SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND FAILURE DIAGNOSIS OF DISCRETE EVENT SYSTEMS: A TEMPORAL LOGIC APPROACH

Discrete event systems (DESs) are systems which involve quantities that take a discrete set of values, called states, and which evolve according to the occurrence of certain discrete qualitative changes, called events. Examples of DESs include many man-made systems such as computer and communication networks, robotics and manufacturing systems, computer programs, and automated trac systems. Supervisory control and failure diagnosis are two important problems in the study of DESs. This dissertation presents a temporal logic approach to the control and failure diagnosis of DESs. For the control of DESs, full branching time temporal logic-CTL* is used to express control specifications. Control problem of DES in the temporal logic setting is formulated; and the controllability of DES is defined. By encoding the system with a CTL formula, the control problem of CTL* is reduced to the decision problem of CTL*. It is further shown that the control problem of CTL* (resp., CTL{computation tree logic) is complete for deterministic double (resp., single) exponential time. A sound and complete supervisor synthesis algorithm for the control of CTL* is provided. Special cases of the control of computation tree logic (CTL) and linear-time temporal logic (LTL) are also studied; and for which algorithms of better complexity are provided. For the failure diagnosis of DESs, LTL is used to express fault specifications. Failure diagnosis problem of DES in the temporal logic setting is formulated; and the diagnosability of DES is defined. The problem of testing the diagnosability is reduced to that of model checking. An algorithm for the test of diagnosability and the synthesis of a diagnoser is obtained. The algorithm has a polynomial complexity in the number of system states and the number of fault specifications. For the diagnosis of repeated failures in DESs, different notions of repeated failure diagnosability, K-diagnosability, [1,K]-diagnosability, and [1,1]-diagnosability, are introduced. Polynomial algorithms for checking these various notions of repeated failure diagnosability are given, and a procedure of polynomial complexity for the on-line diagnosis of repeated failures is also presented

