75,734 research outputs found
Conceptual Spaces for Cognitive Architectures: A Lingua Franca for Different Levels of Representation
During the last decades, many cognitive architectures (CAs) have been realized adopting different assumptions about the organization and the representation of their knowledge level. Some of them (e.g. SOAR [35]) adopt a classical symbolic approach, some (e.g. LEABRA[ 48]) are based on a purely connectionist model, while others (e.g. CLARION [59]) adopt a hybrid approach combining connectionist and symbolic representational levels. Additionally, some attempts (e.g. biSOAR) trying to extend the representational capacities of CAs by integrating diagrammatical representations and reasoning are also available [34]. In this paper we propose a reflection on the role that Conceptual Spaces, a framework
developed by Peter G¨ardenfors [24] more than fifteen years ago, can play in the current development of the Knowledge Level in Cognitive Systems and Architectures. In particular, we claim that Conceptual Spaces offer a lingua franca that allows to unify and generalize many aspects of the symbolic, sub-symbolic and diagrammatic approaches (by overcoming some of their typical problems) and to integrate them on a common ground. In doing so we extend and detail some of the arguments explored by G¨ardenfors [23] for defending the need of a conceptual, intermediate, representation level between the symbolic and the sub-symbolic one. In particular we focus on the advantages offered by Conceptual
Spaces (w.r.t. symbolic and sub-symbolic approaches) in dealing with the problem of compositionality of representations based on typicality traits. Additionally, we argue that Conceptual Spaces could offer a unifying framework for interpreting many kinds of diagrammatic and analogical representations.
As a consequence, their adoption could also favor the integration of diagrammatical representation and reasoning in CAs
SDRL: Interpretable and Data-efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Leveraging Symbolic Planning
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has gained great success by learning
directly from high-dimensional sensory inputs, yet is notorious for the lack of
interpretability. Interpretability of the subtasks is critical in hierarchical
decision-making as it increases the transparency of black-box-style DRL
approach and helps the RL practitioners to understand the high-level behavior
of the system better. In this paper, we introduce symbolic planning into DRL
and propose a framework of Symbolic Deep Reinforcement Learning (SDRL) that can
handle both high-dimensional sensory inputs and symbolic planning. The
task-level interpretability is enabled by relating symbolic actions to
options.This framework features a planner -- controller -- meta-controller
architecture, which takes charge of subtask scheduling, data-driven subtask
learning, and subtask evaluation, respectively. The three components
cross-fertilize each other and eventually converge to an optimal symbolic plan
along with the learned subtasks, bringing together the advantages of long-term
planning capability with symbolic knowledge and end-to-end reinforcement
learning directly from a high-dimensional sensory input. Experimental results
validate the interpretability of subtasks, along with improved data efficiency
compared with state-of-the-art approaches
Integrating testing techniques through process programming
Integration of multiple testing techniques is required to demonstrate high quality of software. Technique integration has three basic goals: incremental testing capabilities, extensive error detection, and cost-effective application. We are experimenting with the use of process programming as a mechanism of integrating testing techniques. Having set out to integrate DATA FLOW testing and RELAY, we proposed synergistic use of these techniques to achieve all three goals. We developed a testing process program much as we would develop a software product from requirements through design to implementation and evaluation. We found process programming to be effective for explicitly integrating the techniques and achieving the desired synergism. Used in this way, process programming also mitigates many of the other problems that plague testing in the software development process
Recommended from our members
Neurons and symbols: a manifesto
We discuss the purpose of neural-symbolic integration including its principles, mechanisms and applications. We outline a cognitive computational model for neural-symbolic integration, position the model in the broader context of multi-agent systems, machine learning and automated reasoning, and list some of the challenges for the area of
neural-symbolic computation to achieve the promise of effective integration of robust learning and expressive reasoning under uncertainty
The Knowledge Level in Cognitive Architectures: Current Limitations and Possible Developments
In this paper we identify and characterize an analysis of two problematic aspects affecting the representational level of cognitive architectures (CAs), namely: the limited size and the homogeneous typology of the encoded and processed knowledge.
We argue that such aspects may constitute not only a technological problem that, in our opinion, should be addressed in order to build articial agents able to exhibit intelligent behaviours in general scenarios, but also an epistemological one, since they limit the plausibility of the comparison of the CAs' knowledge representation and processing mechanisms with those executed by humans in their everyday activities. In the final part of the paper further directions of research will be explored, trying to address current limitations and
future challenges
- …