Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses : who wrote the top 100 most cited articles?

Background: Systematic reviews of the literature occupy the highest position in currently proposed hierarchies of evidence. The aims of this study were to assess whether citation classics exist in published systematic review and meta-analysis (SRM), examine the characteristics of the most frequently cited SRM articles, and evaluate the contribution of different world regions. Methods: The 100 most cited SRM were identified in October 2012 using the Science Citation Index database of the Institute for Scientific Information. Data were extracted by one author. Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the association between years since publication, numbers of authors, article length, journal impact factor, and average citations per year. Results: Among the 100 citation classics, published between 1977 and 2008, the most cited article received 7308 citations and the least-cited 675 citations. The average citations per year ranged from 27.8 to 401.6. First authors from the USA produced the highest number of citation classics (n=46), followed by the UK (n=28) and Canada (n=15). The 100 articles were published in 42 journals led by the Journal of the American Medical Association (n=18), followed by the British Medical Journal (n=14) and The Lancet (n=13). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between number of authors (Spearman’s rho=0.320, p=0.001), journal impact factor (rho=0.240, p=0.016) and average citations per year. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between average citations per year and year since publication (rho = -0.636, p=0.0001). The most cited papers identified seminal contributions and originators of landmark methodological aspects of SRM and reflect major advances in the management of and predisposing factors for chronic diseases. Conclusions: Since the late 1970s, the USA, UK, and Canada have taken leadership in the production of citation classic papers. No first author from low or middle-income countries (LMIC) led one of the most cited 100 SRM

Bibliometric Analysis of International Scientific Production on Pharmacologic Treatments for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 During 2020

This work was supported by the PAIDI (Plan Andaluz de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación 2020) program (Junta de Andalucía. Spain. HUM.777-EC3 Research Group).Background: COVID-19 is causing a grave global health and economic crisis and the fight against the pandemic has led to unprecedented scientific activity. Bibliometrics could be a useful tool for guiding future researches lines and promoting international collaboration for an effective treatment. For this purpose, we have conducted a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on drugs and therapies used to treat COVID-19 during 2020. Methods: Data source: Web of Science. We gathered data on scientific production relating to drugs used to treat COVID-19. We calculated impact factors and analyzed production by institution, country, and journal, visualizing our results in bibliometric networks. Results: In 1 year, production relating to COVID-19 exceeded 100 000 publications, with over 6,500 on Drugs and COVID-19. Research into hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, remdesivir, lopinavir and ritonavir, tocilizumab and convalescent plasma is particularly noteworthy. Mean citations/study range from 11.9 to 15.4. Producer institutions fall into three groups: one in the US and centered on Harvard Medical School; another in Europe led by INSERS; and another in China led by Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Production by journal is widespread but the Journal of Medical Virology, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, and American Journal of Transplantation are noteworthy. Conclusions: The volume of research that is currently under way is comparable to the magnitude of the pandemic itself. Such a high volume of studies is infrequent and the impact they have achieved has no known precedent. The producing countries are those with highest incidence of the pandemic and greatest scientific potential; moreover, inter-agency and international collaboration has reached extraordinarily high levels.Junta de Andalucía. Spain. HUM.777-EC3 Research Grou

Bibliometric Analysis of Yam Production Literature on Sub-Saharan Africa Listed in AGORA and TEEAL Databases between 2003 and 2017

ABSTRACT Objective - This paper reports the findings from a study designed to investigate the following traits on white guinea yam publications for fifteen years: information outlets, trend of scientific productivity, degree of author’s collaboration, prolific authors and their institutional affiliations, journal bibliographic coupling and co-citation analysis. The main aim of the paper is to examine patterns in yam research literature with a view to enhancing the development of yam production research by collating indexed information. Methods - Scholarly citation data of yam production literature on Sub-Saharan Africa from AGORA and TEEAL databases between 2003 and 2017 were collected. Network analysis and descriptive bibliometric research design was adopted to analyse the citation data of yam production literature on Sub-Saharan Africa listed in AGORA and TEEAL. The data obtained was analysed using frequency and percentages, co-citation analysis and bibliographic coupling. VOS viewer was used for bibliographic coupling and co-citation analysis. Results - Findings showed that journal articles are published more in journals (93.5%) than other outlets. Collaboration index was 0.8% which indicates that 80% journal articles were written by 2 or more authors. Journal articles are mostly published in Nigeria Agricultural Journal (21 articles) and the citation network contains 36 items (authors) with 11 clusters and a total link strength of 136. The journal bibliographic coupling citation network contains 8 items (journals) including journals with 3 clusters, 8 links and a total link strength of 31. Food Chemistry, Soil and Tillage Research and Field Crops Research which were journals published in Netherlands have the highest ranking JIF (above 3.0) and H-Index (between 109 and 204). Publications from Economics of production accounted for 40 articles (31 journals, 6 reports and 3 Technical Notes). Conclusion – The study has been able to identify the principal forms of sources; degree of author’s collaboration; first 25 prolific authors; geographical location of journals; top 20 journals; study areas of publications; trend of scientific productivity; impact factors and H-index of publication outlets; institutional affiliations of authors; co-cited authors; and co-cited journals in Sub-Saharan yam literature listed in AGORA and TEAL databases between 2003 and 2017

