Efficient instance and hypothesis space revision in Meta-Interpretive Learning

Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) is a form of Machine Learning. The goal of ILP is to induce hypotheses, as logic programs, that generalise training examples. ILP is characterised by a high expressivity, generalisation ability and interpretability. Meta-Interpretive Learning (MIL) is a state-of-the-art sub-field of ILP. However, current MIL approaches have limited efficiency: the sample and learning complexity respectively are polynomial and exponential in the number of clauses. My thesis is that improvements over the sample and learning complexity can be achieved in MIL through instance and hypothesis space revision. Specifically, we investigate 1) methods that revise the instance space, 2) methods that revise the hypothesis space and 3) methods that revise both the instance and the hypothesis spaces for achieving more efficient MIL. First, we introduce a method for building training sets with active learning in Bayesian MIL. Instances are selected maximising the entropy. We demonstrate this method can reduce the sample complexity and supports efficient learning of agent strategies. Second, we introduce a new method for revising the MIL hypothesis space with predicate invention. Our method generates predicates bottom-up from the background knowledge related to the training examples. We demonstrate this method is complete and can reduce the learning and sample complexity. Finally, we introduce a new MIL system called MIGO for learning optimal two-player game strategies. MIGO learns from playing: its training sets are built from the sequence of actions it chooses. Moreover, MIGO revises its hypothesis space with Dependent Learning: it first solves simpler tasks and can reuse any learned solution for solving more complex tasks. We demonstrate MIGO significantly outperforms both classical and deep reinforcement learning. The methods presented in this thesis open exciting perspectives for efficiently learning theories with MIL in a wide range of applications including robotics, modelling of agent strategies and game playing.Open Acces

On Differentiable Interpreters

Neural networks have transformed the fields of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence with the ability to model complex features and behaviours from raw data. They quickly became instrumental models, achieving numerous state-of-the-art performances across many tasks and domains. Yet the successes of these models often rely on large amounts of data. When data is scarce, resourceful ways of using background knowledge often help. However, though different types of background knowledge can be used to bias the model, it is not clear how one can use algorithmic knowledge to that extent. In this thesis, we present differentiable interpreters as an effective framework for utilising algorithmic background knowledge as architectural inductive biases of neural networks. By continuously approximating discrete elements of traditional program interpreters, we create differentiable interpreters that, due to the continuous nature of their execution, are amenable to optimisation with gradient descent methods. This enables us to write code mixed with parametric functions, where the code strongly biases the behaviour of the model while enabling the training of parameters and/or input representations from data. We investigate two such differentiable interpreters and their use cases in this thesis. First, we present a detailed construction of ∂4, a differentiable interpreter for the programming language FORTH. We demonstrate the ability of ∂4 to strongly bias neural models with incomplete programs of variable complexity while learning missing pieces of the program with parametrised neural networks. Such models can learn to solve tasks and strongly generalise to out-of-distribution data from small datasets. Second, we present greedy Neural Theorem Provers (gNTPs), a significant improvement of a differentiable Datalog interpreter NTP. gNTPs ameliorate the large computational cost of recursive differentiable interpretation, achieving drastic time and memory speedups while introducing soft reasoning over logic knowledge and natural language

Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition

A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles (rather than an encyclopedic list of heuristics). If that hypothesis was correct, we could more easily both understand our own intelligence and build intelligent machines. Just like in physics, the principles themselves would not be sufficient to predict the behavior of complex systems like brains, and substantial computation might be needed to simulate human-like intelligence. This hypothesis would suggest that studying the kind of inductive biases that humans and animals exploit could help both clarify these principles and provide inspiration for AI research and neuroscience theories. Deep learning already exploits several key inductive biases, and this work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing. The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities in terms of flexible out-of-distribution and systematic generalization, which is currently an area where a large gap exists between state-of-the-art machine learning and human intelligence.Comment: This document contains a review of authors research as part of the requirement of AG's predoctoral exam, an overview of the main contributions of the authors few recent papers (co-authored with several other co-authors) as well as a vision of proposed future researc

