Generalised Multiparty Session Types with Crash-Stop Failures

Session types enable the specification and verification of communicating systems. However, their theory often assumes that processes never fail. To address this limitation, we present a generalised multiparty session type (MPST) theory with crash-stop failures, where processes can crash arbitrarily. Our new theory validates more protocols and processes w.r.t. previous work. We apply minimal syntactic changes to standard session ?-calculus and types: we model crashes and their handling semantically, with a generalised MPST typing system parametric on a behavioural safety property. We cover the spectrum between fully reliable and fully unreliable sessions, via optional reliability assumptions, and prove type safety and protocol conformance in the presence of crash-stop failures. Introducing crash-stop failures has non-trivial consequences: writing correct processes that handle all crash scenarios can be difficult. Yet, our generalised MPST theory allows us to tame this complexity, via model checking, to validate whether a multiparty session satisfies desired behavioural properties, e.g. deadlock-freedom or liveness, even in presence of crashes. We implement our approach using the mCRL2 model checker, and evaluate it with examples extended from the literature

Formal Techniques for Distributed Objects, Components, and Systems: 37th IFIP WG 6.1 International Conference, FORTE 2017, Held as Part of the 12th International Federated Conference on Distributed Computing Techniques, DisCoTec 2017, Neuchâtel, Switzerland, June 19-22, 2017, Proceedings

International audienceBook Front Matter of LNCS 1032

Actor programming with static guarantees

This thesis discusses two methodologies for applying type discipline to concurrent programming with actors: process types, and session types. A system based on each of the two is developed, and used as the basis for a comprehensive overview of process- and session- type merits and limitations. In particular, we analyze the trade-offs of the two approaches with regard to the expressiveness of the resulting calculi, versus the nature of the static guarantees offered. The first system discussed is based on the notion of a \emph{typestate}, that is, a view of an actor's internal state that can be statically tracked. The typestates used here capture what each actor handle \emph{may} be used for, as well as what it \emph{must} be used for. This is done by associating two kinds of tokens with each actor handle: tokens of the first kind are consumed when the actor receives a message, and thus dictate the types of messages that can be sent through the handle; tokens of the second kind dictate messaging obligations, and the type system ensures that related messages have been sent through the handle by the end of its lifetime. The next system developed here adapts session types to suit actor programming. Session types come from the world of process calculi, and are a means to statically check the messaging taking place over communication channels against a pre-defined protocol. Since actors do not use channels, one needs to consider pairs of actors as participants in multiple, concurrently executed---and thus interleaving---protocols. The result is a system with novel, parameterized type constructs to capture communication patterns that prior work cannot handle, such as the sliding window protocol. Although this system can statically verify the implementation of complicated messaging patterns, it requires deviations from industry-standard programming models---a problem that is true for all session type systems in the literature. This work argues that the typestate-based system, while not enforcing protocol fidelity as the session-inspired one does, is nevertheless more suitable for model actor calculi adopted by practical, already established frameworks such as Erlang and Akka

Distributed programming using role-parametric session types in go

This paper presents a framework for the static specification and safe programming of message passing protocols where the number and kinds of participants are dynamically instantiated. We develop the first theory of distributed multiparty session types (MPST) to support parameterised protocols with indexed rolesÐour framework statically infers the different kinds of participants induced by a protocol definition as role variants, and produces decoupled endpoint projections of the protocol onto each variant. This enables safe MPST-based programming of the parameterised endpoints in distributed settings: each endpoint can be implemented separately by different programmers, using different techniques (or languages). We prove the decidability of role variant inference and well-formedness checking, and the correctness of projection. We implement our theory as a toolchain for programming such role-parametric MPST protocols in Go. Our approach is to generate API families of lightweight, protocol- and variant-specific type wrappers for I/O. The APIs ensure a well-typed Go endpoint program (by native Go type checking) will perform only compliant I/O actions w.r.t. the source protocol. We leverage the abstractions of MPST to support the specification and implementation of Go applications involving multiple channels, possibly over mixed transports (e.g., Go channels, TCP), and channel passing via a unified programming interface. We evaluate the applicability and run-time performance of our generated APIs using microbenchmarks and real-world applications

Session-based concurrency, declaratively

Session-based concurrency is a type-based approach to the analysis of message-passing programs. These programs may be specified in an operational or declarative style: the former defines how interactions are properly structured; the latter defines governing conditions for correct interactions. In this paper, we study rigorous relationships between operational and declarative models of session-based concurrency. We develop a correct encoding of session 휋-calculus processes into the linear concurrent constraint calculus (횕회회), a declarative model of concurrency based on partial information (constraints). We exploit session types to ensure that our encoding satisfies precise correctness properties and that it offers a sound basis on which operational and declarative requirements can be jointly specified and reasoned about. We demonstrate the applicability of our results by using our encoding in the specification of realistic communication patterns with time and contextual information

Session-based concurrency, declaratively

Session-based concurrency is a type-based approach to the analysis of message-passing programs. These programs may be specified in an operational or declarative style: the former defines how interactions are properly structured; the latter defines governing conditions for correct interaction