21 research outputs found

    Machine learning techniques for identification using mobile and social media data

    Get PDF
    Networked access and mobile devices provide near constant data generation and collection. Users, environments, applications, each generate different types of data; from the voluntarily provided data posted in social networks to data collected by sensors on mobile devices, it is becoming trivial to access big data caches. Processing sufficiently large amounts of data results in inferences that can be characterized as privacy invasive. In order to address privacy risks we must understand the limits of the data exploring relationships between variables and how the user is reflected in them. In this dissertation we look at data collected from social networks and sensors to identify some aspect of the user or their surroundings. In particular, we find that from social media metadata we identify individual user accounts and from the magnetic field readings we identify both the (unique) cellphone device owned by the user and their course-grained location. In each project we collect real-world datasets and apply supervised learning techniques, particularly multi-class classification algorithms to test our hypotheses. We use both leave-one-out cross validation as well as k-fold cross validation to reduce any bias in the results. Throughout the dissertation we find that unprotected data reveals sensitive information about users. Each chapter also contains a discussion about possible obfuscation techniques or countermeasures and their effectiveness with regards to the conclusions we present. Overall our results show that deriving information about users is attainable and, with each of these results, users would have limited if any indication that any type of analysis was taking place

    Ranked Retrieval in Uncertain and Probabilistic Databases

    Get PDF
    Ranking queries are widely used in data exploration, data analysis and decision making scenarios. While most of the currently proposed ranking techniques focus on deterministic data, several emerging applications involve data that are imprecise or uncertain. Ranking uncertain data raises new challenges in query semantics and processing, making conventional methods inapplicable. Furthermore, the interplay between ranking and uncertainty models introduces new dimensions for ordering query results that do not exist in the traditional settings. This dissertation introduces new formulations and processing techniques for ranking queries on uncertain data. The formulations are based on marriage of traditional ranking semantics with possible worlds semantics under widely-adopted uncertainty models. In particular, we focus on studying the impact of tuple-level and attribute-level uncertainty on the semantics and processing techniques of ranking queries. Under the tuple-level uncertainty model, we introduce a processing framework leveraging the capabilities of relational database systems to recognize and handle data uncertainty in score-based ranking. The framework encapsulates a state space model, and efficient search algorithms that compute query answers by lazily materializing the necessary parts of the space. Under the attribute-level uncertainty model, we give a new probabilistic ranking model, based on partial orders, to encapsulate the space of possible rankings originating from uncertainty in attribute values. We present a set of efficient query evaluation algorithms, including sampling-based techniques based on the theory of Markov chains and Monte-Carlo method, to compute query answers. We build on our techniques for ranking under attribute-level uncertainty to support rank join queries on uncertain data. We show how to extend current rank join methods to handle uncertainty in scoring attributes. We provide a pipelined query operator implementation of uncertainty-aware rank join algorithm integrated with sampling techniques to compute query answers

    Exploiting general-purpose background knowledge for automated schema matching

    Full text link
    The schema matching task is an integral part of the data integration process. It is usually the first step in integrating data. Schema matching is typically very complex and time-consuming. It is, therefore, to the largest part, carried out by humans. One reason for the low amount of automation is the fact that schemas are often defined with deep background knowledge that is not itself present within the schemas. Overcoming the problem of missing background knowledge is a core challenge in automating the data integration process. In this dissertation, the task of matching semantic models, so-called ontologies, with the help of external background knowledge is investigated in-depth in Part I. Throughout this thesis, the focus lies on large, general-purpose resources since domain-specific resources are rarely available for most domains. Besides new knowledge resources, this thesis also explores new strategies to exploit such resources. A technical base for the development and comparison of matching systems is presented in Part II. The framework introduced here allows for simple and modularized matcher development (with background knowledge sources) and for extensive evaluations of matching systems. One of the largest structured sources for general-purpose background knowledge are knowledge graphs which have grown significantly in size in recent years. However, exploiting such graphs is not trivial. In Part III, knowledge graph em- beddings are explored, analyzed, and compared. Multiple improvements to existing approaches are presented. In Part IV, numerous concrete matching systems which exploit general-purpose background knowledge are presented. Furthermore, exploitation strategies and resources are analyzed and compared. This dissertation closes with a perspective on real-world applications

    Building high-quality merged ontologies from multiple sources with requirements customization

    Get PDF
    Ontologies are the prime way of organizing data in the Semantic Web. Often, it is necessary to combine several, independently developed ontologies to obtain a knowledge graph fully representing a domain of interest. Existing approaches scale rather poorly to the merging of multiple ontologies due to using a binary merge strategy. Thus, we aim to investigate the extent to which the n-ary strategy can solve the scalability problem. This thesis contributes to the following important aspects: 1. Our n-ary merge strategy takes as input a set of source ontologies and their mappings and generates a merged ontology. For efficient processing, rather than successively merging complete ontologies pairwise, we group related concepts across ontologies into partitions and merge first within and then across those partitions. 2. We take a step towards parameterizable merge methods. We have identified a set of Generic Merge Requirements (GMRs) that merged ontologies might be expected to meet. We have investigated and developed compatibilities of the GMRs by a graph-based method. 3. When multiple ontologies are merged, inconsistencies can occur due to different world views encoded in the source ontologies To this end, we propose a novel Subjective Logic-based method to handling the inconsistency occurring while merging ontologies. We apply this logic to rank and estimate the trustworthiness of conflicting axioms that cause inconsistencies within a merged ontology. 4. To assess the quality of the merged ontologies systematically, we provide a comprehensive set of criteria in an evaluation framework. The proposed criteria cover a variety of characteristics of each individual aspect of the merged ontology in structural, functional, and usability dimensions. 5. The final contribution of this research is the development of the CoMerger tool that implements all aforementioned aspects accessible via a unified interface

    Exploring the importance of cell-type-specific gene expression regulation and splicing in Parkinson’s disease

    Get PDF
    Parkinson’s disease (PD) is defined primarily as a movement disorder, but its symptoms extend beyond the diagnosis-defining motor symptoms. Among non-motor symptoms, dementia is one of the most common and debilitating, yet it remains relatively understudied in comparison to motor symptoms, in part due to the considerable clinical, genetic and pathologic overlap between Parkinson’s disease with dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Common to all three diseases is a lack of disease-modifying therapies, the development of which requires knowledge of the genes, cell types and biological pathways affected in disease. In this thesis, publicly available brain-relevant functional genomic annotations were used to identify PD-relevant pathways and cell types in silico. PD heritability was not found enriched in a specific cell type or state; however, PD heritability was found significantly enriched in a lysosomal and loss-of-function-intolerant gene set, with the former highly expressed in astrocytic, microglial, and oligodendrocyte subtypes and the latter highly expressed in almost all tested cellular subtypes. In addition, new annotations were generated by applying bulk-tissue and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing to anterior cingulate cortex samples derived from individuals with PD, PDD and DLB. This pairing permitted cellular deconvolution of bulk-tissue gene expression; estimation of bulk-tissue cell-type abundances; and in-depth splicing analyses. These analyses found that PD, PDD and DLB were associated not just with one, but several cell types, including neuronal, glial and vascular cell types, suggesting that these are disorders of global pathways working across various cell types. Furthermore, these analyses illustrated the commonalities and differences between the three diseases in terms of associated pathways, cell types, and upstream regulators of splicing, observations that can be used to begin building a biological basis on which to distinguish these disorders
    corecore