Quality-Aware Learning to Prioritize Test Cases

Software applications evolve at a rapid rate because of continuous functionality extensions, changes in requirements, optimization of code, and fixes of faults. Moreover, modern software is often composed of components engineered with different programming languages by different internal or external teams. During this evolution, it is crucial to continuously detect unintentionally injected faults and continuously release new features. Software testing aims at reducing this risk by running a certain suite of test cases regularly or at each change of the source code. However, the large number of test cases makes it infeasible to run all test cases. Automated test case prioritization and selection techniques have been studied in order to reduce the cost and improve the efficiency of testing tasks. However, the current state-of-art techniques remain limited in some aspects. First, the existing test prioritization and selection techniques often assume that faults are equally distributed across the software components, which can lead to spending most of the testing budget on components less likely to fail rather than the ones highly to contain faults. Second, the existing techniques share a scalability problem not only in terms of the size of the selected test suite but also in terms of the round-trip time between code commits and engineer feedback on test cases failures in the context of Continuous Integration (CI) development environments. Finally, it is hard to algorithmically capture the domain knowledge of the human testers which is crucial in testing and release cycles. This thesis is a new take on the old problem of reducing the cost of software testing in these regards by presenting a data-driven lightweight approach for test case prioritization and execution scheduling that is being used (i) during CI cycles for quick and resource-optimal feedback to engineers, and (ii) during release planning by capturing the testers domain knowledge and release requirements. Our approach combines software quality metrics with code churn metrics to build a regressive model that predicts the fault density of each component and a classification model to discriminate faulty from non-faulty components. Both models are used to guide the testing effort to the components likely to contain the largest number of faults. The predictive models have been validated on eight industrial automotive software applications at Daimler, showing a classification accuracy of 89% and an accuracy of 85.7% for the regression model. The thesis develops a test cases prioritization model based on features of the code change, the tests execution history and the component development history. The model reduces the cost of CI by predicting whether a particular code change should trigger the individual test suites and their corresponding test cases. In order to algorithmically capture the domain knowledge and the preferences of the tester, our approach developed a test case execution scheduling model that consumes the testers preferences in the form of a probabilistic graph and solves the optimal test budget allocation problem both online in the context of CI cycles and offline when planning a release. Finally, the thesis presents a theoretical cost model that describes when our prioritization and scheduling approach is worthwhile. The overall approach is validated on two industrial analytical applications in the area of energy management and predictive maintenance, showing that over 95% of the test failures are still reported back to the engineers while only 43% of the total available test cases are being executed

Quality-Aware Learning to Prioritize Test Cases

Software applications evolve at a rapid rate because of continuous functionality extensions, changes in requirements, optimization of code, and fixes of faults. Moreover, modern software is often composed of components engineered with different programming languages by different internal or external teams. During this evolution, it is crucial to continuously detect unintentionally injected faults and continuously release new features. Software testing aims at reducing this risk by running a certain suite of test cases regularly or at each change of the source code. However, the large number of test cases makes it infeasible to run all test cases. Automated test case prioritization and selection techniques have been studied in order to reduce the cost and improve the efficiency of testing tasks. However, the current state-of-art techniques remain limited in some aspects. First, the existing test prioritization and selection techniques often assume that faults are equally distributed across the software components, which can lead to spending most of the testing budget on components less likely to fail rather than the ones highly to contain faults. Second, the existing techniques share a scalability problem not only in terms of the size of the selected test suite but also in terms of the round-trip time between code commits and engineer feedback on test cases failures in the context of Continuous Integration (CI) development environments. Finally, it is hard to algorithmically capture the domain knowledge of the human testers which is crucial in testing and release cycles. This thesis is a new take on the old problem of reducing the cost of software testing in these regards by presenting a data-driven lightweight approach for test case prioritization and execution scheduling that is being used (i) during CI cycles for quick and resource-optimal feedback to engineers, and (ii) during release planning by capturing the testers domain knowledge and release requirements. Our approach combines software quality metrics with code churn metrics to build a regressive model that predicts the fault density of each component and a classification model to discriminate faulty from non-faulty components. Both models are used to guide the testing effort to the components likely to contain the largest number of faults. The predictive models have been validated on eight industrial automotive software applications at Daimler, showing a classification accuracy of 89% and an accuracy of 85.7% for the regression model. The thesis develops a test cases prioritization model based on features of the code change, the tests execution history and the component development history. The model reduces the cost of CI by predicting whether a particular code change should trigger the individual test suites and their corresponding test cases. In order to algorithmically capture the domain knowledge and the preferences of the tester, our approach developed a test case execution scheduling model that consumes the testers preferences in the form of a probabilistic graph and solves the optimal test budget allocation problem both online in the context of CI cycles and offline when planning a release. Finally, the thesis presents a theoretical cost model that describes when our prioritization and scheduling approach is worthwhile. The overall approach is validated on two industrial analytical applications in the area of energy management and predictive maintenance, showing that over 95% of the test failures are still reported back to the engineers while only 43% of the total available test cases are being executed

Principles of Human Learning

What are the general principles that drive human learning in different situations? I argue that much of human learning can be understood with just three principles. These are generalization, adaptation, and simplicity. To verify this conjecture, I introduce a modeling framework based on the same principles. This framework combines the idea of meta-learning -- also known as learning-to-learn -- with the minimum description length principle. The models that result from this framework capture many aspects of human learning across different domains, including decision-making, associative learning, function learning, multi-task learning, and reinforcement learning. In the context of decision-making, they explain why different heuristic decision-making strategies emerge and how appropriate strategies are selected. The same models furthermore capture order effects found in associative learning, function learning and multi-task learning. In the reinforcement learning context, they resemble individual differences between human exploration strategies and explain empirical data better than any other strategy under consideration. The proposed modeling framework -- together with its accompanying empirical evidence -- may therefore be viewed as a first step towards the identification of a minimal set of principles from which all human behavior derives