Rigorous Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art TSP Heuristic Solvers

Understanding why some problems are better solved by one algorithm rather than another is still an open problem, and the symmetric Travelling Salesperson Problem (TSP) is no exception. We apply three state-of-the-art heuristic solvers to a large set of TSP instances of varying structure and size, identifying which heuristics solve specific instances to optimality faster than others. The first two solvers considered are variants of the multi-trial Helsgaun's Lin-Kernighan Heuristic (a form of iterated local search), with each utilising a different form of Partition Crossover; the third solver is a genetic algorithm (GA) using Edge Assembly Crossover. Our results show that the GA with Edge Assembly Crossover is the best solver, shown to significantly outperform the other algorithms in 73% of the instances analysed. A comprehensive set of features for all instances is also extracted, and decision trees are used to identify main features which could best inform algorithm selection. The most prominent features identified a high proportion of instances where the GA with Edge Assembly Crossover performed significantly better when solving to optimality

A New Generalized Partition Crossover for the Traveling Salesman Problem: Tunneling Between Local Optima

Generalized Partition Crossover (GPX) is a deterministic recombination operator developed for the Traveling Salesman Problem. Partition crossover operators return the best of 2 k reachable offspring, where k is the number of recombining components. This paper introduces a new GPX2 operator, which finds more recombining components than GPX or Iterative Partial Transcription (IPT). We also show that GPX2 has O(n) runtime complexity, while also introducing new enhancements to reduce the execution time of GPX2. Finally, we experimentally demonstrate the efficiency of GPX2 when it is used to improve solutions found by multi-trial Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaum (LKH) algorithm. Significant improvements in performance are documented on large (n > 5000) and very large (n = 100, 000) instances of the Traveling Salesman Problem

Tunnelling Crossover Networks for the Asymmetric TSP

Local optima networks are a compact representation of fitness landscapes that can be used for analysis and visualisation. This paper provides the first analysis of the Asymmetric Travelling Salesman Problem using local optima networks. These are generated by sampling the search space by recording the progress of an existing evolutionary algorithm based on the Generalised Asymmetric Partition Crossover. They are compared to networks sampled through the Chained Lin-Kernighan heuristic across 25 instances. Structural differences and similarities are identified, as well as examples where crossover smooths the landscape

Reinforced Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Algorithms for the Traveling Salesman Problems

TSP is a classical NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem with many practical variants. LKH is one of the state-of-the-art local search algorithms for the TSP. LKH-3 is a powerful extension of LKH that can solve many TSP variants. Both LKH and LKH-3 associate a candidate set to each city to improve the efficiency, and have two different methods, $\alpha$-measure and POPMUSIC, to decide the candidate sets. In this work, we first propose a Variable Strategy Reinforced LKH (VSR-LKH) algorithm, which incorporates three reinforcement learning methods (Q-learning, Sarsa, Monte Carlo) with LKH, for the TSP. We further propose a new algorithm called VSR-LKH-3 that combines the variable strategy reinforcement learning method with LKH-3 for typical TSP variants, including the TSP with time windows (TSPTW) and Colored TSP (CTSP). The proposed algorithms replace the inflexible traversal operations in LKH and LKH-3 and let the algorithms learn to make a choice at each search step by reinforcement learning. Both LKH and LKH-3, with either $\alpha$-measure or POPMUSIC, can be significantly improved by our methods. Extensive experiments on 236 widely-used TSP benchmarks with up to 85,900 cities demonstrate the excellent performance of VSR-LKH. VSR-LKH-3 also significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art heuristics for TSPTW and CTSP.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2107.0687

Generalized partition crossover for the traveling salesman problem

2011 Spring.Includes bibliographical references.The Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) is a well-studied combinatorial optimization problem with a wide spectrum of applications and theoretical value. We have designed a new recombination operator known as Generalized Partition Crossover (GPX) for the TSP. GPX is unique among other recombination operators for the TSP in that recombining two local optima produces new local optima with a high probability. Thus the operator can 'tunnel' between local optima without the need for intermediary solutions. The operator is respectful, meaning that any edges common between the two parent solutions are present in the offspring, and transmits alleles, meaning that offspring are comprised only of edges found in the parent solutions. We design a hybrid genetic algorithm, which uses local search in addition to recombination and selection, specifically for GPX. We show that this algorithm outperforms Chained Lin-Kernighan, a state-of-the-art approximation algorithm for the TSP. We next analyze these algorithms to determine why the algorithms are not capable of consistently finding a globally optimal solution. Our results reveal a search space structure which we call 'funnels' because they are analogous to the funnels found in continuous optimization. Funnels are clusters of tours in the search space that are separated from one another by a non-trivial distance. We find that funnels can trap Chained Lin-Kernighan, preventing the search from finding an optimal solution. Our data indicate that, under certain conditions, GPX can tunnel between funnels, explaining the higher frequency of optimal solutions produced by our hybrid genetic algorithm using GPX

How Good Is Neural Combinatorial Optimization?

Traditional solvers for tackling combinatorial optimization (CO) problems are usually designed by human experts. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in utilizing Deep Learning, especially Deep Reinforcement Learning, to automatically learn effective solvers for CO. The resultant new paradigm is termed Neural Combinatorial Optimization (NCO). However, the advantages and disadvantages of NCO over other approaches have not been well studied empirically or theoretically. In this work, we present a comprehensive comparative study of NCO solvers and alternative solvers. Specifically, taking the Traveling Salesman Problem as the testbed problem, we assess the performance of the solvers in terms of five aspects, i.e., effectiveness, efficiency, stability, scalability and generalization ability. Our results show that in general the solvers learned by NCO approaches still fall short of traditional solvers in nearly all these aspects. A potential benefit of the former would be their superior time and energy efficiency on small-size problem instances when sufficient training instances are available. We hope this work would help better understand the strengths and weakness of NCO, and provide a comprehensive evaluation protocol for further benchmarking NCO approaches against other approaches