16 research outputs found

    Solving Two Conjectures regarding Codes for Location in Circulant Graphs

    Full text link
    Identifying and locating-dominating codes have been widely studied in circulant graphs of type Cn(1,2,,r)C_n(1,2, \ldots, r), which can also be viewed as power graphs of cycles. Recently, Ghebleh and Niepel (2013) considered identification and location-domination in the circulant graphs Cn(1,3)C_n(1,3). They showed that the smallest cardinality of a locating-dominating code in Cn(1,3)C_n(1,3) is at least n/3\lceil n/3 \rceil and at most n/3+1\lceil n/3 \rceil + 1 for all n9n \geq 9. Moreover, they proved that the lower bound is strict when n0,1,4(mod6)n \equiv 0, 1, 4 \pmod{6} and conjectured that the lower bound can be increased by one for other nn. In this paper, we prove their conjecture. Similarly, they showed that the smallest cardinality of an identifying code in Cn(1,3)C_n(1,3) is at least 4n/11\lceil 4n/11 \rceil and at most 4n/11+1\lceil 4n/11 \rceil + 1 for all n11n \geq 11. Furthermore, they proved that the lower bound is attained for most of the lengths nn and conjectured that in the rest of the cases the lower bound can improved by one. This conjecture is also proved in the paper. The proofs of the conjectures are based on a novel approach which, instead of making use of the local properties of the graphs as is usual to identification and location-domination, also manages to take advantage of the global properties of the codes and the underlying graphs

    Mixed-Weight Open Locating-Dominating Sets

    Get PDF
    The detection and location of issues in a network is a common problem encompassing a wide variety of research areas. Location-detection problems have been studied for wireless sensor networks and environmental monitoring, microprocessor fault detection, public utility contamination, and finding intruders in buildings. Modeling these systems as a graph, we want to find the smallest subset of nodes that, when sensors are placed at those locations, can detect and locate any anomalies that arise. One type of set that solves this problem is the open locating-dominating set (OLD-set), a set of nodes that forms a unique and nonempty neighborhood with every node in the graph. For this work, we begin with a study of OLD-sets in circulant graphs. Circulant graphs are a group of regular cyclic graphs that are often used in massively parallel systems. We prove the optimal OLD-set size for two circulant graphs using two proof techniques: the discharging method and Hall\u27s Theorem. Next we introduce the mixed-weight open locating-dominating set (mixed-weight OLD-set), an extension of the OLD-set. The mixed-weight OLD-set allows nodes in the graph to have different weights, representing systems that use sensors of varying strengths. This is a novel approach to the study of location-detection problems. We show that the decision problem for the minimum mixed-weight OLD-set, for any weights up to positive integer d, is NP-complete. We find the size of mixed-weight OLD-sets in paths and cycles for weights 1 and 2. We consider mixed-weight OLD-sets in random graphs by providing probabilistic bounds on the size of the mixed-weight OLD-set and use simulation to reinforce the theoretical results. Finally, we build and study an integer linear program to solve for mixed-weight OLD-sets and use greedy algorithms to generate mixed-weight OLD-set estimates in random geometric graphs. We also extend our results for mixed-weight OLD-sets in random graphs to random geometric graphs by estimating the probabilistic upper bound for the size of the set

    Optimal bounds on codes for location in circulant graphs

    Get PDF
    Identifying and locating-dominating codes have been studied widely in circulant graphs of type Cn(1,2,3,...,r) over the recent years. In 2013, Ghebleh and Niepel studied locating-dominating and identifying codes in the circulant graphs Cn(1,d) for d=3 and proposed as an open question the case of d>3. In this paper we study identifying, locating-dominating and self-identifying codes in the graphs Cn(1,d), Cn(1,d-1,d) and Cn(1,d-1,d,d+1). We give a new method to study lower bounds for these three codes in the circulant graphs using suitable grids. Moreover, we show that these bounds are attained for infinitely many parameters n and d. In addition, new approaches are provided which give the exact values for the optimal self-identifying codes in Cn(1,3) and Cn(1,4)

    Solving Two Conjectures regarding Codes for Location in Circulant Graphs

    Get PDF
    Identifying and locating-dominating codes have been widely studied in circulant graphs of type Cn(1, 2, . . ., r), which can also be viewed as power graphs of cycles. Recently, Ghebleh and Niepel (2013) considered identification and location-domination in the circulant graphs Cn(1, 3). They showed that the smallest cardinality of a locating-dominating code in Cn(1, 3) is at least ⌈n/3⌉ and at most ⌈n/3⌉ + 1 for all n ≥ 9. Moreover, they proved that the lower bound is strict when n ≡ 0, 1, 4 (mod 6) and conjectured that the lower bound can be increased by one for other n. In this paper, we prove their conjecture. Similarly, they showed that the smallest cardinality of an identifying code in Cn(1, 3) is at least ⌈4n/11⌉ and at most ⌈4n/11⌉ + 1 for all n ≥ 11. Furthermore, they proved that the lower bound is attained for most of the lengths n and conjectured that in the rest of the cases the lower bound can improved by one. This conjecture is also proved in the paper. The proofs of the conjectures are based on a novel approach which, instead of making use of the local properties of the graphs as is usual to identification and location-domination, also manages to take advantage of the global properties of the codes and the underlying graphs.</p

    Proceedings of the Fourth Russian Finnish Symposium on Discrete Mathematics

    Get PDF

    Proceedings of the Fourth Russian Finnish Symposium on Discrete Mathematics

    Get PDF

    An integrated study of earth resources in the state of California using remote sensing techniques

    Get PDF
    There are no author-identified significant results in this report

    Eight Biennial Report : April 2005 – March 2007

    No full text
    corecore