Plagiarism detection for Indonesian texts

As plagiarism becomes an increasing concern for Indonesian universities and research centers, the need of using automatic plagiarism checker is becoming more real. However, researches on Plagiarism Detection Systems (PDS) in Indonesian documents have not been well developed, since most of them deal with detecting duplicate or near-duplicate documents, have not addressed the problem of retrieving source documents, or show tendency to measure document similarity globally. Therefore, systems resulted from these researches are incapable of referring to exact locations of ``similar passage'' pairs. Besides, there has been no public and standard corpora available to evaluate PDS in Indonesian texts. To address the weaknesses of former researches, this thesis develops a plagiarism detection system which executes various methods of plagiarism detection stages in a workflow system. In retrieval stage, a novel document feature coined as phraseword is introduced and executed along with word unigram and character n-grams to address the problem of retrieving source documents, whose contents are copied partially or obfuscated in a suspicious document. The detection stage, which exploits a two-step paragraph-based comparison, is aimed to address the problems of detecting and locating source-obfuscated passage pairs. The seeds for matching source-obfuscated passage pairs are based on locally-weighted significant terms to capture paraphrased and summarized passages. In addition to this system, an evaluation corpus was created through simulation by human writers, and by algorithmic random generation. Using this corpus, the performance evaluation of the proposed methods was performed in three scenarios. On the first scenario which evaluated source retrieval performance, some methods using phraseword and token features were able to achieve the optimum recall rate 1. On the second scenario which evaluated detection performance, our system was compared to Alvi's algorithm and evaluated in 4 levels of measures: character, passage, document, and cases. The experiment results showed that methods resulted from using token as seeds have higher scores than Alvi's algorithm in all 4 levels of measures both in artificial and simulated plagiarism cases. In case detection, our systems outperform Alvi's algorithm in recognizing copied, shaked, and paraphrased passages. However, Alvi's recognition rate on summarized passage is insignificantly higher than our system. The same tendency of experiment results were demonstrated on the third experiment scenario, only the precision rates of Alvi's algorithm in character and paragraph levels are higher than our system. The higher Plagdet scores produced by some methods in our system than Alvi's scores show that this study has fulfilled its objective in implementing a competitive state-of-the-art algorithm for detecting plagiarism in Indonesian texts. Being run at our test document corpus, Alvi's highest scores of recall, precision, Plagdet, and detection rate on no-plagiarism cases correspond to its scores when it was tested on PAN'14 corpus. Thus, this study has contributed in creating a standard evaluation corpus for assessing PDS for Indonesian documents. Besides, this study contributes in a source retrieval algorithm which introduces phrasewords as document features, and a paragraph-based text alignment algorithm which relies on two different strategies. One of them is to apply local-word weighting used in text summarization field to select seeds for both discriminating paragraph pair candidates and matching process. The proposed detection algorithm results in almost no multiple detection. This contributes to the strength of this algorithm

Overview of the 3rd international competition on plagiarism detection

This paper overviews eleven plagiarism detectors that have been developed and evaluated within PAN'11. We survey the detection approaches developed for the two sub-tasks "external plagiarism detection" and "intrinsic plagiarism detection," and we report on their detailed evaluation based on the third revised edition of the PAN plagiarism corpus PAN-PC-11

Scalable and Language-Independent Embedding-based Approach for Plagiarism Detection Considering Obfuscation Type: No Training Phase

[EN] The efficiency and scalability of plagiarism detection systems have become a major challenge due to the vast amount of available textual data in several languages over the Internet. Plagiarism occurs in different levels of obfuscation, ranging from the exact copy of original materials to text summarization. Consequently, designed algorithms to detect plagiarism should be robust to the diverse languages and different type of obfuscation in plagiarism cases. In this paper, we employ text embedding vectors to compare similarity among documents to detect plagiarism. Word vectors are combined by a simple aggregation function to represent a text document. This representation comprises semantic and syntactic information of the text and leads to efficient text alignment among suspicious and original documents. By comparing representations of sentences in source and suspicious documents, pair sentences with the highest similarity are considered as the candidates or seeds of plagiarism cases. To filter and merge these seeds, a set of parameters, including Jaccard similarity and merging threshold, are tuned by two different approaches: offline tuning and online tuning. The offline method, which is used as the benchmark, regulates a unique set of parameters for all types of plagiarism by several trials on the training corpus. Experiments show improvements in performance by considering obfuscation type during threshold tuning. In this regard, our proposed online approach uses two statistical methods to filter outlier candidates automatically by their scale of obfuscation. By employing the online tuning approach, no distinct training dataset is required to train the system. We applied our proposed method on available datasets in English, Persian and Arabic languages on the text alignment task to evaluate the robustness of the proposed methods from the language perspective as well. As our experimental results confirm, our efficient approach can achieve considerable performance on the different datasets in various languages. Our online threshold tuning approach without any training datasets works as well as, or even in some cases better than, the training-base method.The work of Paolo Rosso was partially funded by the Spanish MICINN under the research Project MISMIS-FAKEn-HATE on Misinformation and Miscommunication in social media: FAKE news and HATE speech (PGC2018-096212-B-C31).Gharavi, E.; Veisi, H.; Rosso, P. (2020). Scalable and Language-Independent Embedding-based Approach for Plagiarism Detection Considering Obfuscation Type: No Training Phase. Neural Computing and Applications. 32(14):10593-10607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04594-yS1059310607321

