45 research outputs found
On almost hypohamiltonian graphs
A graph is almost hypohamiltonian (a.h.) if is non-hamiltonian, there
exists a vertex in such that is non-hamiltonian, and is
hamiltonian for every vertex in . The second author asked in [J.
Graph Theory 79 (2015) 63--81] for all orders for which a.h. graphs exist. Here
we solve this problem. To this end, we present a specialised algorithm which
generates complete sets of a.h. graphs for various orders. Furthermore, we show
that the smallest cubic a.h. graphs have order 26. We provide a lower bound for
the order of the smallest planar a.h. graph and improve the upper bound for the
order of the smallest planar a.h. graph containing a cubic vertex. We also
determine the smallest planar a.h. graphs of girth 5, both in the general and
cubic case. Finally, we extend a result of Steffen on snarks and improve two
bounds on longest paths and longest cycles in polyhedral graphs due to
Jooyandeh, McKay, {\"O}sterg{\aa}rd, Pettersson, and the second author.Comment: 18 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1602.0717
Hypohamiltonian and hypotraceable graphs
AbstractIn this note hypohamiltonian and hypotraceable graphs are constructed
On almost hypohamiltonian graphs
A graph G is almost hypohamiltonian (a.h.) if G is non-hamiltonian, there exists a vertex w in G such that G - w is non-hamiltonian, and G - v is hamiltonian for every vertex v \ne w in G. The second author asked in [J. Graph Theory 79 (2015) 63–81] for all orders for which a.h. graphs exist. Here we solve this problem. To this end, we present a specialised algorithm which generates complete sets of a.h. graphs for various orders. Furthermore, we show that the smallest cubic a.h. graphs have order 26. We provide a lower bound for the order of the smallest planar a.h. graph and improve the upper bound for the order of the smallest planar a.h. graph containing a cubic vertex. We also determine the smallest planar a.h. graphs of girth 5, both in the general and cubic case. Finally, we extend a result of Steffen on snarks and improve two bounds on longest paths and longest cycles in polyhedral graphs due to Jooyandeh, McKay, Östergård, Pettersson, and the second author
On non-traceable, non-hypotraceable, arachnoid graphs
Motivated by questions concerning optical networks, in 2003 Gargano, Hammar, Hell, Stacho, and Vaccaro defined the notions of spanning spiders and arachnoid graphs. A spider is a tree with at most one branch (vertex of degree at least 3). The spider is centred at the branch vertex (if there is any,otherwise it is centred at any of the vertices). A graph is arachnoid if it has
a spanning spider centred at any of its vertices. Traceable graphs are obviously arachnoid, and Gargano et al. observed that hypotraceable graphs (non-traceable graphs with the property that all vertex-deleted subgraphs are
traceable) are also easily seen to be arachnoid. However, they did not find any other arachnoid graphs, and asked the question whether they exist. The main goal of this paper is to answer this question in the affirmative, moreover, we show that for any prescribed graph H, there exists a non-traceable, non-hypotraceable, arachnoid graph that contains H as an induced subgraph
Every graph occurs as an induced subgraph of some hypohamiltonian graph
We prove the titular statement. This settles a problem of Chvátal from 1973 and encompasses earlier results of Thomassen, who showed it for K_3, and Collier and Schmeichel, who proved it for bipartite graphs. We also show that for every outerplanar graph there exists a planar hypohamiltonian graph containing it as an induced subgraph