Identifying and exploiting homogeneous communities in labeled networks

AbstractAttribute-aware community discovery aims to find well-connected communities that are also homogeneous w.r.t. the labels carried by the nodes. In this work, we address such a challenging task presenting Eva, an algorithmic approach designed to maximize a quality function tailoring both structural and homophilic clustering criteria. We evaluate Eva on several real-world labeled networks carrying both nominal and ordinal information, and we compare our approach to other classic and attribute-aware algorithms. Our results suggest that Eva is the only method, among the compared ones, able to discover homogeneous clusters without considerably degrading partition modularity.We also investigate two well-defined applicative scenarios to characterize better Eva: i) the clustering of a mental lexicon, i.e., a linguistic network modeling human semantic memory, and (ii) the node label prediction task, namely the problem of inferring the missing label of a node

Incremental Non-Greedy Clustering at Scale

Clustering is the task of organizing data into meaningful groups. Modern clustering applications such as entity resolution put several demands on clustering algorithms: (1) scalability to massive numbers of points as well as clusters, (2) incremental additions of data, (3) support for any user-specified similarity functions. Hierarchical clusterings are often desired as they represent multiple alternative flat clusterings (e.g., at different granularity levels). These tree-structured clusterings provide for both fine-grained clusters as well as uncertainty in the presence of newly arriving data. Previous work on hierarchical clustering does not fully address all three of the aforementioned desiderata. Work on incremental hierarchical clustering often makes greedy, irrevocable clustering decisions that are regretted in the presence of future data. Work on scalable hierarchical clustering does not support incremental additions or deletions. These methods often make requirements on the similarity functions used and/or empirically tend to over merge clusters, which can lead to inaccurate clusterings. In this thesis, we present incremental and scalable methods for hierarchical clustering to empirically satisfy the above desiderata. Our work aims to represent uncertainty and meaningful alternative clusterings, to efficiently reconsider past decisions in the incremental case, and to use parallelism to scale to massive datasets. Our method, Grinch, handles incrementally arriving data in a non-greedy fashion, by reconsidering past decisions using tree structure re-arrangements (e.g., rotations and grafts) invoked in accordance with the user’s specified similarity function. To achieve scalability to massive datasets, our method, SCC, builds a hierarchical clusterings in a level-wise bottom-up manner. Certain clustering decisions are made independently in parallel within each level, and a global similarity threshold schedule prevents greedy over-merging. We show how SCC can be combined with the tree-structure re-arrangements in Grinch to form a mini-batch algorithm achieving both scalable and incremental performance. Lastly, we generalize our hierarchical clustering approaches to DAG-structured ones, which can better represent uncertainty in clustering by representing overlapping clusters. We introduce an efficient bottom-up method for DAG-structured clustering, Llama. For each of the proposed methods, we provide both a theoretical and empirical analysis. Empirically, our methods achieve state-of-the-art results on clustering benchmarks in both the batch and the incremental settings, including multiple point improvements in dendrogram purity and scalability to billions of points