฑ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™ ์•ฑ์€ ๊ฐœ๊ฐœ์ธ์ด ์ž์‹ ์˜ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น ๋‹ˆ์ฆˆ์— ๋งž๋Š” ํŠธ๋ž˜์ปค๋ฅผ ์ปค์Šคํ„ฐ๋งˆ์ด์ง•ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ๊ณ ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™์„ ์ž์‹ ์˜ ๋‹ˆ์ฆˆ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ฑ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ(usability testing)์™€ ํ•„๋“œ ๋ฐฐํฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(field deployment study)๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž๋“ค์€ ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™์„ ํ™œ๋ฐœํžˆ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋””์ž์ธ์˜ ํŠธ๋ž˜์ปคโ€”์•„์ฃผ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ•œ ๊ฐ์ • ํŠธ๋ž˜์ปค๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ํ•„๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ผ์ผ ํ™œ๋™ ํŠธ๋ž˜์ปค๊นŒ์ง€โ€”๋“ค์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™์„ ํ˜„์žฅ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ '์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™ ๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜ ํ‚ท(OmniTrack Research Kit)'์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™ ๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜ ํ‚ท์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ ์–ธ์–ด ์—†์ด ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™ ์•ฑ์„ ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž๋“ค์˜ ์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฐํฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋””์ž์ธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™ ๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜ ํ‚ท์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ผ์ง€๊ธฐ๋ก ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(diary study)๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์˜ด๋‹ˆํŠธ๋ž™ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ์ด๋ฃจ๋Š” ๋ฐ์— ๋„์›€์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์ง์ ‘ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํœด๋จผ-์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ž™์…˜(Human-Computer Interaction) ๋ฐ ์œ ๋น„์ฟผํ„ฐ์Šค ์ปดํ“จํŒ…(Ubiquitous Computing) ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋ฌผ๋กœ์จ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ž์œ ๋„ ๋†’์€ ์…€ํ”„ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น ๋„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ์ธ๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์„ ๋„์šธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์‹ค์ฆ์ ์ธ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ฆ์ง„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ž์œ ๋„ ๋†’์€ ์…€ํ”„ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ‚น ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋””์ž์ธ์  ๋‚œ์ œ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ, ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ง‘๋‹จ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋…ผ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค.Abstract CHAPTER 1. Introduction 1.1 Background and Motivation 1.2 Research Questions and Approaches 1.2.1 Designing a Flexible Self-Tracking Approach Leveraging Semiautomated Tracking 1.2.2 Design and Evaluation of OmniTrack in Individual Tracking Contexts 1.2.3 Designing a Research Platform for In Situ Data Collection Studies Leveraging OmniTrack 1.2.4 A Case Study of Conducting an In Situ Data Collection Study using the Research Platform 1.3 Contributions 1.4 Structure of this Dissertation CHAPTER 2. Related Work 2.1 Background on Self-Tracking 2.1.1 Self-Tracking in Personal Tracking Contexts 2.1.2 Utilization of Self-Tracking in Other Contexts 2.2 Barriers Caused by Limited Tool Support 2.2.1 Limited Tools and Siloed Data in Personal Tracking 2.2.2 Challenges of the Instrumentation for In Situ Data Collection 2.3 Flexible Self-Tracking Approaches 2.3.1 Appropriation of Generic Tools 2.3.2 Universal Tracking Systems for Individuals 2.3.3 Research Frameworks for In Situ Data Collection 2.4 Grounding Design Approach: Semi-Automated Tracking 2.5 Summary of Related Work CHAPTER3 DesigningOmniTrack: a Flexible Self-Tracking Approach 3.1 Design Goals and Rationales 3.2 System Design and User Interfaces 3.2.1 Trackers: Enabling Flexible Data Inputs 3.2.2 Services: Integrating External Trackers and Other Services 3.2.3 Triggers: Retrieving Values Automatically 3.2.4 Streamlining Tracking and Lowering the User Burden 3.2.5 Visualization and Feedback 3.3 OmniTrack Use Cases 3.3.1 Tracker 1: Beer Tracker 3.3.2 Tracker 2: SleepTight++ 3.3.3 Tracker 3: Comparison of Automated Trackers 3.4 Summary CHAPTER 4. Understanding HowIndividuals Adopt and Adapt OmniTrack 4.1 Usability Study 4.1.1 Participants 4.1.2 