AN INVESTIGATION OF SPORT MANAGEMENT: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS (1979-2022)

Sports management has been regarded as a key element in the planning process of education of sports and sports organizations, which have particularly evolved on a macro scale with the developing technology and economic growth. Macro development has also been prevalent in incremental scientific studies on sports education and management areas. In the present study, which employs qualitative research design, 1792 documents embracing more than 40 years on sports management in the databases such as Scopus and Web of Science, were analyzed using the bibliometric analysis technique. The findings, while urging upon the inclusive nature of the research, are a prepotent agent in designating the (a) countries, (b) journals, (c) authors, (d) universities and (e) impact factors studying on sports management. The results have revealed that it is in the first three places in the citation and journal ranking of the "Sport Management Review, European Sport Management Quarterly and Journal of Sport Management" journals, where the studies on sports management are at the highest level in 2021 are evaluated. It is clear that the rate of scientific production and citation numbers of America, Australia and United Kingdom is in parallel with the first three journals. While it is obvious that the most cited work belongs to "Funk and James (2001)" in the "Sport Management Review" journal, it proves that the journal order, citation rates, author order and scientific production are parallel for all variables.

Higher-Order Soft Corrections to Lepton Pair and Higgs Boson Production

Utilizing recent three-loop results on the quark and gluon splitting functions and form factors, we derive the complete threshold-enhanced third-order (N^3LO) QCD corrections to the total cross sections for the production of lepton pairs and the Higgs boson in hadron collisions. These results, for the latter case obtained in the heavy top-quark limit, are employed to extend the threshold resummation for these processes to the fourth logarithmic order. We investigate the numerical impact of the higher-order corrections for Higgs boson production at the Tevatron and the LHC. Our results, suitably treated in Mellin N-space, provide a sufficiently accurate approximation to the full N^3LO contributions. Corrections of about 5% at the LHC and 10% at the Tevatron are found for typical Higgs masses. The N^3LO predictions exhibit a considerably reduced dependence on the renormalization scale with, for the first time, stationary points close to the Higgs mass.Comment: 11 pages, LaTeX, 2 eps-figures. Slightly revised text of journal version, with two new references. Misprint in eq. (13) correcte

U.S. Meat Demand: Household Dynamics and Media Information Impacts

This article uses national, quarterly data to examine U.S. meat demand using the Rotterdam model. We investigate the effect of multiple information indices linking different health concerns with diet, changes in household dynamics, and meat recall information. Medical journal articles linking iron, zinc, and protein with health and diet increase beef and poultry demand, whereas articles dealing with fat, cholesterol, and diet concerns reduce beef demand. Increasing consumption of food away from home enhances pork and poultry demand while reducing beef demand. Combined, these results provide a more complete and current understanding of the impact of multiple information factors faced by U.S. consumers.Atkins diet, female workforce, food away from home, food safety, health concerns, meat recalls, U.S. meat demand, Demand and Price Analysis, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Livestock Production/Industries,

Assessing the environmental impact of Spanish vineyards in Utiel-Requena PDO: The influence of farm management and on-field emission modelling

