Optimal Control for Aperiodic Dual-Rate Systems With Time-Varying Delays

[EN] In this work, we consider a dual-rate scenario with slow input and fast output. Our objective is the maximization of the decay rate of the system through the suitable choice of the n-input signals between two measures (periodic sampling) and their times of application. The optimization algorithm is extended for time-varying delays in order to make possible its implementation in networked control systems. We provide experimental results in an air levitation system to verify the validity of the algorithm in a real plant.This work was supported in part by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under the Projects DPI2012-31303 and DPI2014-55932-C2-2-R.Aranda-Escolástico, E.; Salt Llobregat, JJ.; Guinaldo, M.; Chacon, J.; Dormido, S. (2018). Optimal Control for Aperiodic Dual-Rate Systems With Time-Varying Delays. Sensors. 18(5):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051491S119185Mansano, R., Godoy, E., & Porto, A. (2014). The Benefits of Soft Sensor and Multi-Rate Control for the Implementation of Wireless Networked Control Systems. Sensors, 14(12), 24441-24461. doi:10.3390/s141224441Shao, Q. M., & Cinar, A. (2015). System identification and distributed control for multi-rate sampled systems. Journal of Process Control, 34, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.06.010Albertos, P., & Salt, J. (2011). Non-uniform sampled-data control of MIMO systems. Annual Reviews in Control, 35(1), 65-76. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2011.03.004Cuenca, A., & Salt, J. (2012). RST controller design for a non-uniform multi-rate control system. Journal of Process Control, 22(10), 1865-1877. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.09.010Cuenca, Á., Ojha, U., Salt, J., & Chow, M.-Y. (2015). A non-uniform multi-rate control strategy for a Markov chain-driven Networked Control System. Information Sciences, 321, 31-47. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2015.05.035Kalman, R. E., & Bertram, J. E. (1959). General synthesis procedure for computer control of single-loop and multiloop linear systems (an optimal sampling system). Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Part II: Applications and Industry, 77(6), 602-609. doi:10.1109/tai.1959.6371508Khargonekar, P., Poolla, K., & Tannenbaum, A. (1985). Robust control of linear time-invariant plants using periodic compensation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 30(11), 1088-1096. doi:10.1109/tac.1985.1103841Bamieh, B., Pearson, J. B., Francis, B. A., & Tannenbaum, A. (1991). A lifting technique for linear periodic systems with applications to sampled-data control. Systems & Control Letters, 17(2), 79-88. doi:10.1016/0167-6911(91)90033-bLi, D., Shah, S. L., Chen, T., & Qi, K. Z. (2001). Application of dual-rate modeling to CCR octane quality inferential control. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 34(25), 353-357. doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)33849-1Salt, J., & Albertos, P. (2005). Model-based multirate controllers design. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 13(6), 988-997. doi:10.1109/tcst.2005.857410Nemani, M., Tsao, T.-C., & Hutchinson, S. (1994). Multi-Rate Analysis and Design of Visual Feedback Digital Servo-Control System. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 116(1), 45-55. doi:10.1115/1.2900680Sim, T. P., Lim, K. B., & Hong, G. S. (2002). Multirate predictor control scheme for visual servo control. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications, 149(2), 117-124. doi:10.1049/ip-cta:20020238Xinghui Huang, Nagamune, R., & Horowitz, R. (2006). A comparison of multirate robust track-following control synthesis techniques for dual-stage and multisensing servo systems in hard disk drives. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 42(7), 1896-1904. doi:10.1109/tmag.2006.875353Wu, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2013). A Discrete-Time Chattering Free Sliding Mode Control with Multirate Sampling Method for Flight Simulator. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1-8. doi:10.1155/2013/865493Salt, J., & Tomizuka, M. (2014). Hard disk drive control by model based dual-rate controller. Computation saving by interlacing. Mechatronics, 24(6), 691-700. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.12.003Salt, J., Casanova, V., Cuenca, A., & Pizá, R. (2013). Multirate control with incomplete information over Profibus-DP network. International Journal of Systems Science, 45(7), 1589-1605. doi:10.1080/00207721.2013.844286Liu, F., Gao, H., Qiu, J., Yin, S., Fan, J., & Chai, T. (2014). Networked Multirate Output Feedback Control for Setpoints Compensation and Its Application to Rougher Flotation Process. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(1), 460-468. doi:10.1109/tie.2013.2240640Khargonekar, P. P., & Sivashankar, N. (1991). 2 optimal control for sampled-data systems. Systems & Control Letters, 17(6), 425-436. doi:10.1016/0167-6911(91)90082-pTornero, J., Albertos, P., & Salt, J. (2001). Periodic Optimal Control of Multirate Sampled Data Systems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 34(12), 195-200. doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)34084-3Kim, C. H., Park, H. J., Lee, J., Lee, H. W., & Lee, K. D. (2015). Multi-rate optimal controller design for electromagnetic suspension systems via linear matrix inequality optimization. Journal of Applied Physics, 117(17), 17B506. doi:10.1063/1.4906588LEE, J. H., GELORMINO, M. S., & MORARIH, M. (1992). Model predictive control of multi-rate sampled-data systems: a state-space approach. International Journal of Control, 55(1), 153-191. doi:10.1080/00207179208934231Mizumoto, I., Ikejiri, M., & Takagi, T. (2015). Stable Adaptive Predictive Control System Design via Adaptive Output Predictor for Multi-rate Sampled Systems∗∗This work was partially supported by KAKENHI, the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 25420444, from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(8), 1039-1044. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.105Carpiuc, S., & Lazar, C. (2016). Real-Time Multi-Rate Predictive Cascade Speed Control of Synchronous Machines in Automotive Electrical Traction Drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 1-1. doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2561881Roshany-Yamchi, S., Cychowski, M., Negenborn, R. R., De Schutter, B., Delaney, K., & Connell, J. (2013). Kalman Filter-Based Distributed Predictive Control of Large-Scale Multi-Rate Systems: Application to Power Networks. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 21(1), 27-39. doi:10.1109/tcst.2011.2172444Donkers, M. C. F., Tabuada, P., & Heemels, W. P. M. H. (2012). Minimum attention control for linear systems. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 24(2), 199-218. doi:10.1007/s10626-012-0155-xQuevedo, D. E., Ma, W.-J., & Gupta, V. (2015). Anytime Control Using Input Sequences With Markovian Processor Availability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 60(2), 515-521. doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2335311Aranda Escolastico, E., Guinaldo, M., Cuenca, A., Salt, J., & Dormido, S. (2017). Anytime Optimal Control Strategy for Multi-Rate Systems. IEEE Access, 5, 2790-2797. doi:10.1109/access.2017.2671906Guinaldo, M., Sánchez, J., & Dormido, S. (2017). Control en red basado en eventos: de lo centralizado a lo distribuido. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática Industrial RIAI, 14(1), 16-30. doi:10.1016/j.riai.2016.09.007Van Loan, C. (1977). The Sensitivity of the Matrix Exponential. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 14(6), 971-981. doi:10.1137/0714065Hazan, E. (2016). Introduction to Online Convex Optimization. Foundations and Trends® in Optimization, 2(3-4), 157-325. doi:10.1561/2400000013Sala, A., Cuenca, Á., & Salt, J. (2009). A retunable PID multi-rate controller for a networked control system. Information Sciences, 179(14), 2390-2402. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.02.017Chacon, J., Saenz, J., Torre, L., Diaz, J., & Esquembre, F. (2017). Design of a Low-Cost Air Levitation System for Teaching Control Engineering. Sensors, 17(10), 2321. doi:10.3390/s1710232