Procedure and Study Setup 4.1.3 Tasks 4.1.4 Results and Discussion 4.1.5 Improvements A_er the Usability Study 4.2 Field Deployment Study 4.2.1 Study Setup 4.2.2 Participants 4.2.3 Data Analysis and Results 4.2.4 Reflections on the Deployment Study 4.3 Discussion 4.3.1 Expanding the Design Space for Self-Tracking 4.3.2 Leveraging Other Building Blocks of Self-Tracking 4.3.3 Sharing Trackers with Other People 4.3.4 Studying with a Broader Audience 4.4 Summary CHAPTER 5. Extending OmniTrack for Supporting In Situ Data Collection Studies 5.1 Design Space of Study Instrumentation for In-Situ Data Collection 5.1.1 Experiment-Level Dimensions 5.1.2 Condition-Level Dimensions 5.1.3 Tracker-Level Dimensions 5.1.4 Reminder/Trigger-Level Dimensions 5.1.5 Extending OmniTrack to Cover the Design Space 5.2 Design Goals and Rationales 5.3 System Design and User Interfaces 5.3.1 Experiment Management and Collaboration 5.3.2 Experiment-level Configurations 5.3.3 A Participants Protocol for Joining the Experiment 5.3.4 Implementation 5.4 Replicated Study Examples 5.4.1 Example A: Revisiting the Deployment Study of OmniTrack 5.4.2 Example B: Exploring the Clinical Applicability of a Mobile Food Logger 5.4.3 Example C: Understanding the Effect of Cues and Positive Reinforcement on Habit Formation 5.4.4 Example D: Collecting Stress and Activity Data for Building a Prediction Model 5.5 Discussion 5.5.1 Supporting Multiphase Experimental Design 5.5.2 Serving as Testbeds for Self-Tracking Interventions 5.5.3 Exploiting the Interaction Logs 5.6 Summary CHAPTER 6. Using the OmniTrack Research Kit: A Case Study 6.1 Study Background and Motivation 6.2 OmniTrack Configuration for Study Instruments 6.3 Participants 6.4 Study Procedure 6.5 Dataset and Analysis 6.6 Study Result 6.6.1 Diary Entries 6.6.2 Aspects of Productivity Evaluation 6.6.3 Productive Activities 6.7 Experimenter Experience of OmniTrack 6.8 Participant Experience of OmniTrack 6.9 Implications 6.9.1 Visualization Support for Progressive, Preliminary Analysis of Collected Data 6.9.2 Inspection to Prevent Misconfiguration 6.9.3 Providing More Alternative Methods to Capture Data 6.10 Summary CHAPTER 7. Discussion 7.1 Lessons Learned 7.2 Design Challenges and Implications 7.2.1 Making the Flexibility Learnable 7.2.2 Additive vs. Subtractive Design for Flexibility 7.3 Future Opportunities for Improvement 7.3.1 Utilizing External Information and Contexts 7.3.2 Providing Flexible Visual Feedback 7.4 Expanding Audiences of OmniTrack 7.4.1 Supporting Clinical Contexts 7.4.2 Supporting Self-Experimenters 7.5 Limitations CHAPTER 8. Conclusion 8.1 Summary of the Approaches 8.2 Summary of Contributions 8.2.1 Artifact Contributions 8.2.2 Empirical Research Contributions 8.3 Future Work 8.3.1 Understanding the Long-term E_ect of OmniTrack 8.3.2 Utilizing External Information and Contexts 8.3.3 Extending the Input Modality to Lower the Capture Burden 8.3.4 Customizable Visual Feedback 8.3.5 Community-Driven Tracker Sharing 8.3.6 Supporting Multiphase Study Design 8.4 Final Remarks APPENDIX A. Study Material for Evaluations of the OmniTrack App A.1 Task Instructions for Usability Study A.2 The SUS (System Usability Scale) Questionnaire A.3 Screening Questionnaire for Deployment Study A.4 Exit Interview Guide for Deployment Study A.5 Deployment Participant Information APPENDIX B Study Material for Productivity Diary Study B.1 Recruitment Screening Questionnaire B.2 Exit Interview Guide Abstract (Korean)Docto

    The Use of Information and Communication Technology in Physical Education in the United States

    Get PDF
    La integraciรณn de la tecnologรญa en el aprendizaje ha visto diferentes tรฉcnicas de tecnologรญas de la informaciรณn y la comunicaciรณn utilizadas en diferentes asignaturas. Sin embargo, el uso de la tecnologรญa en Educaciรณn Fรญsica no ha recibido mucha atenciรณn en comparaciรณn con las otras asignaturas, especialmente en las escuelas primarias. Cuando nos centramos en la escuela primaria, surge la pregunta sobre cรณmo se puede garantizar la calidad y la efectividad. El objetivo de esta investigaciรณn fue determinar cรณmo se utilizan las TIC en educaciรณn fรญsica en las escuelas primarias de los Estados Unidos.The integration of technology in learning has seen different Information Communication Technology techniques being used in various subjects. However, the use of technology in Physical Education has not been given much attention as compared to the other subjects, especially in elementary schools. When the picture is narrowed down to the elementary level, then the question regarding how quality and effectiveness could be guaranteed emerges. The objective of this research was to determine how ICT is used in PE in elementary schools in the United States
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore