148 research outputs found
Induced and non-induced forbidden subposet problems
The problem of determining the maximum size that a -free
subposet of the Boolean lattice can have, attracted the attention of many
researchers, but little is known about the induced version of these problems.
In this paper we determine the asymptotic behavior of , the maximum
size that an induced -free subposet of the Boolean lattice can have
for the case when is the complete two-level poset or the complete
multi-level poset when all 's either equal 4 or
are large enough and satisfy an extra condition. We also show lower and upper
bounds for the non-induced problem in the case when is the complete
three-level poset . These bounds determine the asymptotics of
for some values of independently of the values of and
An improvement of the general bound on the largest family of subsets avoiding a subposet
Let be the maximum size of a family of subsets of not containing as a (weak) subposet, and let be the length of
a longest chain in . The best known upper bound for in terms of
and is due to Chen and Li, who showed that for any fixed .
In this paper we show that for any fixed , improving the best known upper bound. By choosing appropriately, we
obtain that as a corollary, which we show is best
possible for general . We also give a different proof of this corollary by
using bounds for generalized diamonds. We also show that the Lubell function of
a family of subsets of not containing as an induced subposet is
for every .Comment: Corrected mistakes, improved the writing. Also added a result about
the Lubell function with forbidden induced subposets. The final publication
will be available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11083-016-9390-
Sperner type theorems with excluded subposets
Let F be a family of subsets of an n-element set. Sperner's theorem says that if there is no inclusion among the members of F then the largest family under this condition is the one containing all ⌊ frac(n, 2) ⌋-element subsets. The present paper surveys certain generalizations of this theorem. The maximum size of F is to be found under the condition that a certain configuration is excluded. The configuration here is always described by inclusions. More formally, let P be a poset. The maximum size of a family F which does not contain P as a (not-necessarily induced) subposet is denoted by La (n, P). The paper is based on a lecture of the author at the Jubilee Conference on Discrete Mathematics [Banasthali University, January 11-13, 2009], but it was somewhat updated in December 2010. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
- …