Overview of the Authorship Verification Task at PAN 2022

The authorship verification task at PAN 2022 follows the experimental setup of similar shared tasks in the recent past. However, it focuses on a different, and very challenging scenario: given two texts belonging to different discourse types, the task is to determine whether they are written by the same author. Based on a new corpus in English, we provide pairs of texts using four discourse types: essays, emails, text messages, and business memos. The differences in communicative purpose, intended audience, and the level of formality render the cross-discourse-type authorship verification task very hard. We received 7 submissions and evaluated them using the TIRA integrated research architecture, along with two baseline approaches. This paper reviews the submissions and presents a detailed discussion of the evaluation results

Ontology model for zakat hadith knowledge based on causal relationship, semantic relatedness and suggestion extraction

Hadith is the second most important source used by all Muslims. However, semantic ambiguity in the hadith raises issues such as misinterpretation, misunderstanding, and misjudgement of the hadith’s content. How to tackle the semantic ambiguity will be focused on this research (RQ). The Zakat hadith data should be expressed semantically by changing the surface-level semantics to a deeper sense of the intended meaning. This can be achieved using an ontology model covering three main aspects (i.e., semantic relationship extraction, causal relationship representation, and suggestion extraction). This study aims to resolve the semantic ambiguity in hadith, particularly in the Zakat topic by proposing a semantic approach to resolve semantic ambiguity, representing causal relationships in the Zakat ontology model, proposing methods to extract suggestion polarity in hadith, and building the ontology model for Zakat topic. The selection of the Zakat topic is based on the survey findings that respondents still lack knowledge and understanding of the Zakat process. Four hadith book types (i.e., Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud, and Sunan Ibn Majah) that was covering 334 concept words and 247 hadiths were analysed. The Zakat ontology modelling cover three phases which are Preliminary study, source selection and data collection, data pre-processing and analysis, and development and evaluation of ontology models. Domain experts in language, Zakat hadith, and ontology have evaluated the Zakat ontology and identified that 85% of Zakat concept was defined correctly. The Ontology Usability Scale was used to evaluate the final ontology model. An expert in ontology development evaluated the ontology that was developed in Protégé OWL, while 80 respondents evaluated the ontology concepts developed in PHP systems. The evaluation results show that the Zakat ontology has resolved the issue of ambiguity and misunderstanding of the Zakat process in the Zakat hadith. The Zakat ontology model also allows practitioners in Natural language processing (NLP), hadith, and ontology to extract Zakat hadith based on the representation of a reusable formal model, as well as causal relationships and the suggestion polarity of the Zakat hadith

Overview of PAN 2020: Authorship Verification, Celebrity Profiling, Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Twitter, and Style Change Detection

[EN] We briefly report on the four shared tasks organized as part of the PAN 2020 evaluation lab on digital text forensics and authorship analysis. Each tasks is introduced, motivated, and the results obtained are presented. Altogether, the four tasks attracted 230 registrations, yielding 83 successful submissions. This, and the fact that we continue to invite the submissions of software rather than its run output using the TIRA experimentation platform, marks for a good start into the second decade of PAN evaluations labs.We thank Symanto for sponsoring the ex aequo award for the two best performing systems at the author profiling shared task of this year on Profiling fake news spreaders on Twitter. The work of Paolo Rosso was partially funded by the Spanish MICINN under the research project MISMIS-FAKEnHATE on Misinformation and Miscommunication in social media: FAKE news and HATE speech (PGC2018¿096212-B-C31). The work of Anastasia Giachanou is supported by the SNSF Early Postdoc Mobility grant under the project Early Fake News Detection on Social Media, Switzerland (P2TIP2_181441).Bevendorff, J.; Ghanem, BHH.; Giachanou, A.; Kestemont, M.; Manjavacas, E.; Markov, I.; Mayerl, M.... (2020). Overview of PAN 2020: Authorship Verification, Celebrity Profiling, Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Twitter, and Style Change Detection. Springer. 372-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58219-7_25S372383Bevendorff, J., et al.: Shared tasks on authorship analysis at PAN 2020. In: Jose, J.M., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2020. LNCS, vol. 12036, pp. 508–516. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_66Bevendorff, J., Stein, B., Hagen, M., Potthast, M.: Bias analysis and mitigation in the evaluation of authorship verification. In: 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 6301–6306 (2019)Bevendorff, J., Stein, B., Hagen, M., Potthast, M.: Generalizing unmasking for short texts. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT, pp. 654–659 (2019)Ghanem, B., Rosso, P., Rangel, F.: An emotional analysis of false information in social media and news articles. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 20(2), 1–18 (2020)Giachanou, A., Ríssola, E.A., Ghanem, B., Crestani, F., Rosso, Paolo: The role of personality and linguistic patterns in discriminating between fake news spreaders and fact checkers. In: Métais, E., Meziane, F., Horacek, H., Cimiano, P. (eds.) NLDB 2020. LNCS, vol. 12089, pp. 181–192. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51310-8_17Giachanou, A., Rosso, P., Crestani, F.: Leveraging emotional signals for credibility detection. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 877–880 (2019)Kestemont, M., Stamatatos, E., Manjavacas, E., Daelemans, W., Potthast, M., Stein, B.: Overview of the cross-domain authorship attribution task at PAN 2019. In: Working Notes Papers of the CLEF 2019 Evaluation Labs. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2019)Kestemont, M., et al.: Overview of the author identification task at PAN-2018: cross-domain authorship attribution and style change detection. In: Working Notes Papers of the CLEF 2018 Evaluation Labs. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2018)Peñas, A., Rodrigo, A.: A simple measure to assess non-response. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (2011)Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)Rangel, F., Giachanou, A., Ghanem, B., Rosso, P.: Overview of the 8th author profiling task at PAN 2020: profiling fake news spreaders on Twitter. In: CLEF 2020 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2020)Rangel, F., Franco-Salvador, M., Rosso, P.: A low dimensionality representation for language variety identification. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2016. LNCS, vol. 9624, pp. 156–169. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75487-1_13Shu, K., Wang, S., Liu, H.: Understanding user profiles on social media for fake news detection. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR), pp. 430–435 (2018)Vo, N., Lee, K.: Learning from fact-checkers: analysis and generation of fact-checking language. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2019)Noreen, E.W.: Computer-Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, Hoboken (1989)Wiegmann, M., Potthast, M., Stein, B.: Overview of the celebrity profiling task at PAN 2020. In: CLEF 2020 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2020)Wiegmann, M., Stein, B., Potthast, M.: Celebrity profiling. In: 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2019). Association for Computational Linguistics (2019)Wiegmann, M., Stein, B., Potthast, M.: Overview of the celebrity profiling task at PAN 2019. In: CLEF 2019 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2019)Zangerle, E., Mayerl, M., Specht, G., Potthast, M., Stein, B.: Overview of the style change detection task at PAN 2020. In: CLEF 2020 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2020)Zangerle, E., Tschuggnall, M., Specht, G., Potthast, M., Stein, B.: Overview of the style change detection task at PAN 2019. In: CLEF 2019 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2019