20,385 research outputs found
Contextualised Browsing in a Digital Library's Living Lab
Contextualisation has proven to be effective in tailoring \linebreak search
results towards the users' information need. While this is true for a basic
query search, the usage of contextual session information during exploratory
search especially on the level of browsing has so far been underexposed in
research. In this paper, we present two approaches that contextualise browsing
on the level of structured metadata in a Digital Library (DL), (1) one variant
bases on document similarity and (2) one variant utilises implicit session
information, such as queries and different document metadata encountered during
the session of a users. We evaluate our approaches in a living lab environment
using a DL in the social sciences and compare our contextualisation approaches
against a non-contextualised approach. For a period of more than three months
we analysed 47,444 unique retrieval sessions that contain search activities on
the level of browsing. Our results show that a contextualisation of browsing
significantly outperforms our baseline in terms of the position of the first
clicked item in the result set. The mean rank of the first clicked document
(measured as mean first relevant - MFR) was 4.52 using a non-contextualised
ranking compared to 3.04 when re-ranking the result lists based on similarity
to the previously viewed document. Furthermore, we observed that both
contextual approaches show a noticeably higher click-through rate. A
contextualisation based on document similarity leads to almost twice as many
document views compared to the non-contextualised ranking.Comment: 10 pages, 2 figures, paper accepted at JCDL 201
Current Challenges and Visions in Music Recommender Systems Research
Music recommender systems (MRS) have experienced a boom in recent years,
thanks to the emergence and success of online streaming services, which
nowadays make available almost all music in the world at the user's fingertip.
While today's MRS considerably help users to find interesting music in these
huge catalogs, MRS research is still facing substantial challenges. In
particular when it comes to build, incorporate, and evaluate recommendation
strategies that integrate information beyond simple user--item interactions or
content-based descriptors, but dig deep into the very essence of listener
needs, preferences, and intentions, MRS research becomes a big endeavor and
related publications quite sparse.
The purpose of this trends and survey article is twofold. We first identify
and shed light on what we believe are the most pressing challenges MRS research
is facing, from both academic and industry perspectives. We review the state of
the art towards solving these challenges and discuss its limitations. Second,
we detail possible future directions and visions we contemplate for the further
evolution of the field. The article should therefore serve two purposes: giving
the interested reader an overview of current challenges in MRS research and
providing guidance for young researchers by identifying interesting, yet
under-researched, directions in the field
CHORUS Deliverable 2.2: Second report - identification of multi-disciplinary key issues for gap analysis toward EU multimedia search engines roadmap
After addressing the state-of-the-art during the first year of Chorus and establishing the existing landscape in
multimedia search engines, we have identified and analyzed gaps within European research effort during our second year.
In this period we focused on three directions, notably technological issues, user-centred issues and use-cases and socio-
economic and legal aspects. These were assessed by two central studies: firstly, a concerted vision of functional breakdown
of generic multimedia search engine, and secondly, a representative use-cases descriptions with the related discussion on
requirement for technological challenges. Both studies have been carried out in cooperation and consultation with the
community at large through EC concertation meetings (multimedia search engines cluster), several meetings with our
Think-Tank, presentations in international conferences, and surveys addressed to EU projects coordinators as well as
National initiatives coordinators. Based on the obtained feedback we identified two types of gaps, namely core
technological gaps that involve research challenges, and “enablers”, which are not necessarily technical research
challenges, but have impact on innovation progress. New socio-economic trends are presented as well as emerging legal
challenges
- …