Gain-scheduled Smith predictor PID-based LPV controller for open-flow canal control

In this paper, a gain-scheduled Smith Predictor PID controller is proposed for the control of an open-flow canal system that allows for dealing with large variation in operating conditions. A linear parameter varying (LPV) control-oriented model for open-flow canal systems based on a second-order delay Hayami model is proposed. Exploiting the second-order structure of this model, an LPV PID controller is designed using H∞ and linear matrix inequalities pole placement. The controller structure includes a Smith Predictor, real time estimated parameters from measurements (including the known part of the delay) that schedule the controller and predictor and unstructured dynamic uncertainty, which covers the unknown portion of the delay. Finally, the proposed controller is validated in a case study based on a single real reach canal: the Lunax Gallery at Gascogne (France).This work has been funded by contract ref. HYFA DPI2008-01996 and WATMAN DPI2009-13744 of Spanish Ministry of Education.Peer Reviewe

Gain-scheduling multivariable LPV control of an irrigation canal system

The purpose of this paper is to present a multivariable linear parameter varying (LPV) controller with a gain scheduling Smith Predictor (SP) scheme applicable to open-flow canal systems. This LPV controller based on SP is designed taking into account the uncertainty in the estimation of delay and the variation of plant parameters according to the operating point. This new methodology can be applied to a class of delay systems that can be represented by a set of models that can be factorized into a rational multivariable model in series with left/right diagonal (multiple) delays, such as, the case of irrigation canals. A multiple pool canal system is used to test and validate the proposed control approach.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Safe Coordination of Autonomous Vehicles

As more and more autonomous vehicles enter our road, new mechanisms must be considered to ensure the safe coordination between the autonomous vehicles. Al- though many algorithms have been proposed to coordinate autonomous vehicles, few of them have considered the robustness of the solution against disturbances. Therefore, in this master’s thesis, a vehicle coordination algorithm that uses vehicle to vehicle (V2V) communication is design in order to achieve collision free trajectories, while rejecting disturbances. Specifically, a robust tube-based model predictive control (MPC) scheme is proposed in order to control the autonomous vehicle. This controller uses series of zonotopic reachable sets (also known as tube) to compute a set of state and input constraints, which ensure the robust feasibility of the problem. To reduce the computational burden of the MPC opti- mization problem, the vehicle model is reformulated into a pseudo-linear model by transforming its non-linear equations into the linear parameter varying (LPV) form. The disturbance rejection is performed by a H∞-optimal corrective con- troller. Finally, the collision avoidance is achieved by a V2V coordination algo- rithm, in which the lateral bounds of a collision free path are computed. To validate the proposed control scheme, a series of simulations have been performed to test the disturbance rejection of the corrective controller, as well as the vehicle coordination capabilities. The results from these tests show that the proposed controller is effective in coordinating a multiple overtaking maneuver, while rejecting the disturbances