[EN] Environmental studies into wine from different protected designations of origin (PDO) highlight farming and packaging stages as those contributing the most to the total environmental impacts of this product. However, farming impact, not only depends on the agricultural practices but also on data quality and modelling complexity. By using the life cycle assessment methodology, a twofold goal is aimed. Firstly, to analyse the environmental profile of the most widespread viticultural practices in the Utiel-Requena PDO (Spain). The second aim is to evaluate the differences between the environmental impacts estimated by means of modelling approaches using generic information (Baseline modelling) versus those using site-specific information (Alternative modelling). As regards the agricultural practices and grape cultivars, eight systems were defined and assessed per kg of grape at the farm gate. The differences between farming systems and modelling approaches were statistically assessed. The results show that, regardless of the grape cultivar, organic systems are more environmentally friendly than the conventional ones (on average, the greatest differences occur in the ionizing radiation, marine eutrophication and land use, being the values for organic vineyards 1678%, 648% and 171% lower than those of the conventional ones, respectively), the results for the Bobal cultivar being better than those for the Tempranillo because of the higher yield (differences in yield around 1.500 kg ha¿1). The use of site-specific modelling approaches guarantees the precision of the analysis; however, for some impact categories, namely climate change, fine particulate matter formation, marine eutrophication and terrestrial acidification, the possibility of using general methodologies is open; in this way, the modelling efforts can be minimised, and the results would be consistent with those of more specific methodologies. The results also underline the need for a consensus within LCA practitioners on which methodologies to use in order to estimate on-field emissions taking into account both complexity reduction and accuracy improvement.The authors gratefully acknowledge the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad for the financial support under the project CTM 2013-47,340-R and the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia for providing the funds for N.K. Sinisterra-Solis's research contract through Subprogram 1 (PAID-01-18).Sinisterra-Solis, NK.; Sanjuán Pellicer, MN.; Estruch-Guitart, V.; Clemente Polo, G. (2020). Assessing the environmental impact of Spanish vineyards in Utiel-Requena PDO: The influence of farm management and on-field emission modelling. Journal of Environmental Management. 262:1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110325S112262Bacenetti, J., Fusi, A., Negri, M., Bocchi, S., & Fiala, M. (2016). Organic production systems: Sustainability assessment of rice in Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 225, 33-44. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.046Bacenetti, J., Fusi, A., Negri, M., & Fiala, M. (2015). Impact of cropping system and soil tillage on environmental performance of cereal silage productions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 49-59. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.052Balsari, P., Marucco, P., & Tamagnone, M. (2007). A test bench for the classification of boom sprayers according to drift risk. Crop Protection, 26(10), 1482-1489. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2006.12.012Bartocci, P., Fantozzi, P., & Fantozzi, F. (2017). Environmental impact of Sagrantino and Grechetto grapes cultivation for wine and vinegar production in central Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 569-580. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.090Boulay, A.-M., Bare, J., Benini, L., Berger, M., Lathuillière, M. J., Manzardo, A., … Pfister, S. (2017). The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(2), 368-378. doi:10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J., & Kuhlmann, H. (2000). Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(6). doi:10.1007/bf02978670Brisson, N., Mary, B., Ripoche, D., Jeuffroy, M. H., Ruget, F., Nicoullaud, B., … Delécolle, R. (1998). STICS: a generic model for the simulation of crops and their water and nitrogen balances. I. Theory and parameterization applied to wheat and corn. Agronomie, 18(5-6), 311-346. doi:10.1051/agro:19980501Cayuela, M. L., Aguilera, E., Sanz-Cobena, A., Adams, D. C., Abalos, D., Barton, L., … Lassaletta, L. (2017). Direct nitrous oxide emissions in Mediterranean climate cropping systems: Emission factors based on a meta-analysis of available measurement data. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 238, 25-35. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.006Felsot, A. S., Unsworth, J. B., Linders, J. B. H. J., Roberts, G., Rautman, D., Harris, C., & Carazo, E. (2010). Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation—A review*. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 46(1), 1-23. doi:10.1080/03601234.2010.515161Fenollosa, M. L., Ribal, J., Lidón, A., Bautista, I., Juraske, R., Clemente, G., & Sanjuan, N. (2014). Influence of Management Practices on Economic and Environmental Performance of Crops. A Case Study in Spanish Horticulture. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 38(6), 635-659. doi:10.1080/21683565.2014.896302Flor, F. J., Leiva, F. J., García, J. L., Martínez, E., Jiménez, E., & Blanco, J. (2018). Environmental Impact of Wine Aging Process in Oak Barrels in Wineries of La Rioja (Spain). American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 69(3), 302-306. doi:10.5344/ajev.2018.17076Fusi, A., Guidetti, R., & Benedetto, G. (2014). Delving into the environmental aspect of a Sardinian white wine: From partial to total life cycle assessment. Science of The Total Environment, 472, 989-1000. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.148Gazulla, C., Raugei, M., & Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2010). Taking a life cycle look at crianza wine production in Spain: where are the bottlenecks? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(4), 330-337. doi:10.1007/s11367-010-0173-6Gil, Y., & Sinfort, C. (2005). Emission of pesticides to the air during sprayer application: A bibliographic review. Atmospheric Environment, 39(28), 5183-5193. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.019Goglio, P., Smith, W. N., Grant, B. B., Desjardins, R. L., Gao, X., Hanis, K., … Williams, A. G. (2018). A comparison of methods to quantify greenhouse gas emissions of cropping systems in LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4010-4017. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.133González-García, S., Silva, F. J., Moreira, M. T., Pascual, R. C., Lozano, R. G., Gabarrell, X., … Feijoo, G. (2011). Combined application of LCA and eco-design for the sustainable production of wood boxes for wine bottles storage. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(3), 224-237. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0261-2Hauschild, M. Z., Huijbregts, M., Jolliet, O., Macleod, M., Margni, M., van de Meent, D., … McKone, T. E. (2008). Building a Model Based on Scientific Consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Chemicals: The Search for Harmony and Parsimony. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(19), 7032-7037. doi:10.1021/es703145tHuijbregts, M. A. J., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Elshout, P. M. F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., … van Zelm, R. (2016). ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(2), 138-147. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1246-yJuraske, R., & Sanjuán, N. (2011). Life cycle toxicity assessment of pesticides used in integrated and organic production of oranges in the Comunidad Valenciana, Spain. Chemosphere, 82(7), 956-962. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.081Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Novara, A., Finger, D., Avelar, D., Kalantari, Z., & Cerdà, A. (2018). The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Science of The Total Environment, 610-611, 997-1009. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.077Margni, M., Rossier, D., Crettaz, P., & Jolliet, O. (2002). Life cycle impact assessment of pesticides on human health and ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93(1-3), 379-392. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00336-xMartins, A. A., Araújo, A. R., Graça, A., Caetano, N. S., & Mata, T. M. (2018). Towards sustainable wine: Comparison of two Portuguese wines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 662-676. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.057Meier, M. S., Stoessel, F., Jungbluth, N., Juraske, R., Schader, C., & Stolze, M. (2015). Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products – Are the differences captured by life cycle assessment? Journal of Environmental Management, 149, 193-208. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.006Mohseni, P., Borghei, A. M., & Khanali, M. (2018). Coupled life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for mitigation of environmental impacts and enhancement of energy efficiency in grape production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 937-947. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.243Neto, B., Dias, A. C., & Machado, M. (2012). Life cycle assessment of the supply chain of a Portuguese wine: from viticulture to distribution. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(3), 590-602. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0518-4Peña, N., Knudsen, M. T., Fantke, P., Antón, A., & Hermansen, J. E. (2019). Freshwater ecotoxicity assessment of pesticide use in crop production: Testing the influence of modeling choices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1332-1341. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.257Pereyra, M. A., Fernández, D. S., Marcial, E. R., & Puchulu, M. E. (2020). Agricultural land degradation by piping erosion in Chaco Plain, Northwestern Argentina. CATENA, 185, 104295. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104295Perrin, A., Basset-Mens, C., & Gabrielle, B. (2014). Life cycle assessment of vegetable products: a review focusing on cropping systems diversity and the estimation of field emissions. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(6), 1247-1263. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0724-3Perrin, A., Basset-Mens, C., Huat, J., & Gabrielle, B. (2017). The variability of field emissions is critical to assessing the environmental impacts of vegetables: A Benin case-study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 104-113. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.159Peter, C., Fiore, A., Hagemann, U., Nendel, C., & Xiloyannis, C. (2016). Improving the accounting of field emissions in the carbon footprint of agricultural products: a comparison of default IPCC methods with readily available medium-effort modeling approaches. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(6), 791-805. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1056-2Ponstein, H. J., Meyer-Aurich, A., & Prochnow, A. (2019). Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for German wine production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 800-809. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.206Prosdocimi, M., Cerdà, A., & Tarolli, P. (2016). Soil water erosion on Mediterranean vineyards: A review. CATENA, 141, 1-21. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.010Renouf, M. A., Renaud-Gentié, C., Perrin, A., van der Werf, H. M. G., Kanyarushoki, C., & Jourjon, F. (2018). Effectiveness criteria for customised agricultural life cycle assessment tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 246-254. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.170Ribal, J., Ramírez-Sanz, C., Estruch, V., Clemente, G., & Sanjuán, N. (2016). Organic versus conventional citrus. Impact assessment and variability analysis in the Comunitat Valenciana (Spain). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(4), 571-586. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1048-2Rives, J., Fernandez-Rodriguez, I., Rieradevall, J., & Gabarrell, X. (2011). Environmental analysis of the production of natural cork stoppers in southern Europe (Catalonia – Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2-3), 259-271. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.001Rodrigo-Comino, J., Brevik, E. C., & Cerdà, A. (2018). The age of vines as a controlling factor of soil erosion processes in Mediterranean vineyards. Science of The Total Environment, 616-617, 1163-1173. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.204Rosenbaum, R. K., Bachmann, T. M., Gold, L. S., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., … Hauschild, M. Z. (2008). USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(7), 532-546. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4Schmidt Rivera, X. C., Bacenetti, J., Fusi, A., & Niero, M. (2017). The influence of fertiliser and pesticide emissions model on life cycle assessment of agricultural products: The case of Danish and Italian barley. Science of The Total Environment, 592, 745-757. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.183Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature, 485(7397), 229-232. doi:10.1038/nature11069Steenwerth, K. L., Strong, E. B., Greenhut, R. F., Williams, L., & Kendall, A. (2015). Life cycle greenhouse gas, energy, and water assessment of wine grape production in California. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(9), 1243-1253. doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0935-2Vázquez-Rowe, I., Villanueva-Rey, P., Moreira, M. T., & Feijoo, G. (2012). Environmental analysis of Ribeiro wine from a timeline perspective: Harvest year matters when reporting environmental impacts. Journal of Environmental Management, 98, 73-83. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.009Villanueva-Rey, P., Quinteiro, P., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Rafael, S., Arroja, L., Moreira, M. T., … Dias, A. C. (2018). Assessing water footprint in a wine appellation: A case study for Ribeiro in Galicia, Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2097-2107. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.210Villanueva-Rey, P., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Moreira, M. T., & Feijoo, G. (2014). Comparative life cycle assessment in the wine sector: biodynamic vs. conventional viticulture activities in NW Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 330-341. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.026Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(9), 1218-1230. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1087-

