Avoiding dative overgeneralisation errors: semantics, statistics or both?

Item does not contain fulltextHow do children eventually come to avoid the production of overgeneralisation errors, in particular, those involving the dative (e.g., *I said her "no")? The present study addressed this question by obtaining from adults and children (5-6, 9-10 years) judgements of well-formed and over-general datives with 301 different verbs (44 for children). A significant effect of pre-emption - whereby the use of a verb in the prepositional-object (PO)-dative construction constitutes evidence that double-object (DO)-dative uses are not permitted - was observed for every age group. A significant effect of entrenchment - whereby the use of a verb in any construction constitutes evidence that unattested dative uses are not permitted - was also observed for every age group, with both predictors also accounting for developmental change between ages 5-6 and 9-10 years. Adults demonstrated knowledge of a morphophonological constraint that prohibits Latinate verbs from appearing in the DO-dative construction (e.g., *I suggested her the trip). Verbs' semantic properties (supplied by independent adult raters) explained additional variance for all groups and developmentally, with the relative influence of narrow- vs broad-range semantic properties increasing with age. We conclude by outlining an account of the formation and restriction of argument-structure generalisations designed to accommodate these findings.26 p

Generalizing between form and meaning using learned verb classes

Early language development critically depends on the ability to form abstract representations of linguistic knowledge, and to generalize that knowledge to new situations. In verb knowledge, much generalization appears to be driven by various regularities between form and meaning, but it is difficult to assess how these factors interact in a complex learning environment. knowledge of verbs from naturalistic child-directed speech, then generalize these abstractions to novel verbs, simulating child behaviour. We use the syntactic alternation structure of a novel verb to infer aspects of its meaning, and use the meaning of a novel verb to predict its range of acceptable syntactic forms. The model provides a useful framework to investigate the interaction of complex factors in verb learning

An investigation into deviant morphology : issues in the implementation of a deep grammar for Indonesian

This thesis investigates deviant morphology in Indonesian for the implementation of a deep grammar. In particular we focus on the implementation of the verbal suffix -kan. This suffix has been described as having many functions, which alter the kinds of arguments and the number of arguments the verb takes (Dardjowidjojo 1971; Chung 1976; Arka 1993; Vamarasi 1999; Kroeger 2007; Son and Cole 2008). Deep grammars or precision grammars (Butt et al. 1999a; Butt et al. 2003; Bender et al. 2011) have been shown to be useful for natural language processing (NLP) tasks, such as machine translation and generation (Oepen et al. 2004; Cahill and Riester 2009; Graham 2011), and information extraction (MacKinlay et al. 2012), demonstrating the need for linguistically rich information to aid NLP tasks. Although these linguistically-motivated grammars are invaluable resources to the NLP community, the biggest drawback is the time required for the manual creation and curation of the lexicon. Our work aims to expedite this process by applying methods to assign syntactic information to kan-affixed verbs automatically. The method we employ exploits the hypothesis that semantic similarity is tightly connected with syntactic behaviour (Levin 1993). Our endeavour in automatically acquiring verbal information for an Indonesian deep grammar poses a number of lingustic challenges. First of all Indonesian verbs exhibit voice marking that is characteristic of the subgrouping of its language family. In order to be able to characterise verbal behaviour in Indonesian, we first need to devise a detailed analysis of voice for implementation. Another challenge we face is the claim that all open class words in Indonesian, at least as it is spoken in some varieties (Gil 1994; Gil 2010), cannot linguistically be analysed as being distinct from each other. That is, there is no distiction between nouns, verbs or adjectives in Indonesian, and all word from the open class categories should be analysed uniformly. This poses difficulties in implementing a grammar in a linguistically motivated way, as well discovering syntactic behaviour of verbs, if verbs cannot be distinguished from nouns. As part of our investigation we conduct experiments to verify the need to employ word class categories, and we find that indeed these are linguistically motivated labels in Indonesian. Through our investigation into deviant morphological behaviour, we gain a better characterisation of the morphosyntactic effects of -kan, and we discover that, although Indonesian has been labelled as a language with no open word class distinctions, word classes can be established as being linguistically-motivated