Fourth International Workshop on Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship, and Social Software Misuse

© ACM, 2011. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in ACM SIGIR Forum (2011) http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1988852.1988860[EN] The Fourth International Workshop on Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship, and Social Software Misuse (PAN 10) was held in conjunction with the 2010 Conference on Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access Evaluation (CLEF-10) in Padua, Italy. The workshop was organized as a competition covering two tasks: plagiarism detection and Wikipedia vandalism detection. This report gives a short overview of the plagiarism detection task. Detailed analyses of both tasks have been published as CLEF Notebook Papers [3, 6], which can be downloaded at www.webis.de/publications.Our special thanks go to the participants of the competition for their devoted work. We also thank Yahoo! Research for their sponsorship. This work is partially funded by CONACYTMexico and the MICINN project TEXT-ENTERPRISE 2.0 TIN2009-13391-C04-03 (Plan I+D+i).Stein, B.; Rosso, P.; Stamatatos, E.; Potthast, M.; Barrón Cedeño, LA.; Koppel, M. (2011). Fourth International Workshop on Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship, and Social Software Misuse. ACM SIGIR Forum. 45(1):45-48. https://doi.org/10.1145/1988852.1988860S454845

On the use of word embedding for cross language plagiarism detection

[EN] Cross language plagiarism is the unacknowledged reuse of text across language pairs. It occurs if a passage of text is translated from source language to target language and no proper citation is provided. Although various methods have been developed for detection of cross language plagiarism, less attention has been paid to measure and compare their performance, especially when tackling with different types of paraphrasing through translation. In this paper, we investigate various approaches to cross language plagiarism detection. Moreover, we present a novel approach to cross language plagiarism detection using word embedding methods and explore its performance against other state-of-the-art plagiarism detection algorithms. In order to evaluate the methods, we have constructed an English-Persian bilingual plagiarism detection corpus (referred to as HAMTA-CL) comprised of seven types of obfuscation. The results show that the word embedding approach outperforms the other approaches with respect to recall when encountering heavily paraphrased passages. On the other hand, translation based approach performs well when the precision is the main consideration of the cross language plagiarism detection system.Asghari, H.; Fatemi, O.; Mohtaj, S.; Faili, H.; Rosso, P. (2019). On the use of word embedding for cross language plagiarism detection. Intelligent Data Analysis. 23(3):661-680. https://doi.org/10.3233/IDA-183985S661680233H. Asghari, K. Khoshnava, O. Fatemi and H. Faili, Developing bilingual plagiarism detection corpus using sentence aligned parallel corpus: Notebook for {PAN} at {CLEF} 2015, In L. Cappellato, N. Ferro, G.J.F. Jones and E. SanJuan, editors, Working Notes of {CLEF} 2015 – Conference and Labs of the Evaluation forum, Toulouse, France, September 8–11, 2015, volume 1391 of {CEUR} Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, 2015.A. Barrón-Cede no, M. Potthast, P. Rosso and B. Stein, Corpus and evaluation measures for automatic plagiarism detection, In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, M. Rosner and D. Tapias, editors, Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, {LREC} 2010, 17–23 May 2010, Valletta, Malta. European Language Resources Association, 2010.A. Barrón-Cede no, P. Rosso, D. Pinto and A. Juan, On cross-lingual plagiarism analysis using a statistical model, In B. Stein, E. Stamatatos and M. Koppel, editors, Proceedings of the ECAI’08 Workshop on Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship and Social Software Misuse, Patras, Greece, July 22, 2008, volume 377 of {CEUR} Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, 2008.Farghaly, A., & Shaalan, K. (2009). Arabic Natural Language Processing. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 8(4), 1-22. doi:10.1145/1644879.1644881J. Ferrero, F. Agnès, L. Besacier and D. Schwab, A multilingual, multi-style and multi-granularity dataset for cross-language textual similarity detection, In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, M. Grobelnik, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, A. Moreno, J. Odijk and S. Piperidis, editors, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation {LREC} 2016, Portorož, Slovenia, May 23–28, 2016, European Language Resources Association {(ELRA)}, 2016.Franco-Salvador, M., Gupta, P., Rosso, P., & Banchs, R. E. (2016). Cross-language plagiarism detection over continuous-space- and knowledge graph-based representations of language. Knowledge-Based Systems, 111, 87-99. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.004Franco-Salvador, M., Rosso, P., & Montes-y-Gómez, M. (2016). A systematic study of knowledge graph analysis for cross-language plagiarism detection. Information Processing & Management, 52(4), 550-570. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2015.12.004C.K. Kent and N. Salim, Web based cross language plagiarism detection, CoRR, abs/0912.3, 2009.McNamee, P., & Mayfield, J. (2004). Character N-Gram Tokenization for European Language Text Retrieval. Information Retrieval, 7(1/2), 73-97. doi:10.1023/b:inrt.0000009441.78971.beT. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado and J. Dean, Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space, CoRR, abs/1301.3, 2013.S. Mohtaj, B. Roshanfekr, A. Zafarian and H. Asghari, Parsivar: A language processing toolkit for persian, In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, K. Hasida, H. Isahara, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis and T. Tokunaga, editors, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2018, Miyazaki, Japan, May 7–12, 2018, European Language Resources Association ELRA, 2018.R.M.A. Nawab, M. Stevenson and P.D. Clough, University of Sheffield – Lab Report for {PAN} at {CLEF} 2010, In M. Braschler, D. Harman and E. Pianta, editors, {CLEF} 2010 LABs and Workshops, Notebook Papers, 22–23 September 2010, Padua, Italy, volume 1176 of {CEUR} Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, 2010.G. Oberreuter, G. L’Huillier, S.A. Rios and J.D. Velásquez, Approaches for intrinsic and external plagiarism detection – Notebook for {PAN} at {CLEF} 2011, In V. Petras, P. Forner and P.D. Clough, editors, {CLEF} 2011 Labs and Workshop, Notebook Papers, 19–22 September 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, volume 1177 of {CEUR} Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, 2011.Pinto, D., Civera, J., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Juan, A., & Rosso, P. (2009). A statistical approach to crosslingual natural language tasks. Journal of Algorithms, 64(1), 51-60. doi:10.1016/j.jalgor.2009.02.005M. Potthast, A. Barrón-Cede no, A. Eiselt, B. Stein and P. Rosso, Overview of the 2nd international competition on plagiarism detection, In M. Braschler, D. Harman and E. Pianta, editors, {CLEF} 2010 LABs and Workshops, Notebook Papers, 22–23 September 2010, Padua, Italy, volume 1176 of {CEUR} Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, 2010.Potthast, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Stein, B., & Rosso, P. (2010). Cross-language plagiarism detection. Language Resources and Evaluation, 45(1), 45-62. doi:10.1007/s10579-009-9114-zM. Potthast, A. Eiselt, A. Barrón-Cede no, B. Stein and P. Rosso, Overview of the 3rd international competition on plagiarism detection, In V. Petras, P. Forner and P.D. Clough, editors, {CLEF} 2011 Labs and Workshop, Notebook Papers, 19–22 September 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, volume 1177 of {CEUR} Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, 2011.M. Potthast, S. Goering, P. Rosso and B. Stein, Towards data submissions for shared tasks: First experiences for the task of text alignment, In L. Cappellato, N. Ferro, G.J.F. Jones and E. SanJuan, editors, Working Notes of {CLEF} 2015 – Conference and Labs of the Evaluation forum, Toulouse, France, September 8–11, 2015, volume 1391 of {CEUR} Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, 2015.Potthast, M., Stein, B., & Anderka, M. (s. f.). A Wikipedia-Based Multilingual Retrieval Model. Advances in Information Retrieval, 522-530. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78646-7_51B. Pouliquen, R. Steinberger and C. Ignat, Automatic identification of document translations in large multilingual document collections, CoRR, abs/cs/060, 2006.B. Stein, E. Stamatatos and M. Koppel, Proceedings of the ECAI’08 Workshop on Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship and Social Software Misuse, Patras, Greece, July 22, 2008, volume 377 of {CEUR} Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, 2008.J. Wieting, M. Bansal, K. Gimpel and K. Livescu, Towards universal paraphrastic sentence embeddings, CoRR, abs/1511.0, 2015.V. Zarrabi, J. Rafiei, K. Khoshnava, H. Asghari and S. Mohtaj, Evaluation of text reuse corpora for text alignment task of plagiarism detection, In L. Cappellato, N. Ferro, G.J.F. Jones and E. SanJuan, editors, Working Notes of {CLEF} 2015 – Conference and Labs of the Evaluation forum, Toulouse, France, September 8–11, 2015, volume 1391 of {CEUR} Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, 2015.Barrón-Cedeño, A., Gupta, P., & Rosso, P. (2013). Methods for cross-language plagiarism detection. Knowledge-Based Systems, 50, 211-217. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.06.01

