1,908 research outputs found

    Generalized Balanced Tournament Packings and Optimal Equitable Symbol Weight Codes for Power Line Communications

    Full text link
    Generalized balance tournament packings (GBTPs) extend the concept of generalized balanced tournament designs introduced by Lamken and Vanstone (1989). In this paper, we establish the connection between GBTPs and a class of codes called equitable symbol weight codes. The latter were recently demonstrated to optimize the performance against narrowband noise in a general coded modulation scheme for power line communications. By constructing classes of GBTPs, we establish infinite families of optimal equitable symbol weight codes with code lengths greater than alphabet size and whose narrowband noise error-correcting capability to code length ratios do not diminish to zero as the length grows

    Paired Comparisons Analysis: An Axiomatic Approach to Rankings in Tournaments

    Get PDF
    In this paper we present an axiomatic analysis of several ranking methods for tournaments. We find that two of them exhibit a very good behaviour with respect to the set of properties under consideration. One of them is the maximum likelihood ranking, the most common method in statistics and psychology. The other one is a new ranking method introduced in this paper: recursive Buchholz. One of the most widely studied methods in social choice, the fair bets ranking, also performs quite well, but fails to satisfy some arguably important properties.Tournament;ranking;paired comparisons;fair bets;maximum likelihood

    An extensive English language bibliography on graph theory and its applications

    Get PDF
    Bibliography on graph theory and its application

    An extensive English language bibliography on graph theory and its applications, supplement 1

    Get PDF
    Graph theory and its applications - bibliography, supplement

    Factoring Polynomials and Groebner Bases

    Get PDF
    Factoring polynomials is a central problem in computational algebra and number theory and is a basic routine in most computer algebra systems (e.g. Maple, Mathematica, Magma, etc). It has been extensively studied in the last few decades by many mathematicians and computer scientists. The main approaches include Berlekamp\u27s method (1967) based on the kernel of Frobenius map, Niederreiter\u27s method (1993) via an ordinary differential equation, Zassenhaus\u27s modular approach (1969), Lenstra, Lenstra and Lovasz\u27s lattice reduction (1982), and Gao\u27s method via a partial differential equation (2003). These methods and their recent improvements due to van Hoeij (2002) and Lecerf et al (2006--2007) provide efficient algorithms that are widely used in practice today. This thesis studies two issues on polynomial factorization. One is to improve the efficiency of modular approach for factoring bivariate polynomials over finite fields. The usual modular approach first solves a modular linear equation (from Berlekamp\u27s equation or Niederreiter\u27s differential equation), then performs Hensel lifting of modular factors, and finally finds right combinations. An alternative method is presented in this thesis that performs Hensel lifting at the linear algebra stage instead of lifting modular factors. In this way, there is no need to find the right combinations of modular factors, and it finds instead the right linear space from which the irreducible factors can be computed via gcd. The main advantage of this method is that extra solutions can be eliminated at the early stage of computation, so improving on previous Hensel lifting methods. Another issue is about whether random numbers are essential in designing efficient algorithms for factoring polynomials. Although polynomials can be quickly factored by randomized polynomial time algorithms in practice, it is still an open problem whether there exists any deterministic polynomial time algorithm, even if generalized Riemann hypothesis (GRH) is assumed. The deterministic complexity of factoring polynomials is studied here from a different point of view that is more geometric and combinatorial in nature. Tools used include Gr\u27{o}bner basis structure theory and graphs, with connections to combinatorial designs. It is shown how to compute deterministically new Gr\u27{o}bner bases from given G\u27{o}bner bases when new polynomials are added, with running time polynomial in the degree of the original ideals. Also, a new upper bound is given on the number of ring extensions needed for finding proper factors, improving on previous results of Evdokimov (1994) and Ivanyos, Karpinski and Saxena (2008)
    corecore