Fusing Multiple Multiband Images

We consider the problem of fusing an arbitrary number of multiband, i.e., panchromatic, multispectral, or hyperspectral, images belonging to the same scene. We use the well-known forward observation and linear mixture models with Gaussian perturbations to formulate the maximum-likelihood estimator of the endmember abundance matrix of the fused image. We calculate the Fisher information matrix for this estimator and examine the conditions for the uniqueness of the estimator. We use a vector total-variation penalty term together with nonnegativity and sum-to-one constraints on the endmember abundances to regularize the derived maximum-likelihood estimation problem. The regularization facilitates exploiting the prior knowledge that natural images are mostly composed of piecewise smooth regions with limited abrupt changes, i.e., edges, as well as coping with potential ill-posedness of the fusion problem. We solve the resultant convex optimization problem using the alternating direction method of multipliers. We utilize the circular convolution theorem in conjunction with the fast Fourier transform to alleviate the computational complexity of the proposed algorithm. Experiments with multiband images constructed from real hyperspectral datasets reveal the superior performance of the proposed algorithm in comparison with the state-of-the-art algorithms, which need to be used in tandem to fuse more than two multiband images

A COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR EDGE-PRESERVING REGULARIZATION IN DYNAMIC INVERSE PROBLEMS

We devise efficient methods for dynamic inverse problems, where both the quantities of interest and the forward operator (measurement process) may change in time. Our goal is to solve for all the quantities of interest simultaneously. We consider large-scale ill-posed problems made more challenging by their dynamic nature and, possibly, by the limited amount of available data per measurement step. To alleviate these difficulties, we apply a unified class of regularization methods that enforce simultaneous regularization in space and time (such as edge enhancement at each time instant and proximity at consecutive time instants) and achieve this with low computational cost and enhanced accuracy. More precisely, we develop iterative methods based on a majorization-minimization (MM) strategy with quadratic tangent majorant, which allows the resulting least-squares problem with a total variation regularization term to be solved with a generalized Krylov subspace (GKS) method; the regularization parameter can be determined automatically and efficiently at each iteration. Numerical examples from a wide range of applications, such as limited-angle computerized tomography (CT), space-time image deblurring, and photoacoustic tomography (PAT), illustrate the effectiveness of the described approaches.</p

Tensor Networks for Dimensionality Reduction and Large-Scale Optimizations. Part 2 Applications and Future Perspectives

Part 2 of this monograph builds on the introduction to tensor networks and their operations presented in Part 1. It focuses on tensor network models for super-compressed higher-order representation of data/parameters and related cost functions, while providing an outline of their applications in machine learning and data analytics. A particular emphasis is on the tensor train (TT) and Hierarchical Tucker (HT) decompositions, and their physically meaningful interpretations which reflect the scalability of the tensor network approach. Through a graphical approach, we also elucidate how, by virtue of the underlying low-rank tensor approximations and sophisticated contractions of core tensors, tensor networks have the ability to perform distributed computations on otherwise prohibitively large volumes of data/parameters, thereby alleviating or even eliminating the curse of dimensionality. The usefulness of this concept is illustrated over a number of applied areas, including generalized regression and classification (support tensor machines, canonical correlation analysis, higher order partial least squares), generalized eigenvalue decomposition, Riemannian optimization, and in the optimization of deep neural networks. Part 1 and Part 2 of this work can be used either as stand-alone separate texts, or indeed as a conjoint comprehensive review of the exciting field of low-rank tensor networks and tensor decompositions.Comment: 232 page

Tensor Networks for Dimensionality Reduction and Large-Scale Optimizations. Part 2 Applications and Future Perspectives