Overview of the 5th International Competition on Plagiarism Detection

Abstract This paper overviews 18 plagiarism detectors that have been evaluated within the fifth international competition on plagiarism detection at PAN 2013. We report on their performances for the two tasks source retrieval and text alignment of external plagiarism detection. Furthermore, we continue last year’s initiative to invite software submissions instead of run submissions, and, re-evaluate this year’s submissions on last year’s evaluation corpora and vice versa, thus demonstrating the benefits of software submissions in terms of reproducibility.Potthast, M.; Hagen, M.; Gollub, T.; Tippmann, M.; Kiesel, J.; Rosso, P.; Stamatatos, E.... (2013). Overview of the 5th International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. CLEF Conference on Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access Evaluation. 301-331. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/46635S30133

Overview of the 6th International Competition on Plagiarism Detection

[EN] This paper overviews 17 plagiarism detectors that have been evaluated within the sixth international competition on plagiarism detection at PAN 2014. We report on their performances for the two tasks source retrieval and text alignment of external plagiarism detection. For the third year in a row, we invite software submissions instead of run submissions for this task, which allows for cross-year evaluations. Moreover, we introduce new performance measures for text alignment to shed light on new aspects of detection performance.We thank the participating teams of this task for their devoted work. This paper was partially supported by the WIQ-EI IRSES project (Grant No. 269180) within the FP7 Marie Curie action.Potthast, M.; Hagen, M.; Beyer, A.; Busse, M.; Tippmann, M.; Rosso, P.; Stein, B. (2014). Overview of the 6th International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 1180:845-876. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/61151S845876118

Plagiarism detection for Indonesian texts

As plagiarism becomes an increasing concern for Indonesian universities and research centers, the need of using automatic plagiarism checker is becoming more real. However, researches on Plagiarism Detection Systems (PDS) in Indonesian documents have not been well developed, since most of them deal with detecting duplicate or near-duplicate documents, have not addressed the problem of retrieving source documents, or show tendency to measure document similarity globally. Therefore, systems resulted from these researches are incapable of referring to exact locations of ``similar passage'' pairs. Besides, there has been no public and standard corpora available to evaluate PDS in Indonesian texts. To address the weaknesses of former researches, this thesis develops a plagiarism detection system which executes various methods of plagiarism detection stages in a workflow system. In retrieval stage, a novel document feature coined as phraseword is introduced and executed along with word unigram and character n-grams to address the problem of retrieving source documents, whose contents are copied partially or obfuscated in a suspicious document. The detection stage, which exploits a two-step paragraph-based comparison, is aimed to address the problems of detecting and locating source-obfuscated passage pairs. The seeds for matching source-obfuscated passage pairs are based on locally-weighted significant terms to capture paraphrased and summarized passages. In addition to this system, an evaluation corpus was created through simulation by human writers, and by algorithmic random generation. Using this corpus, the performance evaluation of the proposed methods was performed in three scenarios. On the first scenario which evaluated source retrieval performance, some methods using phraseword and token features were able to achieve the optimum recall rate 1. On the second scenario which evaluated detection performance, our system was compared to Alvi's algorithm and evaluated in 4 levels of measures: character, passage, document, and cases. The experiment results showed that methods resulted from using token as seeds have higher scores than Alvi's algorithm in all 4 levels of measures both in artificial and simulated plagiarism cases. In case detection, our systems outperform Alvi's algorithm in recognizing copied, shaked, and paraphrased passages. However, Alvi's recognition rate on summarized passage is insignificantly higher than our system. The same tendency of experiment results were demonstrated on the third experiment scenario, only the precision rates of Alvi's algorithm in character and paragraph levels are higher than our system. The higher Plagdet scores produced by some methods in our system than Alvi's scores show that this study has fulfilled its objective in implementing a competitive state-of-the-art algorithm for detecting plagiarism in Indonesian texts. Being run at our test document corpus, Alvi's highest scores of recall, precision, Plagdet, and detection rate on no-plagiarism cases correspond to its scores when it was tested on PAN'14 corpus. Thus, this study has contributed in creating a standard evaluation corpus for assessing PDS for Indonesian documents. Besides, this study contributes in a source retrieval algorithm which introduces phrasewords as document features, and a paragraph-based text alignment algorithm which relies on two different strategies. One of them is to apply local-word weighting used in text summarization field to select seeds for both discriminating paragraph pair candidates and matching process. The proposed detection algorithm results in almost no multiple detection. This contributes to the strength of this algorithm