Time-and event-driven communication process for networked control systems: A survey

Copyright © 2014 Lei Zou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.In recent years, theoretical and practical research topics on networked control systems (NCSs) have gained an increasing interest from many researchers in a variety of disciplines owing to the extensive applications of NCSs in practice. In particular, an urgent need has arisen to understand the effects of communication processes on system performances. Sampling and protocol are two fundamental aspects of a communication process which have attracted a great deal of research attention. Most research focus has been on the analysis and control of dynamical behaviors under certain sampling procedures and communication protocols. In this paper, we aim to survey some recent advances on the analysis and synthesis issues of NCSs with different sampling procedures (time-and event-driven sampling) and protocols (static and dynamic protocols). First, these sampling procedures and protocols are introduced in detail according to their engineering backgrounds as well as dynamic natures. Then, the developments of the stabilization, control, and filtering problems are systematically reviewed and discussed in great detail. Finally, we conclude the paper by outlining future research challenges for analysis and synthesis problems of NCSs with different communication processes.This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61329301, 61374127, and 61374010, the Royal Society of the UK, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany

Performance analysis with network-enhanced complexities: On fading measurements, event-triggered mechanisms, and cyber attacks

Copyright © 2014 Derui Ding et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Nowadays, the real-world systems are usually subject to various complexities such as parameter uncertainties, time-delays, and nonlinear disturbances. For networked systems, especially large-scale systems such as multiagent systems and systems over sensor networks, the complexities are inevitably enhanced in terms of their degrees or intensities because of the usage of the communication networks. Therefore, it would be interesting to (1) examine how this kind of network-enhanced complexities affects the control or filtering performance; and (2) develop some suitable approaches for controller/filter design problems. In this paper, we aim to survey some recent advances on the performance analysis and synthesis with three sorts of fashionable network-enhanced complexities, namely, fading measurements, event-triggered mechanisms, and attack behaviors of adversaries. First, these three kinds of complexities are introduced in detail according to their engineering backgrounds, dynamical characteristic, and modelling techniques. Then, the developments of the performance analysis and synthesis issues for various networked systems are systematically reviewed. Furthermore, some challenges are illustrated by using a thorough literature review and some possible future research directions are highlighted.This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61134009, 61329301, 61203139, 61374127, and 61374010, the Royal Society of the UK, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany

Cross-Layer Adaptive Feedback Scheduling of Wireless Control Systems

There is a trend towards using wireless technologies in networked control systems. However, the adverse properties of the radio channels make it difficult to design and implement control systems in wireless environments. To attack the uncertainty in available communication resources in wireless control systems closed over WLAN, a cross-layer adaptive feedback scheduling (CLAFS) scheme is developed, which takes advantage of the co-design of control and wireless communications. By exploiting cross-layer design, CLAFS adjusts the sampling periods of control systems at the application layer based on information about deadline miss ratio and transmission rate from the physical layer. Within the framework of feedback scheduling, the control performance is maximized through controlling the deadline miss ratio. Key design parameters of the feedback scheduler are adapted to dynamic changes in the channel condition. An event-driven invocation mechanism for the feedback scheduler is also developed. Simulation results show that the proposed approach is efficient in dealing with channel capacity variations and noise interference, thus providing an enabling technology for control over WLAN.Comment: 17 pages, 12 figures; Open Access at http://www.mdpi.org/sensors/papers/s8074265.pd

Networked PID control design : a pseudo-probabilistic robust approach

Networked Control Systems (NCS) are feedback/feed-forward control systems where control components (sensors, actuators and controllers) are distributed across a common communication network. In NCS, there exist network-induced random delays in each channel. This paper proposes a method to compensate the effects of these delays for the design and tuning of PID controllers. The control design is formulated as a constrained optimization problem and the controller stability and robustness criteria are incorporated as design constraints. The design is based on a polytopic description of the system using a Poisson pdf distribution of the delay. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method