Part 2 of this monograph builds on the introduction to tensor networks and their operations presented in Part 1. It focuses on tensor network models for super-compressed higher-order representation of data/parameters and related cost functions, while providing an outline of their applications in machine learning and data analytics. A particular emphasis is on the tensor train (TT) and Hierarchical Tucker (HT) decompositions, and their physically meaningful interpretations which reflect the scalability of the tensor network approach. Through a graphical approach, we also elucidate how, by virtue of the underlying low-rank tensor approximations and sophisticated contractions of core tensors, tensor networks have the ability to perform distributed computations on otherwise prohibitively large volumes of data/parameters, thereby alleviating or even eliminating the curse of dimensionality. The usefulness of this concept is illustrated over a number of applied areas, including generalized regression and classification (support tensor machines, canonical correlation analysis, higher order partial least squares), generalized eigenvalue decomposition, Riemannian optimization, and in the optimization of deep neural networks. Part 1 and Part 2 of this work can be used either as stand-alone separate texts, or indeed as a conjoint comprehensive review of the exciting field of low-rank tensor networks and tensor decompositions.Comment: 232 page

クープマン作用素に基づく力学系のデータによる解析 : 機械学習の視点から

学位の種別: 課程博士審査委員会委員 : （主査）東京大学准教授 矢入 健久, 東京大学教授 堀 浩一, 東京大学教授 岩崎 晃, 東京大学准教授 中谷 辰爾, 東京大学准教授 柳澤 大地, 大阪大学准教授 河原 吉伸University of Tokyo(東京大学

Hyperspectral Image Analysis through Unsupervised Deep Learning

Hyperspectral image (HSI) analysis has become an active research area in computer vision field with a wide range of applications. However, in order to yield better recognition and analysis results, we need to address two challenging issues of HSI, i.e., the existence of mixed pixels and its significantly low spatial resolution (LR). In this dissertation, spectral unmixing (SU) and hyperspectral image super-resolution (HSI-SR) approaches are developed to address these two issues with advanced deep learning models in an unsupervised fashion. A specific application, anomaly detection, is also studied, to show the importance of SU.Although deep learning has achieved the state-of-the-art performance on supervised problems, its practice on unsupervised problems has not been fully developed. To address the problem of SU, an untied denoising autoencoder is proposed to decompose the HSI into endmembers and abundances with non-negative and abundance sum-to-one constraints. The denoising capacity is incorporated into the network with a sparsity constraint to boost the performance of endmember extraction and abundance estimation.Moreover, the first attempt is made to solve the problem of HSI-SR using an unsupervised encoder-decoder architecture by fusing the LR HSI with the high-resolution multispectral image (MSI). The architecture is composed of two encoder-decoder networks, coupled through a shared decoder, to preserve the rich spectral information from the HSI network. It encourages the representations from both modalities to follow a sparse Dirichlet distribution which naturally incorporates the two physical constraints of HSI and MSI. And the angular difference between representations are minimized to reduce the spectral distortion.Finally, a novel detection algorithm is proposed through spectral unmixing and dictionary based low-rank decomposition, where the dictionary is constructed with mean-shift clustering and the coefficients of the dictionary is encouraged to be low-rank. Experimental evaluations show significant improvement on the performance of anomaly detection conducted on the abundances (through SU).The effectiveness of the proposed approaches has been evaluated thoroughly by extensive experiments, to achieve the state-of-the-art results

Image Processing and Machine Learning for Hyperspectral Unmixing: An Overview and the HySUPP Python Package

Spectral pixels are often a mixture of the pure spectra of the materials, called endmembers, due to the low spatial resolution of hyperspectral sensors, double scattering, and intimate mixtures of materials in the scenes. Unmixing estimates the fractional abundances of the endmembers within the pixel. Depending on the prior knowledge of endmembers, linear unmixing can be divided into three main groups: supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised (blind) linear unmixing. Advances in Image processing and machine learning substantially affected unmixing. This paper provides an overview of advanced and conventional unmixing approaches. Additionally, we draw a critical comparison between advanced and conventional techniques from the three categories. We compare the performance of the unmixing techniques on three simulated and two real datasets. The experimental results reveal the advantages of different unmixing categories for different unmixing scenarios. Moreover, we provide an open-source Python-based package available at https://github.com/BehnoodRasti/HySUPP to reproduce the results