Stochastic DES Fault Diagnosis with Coloured Interpreted Petri Nets

[EN] This proposal presents an online method to detect and isolate faults in stochastic discrete event systems without previous model. A coloured timed interpreted Petri Net generates the normal behavior language after an identification stage.The next step is fault detection that is carried out by comparing the observed event sequences with the expected event sequences. Once a new fault is detected, a learning algorithm changes the structure of the diagnoser, so it is able to learn new fault languages. Moreover, the diagnoser includes timed events to represent and diagnose stochastic languages. Finally, this paper proposes a detectability condition for stochastic DES and the sufficient and necessary conditions are proved.This work was supported by a grant from the Universidad del Cauca, Reference 2.3-31.2/05 2011.Muñoz-Añasco, DM.; Correcher Salvador, A.; García Moreno, E.; Morant Anglada, FJ. (2015). Stochastic DES Fault Diagnosis with Coloured Interpreted Petri Nets. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2015:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/303107S1132015Jiang, S., & Kumar, R. (2004). Failure Diagnosis of Discrete-Event Systems With Linear-Time Temporal Logic Specifications. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(6), 934-945. doi:10.1109/tac.2004.829616Zaytoon, J., & Lafortune, S. (2013). Overview of fault diagnosis methods for Discrete Event Systems. Annual Reviews in Control, 37(2), 308-320. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2013.09.009Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Lafortune, S., Sinnamohideen, K., & Teneketzis, D. (1995). Diagnosability of discrete-event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40(9), 1555-1575. doi:10.1109/9.412626Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Lafortune, S., Sinnamohideen, K., & Teneketzis, D. C. (1996). Failure diagnosis using discrete-event models. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 4(2), 105-124. doi:10.1109/87.486338Estrada-Vargas, A. P., López-Mellado, E., & Lesage, J.-J. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Recent Identification Approaches for Discrete-Event Systems. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2010, 1-21. doi:10.1155/2010/453254Cabasino, M. P., Giua, A., & Seatzu, C. (2010). Fault detection for discrete event systems using Petri nets with unobservable transitions. Automatica, 46(9), 1531-1539. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2010.06.013Prock, J. (1991). A new technique for fault detection using Petri nets. Automatica, 27(2), 239-245. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(91)90074-cAghasaryan, A., Fabre, E., Benveniste, A., Boubour, R., & Jard, C. (1998). Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 8(2), 203-231. doi:10.1023/a:1008241818642Hadjicostis, C. N., & Verghese, G. C. (1999). Monitoring Discrete Event Systems Using Petri Net Embeddings. Application and Theory of Petri Nets 1999, 188-207. doi:10.1007/3-540-48745-x_12Benveniste, A., Fabre, E., Haar, S., & Jard, C. (2003). Diagnosis of asynchronous discrete-event systems: a net unfolding approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(5), 714-727. doi:10.1109/tac.2003.811249Genc, S., & Lafortune, S. (2003). Distributed Diagnosis of Discrete-Event Systems Using Petri Nets. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 316-336. doi:10.1007/3-540-44919-1_21Genc, S., & Lafortune, S. (2007). Distributed Diagnosis of Place-Bordered Petri Nets. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 4(2), 206-219. doi:10.1109/tase.2006.879916Ramirez-Trevino, A., Ruiz-Beltran, E., Rivera-Rangel, I., & Lopez-Mellado, E. (2007). Online Fault Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems. A Petri Net-Based Approach. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 4(1), 31-39. doi:10.1109/tase.2006.872120Dotoli, M., Fanti, M. P., Mangini, A. M., & Ukovich, W. (2009). On-line fault detection in discrete event systems by Petri nets and integer linear programming. Automatica, 45(11), 2665-2672. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2009.07.021Fanti, M. P., Mangini, A. M., & Ukovich, W. (2013). Fault Detection by Labeled Petri Nets in Centralized and Distributed Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10(2), 392-404. doi:10.1109/tase.2012.2203596Basile, F., Chiacchio, P., & De Tommasi, G. (2009). An Efficient Approach for Online Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54(4), 748-759. doi:10.1109/tac.2009.2014932Roth, M., Lesage, J.-J., & Litz, L. (2011). The concept of residuals for fault localization in discrete event systems. Control Engineering Practice, 19(9), 978-988. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.02.008Roth, M., Schneider, S., Lesage, J.-J., & Litz, L. (2012). Fault detection and isolation in manufacturing systems with an identified discrete event model. International Journal of Systems Science, 43(10), 1826-1841. doi:10.1080/00207721.2011.649369Chung-Hsien Kuo, & Han-Pang Huang. (2000). Failure modeling and process monitoring for flexible manufacturing systems using colored timed Petri nets. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 16(3), 301-312. doi:10.1109/70.850648Ramirez-Trevino, A., Ruiz-Beltran, E., Aramburo-Lizarraga, J., & Lopez-Mellado, E. (2012). Structural Diagnosability of DES and Design of Reduced Petri Net Diagnosers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 42(2), 416-429. doi:10.1109/tsmca.2011.2169950Cabasino, M. P., Giua, A., & Seatzu, C. (2014). Diagnosability of Discrete-Event Systems Using Labeled Petri Nets. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 11(1), 144-153. doi:10.1109/tase.2013.2289360Yao, L., Feng, L., & Jiang, B. (2014). Fault Diagnosis and Fault Tolerant Control for Non-Gaussian Singular Time-Delayed Stochastic Distribution Systems. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1-9. doi:10.1155/2014/937583Murata, T. (1989). Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(4), 541-580. doi:10.1109/5.24143Dotoli, M., Fanti, M. P., & Mangini, A. M. (2008). Real time identification of discrete event systems using Petri nets. Automatica, 44(5), 1209-1219. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.10.014Muñoz, D. M., Correcher, A., García, E., & Morant, F. (2014). Identification of Stochastic Timed Discrete Event Systems with st-IPN. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1-21. doi:10.1155/2014/835312Latorre-Biel, J.-I., Jiménez-Macías, E., Pérez de la Parte, M., Blanco-Fernández, J., & Martínez-Cámara, E. (2014). Control of Discrete Event Systems by Means of Discrete Optimization and Disjunctive Colored PNs: Application to Manufacturing Facilities. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014, 1-16. doi:10.1155/2014/821707Cabasino, M. P., Giua, A., Lafortune, S., & Seatzu, C. (2012). A New Approach for Diagnosability Analysis of Petri Nets Using Verifier Nets. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(12), 3104-3117. doi:10.1109/tac.2012.2200372Abdelwahed, S., Karsai, G., Mahadevan, N., & Ofsthun, S. C. (2009). Practical Implementation of Diagnosis Systems Using Timed Failure Propagation Graph Models. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 58(2), 240-247. doi:10.1109/tim.2008.200595