Dynamical Analysis and Robust Control Synthesis for Water Treatment Processes

Nowadays, water demand and water scarcity are very urgent issues due to population growth, drought and poor water quality all over the world. Therefore, water treatment plants are playing a vital role for good living condition of human. Water area needs more concentration study to increase water productivity and decrease water cost. This dissertation presents the analysis and control of water treatment plants using robust control techniques. The applied control algorithms include H∞, gain scheduled and observer-based loop-shaping control technique. They are modern control algorithms and very powerful in robust controlling of systems with uncertainties and disturbances. The water treatment plants include a desalination system and a wastewater process. Since fresh water scarcity is getting more serious, the desalination plants are to produce drinking water and wastewater treatment plants give the reusable water. The desalination system is a RO one used to produce drinking water from seawater and brackish water. The nonlinear behaviors of this system is carefully analyzed before the linearization. Due to the uncertainty caused by concentration polarization, the system is linearized using linear state-space parametric uncertainty framework. The system also suffer from many disturbances which water hammer is one of the most influential one. The mixed robust H∞ and μ-synthesis control algorithm is applied to control the RO system coping with large uncertainties, disturbances and noises. The wastewater treatment process is an activated sludge process. This biological process use microorganisms to convert organic and certain inorganic matter from wastewater into cell mass. The process is very complex with many coupled biological and chemical reactions. Due to the large variation in the influent flow, the system is modelized and linearized as a linear parametric varying system using affine parameter-dependent representation. Since the influent flow is quickly variable and easily to be measured, the robust gain scheduled robust controller is applied to deal with the large uncertainty caused by the scheduled parameter. This control algorithm often gives better performances than those of general robust H∞ one. In the wastewater treatment plant, there exist an anaerobic digestion, which is controlled by the observer-based loop-shaping algorithm. The simulations show that all the controllers can effectively deal with large uncertainties, disturbances and noises in water treatment plants. They help improve the system performances and safeties, save energy and reduce product water costs. The studies contribute some potential control approaches for water treatment plants, which is currently a very active research area in the world.Contents ······················································································· iv List of Tables ··············································································· viii List of Figures ··············································································· ix Chapter 1. Introduction ···································································· 1 1.1 Reverse osmosis process ···································································· 2 1.2 Activated sludge process ···································································· 6 1.3 Robust H∞ and gain scheduling control ··················································· 10 Chapter 2. Robust H∞ controller ······················································· 13 2.1 Introduction ·················································································· 13 2.2 Uncertainty modelling ······································································ 13 2.2.1 Unstructured uncertainties ···························································· 14 2.2.2 Parametric uncertainties ······························································· 15 2.2.3 Structured uncertainties ································································ 16 2.2.4 Linear fractional transformation ······················································ 16 2.3 Stability criterion ············································································ 17 2.3.1 Small gain theorem ····································································· 17 2.3.2 Structured singular value (muy) synthesis brief definition ·························· 19 2.4 Robustness analysis and controller design ··············································· 20 2.4.1 Forming generalised plant and N-delta structure ····································· 20 2.4.2 Robustness analysis ···································································· 24 2.5 Reduced controller ·········································································· 26 2.5.1 Truncation ··············································································· 27 2.5.2 Residualization ········································································· 29 2.5.3 Balanced realization···································································· 29 2.5.4 Optimal Hankel norm approximation ················································ 31 Chapter 3. Robust gain scheduling controller ······································· 37 3.1 Introduction ·················································································· 37 3.2 Linear parameter varying (LPV) system ·················································· 39 3.3 Matrix Polytope ·············································································· 40 3.4 Polytope and affine parameter-dependent representation ······························· 41 3.4.1 Polytope representation ································································ 41 3.4.2 Affine parameter-dependent representation ········································· 42 3.5 Quadratic stability of LPV systems and quadratic (robust) H∞ performance ········· 43 3.6 Robust gain scheduling ····································································· 44 3.6.1 LPV system linearization ······························································ 44 3.6.2 Polytope-based gain scheduling ······················································ 45 3.6.3 LFT-based gain scheduling ··························································· 48 Chapter 4. Mixed robust H∞ and μ-synthesis controller applied for a reverse osmosis desalination system ····························································· 52 4.1 RO principles ················································································ 52 4.1.1 Osmosis and reverse osmosis ························································· 52 4.1.2 Dead-end filtration and cross-flow filtration ········································ 53 4.2 Membranes ··················································································· 54 4.2.1 Structure and material ································································· 54 4.2.2 Hollow fine fiber membrane module ················································ 55 4.2.3 Spiral wound membrane module ····················································· 57 4.3 Nonlinear RO modelling and analysis ···················································· 58 4.3.1 RO system introduction ······························································· 58 4.3.2 Modelling ··············································································· 60 4.3.3 Nonlinear analysis ······································································ 62 4.3.4 Concentration polarization ···························································· 64 4.4 Water hammer phenomenon ······························································· 66 4.4.1 Water hammer, column separation and vaporous cavitation ······················ 66 4.4.2 Water hammer analysis and simulation ·············································· 69 4.4.3 Prevention of water hammer effect··················································· 78 4.5 RO linearization ············································································· 79 4.5.1 Nominal linearization ·································································· 79 4.5.2 Uncertainty modeling ·································································· 81 4.5.3 Parametric uncertainty linearization ················································· 83 4.6 Robust H∞ controller design for RO system ·············································· 85 4.6.1 Control of uncertain RO system ······················································ 85 4.6.2 Robustness analysis and H∞ controller design ······································ 86 4.7 Simulation result and discussion··························································· 90 4.8 Conclusion ··················································································· 95 Chapter 5. Robust gain scheduling control of activated sludge process ······· 96 5.1 Introduction about activated sludge process ············································· 96 5.1.1 State variables ·········································································· 98 5.1.2 ASM1 processes ······································································ 100 5.1.3 The control problem of activated sludge process ································· 102 5.2 System modelling ········································································· 104 5.3 Model linearization ········································································ 107 5.4 Robust gain-schedule controller design for activated sludge process ··············· 109 5.5 Simulation result and discussion························································· 115 5.6 Conclusion ················································································· 120 Chapter 6. Observer-based loop-shaping control of anaerobic digestion ···· 121 6.1 Introduction ················································································ 121 6.1.1 Control problem in anaerobic digestion ··········································· 122 6.2 System modelling ········································································· 123 6.3 Controller design ·········································································· 124 6.3.1 H∞ loop-shaping controller ························································· 125 6.3.2 Coprime factor uncertainty ·························································· 126 6.3.3 Control synthesis ····································································· 127 6.4 Simulation result ··········································································· 131 6.5 Conclusion ················································································· 133 Chapter 7. Conclusion ··································································· 134 References ·················································································· 136 Appendices ················································································· 144Docto

