Formal Development of Rough Inclusion Functions

Rough sets, developed by Pawlak [15], are important tool to describe situation of incomplete or partially unknown information. In this article, continuing the formalization of rough sets [12], we give the formal characterization of three rough inclusion functions (RIFs). We start with the standard one, κ£, connected with Łukasiewicz [14], and extend this research for two additional RIFs: κ 1, and κ 2, following a paper by Gomolińska [4], [3]. We also define q-RIFs and weak q-RIFs [2]. The paper establishes a formal counterpart of [7] and makes a preliminary step towards rough mereology [16], [17] in Mizar [13].Institute of Informatics, University of Białystok, PolandAnna Gomolinska. A comparative study of some generalized rough approximations. Fundamenta Informaticae, 51:103–119, 2002.Anna Gomolinska. Rough approximation based on weak q-RIFs. In James F. Peters, Andrzej Skowron, Marcin Wolski, Mihir K. Chakraborty, and Wei-Zhi Wu, editors, Transactions on Rough Sets X, volume 5656 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 117–135, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-03281-3. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03281-3_4.Anna Gomolinska. On three closely related rough inclusion functions. In Marzena Kryszkiewicz, James F. Peters, Henryk Rybinski, and Andrzej Skowron, editors, Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms, volume 4585 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 142–151, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73451-2_16.Anna Gomolinska. On certain rough inclusion functions. In James F. Peters, Andrzej Skowron, and Henryk Rybinski, editors, Transactions on Rough Sets IX, volume 5390 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 35–55. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89876-4_3.Adam Grabowski. On the computer-assisted reasoning about rough sets. In B. Dunin-Kęplicz, A. Jankowski, A. Skowron, and M. Szczuka, editors, International Workshop on Monitoring, Security, and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems Location, volume 28 of Advances in Soft Computing, pages 215–226, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/3-540-32370-8_15.Adam Grabowski. Efficient rough set theory merging. Fundamenta Informaticae, 135(4): 371–385, 2014. doi:10.3233/FI-2014-1129.Adam Grabowski. Building a framework of rough inclusion functions by means of computerized proof assistant. In Tamás Mihálydeák, Fan Min, Guoyin Wang, Mohua Banerjee, Ivo Düntsch, Zbigniew Suraj, and Davide Ciucci, editors, Rough Sets, volume 11499 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 225–238, Cham, 2019. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-030-22815-6. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22815-6_18.Adam Grabowski. Lattice theory for rough sets – a case study with Mizar. Fundamenta Informaticae, 147(2–3):223–240, 2016. doi:10.3233/FI-2016-1406.Adam Grabowski. Relational formal characterization of rough sets. Formalized Mathematics, 21(1):55–64, 2013. doi:10.2478/forma-2013-0006.Adam Grabowski. Binary relations-based rough sets – an automated approach. Formalized Mathematics, 24(2):143–155, 2016. doi:10.1515/forma-2016-0011.Adam Grabowski and Christoph Schwarzweller. On duplication in mathematical repositories. In Serge Autexier, Jacques Calmet, David Delahaye, Patrick D. F. Ion, Laurence Rideau, Renaud Rioboo, and Alan P. Sexton, editors, Intelligent Computer Mathematics, 10th International Conference, AISC 2010, 17th Symposium, Calculemus 2010, and 9th International Conference, MKM 2010, Paris, France, July 5–10, 2010. Proceedings, volume 6167 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 300–314. Springer, 2010. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14128-7_26.Adam Grabowski and Michał Sielwiesiuk. Formalizing two generalized approximation operators. Formalized Mathematics, 26(2):183–191, 2018. doi:10.2478/forma-2018-0016.Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, and Adam Naumowicz. Four decades of Mizar. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 55(3):191–198, 2015. doi:10.1007/s10817-015-9345-1.Jan Łukasiewicz. Die logischen Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. In L. Borkowski, editor, Jan Łukasiewicz – Selected Works, pages 16–63. North Holland, Polish Scientific Publ., Amsterdam London Warsaw, 1970. First published in Kraków, 1913.Zdzisław Pawlak. Rough sets. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 11:341–356, 1982. doi:10.1007/BF01001956.Lech Polkowski. Rough mereology. In Approximate Reasoning by Parts, volume 20 of Intelligent Systems Reference Library, pages 229–257, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-22279-5. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22279-5_6.Lech Polkowski and Andrzej Skowron. Rough mereology: A new paradigm for approximate reasoning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 15(4):333–365, 1996. doi:10.1016/S0888-613X(96)00072-2.Andrzej Skowron and Jarosław Stepaniuk. Tolerance approximation spaces. Fundamenta Informaticae, 27(2/3):245–253, 1996. doi:10.3233/FI-1996-272311.William Zhu. Generalized rough sets based on relations. Information Sciences, 177: 4997–5011, 2007.27433734

Computational aspects of tomographic and neuroscientific problems

4siopenopenBrunetti, S.; Dulio, P.; Frosini, A.; Rozenberg, G.Brunetti, S.; Dulio, P.; Frosini, A.; Rozenberg, G

The Integration of Connectionism and First-Order Knowledge Representation and Reasoning as a Challenge for Artificial Intelligence

Intelligent systems based on first-order logic on the one hand, and on artificial neural networks (also called connectionist systems) on the other, differ substantially. It would be very desirable to combine the robust neural networking machinery with symbolic knowledge representation and reasoning paradigms like logic programming in such a way that the strengths of either paradigm will be retained. Current state-of-the-art research, however, fails by far to achieve this ultimate goal. As one of the main obstacles to be overcome we perceive the question how symbolic knowledge can be encoded by means of connectionist systems: Satisfactory answers to this will naturally lead the way to knowledge extraction algorithms and to integrated neural-symbolic systems.Comment: In Proceedings of INFORMATION'2004, Tokyo, Japan, to appear. 12 page

An Upper Bound on the Complexity of Recognizable Tree Languages

The third author noticed in his 1992 PhD Thesis [Sim92] that every regular tree language of infinite trees is in a class $\Game (D\_n({\bf\Sigma}^0\_2))$ for some natural number $n\geq 1$, where $\Game$ is the game quantifier. We first give a detailed exposition of this result. Next, using an embedding of the Wadge hierarchy of non self-dual Borel subsets of the Cantor space $2^\omega$ into the class ${\bf\Delta}^1\_2$, and the notions of Wadge degree and Veblen function, we argue that this upper bound on the topological complexity of regular tree languages is much better than the usual ${\bf\Delta}^1\_2$

An algebraic semantics for QVT-relations check-only transformations

Fundamenta Informaticae, 114 1, Juan de Lara, Esther Guerra, An algebraic semantics for QVT-relations check-only transformations, 73-101, Copyright 2012, with permission from IOS PressQVT is the standard for model transformation defined by the OMG in the context of the Model-Driven Architecture. It is made of several transformation languages. Among them, QVT-Relations is the one with the highest level of abstraction, as it permits developing bidirectional transformations in a declarative, relational style. Unfortunately, the standard only provides a semiformal description of its semantics, which hinders analysis and has given rise to ambiguities in existing tool implementations. In order to improve this situation, we propose a formal, algebraic semantics for QVT-Relations check-only transformations, defining a notion of satisfaction of QVT-Relations specifications by models.This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation with projects METEORIC (TIN2008-02081) and Go Lite (TIN2011-24139), and by the R&D program of the Community of Madrid with project “e-Madrid” (S2009/TIC-1650)