15,803 research outputs found
Optimizing the geometrical accuracy of curvilinear meshes
This paper presents a method to generate valid high order meshes with
optimized geometrical accuracy. The high order meshing procedure starts with a
linear mesh, that is subsequently curved without taking care of the validity of
the high order elements. An optimization procedure is then used to both
untangle invalid elements and optimize the geometrical accuracy of the mesh.
Standard measures of the distance between curves are considered to evaluate the
geometrical accuracy in planar two-dimensional meshes, but they prove
computationally too costly for optimization purposes. A fast estimate of the
geometrical accuracy, based on Taylor expansions of the curves, is introduced.
An unconstrained optimization procedure based on this estimate is shown to
yield significant improvements in the geometrical accuracy of high order
meshes, as measured by the standard Haudorff distance between the geometrical
model and the mesh. Several examples illustrate the beneficial impact of this
method on CFD solutions, with a particular role of the enhanced mesh boundary
smoothness.Comment: Submitted to JC
A distortion measure to validate and generate curved high-order meshes on CAD surfaces with independence of parameterization
This is the accepted version of the following article: [Gargallo-Peiró, A., Roca, X., Peraire, J., and Sarrate, J. (2016) A distortion measure to validate and generate curved high-order meshes on CAD surfaces with independence of parameterization. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 106: 1100–1130. doi: 10.1002/nme.5162], which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nme.5162/abstractA framework to validate and generate curved nodal high-order meshes on Computer-Aided Design (CAD) surfaces is presented. The proposed framework is of major interest to generate meshes suitable for thin-shell and 3D finite element analysis with unstructured high-order methods. First, we define a distortion (quality) measure for high-order meshes on parameterized surfaces that we prove to be independent of the surface parameterization. Second, we derive a smoothing and untangling procedure based on the minimization of a regularization of the proposed distortion measure. The minimization is performed in terms of the parametric coordinates of the nodes to enforce that the nodes slide on the surfaces. Moreover, the proposed algorithm repairs invalid curved meshes (untangling), deals with arbitrary polynomial degrees (high-order), and handles with low-quality CAD parameterizations (independence of parameterization). Third, we use the optimization procedure to generate curved nodal high-order surface meshes by means of an a posteriori approach. Given a linear mesh, we increase the polynomial degree of the elements, curve them to match the geometry, and optimize the location of the nodes to ensure mesh validity. Finally, we present several examples to demonstrate the features of the optimization procedure, and to illustrate the surface mesh generation process.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
A short note on a Bernstein-Bezier basis for the pyramid
We introduce a Bernstein-Bezier basis for the pyramid, whose restriction to
the face reduces to the Bernstein-Bezier basis on the triangle or
quadrilateral. The basis satisfies the standard positivity and partition of
unity properties common to Bernstein polynomials, and spans the same space as
non-polynomial pyramid bases in the literature.Comment: Submitte
There are 174 Subdivisions of the Hexahedron into Tetrahedra
This article answers an important theoretical question: How many different
subdivisions of the hexahedron into tetrahedra are there? It is well known that
the cube has five subdivisions into 6 tetrahedra and one subdivision into 5
tetrahedra. However, all hexahedra are not cubes and moving the vertex
positions increases the number of subdivisions. Recent hexahedral dominant
meshing methods try to take these configurations into account for combining
tetrahedra into hexahedra, but fail to enumerate them all: they use only a set
of 10 subdivisions among the 174 we found in this article.
The enumeration of these 174 subdivisions of the hexahedron into tetrahedra
is our combinatorial result. Each of the 174 subdivisions has between 5 and 15
tetrahedra and is actually a class of 2 to 48 equivalent instances which are
identical up to vertex relabeling. We further show that exactly 171 of these
subdivisions have a geometrical realization, i.e. there exist coordinates of
the eight hexahedron vertices in a three-dimensional space such that the
geometrical tetrahedral mesh is valid. We exhibit the tetrahedral meshes for
these configurations and show in particular subdivisions of hexahedra with 15
tetrahedra that have a strictly positive Jacobian
Identifying combinations of tetrahedra into hexahedra: a vertex based strategy
Indirect hex-dominant meshing methods rely on the detection of adjacent
tetrahedra an algorithm that performs this identification and builds the set of
all possible combinations of tetrahedral elements of an input mesh T into
hexahedra, prisms, or pyramids. All identified cells are valid for engineering
analysis. First, all combinations of eight/six/five vertices whose connectivity
in T matches the connectivity of a hexahedron/prism/pyramid are computed. The
subset of tetrahedra of T triangulating each potential cell is then determined.
Quality checks allow to early discard poor quality cells and to dramatically
improve the efficiency of the method. Each potential hexahedron/prism/pyramid
is computed only once. Around 3 millions potential hexahedra are computed in 10
seconds on a laptop. We finally demonstrate that the set of potential hexes
built by our algorithm is significantly larger than those built using
predefined patterns of subdivision of a hexahedron in tetrahedral elements.Comment: Preprint submitted to CAD (26th IMR special issue
Simplified numerical approach for incremental sheet metal forming process
The current work presents a finite element approach for numerical simulation of the incremental sheet metal forming (ISF) process, called here ‘‘ISF-SAM’’ (for ISF-Simplified Analysis Modelling). The main goal of the study is to develop a simplified FE model sufficiently accurate to simulate the ISF process and quite efficient in terms of CPU time. Some assumptions have been adopted regarding the constitutive strains/stresses equations and the tool/sheet contact conditions. A simplified contact procedure was proposed to predict nodes in contact with the tool and to estimate their imposed displacements. A Discrete Kirchhoff Triangle shell element called DKT12, taking into account membrane and bending effects, has been used to mesh the sheet. An elasto-plastic constitutive model with isotropic hardening behaviour and a static scheme have been adopted to solve the nonlinear equilibrium equations. Satisfactory results have been obtained on two applications and a good correlation has been shown compared to experimental and numerical results, and at the same time a reduction of CPU time more than 60% has been observed. The bending phenomenon studied through the second application and the obtained results show the reliability of the DKT12 element
Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: analytical calculation model
This paper presents a newly developed design method for non-encased and encased stone columns. The developed analytical closed-form solution is based on previous solutions, initially developed for non-encased columns and for non-dilating rigid-plastic column material. In the present method, the initial stresses in the soil/column are taken into account, with the column considered as an elasto-plastic material with constant dilatancy, the soil as an elastic material and the geosynthetic encasement as a linear-elastic material. To check the validity of the assumptions and the ability of the method to give reasonable predictions of settlements, stresses and encasement forces, comparative elasto-plastic finite element analyses have been performed. The agreement between the two methods is very good, which was the reason that the new method was used to generate a parametric study in order to investigate various parameters, such as soil/column parameters, replacement ratio, load level and geosynthetic encasement stiffness on the behaviour of the improved ground. The results of this study show the influence of key parameters and provide a basis for the rational predictions of settlement response for various encasement stiffnesses, column arrangements and load levels. The practical use of the method is illustrated through the design chart, which enables preliminary selection of column spacing and encasement stiffness to achieve the desired settlement reduction for the selected set of the soil/column parameters. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
- …