Formal Design of Asynchronous Fault Detection and Identification Components using Temporal Epistemic Logic

Autonomous critical systems, such as satellites and space rovers, must be able to detect the occurrence of faults in order to ensure correct operation. This task is carried out by Fault Detection and Identification (FDI) components, that are embedded in those systems and are in charge of detecting faults in an automated and timely manner by reading data from sensors and triggering predefined alarms. The design of effective FDI components is an extremely hard problem, also due to the lack of a complete theoretical foundation, and of precise specification and validation techniques. In this paper, we present the first formal approach to the design of FDI components for discrete event systems, both in a synchronous and asynchronous setting. We propose a logical language for the specification of FDI requirements that accounts for a wide class of practical cases, and includes novel aspects such as maximality and trace-diagnosability. The language is equipped with a clear semantics based on temporal epistemic logic, and is proved to enjoy suitable properties. We discuss how to validate the requirements and how to verify that a given FDI component satisfies them. We propose an algorithm for the synthesis of correct-by-construction FDI components, and report on the applicability of the design approach on an industrial case-study coming from aerospace.Comment: 33 pages, 20 figure

Causality and Temporal Dependencies in the Design of Fault Management Systems

Reasoning about causes and effects naturally arises in the engineering of safety-critical systems. A classical example is Fault Tree Analysis, a deductive technique used for system safety assessment, whereby an undesired state is reduced to the set of its immediate causes. The design of fault management systems also requires reasoning on causality relationships. In particular, a fail-operational system needs to ensure timely detection and identification of faults, i.e. recognize the occurrence of run-time faults through their observable effects on the system. Even more complex scenarios arise when multiple faults are involved and may interact in subtle ways. In this work, we propose a formal approach to fault management for complex systems. We first introduce the notions of fault tree and minimal cut sets. We then present a formal framework for the specification and analysis of diagnosability, and for the design of fault detection and identification (FDI) components. Finally, we review recent advances in fault propagation analysis, based on the Timed Failure Propagation Graphs (TFPG) formalism.Comment: In Proceedings CREST 2017, arXiv:1710.0277

RULES BASED MODELING OF DISCRETE EVENT SYSTEMS WITH FAULTS AND THEIR DIAGNOSIS

Failure diagnosis in large and complex systems is a critical task. In the realm of discrete event systems, Sampath et al. proposed a language based failure diagnosis approach. They introduced the diagnosability for discrete event systems and gave a method for testing the diagnosability by first constructing a diagnoser for the system. The complexity of this method of testing diagnosability is exponential in the number of states of the system and doubly exponential in the number of failure types. In this thesis, we give an algorithm for testing diagnosability that does not construct a diagnoser for the system, and its complexity is of 4th order in the number of states of the system and linear in the number of the failure types. In this dissertation we also study diagnosis of discrete event systems (DESs) modeled in the rule-based modeling formalism introduced in [12] to model failure-prone systems. The results have been represented in [43]. An attractive feature of rule-based model is it\u27s compactness (size is polynomial in number of signals). A motivation for the work presented is to develop failure diagnosis techniques that are able to exploit this compactness. In this regard, we develop symbolic techniques for testing diagnosability and computing a diagnoser. Diagnosability test is shown to be an instance of 1st order temporal logic model-checking. An on-line algorithm for diagnosersynthesis is obtained by using predicates and predicate transformers. We demonstrate our approach by applying it to modeling and diagnosis of a part of the assembly-line. When the system is found to be not diagnosable, we use sensor refinement and sensor augmentation to make the system diagnosable. In this dissertation, a controller is also extracted from the maximally permissive supervisor for the purpose of implementing the control by selecting, when possible, only one controllable event from among the ones allowed by the supervisor for the assembly line in automaton models

10451 Abstracts Collection -- Runtime Verification, Diagnosis, Planning and Control for Autonomous Systems

From November 7 to 12, 2010, the Dagstuhl Seminar 10451 ``Runtime Verification, Diagnosis, Planning and Control for Autonomous Systems\u27\u27 was held in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, 35 participants presented their current research and discussed ongoing work and open problems. This document puts together abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar, and provides links to extended abstracts or full papers, if available