Influence of Management Practices on Economic and Enviromental Performance of Crops. A Case Study in Spanish Horticulture

This article assesses the effect of management practices on the environmental and economic performance of tigernut production. Tigernut is a horticultural crop grown in a very limited and homogeneous area. Results show that the environmental variability among farms was greater than variability in costs. A selection of practices can reduce impacts per kilogram tigernut by factors 252.5 (abiotic depletion), 33 (aquatic ecotoxicity), or 6 (global warming) and costs by factors of between 2 and 3. The analysis shows a positive relationship between economic and environmental performance. Results highlight how proper management leads to both relatively low environmental impacts and costs.The authors acknowledge the support of the Conselleria d'Empresa, Universitat i Ciencia de la Generalitat Valenciana (GV/2007/211) and the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (PAID05-08-316).Fenollosa Ribera, ML.; Ribal Sanchis, FJ.; Lidón Cerezuela, AL.; Bautista Carrascosa, I.; Juraske, R.; Clemente Polo, G.; Sanjuán Pellicer, MN. (2014). Influence of Management Practices on Economic and Enviromental Performance of Crops. A Case Study in Spanish Horticulture. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 38(6):635-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2014.896302635659386De Backer, E., Aertsens, J., Vergucht, S., & Steurbaut, W. (2009). Assessing the ecological soundness of organic and conventional agriculture by means of life cycle assessment (LCA). British Food Journal, 111(10), 1028-1061. doi:10.1108/00070700910992916Basset-Mens, C., Anibar, L., Durand, P., & van der Werf, H. M. G. (2006). Spatialised fate factors for nitrate in catchments: Modelling approach and implication for LCA results. Science of The Total Environment, 367(1), 367-382. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.12.026Basset-Mens, C., Kelliher, F. M., Ledgard, S., & Cox, N. (2009). Uncertainty of global warming potential for milk production on a New Zealand farm and implications for decision making. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14(7), 630-638. doi:10.1007/s11367-009-0108-2Blengini, G. A., & Busto, M. (2009). The life cycle of rice: LCA of alternative agri-food chain management systems in Vercelli (Italy). Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3), 1512-1522. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.10.006Carlsson Reich, M. (2005). Economic assessment of municipal waste management systems—case studies using a combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(3), 253-263. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.015Contreras, W. A., Lidón, A. L., Ginestar, D., & Bru, R. (2009). Compartmental model for nitrogen dynamics in citrus orchards. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 50(5-6), 794-805. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2009.05.008Prudêncio da Silva, V., van der Werf, H. M. G., Spies, A., & Soares, S. R. (2010). Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(9), 1831-1839. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.04.001Jan, P., Dux, D., Lips, M., Alig, M., & Dumondel, M. (2012). On the link between economic and environmental performance of Swiss dairy farms of the alpine area. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(6), 706-719. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0405-zJuraske, R., & Sanjuán, N. (2011). Life cycle toxicity assessment of pesticides used in integrated and organic production of oranges in the Comunidad Valenciana, Spain. Chemosphere, 82(7), 956-962. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.081Lidón, A., Ramos, C., & Rodrigo, A. (1999). Comparison of drainage estimation methods in irrigated citrus orchards. Irrigation Science, 19(1), 25-36. doi:10.1007/s002710050068McDevitt, J. E., & Milà i Canals, L. (2011). Can life cycle assessment be used to evaluate plant breeding objectives to improve supply chain sustainability? A worked example using porridge oats from the UK. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9(4), 484-494. doi:10.1080/14735903.2011.584473Michelsen, J. (2001). Recent Development and Political Acceptance of Organic Farming in Europe. Sociologia Ruralis, 41(1), 3-20. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00167Meisterling, K., Samaras, C., & Schweizer, V. (2009). Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 222-230. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.009Mouron, P., Nemecek, T., Scholz, R. W., & Weber, O. (2006). Management influence on environmental impacts in an apple production system on Swiss fruit farms: Combining life cycle assessment with statistical risk assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(2-4), 311-322. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.020Mouron, P., Scholz, R. W., Nemecek, T., & Weber, O. (2006). Life cycle management on Swiss fruit farms: Relating environmental and income indicators for apple-growing. Ecological Economics, 58(3), 561-578. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.08.007Pascual, B., Maroto, J. V., LóPez-Galarza, Sa., Sanbautista, A., & Alagarda, J. (2000). Chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus boeck.): An unconventional crop. studies related to applications and cultivation. Economic Botany, 54(4), 439-448. doi:10.1007/bf02866543Ribal, J., Sanjuán, N., Clemente, G., & Fenollosa, M. L. (2011). Medición de la ecoeficiencia en procesos productivos en el sector agrario. Caso de estudio sobre producción de cítricos. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 9(2), 125. doi:10.7201/earn.2009.02.06Rosenbaum, R. K., Bachmann, T. M., Gold, L. S., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., … Hauschild, M. Z. (2008). USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(7), 532-546. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4Sanjuan, N., Ribal, J., Clemente, G., & Fenollosa, M. L. (2011). Measuring and Improving Eco-efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(4), 614-628. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00347.xSanjuan, N., Ubeda, L., Clemente, G., Mulet, A., & Girona, F. (2005). LCA of integrated orange production in the Comunidad Valenciana (Spain). International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 4(2), 163. doi:10.1504/ijarge.2005.007198Saxton, K. E., Rawls, W. J., Romberger, J. S., & Papendick, R. I. (1986). Estimating Generalized Soil-water Characteristics from Texture1. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50(4), 1031. doi:10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000040039xThomassen, M. A., Dolman, M. A., van Calker, K. J., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2009). Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms. Ecological Economics, 68(8-9), 2278-2284. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.011Tzilivakis, J., Jaggard, K., Lewis, K. A., May, M., & Warner, D. J. (2005). Environmental impact and economic assessment for UK sugar beet production systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 107(4), 341-358. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.12.016Van der Werf, H. M. G., Kanyarushoki, C., & Corson, M. S. (2009). An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11), 3643-3652. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.003Van Zeijts, H., Leneman, H., & Wegener Sleeswijk, A. (1999). Fitting fertilisation in LCA: allocation to crops in a cropping plan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 7(1), 69-74. doi:10.1016/s0959-6526(98)00040-7Venkat, K. (2012). Comparison of Twelve Organic and Conventional Farming Systems: A Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Perspective. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 36(6), 620-649. doi:10.1080/10440046.2012.67237