Recent trends in digital text forensics and its evaluation

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_28This paper outlines the concepts and achievements of our evaluation lab on digital text forensics, PAN 13, which called for original research and development on plagiarism detection, author identification, and author profiling. We present a standardized evaluation framework for each of the three tasks and discuss the evaluation results of the altogether 58 submitted contributions. For the first time, instead of accepting the output of software runs, we collected the softwares themselves and run them on a computer cluster at our site. As evaluation and experimentation platform we use TIRA, which is being developed at the Webis Group in Weimar. TIRA can handle large-scale software submissions by means of virtualization, sandboxed execution, tailored unit testing, and staged submission. In addition to the achieved evaluation results, a major achievement of our lab is that we now have the largest collection of state-of-the-art approaches with regard to the mentioned tasks for further analysis at our disposal.This work was partially supported by the WIQ-EI IRSES project (Grant No. 269180) within the FP7 Marie Curie action.Gollub, T.; Potthast, M.; Beyer, A.; Busse, M.; Rangel Pardo, FM.; Rosso, P.; Stamatatos, E.... (2013). Recent trends in digital text forensics and its evaluation. En Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Visualization. Springer Verlag (Germany). 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_28S282302Aleman, Y., Loya, N., Vilarino Ayala, D., Pinto, D.: Two Methodologies Applied to the Author Profiling Task—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Argamon, S., Juola, P.: Overview of the International Authorship Identification Competition at PAN-2011. In: Proc. of CLEF 2011 (2011)Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J., Shimoni, A.R.: Gender, Genre, and Writing Style in Formal Written Texts. TEXT 23, 321–346 (2003)Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Pennebaker, J.W., Schler, J.: Automatically Profiling the Author of an Anonymous Text. Commun. ACM 52(2), 119–123 (2009)Armstrong, T.G., Moffat, A., Webber, W., Zobel, J.: EvaluatIR: An Online Tool for Evaluating and Comparing IR Systems. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2009 (2009)Blockeel, H., Vanschoren, J.: Experiment Databases: Towards an Improved Experimental Methodology in Machine Learning. In: Kok, J.N., Koronacki, J., Lopez de Mantaras, R., Matwin, S., Mladenič, D., Skowron, A. (eds.) PKDD 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4702, pp. 6–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Burger, J.D., Henderson, J., Kim, G., Zarrella, G.: Discriminating Gender on Twitter. In: Proc. EMNLP 2011 (2011)Clough, P., Stevenson, M.: Developing a Corpus of Plagiarised Short Answers. Lang. Resour. Eval. 45, 5–24 (2011)Clough, P., Gaizauskas, R., Piao, S.S.L., Wilks, Y.: METER: MEasuring TExt Reuse. In: Proc. ACL 2002 (2002)De Roure, D., Goble, C., Stevens, R.: The Design and Realisation of the myExperiment Virtual Research Environment for Social Sharing of Workflows. Future Gener. Comp. Sy. 25, 561–567 (2009)Caurcel Diaz, A.A., Gomez Hidalgo, J.M.: Experiments with SMS Translation and Stochastic Gradient Descent in Spanish Text Author Profiling—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Downie, J.S.: The Music Information Retrieval Evaluation Exchange (2005–2007): A Window into Music Information Retrieval Research. Acoust. Sc. and Tech. 29(4), 247–255 (2008)Hernandez Farias, D.I., Guzman-Cabrera, R., Reyes, A., Rocha, M.A.: Semantic-based Features for Author Profiling Identification: First Insights—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Flekova, L., Gurevych, I.: Can We Hide in the Web? Large Scale Simultaneous Age and Gender Author Profiling in Social Media–Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Forner, P., Navigli, R., Tufis, D. (eds.): CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop – Working Notes Papers (2013)Gillam, L.: Readability for author profiling?