Mineral identification using data-mining in hyperspectral infrared imagery

Les applications de l’imagerie infrarouge dans le domaine de la géologie sont principalement des applications hyperspectrales. Elles permettent entre autre l’identification minérale, la cartographie, ainsi que l’estimation de la portée. Le plus souvent, ces acquisitions sont réalisées in-situ soit à l’aide de capteurs aéroportés, soit à l’aide de dispositifs portatifs. La découverte de minéraux indicateurs a permis d’améliorer grandement l’exploration minérale. Ceci est en partie dû à l’utilisation d’instruments portatifs. Dans ce contexte le développement de systèmes automatisés permettrait d’augmenter à la fois la qualité de l’exploration et la précision de la détection des indicateurs. C’est dans ce cadre que s’inscrit le travail mené dans ce doctorat. Le sujet consistait en l’utilisation de méthodes d’apprentissage automatique appliquées à l’analyse (au traitement) d’images hyperspectrales prises dans les longueurs d’onde infrarouge. L’objectif recherché étant l’identification de grains minéraux de petites tailles utilisés comme indicateurs minéral -ogiques. Une application potentielle de cette recherche serait le développement d’un outil logiciel d’assistance pour l’analyse des échantillons lors de l’exploration minérale. Les expériences ont été menées en laboratoire dans la gamme relative à l’infrarouge thermique (Long Wave InfraRed, LWIR) de 7.7m à 11.8 m. Ces essais ont permis de proposer une méthode pour calculer l’annulation du continuum. La méthode utilisée lors de ces essais utilise la factorisation matricielle non négative (NMF). En utlisant une factorisation du premier ordre on peut déduire le rayonnement de pénétration, lequel peut ensuite être comparé et analysé par rapport à d’autres méthodes plus communes. L’analyse des résultats spectraux en comparaison avec plusieurs bibliothèques existantes de données a permis de mettre en évidence la suppression du continuum. Les expérience ayant menés à ce résultat ont été conduites en utilisant une plaque Infragold ainsi qu’un objectif macro LWIR. L’identification automatique de grains de différents matériaux tels que la pyrope, l’olivine et le quartz a commencé. Lors d’une phase de comparaison entre des approches supervisées et non supervisées, cette dernière s’est montrée plus approprié en raison du comportement indépendant par rapport à l’étape d’entraînement. Afin de confirmer la qualité de ces résultats quatre expériences ont été menées. Lors d’une première expérience deux algorithmes ont été évalués pour application de regroupements en utilisant l’approche FCC (False Colour Composite). Cet essai a permis d’observer une vitesse de convergence, jusqu’a vingt fois plus rapide, ainsi qu’une efficacité significativement accrue concernant l’identification en comparaison des résultats de la littérature. Cependant des essais effectués sur des données LWIR ont montré un manque de prédiction de la surface du grain lorsque les grains étaient irréguliers avec présence d’agrégats minéraux. La seconde expérience a consisté, en une analyse quantitaive comparative entre deux bases de données de Ground Truth (GT), nommée rigid-GT et observed-GT (rigide-GT: étiquet manuel de la région, observée-GT:étiquetage manuel les pixels). La précision des résultats était 1.5 fois meilleur lorsque l’on a utlisé la base de données observed-GT que rigid-GT. Pour les deux dernières epxérience, des données venant d’un MEB (Microscope Électronique à Balayage) ainsi que d’un microscopie à fluorescence (XRF) ont été ajoutées. Ces données ont permis d’introduire des informations relatives tant aux agrégats minéraux qu’à la surface des grains. Les résultats ont été comparés par des techniques d’identification automatique des minéraux, utilisant ArcGIS. Cette dernière a montré une performance prometteuse quand à l’identification