Learning definite Horn formulas from closure queries

A definite Horn theory is a set of n-dimensional Boolean vectors whose characteristic function is expressible as a definite Horn formula, that is, as conjunction of definite Horn clauses. The class of definite Horn theories is known to be learnable under different query learning settings, such as learning from membership and equivalence queries or learning from entailment. We propose yet a different type of query: the closure query. Closure queries are a natural extension of membership queries and also a variant, appropriate in the context of definite Horn formulas, of the so-called correction queries. We present an algorithm that learns conjunctions of definite Horn clauses in polynomial time, using closure and equivalence queries, and show how it relates to the canonical Guigues–Duquenne basis for implicational systems. We also show how the different query models mentioned relate to each other by either showing full-fledged reductions by means of query simulation (where possible), or by showing their connections in the context of particular algorithms that use them for learning definite Horn formulas.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Schema Independent Relational Learning

Learning novel concepts and relations from relational databases is an important problem with many applications in database systems and machine learning. Relational learning algorithms learn the definition of a new relation in terms of existing relations in the database. Nevertheless, the same data set may be represented under different schemas for various reasons, such as efficiency, data quality, and usability. Unfortunately, the output of current relational learning algorithms tends to vary quite substantially over the choice of schema, both in terms of learning accuracy and efficiency. This variation complicates their off-the-shelf application. In this paper, we introduce and formalize the property of schema independence of relational learning algorithms, and study both the theoretical and empirical dependence of existing algorithms on the common class of (de) composition schema transformations. We study both sample-based learning algorithms, which learn from sets of labeled examples, and query-based algorithms, which learn by asking queries to an oracle. We prove that current relational learning algorithms are generally not schema independent. For query-based learning algorithms we show that the (de) composition transformations influence their query complexity. We propose Castor, a sample-based relational learning algorithm that achieves schema independence by leveraging data dependencies. We support the theoretical results with an empirical study that demonstrates the schema dependence/independence of several algorithms on existing benchmark and real-world datasets under (de) compositions

REVISING HORN FORMULAS

Boolean formulas can be used to model real-world facts. In some situation we may havea Boolean formula that closely approximates a real-world fact, but we need to fine-tune itso that it models the real-world fact exactly. This is a problem of theory revision where thetheory is in the form of a Boolean formula. An algorithm is presented for revising a class ofBoolean formulas that are expressible as conjunctions of Horn clauses. Each of the clausesin the formulas considered here has a unique unnegated variable that does not appear inany other clauses, and is not `F\u27. The revision algorithm uses equivalence and membershipqueries to revise a given formula into a formula that is equivalent to an unknown targetformula having the same set of unnegated variables. The amount of time required by thealgorithm to perform this revision is logarithmic in the number of variables, and polynomialin the number of clauses in the unknown formula. An early version of this work waspresented at the 2003 Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference [4]

Learning Possibilistic Logic Theories

Vi tar opp problemet med å lære tolkbare maskinlæringsmodeller fra usikker og manglende informasjon. Vi utvikler først en ny dyplæringsarkitektur, RIDDLE: Rule InDuction with Deep LEarning (regelinduksjon med dyp læring), basert på egenskapene til mulighetsteori. Med eksperimentelle resultater og sammenligning med FURIA, en eksisterende moderne metode for regelinduksjon, er RIDDLE en lovende regelinduksjonsalgoritme for å finne regler fra data. Deretter undersøker vi læringsoppgaven formelt ved å identifisere regler med konfidensgrad knyttet til dem i exact learning-modellen. Vi definerer formelt teoretiske rammer og viser forhold som må holde for å garantere at en læringsalgoritme vil identifisere reglene som holder i et domene. Til slutt utvikler vi en algoritme som lærer regler med tilhørende konfidensverdier i exact learning-modellen. Vi foreslår også en teknikk for å simulere spørringer i exact learning-modellen fra data. Eksperimenter viser oppmuntrende resultater for å lære et sett med regler som tilnærmer reglene som er kodet i data.We address the problem of learning interpretable machine learning models from uncertain and missing information. We first develop a novel deep learning architecture, named RIDDLE (Rule InDuction with Deep LEarning), based on properties of possibility theory. With experimental results and comparison with FURIA, a state of the art method, RIDDLE is a promising rule induction algorithm for finding rules from data. We then formally investigate the learning task of identifying rules with confidence degree associated to them in the exact learning model. We formally define theoretical frameworks and show conditions that must hold to guarantee that a learning algorithm will identify the rules that hold in a domain. Finally, we develop an algorithm that learns rules with associated confidence values in the exact learning model. We also propose a technique to simulate queries in the exact learning model from data. Experiments show encouraging results to learn a set of rules that approximate rules encoded in data.Doktorgradsavhandlin

On the Usability of Probably Approximately Correct Implication Bases

We revisit the notion of probably approximately correct implication bases from the literature and present a first formulation in the language of formal concept analysis, with the goal to investigate whether such bases represent a suitable substitute for exact implication bases in practical use-cases. To this end, we quantitatively examine the behavior of probably approximately correct implication bases on artificial and real-world data sets and compare their precision and recall with respect to their corresponding exact implication bases. Using a small example, we also provide qualitative insight that implications from probably approximately correct bases can still represent meaningful knowledge from a given data set.Comment: 17 pages, 8 figures; typos added, corrected x-label on graph

Learning Horn Envelopes via Queries from Large Language Models

We investigate an approach for extracting knowledge from trained neural networks based on Angluin's exact learning model with membership and equivalence queries to an oracle. In this approach, the oracle is a trained neural network. We consider Angluin's classical algorithm for learning Horn theories and study the necessary changes to make it applicable to learn from neural networks. In particular, we have to consider that trained neural networks may not behave as Horn oracles, meaning that their underlying target theory may not be Horn. We propose a new algorithm that aims at extracting the "tightest Horn approximation" of the target theory and that is guaranteed to terminate in exponential time (in the worst case) and in polynomial time if the target has polynomially many non-Horn examples. To showcase the applicability of the approach, we perform experiments on pre-trained language models and extract rules that expose occupation-based gender biases.Comment: 35 pages, 2 figures; manuscript accepted for publication in the International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (IJAR