71,198 research outputs found
Detecting and Monitoring Hate Speech in Twitter
Social Media are sensors in the real world that can be used to measure the pulse of societies.
However, the massive and unfiltered feed of messages posted in social media is a phenomenon that
nowadays raises social alarms, especially when these messages contain hate speech targeted to a
specific individual or group. In this context, governments and non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) are concerned about the possible negative impact that these messages can have on individuals
or on the society. In this paper, we present HaterNet, an intelligent system currently being used by
the Spanish National Office Against Hate Crimes of the Spanish State Secretariat for Security that
identifies and monitors the evolution of hate speech in Twitter. The contributions of this research
are many-fold: (1) It introduces the first intelligent system that monitors and visualizes, using social
network analysis techniques, hate speech in Social Media. (2) It introduces a novel public dataset on
hate speech in Spanish consisting of 6000 expert-labeled tweets. (3) It compares several classification
approaches based on different document representation strategies and text classification models. (4)
The best approach consists of a combination of a LTSM+MLP neural network that takes as input the
tweet’s word, emoji, and expression tokens’ embeddings enriched by the tf-idf, and obtains an area
under the curve (AUC) of 0.828 on our dataset, outperforming previous methods presented in the
literatureThe work by Quijano-Sanchez was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
grant FJCI-2016-28855. The research of Liberatore was supported by the Government of Spain, grant MTM2015-65803-R, and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 691161 (GEOSAFE). All the financial support is gratefully acknowledge
Analyzing the Targets of Hate in Online Social Media
Social media systems allow Internet users a congenial platform to freely
express their thoughts and opinions. Although this property represents
incredible and unique communication opportunities, it also brings along
important challenges. Online hate speech is an archetypal example of such
challenges. Despite its magnitude and scale, there is a significant gap in
understanding the nature of hate speech on social media. In this paper, we
provide the first of a kind systematic large scale measurement study of the
main targets of hate speech in online social media. To do that, we gather
traces from two social media systems: Whisper and Twitter. We then develop and
validate a methodology to identify hate speech on both these systems. Our
results identify online hate speech forms and offer a broader understanding of
the phenomenon, providing directions for prevention and detection approaches.Comment: Short paper, 4 pages, 4 table
Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational
linguistics, is to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation.
In this article, we go beyond the state of the art in several ways. (i) We deal
with actual Web data and take up the challenges given by the variety of
registers, multiple domains, and unrestricted noisy user-generated Web
discourse. (ii) We bridge the gap between normative argumentation theories and
argumentation phenomena encountered in actual data by adapting an argumentation
model tested in an extensive annotation study. (iii) We create a new gold
standard corpus (90k tokens in 340 documents) and experiment with several
machine learning methods to identify argument components. We offer the data,
source codes, and annotation guidelines to the community under free licenses.
Our findings show that argumentation mining in user-generated Web discourse is
a feasible but challenging task.Comment: Cite as: Habernal, I. & Gurevych, I. (2017). Argumentation Mining in
User-Generated Web Discourse. Computational Linguistics 43(1), pp. 125-17
- …