automatique et à aussi été utilisée pour la GT de validation. Dans l’ensemble, les quatre méthodes de cette thèse représentent des méthodologies bénéfiques pour l’identification des minéraux. Ces méthodes présentent l’avantage d’être non-destructives, relativement précises et d’avoir un faible coût en temps calcul ce qui pourrait les qualifier pour être utilisée dans des conditions de laboratoire ou sur le terrain.The geological applications of hyperspectral infrared imagery mainly consist in mineral identification, mapping, airborne or portable instruments, and core logging. Finding the mineral indicators offer considerable benefits in terms of mineralogy and mineral exploration which usually involves application of portable instrument and core logging. Moreover, faster and more mechanized systems development increases the precision of identifying mineral indicators and avoid any possible mis-classification. Therefore, the objective of this thesis was to create a tool to using hyperspectral infrared imagery and process the data through image analysis and machine learning methods to identify small size mineral grains used as mineral indicators. This system would be applied for different circumstances to provide an assistant for geological analysis and mineralogy exploration. The experiments were conducted in laboratory conditions in the long-wave infrared (7.7μm to 11.8μm - LWIR), with a LWIR-macro lens (to improve spatial resolution), an Infragold plate, and a heating source. The process began with a method to calculate the continuum removal. The approach is the application of Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) to extract Rank-1 NMF and estimate the down-welling radiance and then compare it with other conventional methods. The results indicate successful suppression of the continuum from the spectra and enable the spectra to be compared with spectral libraries. Afterwards, to have an automated system, supervised and unsupervised approaches have been tested for identification of pyrope, olivine and quartz grains. The results indicated that the unsupervised approach was more suitable due to independent behavior against training stage. Once these results obtained, two algorithms were tested to create False Color Composites (FCC) applying a clustering approach. The results of this comparison indicate significant computational efficiency (more than 20 times faster) and promising performance for mineral identification. Finally, the reliability of the automated LWIR hyperspectral infrared mineral identification has been tested and the difficulty for identification of the irregular grain’s surface along with the mineral aggregates has been verified. The results were compared to two different Ground Truth(GT) (i.e. rigid-GT and observed-GT) for quantitative calculation. Observed-GT increased the accuracy up to 1.5 times than rigid-GT. The samples were also examined by Micro X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) in order to retrieve information for the mineral aggregates and the grain’s surface (biotite, epidote, goethite, diopside, smithsonite, tourmaline, kyanite, scheelite, pyrope, olivine, and quartz). The results of XRF imagery compared with automatic mineral identification techniques, using ArcGIS, and represented a promising performance for automatic identification and have been used for GT validation. In overall, the four methods (i.e. 1.Continuum removal methods; 2. Classification or clustering methods for mineral identification; 3. Two algorithms for clustering of mineral spectra; 4. Reliability verification) in this thesis represent beneficial methodologies to identify minerals. These methods have the advantages to be a non-destructive, relatively accurate and have low computational complexity that might be used to identify and assess mineral grains in the laboratory conditions or in the field