Environmental, Economic and Social Impact Assessment: Study of Bridges in China's Five Major Economic Regions

[EN] The construction industry of all countries in the world is facing the issue of sustainable development. How to make effective and accurate decision-making on the three pillars (Environment; Economy; Social influence) is the key factor. This manuscript is based on an accurate evaluation framework and theoretical modelling. Through a comprehensive evaluation of six cable-stayed highway bridges in the entire life cycle of five provinces in China (from cradle to grave), the research shows that life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), life cycle cost assessment (LCCA), and social impact life assessment (SILA) are under the influence of multi-factor change decisions. The manuscript focused on the analysis of the natural environment over 100 years, material replacement, waste recycling, traffic density, casualty costs, community benefits and other key factors. Based on the analysis data, the close connection between high pollution levels and high cost in the maintenance stage was deeply promoted, an innovative comprehensive evaluation discrete mathematical decision-making model was established, and a reasonable interval between gross domestic product (GDP) and sustainable development was determined.This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, along with FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional), project grant number: BIA2017-85098-R.Zhou, Z.; Alcalá-González, J.; Yepes, V. (2021). Environmental, Economic and Social Impact Assessment: Study of Bridges in China's Five Major Economic Regions. International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health. 18(1):1-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010122S133181ISO 14044:2006/AMD 1:2017. Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines. ISOhttps://www.iso.org/standard/72357.htmlWuni, I. Y., Shen, G. Q. P., & Osei-Kyei, R. (2019). Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy and Buildings, 190, 69-85. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.010World Population in 2050https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-prospects-2017.htmlHuisingh, D., Zhang, Z., Moore, J. C., Qiao, Q., & Li, Q. (2015). Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.098Zhang, X. (2014). Toward a regenerative sustainability paradigm for the built environment: from vision to reality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 3-6. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.025Summary for Policymakers, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Changehttps://www.buildup.eu/en/practices/publications/ipcc-2014-climate-change-2014-mitigation-climate-change-contribution-workingDong, Y. H., & Ng, S. T. (2015). A social life cycle assessment model for building construction in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(8), 1166-1180. doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0908-5Hellweg, S., & Milà i Canals, L. (2014). Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science, 344(6188), 1109-1113. doi:10.1126/science.1248361Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Beerling, D., Berner, R., Masson-Delmotte, V., … Zachos, J. C. (2008). Target Atmospheric CO: Where Should Humanity Aim? The Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2(1), 217-231. doi:10.2174/1874282300802010217WMO Statement on the State of the Global Climate in 2016https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=3414Lin, B., & Liu, H. (2015). CO2 emissions of China’s commercial and residential buildings: Evidence and reduction policy. Building and Environment, 92, 418-431. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.05.020Kim, T., & Tae, S. (2016). Proposal of Environmental Impact Assessment Method for Concrete in South Korea: An Application in LCA (Life Cycle Assessment). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(11), 1074. doi:10.3390/ijerph13111074OpenLCA 1.10http://www.openlca.org/openlca/ISO,14044:2006/AMD 2:2020, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines. ISOhttps://www.iso.org/standard/76122.htmlNavarro, I. J., Yepes, V., Martí, J. V., & González-Vidosa, F. (2018). Life cycle impact assessment of corrosion preventive designs applied to prestressed concrete bridge decks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 698-713. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.110O’Born, R. (2018). Life cycle assessment of large scale timber bridges: A case study from the world’s longest timber bridge design in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 301-312. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.018Milani, C. J., & Kripka, M. (2019). Evaluation of short span bridge projects with a focus on sustainability. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(2), 367-380. doi:10.1080/15732479.2019.1662815Trunzo, G., Moretti, L., & D’Andrea, A. (2019). Life Cycle Analysis of Road Construction and Use. Sustainability, 11(2), 377. doi:10.3390/su11020377Li, H., Deng, Q., Zhang, J., Xia, B., & Skitmore, M. (2019). Assessing the life cycle CO2 emissions of reinforced concrete structures: Four cases from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1496-1506. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.102Frangopol, D. M., Dong, Y., & Sabatino, S. (2017). Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: analysis, prediction, optimisation and decision-making. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(10), 1239-1257. doi:10.1080/15732479.2016.1267772Goh, K. C., Goh, H. H., & Chong, H.-Y. (2019). Integration Model of Fuzzy AHP and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Evaluating Highway Infrastructure Investments. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 25(1), 04018045. doi:10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000473Heidari, M. R., Heravi, G., & Esmaeeli, A. N. (2020). Integrating life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis to select sustainable pavement: A probabilistic model using managerial flexibilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120046. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120046Wang, Z., Yang, D. Y., Frangopol, D. M., & Jin, W. (2019). Inclusion of environmental impacts in life-cycle cost analysis of bridge structures. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 5(4), 252-267. doi:10.1080/23789689.2018.1542212Cadenazzi, T., Dotelli, G., Rossini, M., Nolan, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). Life-Cycle Cost and Life-Cycle Assessment Analysis at the Design Stage of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Concrete Bridge in Florida. Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, 8(2), 20180113. doi:10.1520/acem20180113Social Impact Assessment (SIA)https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/iucn_esms_sia_guidance_note.pdfZhang, A., Zhong, R. Y., Farooque, M., Kang, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2020). Blockchain-based life cycle assessment: An implementation framework and system architecture. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152, 104512. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104512Parent, J., Cucuzzella, C., & Revéret, J.-P. (2010). Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(2), 164-171. doi:10.1007/s11367-009-0146-9Vanclay, F. (2019). Reflections on Social Impact Assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(2), 126-131. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1685807Zamarrón-Mieza, I., Yepes, V., & Moreno-Jiménez, J. M. (2017). A systematic review of application of multi-criteria decision analysis for aging-dam management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 217-230. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.092Parsons, R. (2019). Forces for change in social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(4), 278-286. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1692585Vanclay, F. (2003). International Principles for Social Impact Assessment: their evolution. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 3-4. doi:10.3152/147154603781766464Domínguez-Gómez, J. A. (2016). Four conceptual issues to consider in integrating social and environmental factors in risk and impact assessments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 56, 113-119. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2015.09.009Fischer, T. B., Jha-Thakur, U., Fawcett, P., Clement, S., Hayes, S., & Nowacki, J. (2017). Consideration of urban green space in impact assessments for health. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 36(1), 32-44. doi:10.1080/14615517.2017.1364021Balasbaneh, A. T., & Marsono, A. K. B. (2020). Applying multi-criteria decision-making on alternatives for earth-retaining walls: LCA, LCC, and S-LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(11), 2140-2153. doi:10.1007/s11367-020-01825-6Balasbaneh, A. T., Marsono, A. K. B., & Khaleghi, S. J. (2018). Sustainability choice of different hybrid timber structure for low medium cost single-story residential building: Environmental, economic and social assessment. Journal of Building Engineering, 20, 235-247. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.006Penadés-Plà, V., Martínez-Muñoz, D., García-Segura, T., Navarro, I. J., & Yepes, V. (2020). Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Optimized Post-Tensioned Concrete Road Bridges. Sustainability, 12(10), 4265. doi:10.3390/su12104265Ali, M. S., Aslam, M. S., & Mirza, M. S. (2015). A sustainability assessment framework for bridges – a case study: Victoria and Champlain Bridges, Montreal. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1-14. doi:10.1080/15732479.2015.1120754Kloepffer, W. (2008). Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(2), 89-95. doi:10.1065/lca2008.02.376Hu, M. (2019). Building impact assessment—A combined life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis framework. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150, 104410. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104410Ecoinventhttps://www.ecoinvent.org/database/database.htmlThe Regional Catalan Governmenthttps://en.itec.cat/database/Psilca Greendatebasehttps://psilca.net/Ortiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2009). Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 28-39. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012Asdrubali, F., Baldassarri, C., & Fthenakis, V. (2013). Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy and Buildings, 64, 73-89. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1592-1600. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014). Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 394-416. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037Chau, C. K., Leung, T. M., & Ng, W. Y. (2015). A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings. Applied Energy, 143, 395-413. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.023Baker, L. (2018). Of embodied emissions and inequality: Rethinking energy consumption. Energy Research & Social Science, 36, 52-60. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.027Chen, L., Pelton, R. E. O., & Smith, T. M. (2016). Comparative life cycle assessment of fossil and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 667-676. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.094Walker, S., & Rothman, R. (2020). Life cycle assessment of bio-based and fossil-based plastic: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121158. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121158Recipehttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/230770853_Recipe_2008New Version ReCiPe 2016 to Determine Environmental Impact|RIVMhttps://www.rivm.nl/en/news/new-version-recipe-2016-to-determine-environmental-impactPenadés-Plà, V., Martí, J. V., García-Segura, T., & Yepes, V. (2017). Life-Cycle Assessment: A Comparison between Two Optimal Post-Tensioned Concrete Box-Girder Road Bridges. Sustainability, 9(10), 1864. doi:10.3390/su9101864Zhou, Z., Alcalá, J., & Yepes, V. (2020). Bridge Carbon Emissions and Driving Factors Based on a Life-Cycle Assessment Case Study: Cable-Stayed Bridge over Hun He River in Liaoning, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5953. doi:10.3390/ijerph17165953SimaProhttps://simapro.com/about/Lee, K.-M., Cho, H.-N., & Cha, C.