615 research outputs found

    The Rise of Certificate Transparency and Its Implications on the Internet Ecosystem

    Full text link
    In this paper, we analyze the evolution of Certificate Transparency (CT) over time and explore the implications of exposing certificate DNS names from the perspective of security and privacy. We find that certificates in CT logs have seen exponential growth. Website support for CT has also constantly increased, with now 33% of established connections supporting CT. With the increasing deployment of CT, there are also concerns of information leakage due to all certificates being visible in CT logs. To understand this threat, we introduce a CT honeypot and show that data from CT logs is being used to identify targets for scanning campaigns only minutes after certificate issuance. We present and evaluate a methodology to learn and validate new subdomains from the vast number of domains extracted from CT logged certificates.Comment: To be published at ACM IMC 201

    NXNSAttack: Recursive DNS Inefficiencies and Vulnerabilities

    Get PDF
    This paper exposes a new vulnerability and introduces a corresponding attack, the NoneXistent Name Server Attack (NXNSAttack), that disrupts and may paralyze the DNS system, making it difficult or impossible for Internet users to access websites, web e-mail, online video chats, or any other online resource. The NXNSAttack generates a storm of packets between DNS resolvers and DNS authoritative name servers. The storm is produced by the response of resolvers to unrestricted referral response messages of authoritative name servers. The attack is significantly more destructive than NXDomain attacks (e.g., the Mirai attack): i) It reaches an amplification factor of more than 1620x on the number of packets exchanged by the recursive resolver. ii) In addition to the negative cache, the attack also saturates the 'NS' section of the resolver caches. To mitigate the attack impact, we propose an enhancement to the recursive resolver algorithm, MaxFetch(k), that prevents unnecessary proactive fetches. We implemented the MaxFetch(1) mitigation enhancement on a BIND resolver and tested it on real-world DNS query datasets. Our results show that MaxFetch(1) degrades neither the recursive resolver throughput nor its latency. Following the discovery of the attack, a responsible disclosure procedure was carried out, and several DNS vendors and public providers have issued a CVE and patched their systems