On-line estimation approaches to fault-tolerant control of uncertain systems

This thesis is concerned with fault estimation in Fault-Tolerant Control (FTC) and as such involves the joint problem of on-line estimation within an adaptive control system. The faults that are considered are significant uncertainties affecting the control variables of the process and their estimates are used in an adaptive control compensation mechanism. The approach taken involves the active FTC, as the faults can be considered as uncertainties affecting the control system. The engineering (application domain) challenges that are addressed are: (1) On-line model-based fault estimation and compensation as an FTC problem, for systems with large but bounded fault magnitudes and for which the faults can be considered as a special form of dynamic uncertainty. (2) Fault-tolerance in the distributed control of uncertain inter-connected systems The thesis also describes how challenge (1) can be used in the distributed control problem of challenge (2). The basic principle adopted throughout the work is that the controller has two components, one involving the nominal control action and the second acting as an adaptive compensation for significant uncertainties and fault effects. The fault effects are a form of uncertainty which is considered too large for the application of passive FTC methods. The thesis considers several approaches to robust control and estimation: augmented state observer (ASO); sliding mode control (SMC); sliding mode fault estimation via Sliding Mode Observer (SMO); linear parameter-varying (LPV) control; two-level distributed control with learning coordination

Data-driven linear parameter-varying modelling of the steering dynamics of anautonomous car

Developing automatic driving solutions and driver support systems requires accurate vehicle specific models to describe and predict the associated motion dynamics of the vehicle. Despite of the mature understanding of ideal vehicle dynamics, which are inherently nonlinear, modern cars are equipped with a wide array of digital and mechatronic components that are difficult to model. Furthermore, due to manufacturing, each car has its personal motion characteristics which change over time. Hence, it is important to develop data-driven modelling methods that are capable to capture from data all relevant aspects of vehicle dynamics in a model that is directly utilisable for control. In this paper, we show how Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) modelling and system identification can be applied to reliably capture personalised model of the steering system of an autonomous car based on measured data. Compared to other nonlinear identification techniques, the obtained LPV model is directly utilisable for powerful controller synthesis methods of the LPV framework