-J. (2006). Life-cycle cost-effective optimum design of steel bridges considering environmental stressors. Engineering Structures, 28(9), 1252-1265. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.008Navarro, I. J., Penadés-Plà, V., Martínez-Muñoz, D., Rempling, R., & Yepes, V. (2020). LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN BRIDGE DESIGN: A REVIEW. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 26(7), 690-704. doi:10.3846/jcem.2020.13599García-Segura, T., Penadés-Plà, V., & Yepes, V. (2018). Sustainable bridge design by metamodel-assisted multi-objective optimization and decision-making under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 904-915. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.177Jang, B., & Mohammadi, J. (2019). Impact of fatigue damage from overloads on bridge life-cycle cost analysis. Bridge Structures, 15(4), 181-186. doi:10.3233/brs-190153Matos, J., Solgaard, A., Santos, C., Silva, M. S., Linneberg, P., Strauss, A., … Akiyama, M. (2017). Life Cycle Cost, As a Tool for Decision Making on Concrete Infrastructures. High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet, 1832-1839. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59471-2_210Edited by the Ministry of Construction, National Development and Reform Commission, 2002. Engineering Survey and Design Charging Standardshttps://wenku.baidu.com/view/3fa74a62effdc8d376eeaeaad1f34693daef1088.htmlRossi, B., Marquart, S., & Rossi, G. (2017). Comparative life cycle cost assessment of painted and hot-dip galvanized bridges. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.022Wang, H., Schandl, H., Wang, X., Ma, F., Yue, Q., Wang, G., … Zheng, R. (2020). Measuring progress of China’s circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 105070. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105070Wang, D., Liu, Q., Ma, L., Zhang, Y., & Cong, H. (2019). Road traffic accident severity analysis: A census-based study in China. Journal of Safety Research, 70, 135-147. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.06.002Van der Vlegel, M., Haagsma, J. A., de Munter, L., de Jongh, M. A. C., & Polinder, S. (2020). Health Care and Productivity Costs of Non-Fatal Traffic Injuries: A Comparison of Road User Types. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2217. doi:10.3390/ijerph17072217Al-Rukaibi, F., AlKheder, S., AlOtaibi, N., & Almutairi, M. (2019). Traffic crashes cost estimation in Kuwait. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 25(2), 203-212. doi:10.1080/13588265.2019.1567966Jiménez, J. R., Ayuso, J., Agrela, F., López, M., & Galvín, A. P. (2012). Utilisation of unbound recycled aggregates from selected CDW in unpaved rural roads. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 58, 88-97. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.012Tavira, J., Jiménez, J. R., Ayuso, J., Sierra, M. J., & Ledesma, E. F. (2018). Functional and structural parameters of a paved road section constructed with mixed recycled aggregates from non-selected construction and demolition waste with excavation soil. Construction and Building Materials, 164, 57-69. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.195Sangiorgi, C., Lantieri, C., & Dondi, G. (2014). Construction and demolition waste recycling: an application for road construction. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16(6), 530-537. doi:10.1080/10298436.2014.943134Prenzel, P. V., & Vanclay, F. (2014). How social impact assessment can contribute to conflict management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45, 30-37. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.11.003Vanclay, F. (2003). International Principles For Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5-12. doi:10.3152/147154603781766491Esteves, A. M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 34-42. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.660356Sierra, L. A., Pellicer, E., & Yepes, V. (2017). Method for estimating the social sustainability of infrastructure projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65, 41-53. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2017.02.004Navarro, I. J., Yepes, V., & Martí, J. V. (2018). Social life cycle assessment of concrete bridge decks exposed to aggressive environments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 72, 50-63. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.003Shab-Homehttp://www.socialhotspot.org/PSILCA-A Product Social Impact Life Cycle Assessment Database Database Version 1.0https://www.openlca.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/PSILCA_documentation_v1.1.pdfGeographical Division of China-Wikiwand. Wikihttps://www.wikiwand.com/en/Geography_of_ChinaList of New Cities in China-Wikiwandhttps://m.sohu.com/n/486287408/Dargay, J., Gately, D., & Sommer, M. (2007). Vehicle Ownership and Income Growth, Worldwide: 1960-2030. The Energy Journal, 28(4). doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol28-no4-7Wu, T., Zhang, M., & Ou, X. (2014). Analysis of Future Vehicle Energy Demand in China Based on a Gompertz Function Method and Computable General Equilibrium Model. Energies, 7(11), 7454-7482. doi:10.3390/en7117454Shi, Y., Guo, S., & Sun, P. (2017). The role of infrastructure in China’s regional economic growth. Journal of Asian Economics, 49, 26-41. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2017.02.004International Association for Impact Assessment Purpose and Intended Readershiphttps://www.socialimpactassessment.com/documents/IAIA%202015%20Social%20Impact%20Assessment%20guidance%20document.pdfAppiah-Opoku, S. (2015). Land access and resettlement: a guide to best practice, by Gerry Reddy, Eddie Smyth, and Michael Steyn. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(4), 290-290. doi:10.1080/14615517.2015.1069667Virtual de Publicaciones del M. de. 2010. Code on Structural Concrete (EHE-08) Articles and Annexeshttp://asidac.es/asidac-en/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/EHE-ENG.pdfSuzuki, S., & Nijkamp, P. (2016). An evaluation of energy-environment-economic efficiency for EU, APEC and ASEAN countries: Design of a Target-Oriented DFM model with fixed factors in Data Envelopment Analysis. Energy Policy, 88, 100-112. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.00