Discriminant feature pursuit: from statistical learning to informative learning.

Lin Dahua.Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2006.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 233-250).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Abstract --- p.iAcknowledgement --- p.iiiChapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1Chapter 1.1 --- The Problem We are Facing --- p.1Chapter 1.2 --- Generative vs. Discriminative Models --- p.2Chapter 1.3 --- Statistical Feature Extraction: Success and Challenge --- p.3Chapter 1.4 --- Overview of Our Works --- p.5Chapter 1.4.1 --- New Linear Discriminant Methods: Generalized LDA Formulation and Performance-Driven Sub space Learning --- p.5Chapter 1.4.2 --- Coupled Learning Models: Coupled Space Learning and Inter Modality Recognition --- p.6Chapter 1.4.3 --- Informative Learning Approaches: Conditional Infomax Learning and Information Chan- nel Model --- p.6Chapter 1.5 --- Organization of the Thesis --- p.8Chapter I --- History and Background --- p.10Chapter 2 --- Statistical Pattern Recognition --- p.11Chapter 2.1 --- Patterns and Classifiers --- p.11Chapter 2.2 --- Bayes Theory --- p.12Chapter 2.3 --- Statistical Modeling --- p.14Chapter 2.3.1 --- Maximum Likelihood Estimation --- p.14Chapter 2.3.2 --- Gaussian Model --- p.15Chapter 2.3.3 --- Expectation-Maximization --- p.17Chapter 2.3.4 --- Finite Mixture Model --- p.18Chapter 2.3.5 --- A Nonparametric Technique: Parzen Windows --- p.21Chapter 3 --- Statistical Learning Theory --- p.24Chapter 3.1 --- Formulation of Learning Model --- p.24Chapter 3.1.1 --- Learning: Functional Estimation Model --- p.24Chapter 3.1.2 --- Representative Learning Problems --- p.25Chapter 3.1.3 --- Empirical Risk Minimization --- p.26Chapter 3.2 --- Consistency and Convergence of Learning --- p.27Chapter 3.2.1 --- Concept of Consistency --- p.27Chapter 3.2.2 --- The Key Theorem of Learning Theory --- p.28Chapter 3.2.3 --- VC Entropy --- p.29Chapter 3.2.4 --- Bounds on Convergence --- p.30Chapter 3.2.5 --- VC Dimension --- p.35Chapter 4 --- History of Statistical Feature Extraction --- p.38Chapter 4.1 --- Linear Feature Extraction --- p.38Chapter 4.1.1 --- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) --- p.38Chapter 4.1.2 --- Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) --- p.41Chapter 4.1.3 --- Other Linear Feature Extraction Methods --- p.46Chapter 4.1.4 --- Comparison of Different Methods --- p.48Chapter 4.2 --- Enhanced Models --- p.49Chapter 4.2.1 --- Stochastic Discrimination and Random Subspace --- p.49Chapter 4.2.2 --- Hierarchical Feature Extraction --- p.51Chapter 4.2.3 --- Multilinear Analysis and Tensor-based Representation --- p.52Chapter 4.3 --- Nonlinear Feature Extraction --- p.54Chapter 4.3.1 --- Kernelization --- p.54Chapter 4.3.2 --- Dimension reduction by Manifold Embedding --- p.56Chapter 5 --- Related Works in Feature Extraction --- p.59Chapter 5.1 --- Dimension Reduction --- p.59Chapter 5.1.1 --- Feature Selection --- p.60Chapter 5.1.2 --- Feature Extraction --- p.60Chapter 5.2 --- Kernel Learning --- p.61Chapter 5.2.1 --- Basic Concepts of Kernel --- p.61Chapter 5.2.2 --- The Reproducing Kernel Map --- p.62Chapter 5.2.3 --- The Mercer Kernel Map --- p.64Chapter 5.2.4 --- The Empirical Kernel Map --- p.65Chapter 5.2.5 --- Kernel Trick and Kernelized Feature Extraction --- p.66Chapter 5.3 --- Subspace Analysis --- p.68Chapter 5.3.1 --- Basis and Subspace --- p.68Chapter 5.3.2 --- Orthogonal