120,592 research outputs found
Interpretable multiclass classification by MDL-based rule lists
Interpretable classifiers have recently witnessed an increase in attention
from the data mining community because they are inherently easier to understand
and explain than their more complex counterparts. Examples of interpretable
classification models include decision trees, rule sets, and rule lists.
Learning such models often involves optimizing hyperparameters, which typically
requires substantial amounts of data and may result in relatively large models.
In this paper, we consider the problem of learning compact yet accurate
probabilistic rule lists for multiclass classification. Specifically, we
propose a novel formalization based on probabilistic rule lists and the minimum
description length (MDL) principle. This results in virtually parameter-free
model selection that naturally allows to trade-off model complexity with
goodness of fit, by which overfitting and the need for hyperparameter tuning
are effectively avoided. Finally, we introduce the Classy algorithm, which
greedily finds rule lists according to the proposed criterion. We empirically
demonstrate that Classy selects small probabilistic rule lists that outperform
state-of-the-art classifiers when it comes to the combination of predictive
performance and interpretability. We show that Classy is insensitive to its
only parameter, i.e., the candidate set, and that compression on the training
set correlates with classification performance, validating our MDL-based
selection criterion
Interpretable Categorization of Heterogeneous Time Series Data
Understanding heterogeneous multivariate time series data is important in
many applications ranging from smart homes to aviation. Learning models of
heterogeneous multivariate time series that are also human-interpretable is
challenging and not adequately addressed by the existing literature. We propose
grammar-based decision trees (GBDTs) and an algorithm for learning them. GBDTs
extend decision trees with a grammar framework. Logical expressions derived
from a context-free grammar are used for branching in place of simple
thresholds on attributes. The added expressivity enables support for a wide
range of data types while retaining the interpretability of decision trees. In
particular, when a grammar based on temporal logic is used, we show that GBDTs
can be used for the interpretable classi cation of high-dimensional and
heterogeneous time series data. Furthermore, we show how GBDTs can also be used
for categorization, which is a combination of clustering and generating
interpretable explanations for each cluster. We apply GBDTs to analyze the
classic Australian Sign Language dataset as well as data on near mid-air
collisions (NMACs). The NMAC data comes from aircraft simulations used in the
development of the next-generation Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS
X).Comment: 9 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables, SIAM International Conference on Data
Mining (SDM) 201
On PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Random Forests
Existing guarantees in terms of rigorous upper bounds on the generalization
error for the original random forest algorithm, one of the most frequently used
machine learning methods, are unsatisfying. We discuss and evaluate various
PAC-Bayesian approaches to derive such bounds. The bounds do not require
additional hold-out data, because the out-of-bag samples from the bagging in
the training process can be exploited. A random forest predicts by taking a
majority vote of an ensemble of decision trees. The first approach is to bound
the error of the vote by twice the error of the corresponding Gibbs classifier
(classifying with a single member of the ensemble selected at random). However,
this approach does not take into account the effect of averaging out of errors
of individual classifiers when taking the majority vote. This effect provides a
significant boost in performance when the errors are independent or negatively
correlated, but when the correlations are strong the advantage from taking the
majority vote is small. The second approach based on PAC-Bayesian C-bounds
takes dependencies between ensemble members into account, but it requires
estimating correlations between the errors of the individual classifiers. When
the correlations are high or the estimation is poor, the bounds degrade. In our
experiments, we compute generalization bounds for random forests on various
benchmark data sets. Because the individual decision trees already perform
well, their predictions are highly correlated and the C-bounds do not lead to
satisfactory results. For the same reason, the bounds based on the analysis of
Gibbs classifiers are typically superior and often reasonably tight. Bounds
based on a validation set coming at the cost of a smaller training set gave
better performance guarantees, but worse performance in most experiments
Wrapper Maintenance: A Machine Learning Approach
The proliferation of online information sources has led to an increased use
of wrappers for extracting data from Web sources. While most of the previous
research has focused on quick and efficient generation of wrappers, the
development of tools for wrapper maintenance has received less attention. This
is an important research problem because Web sources often change in ways that
prevent the wrappers from extracting data correctly. We present an efficient
algorithm that learns structural information about data from positive examples
alone. We describe how this information can be used for two wrapper maintenance
applications: wrapper verification and reinduction. The wrapper verification
system detects when a wrapper is not extracting correct data, usually because
the Web source has changed its format. The reinduction algorithm automatically
recovers from changes in the Web source by identifying data on Web pages so
that a new wrapper may be generated for this source. To validate our approach,
we monitored 27 wrappers over a period of a year. The verification algorithm
correctly discovered 35 of the 37 wrapper changes, and made 16 mistakes,
resulting in precision of 0.73 and recall of 0.95. We validated the reinduction
algorithm on ten Web sources. We were able to successfully reinduce the
wrappers, obtaining precision and recall values of 0.90 and 0.80 on the data
extraction task
TLAD 2011 Proceedings:9th international workshop on teaching, learning and assesment of databases (TLAD)
This is the ninth in the series of highly successful international workshops on the Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Databases (TLAD 2011), which once again is held as a workshop of BNCOD 2011 - the 28th British National Conference on Databases. TLAD 2011 is held on the 11th July at Manchester University, just before BNCOD, and hopes to be just as successful as its predecessors.The teaching of databases is central to all Computing Science, Software Engineering, Information Systems and Information Technology courses, and this year, the workshop aims to continue the tradition of bringing together both database teachers and researchers, in order to share good learning, teaching and assessment practice and experience, and further the growing community amongst database academics. As well as attracting academics from the UK community, the workshop has also been successful in attracting academics from the wider international community, through serving on the programme committee, and attending and presenting papers.Due to the healthy number of high quality submissions this year, the workshop will present eight peer reviewed papers. Of these, six will be presented as full papers and two as short papers. These papers cover a number of themes, including: the teaching of data mining and data warehousing, databases and the cloud, and novel uses of technology in teaching and assessment. It is expected that these papers will stimulate discussion at the workshop itself and beyond. This year, the focus on providing a forum for discussion is enhanced through a panel discussion on assessment in database modules, with David Nelson (of the University of Sunderland), Al Monger (of Southampton Solent University) and Charles Boisvert (of Sheffield Hallam University) as the expert panel
TLAD 2011 Proceedings:9th international workshop on teaching, learning and assesment of databases (TLAD)
This is the ninth in the series of highly successful international workshops on the Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Databases (TLAD 2011), which once again is held as a workshop of BNCOD 2011 - the 28th British National Conference on Databases. TLAD 2011 is held on the 11th July at Manchester University, just before BNCOD, and hopes to be just as successful as its predecessors.The teaching of databases is central to all Computing Science, Software Engineering, Information Systems and Information Technology courses, and this year, the workshop aims to continue the tradition of bringing together both database teachers and researchers, in order to share good learning, teaching and assessment practice and experience, and further the growing community amongst database academics. As well as attracting academics from the UK community, the workshop has also been successful in attracting academics from the wider international community, through serving on the programme committee, and attending and presenting papers.Due to the healthy number of high quality submissions this year, the workshop will present eight peer reviewed papers. Of these, six will be presented as full papers and two as short papers. These papers cover a number of themes, including: the teaching of data mining and data warehousing, databases and the cloud, and novel uses of technology in teaching and assessment. It is expected that these papers will stimulate discussion at the workshop itself and beyond. This year, the focus on providing a forum for discussion is enhanced through a panel discussion on assessment in database modules, with David Nelson (of the University of Sunderland), Al Monger (of Southampton Solent University) and Charles Boisvert (of Sheffield Hallam University) as the expert panel
- …