    Global Internet Come into a New DNS Era

    Get PDF

    Characterizing the IoT ecosystem at scale

    Get PDF
    Internet of Things (IoT) devices are extremely popular with home, business, and industrial users. To provide their services, they typically rely on a backend server in- frastructure on the Internet, which collectively form the IoT Ecosystem. This ecosys- tem is rapidly growing and offers users an increasing number of services. It also has been a source and target of significant security and privacy risks. One notable exam- ple is the recent large-scale coordinated global attacks, like Mirai, which disrupted large service providers. Thus, characterizing this ecosystem yields insights that help end-users, network operators, policymakers, and researchers better understand it, obtain a detailed view, and keep track of its evolution. In addition, they can use these insights to inform their decision-making process for mitigating this ecosystem’s security and privacy risks. In this dissertation, we characterize the IoT ecosystem at scale by (i) detecting the IoT devices in the wild, (ii) conducting a case study to measure how deployed IoT devices can affect users’ privacy, and (iii) detecting and measuring the IoT backend infrastructure. To conduct our studies, we collaborated with a large European Internet Service Provider (ISP) and a major European Internet eXchange Point (IXP). They rou- tinely collect large volumes of passive, sampled data, e.g., NetFlow and IPFIX, for their operational purposes. These data sources help providers obtain insights about their networks, and we used them to characterize the IoT ecosystem at scale. We start with IoT devices and study how to track and trace their activity in the wild. We developed and evaluated a scalable methodology to accurately detect and monitor IoT devices with limited, sparsely sampled data in the ISP and IXP. Next, we conduct a case study to measure how a myriad of deployed devices can affect the privacy of ISP subscribers. Unfortunately, we found that the privacy of a substantial fraction of IPv6 end-users is at risk. We noticed that a single device at home that encodes its MAC address into the IPv6 address could be utilized as a tracking identifier for the entire end-user prefix—even if other devices use IPv6 privacy extensions. Our results showed that IoT devices contribute the most to this privacy leakage. Finally, we focus on the backend server infrastructure and propose a methodology to identify and locate IoT backend servers operated by cloud services and IoT vendors. We analyzed their IoT traffic patterns as observed in the ISP. Our analysis sheds light on their diverse operational and deployment strategies. The need for issuing a priori unknown network-wide queries against large volumes of network flow capture data, which we used in our studies, motivated us to develop Flowyager. It is a system built on top of existing traffic capture utilities, and it relies on flow summarization techniques to reduce (i) the storage and transfer cost of flow captures and (ii) query response time. We deployed a prototype of Flowyager at both the IXP and ISP.Internet-of-Things-GerĂ€te (IoT) sind aus vielen Haushalten, BĂŒrorĂ€umen und In- dustrieanlagen nicht mehr wegzudenken. Um ihre Dienste zu erbringen, nutzen IoT- GerĂ€te typischerweise auf eine Backend-Server-Infrastruktur im Internet, welche als Gesamtheit das IoT-Ökosystem bildet. Dieses Ökosystem wĂ€chst rapide an und bie- tet den Nutzern immer mehr Dienste an. Das IoT-Ökosystem ist jedoch sowohl eine Quelle als auch ein Ziel von signifikanten Risiken fĂŒr die Sicherheit und PrivatsphĂ€re. Ein bemerkenswertes Beispiel sind die jĂŒngsten groß angelegten, koordinierten globa- len Angriffe wie Mirai, durch die große Diensteanbieter gestört haben. Deshalb ist es wichtig, dieses Ökosystem zu charakterisieren, eine ganzheitliche Sicht zu bekommen und die Entwicklung zu verfolgen, damit Forscher, EntscheidungstrĂ€ger, Endnutzer und Netzwerkbetreibern Einblicke und ein besseres VerstĂ€ndnis erlangen. Außerdem können alle Teilnehmer des Ökosystems diese Erkenntnisse nutzen, um ihre Entschei- dungsprozesse zur Verhinderung von Sicherheits- und PrivatsphĂ€rerisiken zu verbes- sern. In dieser Dissertation charakterisieren wir die Gesamtheit des IoT-Ökosystems indem wir (i) IoT-GerĂ€te im Internet detektieren, (ii) eine Fallstudie zum Einfluss von benutzten IoT-GerĂ€ten auf die PrivatsphĂ€re von Nutzern durchfĂŒhren und (iii) die IoT-Backend-Infrastruktur aufdecken und vermessen. Um unsere Studien durchzufĂŒhren, arbeiten wir mit einem großen europĂ€ischen Internet- Service-Provider (ISP) und einem großen europĂ€ischen Internet-Exchange-Point (IXP) zusammen. Diese sammeln routinemĂ€ĂŸig fĂŒr operative Zwecke große Mengen an pas- siven gesampelten Daten (z.B. als NetFlow oder IPFIX). Diese Datenquellen helfen Netzwerkbetreibern Einblicke in ihre Netzwerke zu erlangen und wir verwendeten sie, um das IoT-Ökosystem ganzheitlich zu charakterisieren. Wir beginnen unsere Analysen mit IoT-GerĂ€ten und untersuchen, wie diese im Inter- net aufgespĂŒrt und verfolgt werden können. Dazu entwickelten und evaluierten wir eine skalierbare Methodik, um IoT-GerĂ€te mit Hilfe von eingeschrĂ€nkten gesampelten Daten des ISPs und IXPs prĂ€zise erkennen und beobachten können. Als NĂ€chstes fĂŒhren wir eine Fallstudie durch, in der wir messen, wie eine Unzahl von eingesetzten GerĂ€ten die PrivatsphĂ€re von ISP-Nutzern beeinflussen kann. Lei- der fanden wir heraus, dass die PrivatsphĂ€re eines substantiellen Teils von IPv6- Endnutzern bedroht ist. Wir entdeckten, dass bereits ein einzelnes GerĂ€t im Haus, welches seine MAC-Adresse in die IPv6-Adresse kodiert, als Tracking-Identifikator fĂŒr das gesamte Endnutzer-PrĂ€fix missbraucht werden kann — auch wenn andere GerĂ€te IPv6-Privacy-Extensions verwenden. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigten, dass IoT-GerĂ€te den Großteil dieses PrivatsphĂ€re-Verlusts verursachen. Abschließend fokussieren wir uns auf die Backend-Server-Infrastruktur und wir schla- gen eine Methodik zur Identifizierung und Lokalisierung von IoT-Backend-Servern vor, welche von Cloud-Diensten und IoT-Herstellern betrieben wird. Wir analysier- ten Muster im IoT-Verkehr, der vom ISP beobachtet wird. Unsere Analyse gibt Auf- schluss ĂŒber die unterschiedlichen Strategien, wie IoT-Backend-Server betrieben und eingesetzt werden. Die Notwendigkeit a-priori unbekannte netzwerkweite Anfragen an große Mengen von Netzwerk-Flow-Daten zu stellen, welche wir in in unseren Studien verwenden, moti- vierte uns zur Entwicklung von Flowyager. Dies ist ein auf bestehenden Netzwerkverkehrs- Tools aufbauendes System und es stĂŒtzt sich auf die Zusammenfassung von Verkehrs- flĂŒssen, um (i) die Kosten fĂŒr Archivierung und Transfer von Flow-Daten und (ii) die Antwortzeit von Anfragen zu reduzieren. Wir setzten einen Prototypen von Flowyager sowohl im IXP als auch im ISP ein

    Investigation into the security and privacy of iOS VPN applications

    Get PDF
    Due to the increasing number of recommendations for people to use Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to protect their privacy, more application developers are creating VPN applications and publishing them on the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. In this ‘gold rush’, applications are being developed quickly and, in turn, not being developed with security in mind.This paper investigated a selection of VPN applications available on the Apple App Store (for iOS devices) and tested the applications for security and privacy issues. This includes testing for any traffic being transmitted over plain HTTP, DNS leakage and transmission of personally identifiable information (such as phone number, International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI), email address, MAC address) and evaluating the security of the tunneling protocol used by the VPN.The testing methodology involved installing VPN applications on a test device, simulating network traffic for a pre-defined period of time and capturing the traffic. This allows for all traffic to be analysed to check for anything being sent without encryption. Other issues that often cause de-anonymization with VPN applications such as DNS leakage were also considered.The research found several common security issues with VPN applications tested, with a large majority of applications still using HTTP and not HTTPS for transmitting certain data. A large majority of the VPN applications failed to route additional user data (such as DNS queries) through the VPN tunnel. Furthermore, just fifteen of the tested applications were found to have correctly implemented the best-recommended tunneling protocol for user security.Outside of the regular testing criteria, other security anomalies were observed with specific applications, which included outdated servers with known vulnerabilities, applications giving themselves the ability to perform HTTPS interception and questionable privacy policies. From the documented vulnerabilities, this research proposes a set of recommendations for developers to consider when developing VPN applications

    DNS in Computer Forensics

    Get PDF
    The Domain Name Service (DNS) is a critical core component of the global Internet and integral to the majority of corporate intranets. It provides resolution services between the human-readable name-based system addresses and the machine operable Internet Protocol (IP) based addresses required for creating network level connections. Whilst structured as a globally dispersed resilient tree data structure, from the Global and Country Code Top Level Domains (gTLD/ccTLD) down to the individual site and system leaf nodes, it is highly resilient although vulnerable to various attacks, exploits and systematic failures
    • 

    corecore