Projection --- p.69Chapter 5.3.3 --- Orthonormal Basis --- p.70Chapter 5.3.4 --- Subspace Decomposition --- p.70Chapter 5.4 --- Principal Component Analysis --- p.73Chapter 5.4.1 --- PCA Formulation --- p.73Chapter 5.4.2 --- Solution to PCA --- p.75Chapter 5.4.3 --- Energy Structure of PCA --- p.76Chapter 5.4.4 --- Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis --- p.78Chapter 5.4.5 --- Kernel Principal Component Analysis --- p.81Chapter 5.5 --- Independent Component Analysis --- p.83Chapter 5.5.1 --- ICA Formulation --- p.83Chapter 5.5.2 --- Measurement of Statistical Independence --- p.84Chapter 5.6 --- Linear Discriminant Analysis --- p.85Chapter 5.6.1 --- Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis --- p.85Chapter 5.6.2 --- Improved Algorithms for Small Sample Size Problem . --- p.89Chapter 5.6.3 --- Kernel Discriminant Analysis --- p.92Chapter II --- Improvement in Linear Discriminant Analysis --- p.100Chapter 6 --- Generalized LDA --- p.101Chapter 6.1 --- Regularized LDA --- p.101Chapter 6.1.1 --- Generalized LDA Implementation Procedure --- p.101Chapter 6.1.2 --- Optimal Nonsingular Approximation --- p.103Chapter 6.1.3 --- Regularized LDA algorithm --- p.104Chapter 6.2 --- A Statistical View: When is LDA optimal? --- p.105Chapter 6.2.1 --- Two-class Gaussian Case --- p.106Chapter 6.2.2 --- Multi-class Cases --- p.107Chapter 6.3 --- Generalized LDA Formulation --- p.108Chapter 6.3.1 --- Mathematical Preparation --- p.108Chapter 6.3.2 --- Generalized Formulation --- p.110Chapter 7 --- Dynamic Feedback Generalized LDA --- p.112Chapter 7.1 --- Basic Principle --- p.112Chapter 7.2 --- Dynamic Feedback Framework --- p.113Chapter 7.2.1 --- Initialization: K-Nearest Construction --- p.113Chapter 7.2.2 --- Dynamic Procedure --- p.115Chapter 7.3 --- Experiments --- p.115Chapter 7.3.1 --- Performance in Training Stage --- p.116Chapter 7.3.2 --- Performance on Testing set --- p.118Chapter 8 --- Performance-Driven Subspace Learning --- p.119Chapter 8.1 --- Motivation and Principle --- p.119Chapter 8.2 --- Performance-Based Criteria --- p.121Chapter 8.2.1 --- The Verification Problem and Generalized Average Margin --- p.122Chapter 8.2.2 --- Performance Driven Criteria based on Generalized Average Margin --- p.123Chapter 8.3 --- Optimal Subspace Pursuit --- p.125Chapter 8.3.1 --- Optimal threshold --- p.125Chapter 8.3.2 --- Optimal projection matrix --- p.125Chapter 8.3.3 --- Overall procedure --- p.129Chapter 8.3.4 --- Discussion of the Algorithm --- p.129Chapter 8.4 --- Optimal Classifier Fusion --- p.130Chapter 8.5 --- Experiments --- p.131Chapter 8.5.1 --- Performance Measurement --- p.131Chapter 8.5.2 --- Experiment Setting --- p.131Chapter 8.5.3 --- Experiment Results --- p.133Chapter 8.5.4 --- Discussion --- p.139Chapter III --- Coupled Learning of Feature Transforms --- p.140Chapter 9 --- Coupled Space Learning --- p.141Chapter 9.1 --- Introduction --- p.142Chapter 9.1.1 --- What is Image Style Transform --- p.142Chapter 9.1.2 --- Overview of our Framework --- p.143Chapter 9.2 --- Coupled Space Learning --- p.143Chapter 9.2.1 --- Framework of Coupled Modelling --- p.143Chapter 9.2.2 --- Correlative Component Analysis --- p.145Chapter 9.2.3 --- Coupled Bidirectional Transform --- p.148Chapter 9.2.4 --- Procedure of Coupled Space Learning --- p.151Chapter 9.3 --- Generalization to Mixture Model --- p.152Chapter 9.3.1 --- Coupled Gaussian Mixture Model --- p.152Chapter 9.3.2 --- Optimization by EM Algorithm --- p.152Chapter 9.4 --- Integrated Framework for Image Style Transform --- p.154Chapter 9.5 --- Experiments --- p.156Chapter 9.5.1 --- Face Super-resolution --- p.156Chapter 9.5.2 --- Portrait Style Transforms --- p.157Chapter 10 --- Inter-Modality Recognition --- p.162Chapter 10.1 --- Introduction to the Inter-Modality Recognition Problem . . . --- p.163Chapter 10.1.1 --- What is Inter-Modality Recognition --- p.163Chapter 10.1.2 --- Overview of Our Feature Extraction Framework . . . . --- p.163Chapter 10.2 --- Common Discriminant Feature Extraction --- p.165Chapter 10.2.1 --- Formulation of the Learning Problem --- p.165Chapter 10.2.2 --- Matrix-Form of the Objective --- p.168Chapter 10.2.3 --- Solving the Linear Transforms --- p.169Chapter 10.3 --- Kernelized Common Discriminant Feature Extraction --- p.170Chapter 10.4 --- Multi-Mode Framework --- p.172Chapter 10.4.1 --- Multi-Mode Formulation --- p.172Chapter 10.4.2 --- Optimization Scheme --- p.174Chapter 10.5 --- Experiments --- p.176Chapter 10.5.1 --- Experiment Settings --- p.176Chapter 10.5.2 --- Experiment Results --- p.177Chapter IV --- A New Perspective: Informative Learning --- p.180Chapter 11 --- Toward Information Theory --- p.181Chapter 11.1 --- Entropy and Mutual Information --- p.181Chapter 11.1.1 --- Entropy --- p.182Chapter 11.1.2 --- Relative Entropy (Kullback Leibler Divergence) --- p.184Chapter 11.2 --- Mutual Information --- p.184Chapter 11.2.1 --- Definition of Mutual Information --- p.184Chapter 11.2.2 --- Chain rules --- p.186Chapter 11.2.3 --- Information in Data Processing --- p.188Chapter 11.3 --- Differential Entropy --- p.189Chapter 11.3.1 --- Differential Entropy of Continuous Random Variable . --- p.189Chapter 11.3.2 --- Mutual Information of Continuous Random Variable . --- p.190Chapter 12 --- Conditional Infomax Learning --- p.191Chapter 12.1 --- An Overview --- p.192Chapter 12.2 --- Conditional Informative Feature Extraction --- p.193Chapter 12.2.1 --- Problem Formulation and Features --- p.193Chapter 12.2.2 --- The Information Maximization Principle --- p.194Chapter 12.2.3 --- The Information Decomposition and the Conditional Objective --- p.195Chapter 12.3 --- The Efficient Optimization --- p.197Chapter 12.3.1 --- Discrete Approximation Based on AEP --- p.197Chapter 12.3.2 --- Analysis of Terms and Their Derivatives --- p.198Chapter 12.3.3 --- Local Active Region Method --- p.200Chapter 12.4 --- Bayesian Feature Fusion with Sparse Prior --- p.201Chapter 12.5 --- The Integrated Framework for Feature Learning --- p.202Chapter 12.6 --- Experiments --- p.203Chapter 12.6.1 --- A Toy Problem --- p.203Chapter 12.6.2 --- Face Recognition --- p.204Chapter 13 --- Channel-based Maximum Effective Information --- p.209Chapter 13.1 --- Motivation and Overview --- p.209Chapter 13.2 --- Maximizing Effective Information --- p.211Chapter 13.2.1 --- Relation between Mutual Information and Classification --- p.211Chapter 13.2.2 --- Linear Projection and Metric --- p.212Chapter 13.2.3 --- Channel Model and Effective Information --- p.213Chapter 13.2.4 --- Parzen Window Approximation --- p.216Chapter 13.3 --- Parameter Optimization on Grassmann Manifold --- p.217Chapter 13.3.1 --- Grassmann Manifold --- p.217Chapter 13.3.2 --- Conjugate Gradient Optimization on Grassmann Manifold --- p.219Chapter 13.3.3 --- Computation of Gradient --- p.221Chapter 13.4 --- Experiments --- p.222Chapter 13.4.1 --- A Toy Problem --- p.222Chapter 13.4.2 --- Face Recognition --- p.223Chapter 14 --- Conclusion --- p.23