20 research outputs found
The pebbling threshold of the square of cliques
AbstractGiven an initial configuration of pebbles on a graph, one can move pebbles in pairs along edges, at the cost of one of the pebbles moved, with the objective of reaching a specified target vertex. The pebbling number of a graph is the minimum number of pebbles so that every configuration of that many pebbles can reach any chosen target. The pebbling threshold of a sequence of graphs is roughly the number of pebbles so that almost every (resp. almost no) configuration of asymptotically more (resp. fewer) pebbles can reach any chosen target. In this paper we find the pebbling threshold of the sequence of squares of cliques, improving upon an earlier result of Boyle and verifying an important instance of a probabilistic version of Graham's product conjecture
Thresholds for Pebbling on Grids
Given a connected graph and a configuration of pebbles on the
vertices of G, a -pebbling step consists of removing pebbles from a
vertex, and adding a single pebble to one of its neighbors. Given a vector
, -pebbling consists of allowing
-pebbling in coordinate . A distribution of pebbles is called solvable
if it is possible to transfer at least one pebble to any specified vertex of
via a finite sequence of pebbling steps.
In this paper, we determine the weak threshold for -pebbling on the
sequence of grids for fixed and , as . Further,
we determine the strong threshold for -pebbling on the sequence of paths of
increasing length. A fundamental tool in these proofs is a new notion of
centrality, and a sufficient condition for solvability based on the well used
pebbling weight functions; we believe this weight lemma to be the first result
of its kind, and may be of independent interest.
These theorems improve recent results of Czygrinow and Hurlbert, and Godbole,
Jablonski, Salzman, and Wierman. They are the generalizations to the random
setting of much earlier results of Chung.
In addition, we give a short counterexample showing that the threshold
version of a well known conjecture of Graham does not hold. This uses a result
for hypercubes due to Czygrinow and Wagner.Comment: 16 pages; comments are welcom
A linear optimization technique for graph pebbling
Graph pebbling is a network model for studying whether or not a given supply
of discrete pebbles can satisfy a given demand via pebbling moves. A pebbling
move across an edge of a graph takes two pebbles from one endpoint and places
one pebble at the other endpoint; the other pebble is lost in transit as a
toll. It has been shown that deciding whether a supply can meet a demand on a
graph is NP-complete. The pebbling number of a graph is the smallest t such
that every supply of t pebbles can satisfy every demand of one pebble. Deciding
if the pebbling number is at most k is \Pi_2^P-complete. In this paper we
develop a tool, called the Weight Function Lemma, for computing upper bounds
and sometimes exact values for pebbling numbers with the assistance of linear
optimization. With this tool we are able to calculate the pebbling numbers of
much larger graphs than in previous algorithms, and much more quickly as well.
We also obtain results for many families of graphs, in many cases by hand, with
much simpler and remarkably shorter proofs than given in previously existing
arguments (certificates typically of size at most the number of vertices times
the maximum degree), especially for highly symmetric graphs. Here we apply the
Weight Function Lemma to several specific graphs, including the Petersen,
Lemke, 4th weak Bruhat, Lemke squared, and two random graphs, as well as to a
number of infinite families of graphs, such as trees, cycles, graph powers of
cycles, cubes, and some generalized Petersen and Coxeter graphs. This partly
answers a question of Pachter, et al., by computing the pebbling exponent of
cycles to within an asymptotically small range. It is conceivable that this
method yields an approximation algorithm for graph pebbling
PEBBLING IN SPLIT GRAPHS
abstract: Graph pebbling is a network optimization model for transporting discrete resources that are consumed in transit: the movement of 2 pebbles across an edge consumes one of the pebbles. The pebbling number of a graph is the fewest number of pebbles t so that, from any initial configuration of t pebbles on its vertices, one can place a pebble on any given target vertex via such pebbling steps. It is known that deciding whether a given configuration on a particular graph can reach a specified target is NP-complete, even for diameter 2 graphs, and that deciding whether the pebbling number has a prescribed upper bound is Π[P over 2]-complete. On the other hand, for many families of graphs there are formulas or polynomial algorithms for computing pebbling numbers; for example, complete graphs, products of paths (including cubes), trees, cycles, diameter 2 graphs, and more. Moreover, graphs having minimum pebbling number are called Class 0, and many authors have studied which graphs are Class 0 and what graph properties guarantee it, with no characterization in sight. In this paper we investigate an important family of diameter 3 chordal graphs called split graphs; graphs whose vertex set can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. We provide a formula for the pebbling number of a split graph, along with an algorithm for calculating it that runs in O(n[superscript β]) time, where β = 2ω/(ω + 1) [= over ∼] 1.41 and ω [= over ∼] 2.376 is the exponent of matrix multiplication. Furthermore we determine that all split graphs with minimum degree at least 3 are Class 0
A linear optimization technique for graph pebbling
Graph pebbling is a network model for studying whether or not a given supply of discrete pebbles can satisfy a given demand via pebbling moves. A pebbling move across an edge of a graph takes two pebbles from one endpoint and places one pebble at the other endpoint; the other pebble is lost in transit as a toll. It has been shown that deciding whether a supply can meet a demand on a graph is NP-complete. The pebbling number of a graph is the smallest t such that every supply of t pebbles can satisfy every demand of one pebble. Deciding if the pebbling number is at most k is NP 2 -complete. In this paper we develop a tool, called theWeight Function Lemma, for computing upper bounds and sometimes exact values for pebbling numbers with the assistance of linear optimization. With this tool we are able to calculate the pebbling numbers of much larger graphs than in previous algorithms, and much more quickly as well. We also obtain results for many families of graphs, in many cases by hand, with much simpler and remarkably shorter proofs than given in previously existing arguments (certificates typically of size at most the number of vertices times the maximum degree), especially for highly symmetric graphs. Here we apply theWeight Function Lemma to several specific graphs, including the Petersen, Lemke, 4th weak Bruhat, Lemke squared, and two random graphs, as well as to a number of infinite families of graphs, such as trees, cycles, graph powers of cycles, cubes, and some generalized Petersen and Coxeter graphs. This partly answers a question of Pachter, et al., by computing the pebbling exponent of cycles to within an asymptotically small range. It is conceivable that this method yields an approximation algorithm for graph pebbling