—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Gollub, T., Burrows, S., Stein, B.: First Experiences with TIRA for Reproducible Evaluation in Information Retrieval. In: Proc. of OSIR at SIGIR 2012 (August 2012)Gollub, T., Stein, B., Burrows, S.: Ousting Ivory Tower Research: Towards a Web Framework for Providing Experiments as a Service. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2012 (2012)Gollub, T., Stein, B., Burrows, S., Hoppe, D.: TIRA: Configuring, Executing, and Disseminating Information Retrieval Experiments. In: Proc. of TIR at DEXA 2012. IEEE (2012)Goswami, S., Sarkar, S., Rustagi, M.: Stylometric Analysis of Bloggers’ Age and Gender. In: Proc. of ICWSM 2009 (2009)Haggag, O., El-Beltagy, S.: Plagiarism Candidate Retrieval Using Selective Query Formulation and Discriminative Query Scoring—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Holmes, J., Meyerhoff, M.: The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics. Wiley (2003)Inches, G., Crestani, F.: Overview of the International Sexual Predator Identification Competition at PAN-2012. In: Proc. of CLEF 2012 (2012)Juola, P.: Authorship Attribution. Found. and Trends in IR 1, 234–334 (2008)Juola, P.: Ad-hoc Authorship Attribution Competition. In: Proc. of ALLC 2004 (2004)Juola, P.: An Overview of the Traditional Authorship Attribution Subtask. In: Proc. of CLEF 2012 (2012)Koppel, M., Winter, Y.: Determining if Two Documents are by the Same Author. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (to appear)Koppel, M., Argamon, S., Shimoni, A.R.: Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing 17(4), 401–412 (2002)Koppel, M., Schler, J., Bonchek-Dokow, E.: Measuring Differentiability: Unmasking Pseudonymous Authors. Journal of Machine Learning Research 8, 1261–1276 (2007)Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S.: Authorship Attribution in the Wild. Language Resources and Evaluation 45, 83–94 (2011)Kong, L., Qi, H., Du, C., Wang, M., Han, Z.: Approaches for Source Retrieval and Text Alignment of Plagiarism Detection—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Lim, W.Y., Goh, J., Thing, V.L.L.: Content-centric age and gender profiling—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Pastor Lopez-Monroy, A., Montes-Y-Gomez, M., Jair Escalante, H., Villasenor-Pineda, L., Villatoro-Tello, E.: INAOE’s participation at PAN’13: Author Profiling task—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Meina, M., Brodzinska, K., Celmer, B., Czokow, M., Patera, M., Pezacki, J., Wilk, M.: Ensemble-based Classification for Author Profiling using Various Features—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Nguyen, D., Gravel, R., Trieschnigg, D., Meder, T.: “How Old Do You Think I Am?”; A Study of Language and Age in Twitter. In: Proc. of ICWSM 2013 (2013)Nguyen, D., Smith, N.A., Rosé, C.P.: Author Age Prediction from Text Using Linear Regression. In: Proc. of LaTeCH at ACL-HLTGopal Patra, B., Banerjee, S., Das, D., Saikh, T., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Automatic Author Profiling Based on Linguistic and Stylistic Features—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Peersman, C., Daelemans, W., Van Vaerenbergh, L.: Predicting Age and Gender in Online Social Networks. In: Proc. of SMUC 2011 (2011)Pennebaker, J.W.: The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. Bloomsbury, USA (2013)Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., Niederhoffer, K.G.: Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves. Annual Review of Psychology 54(1), 547–577 (2003)Potthast, M., Stein, B., Eiselt, A., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Rosso, P.: Overview of the 1st International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. In: Proc. of PAN at SEPLN 2009 (2009)Potthast, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Eiselt, A., Stein, B., Rosso, P.: Overview of the 2nd International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. In: Proc. of CLEF 2010 (2010)Potthast, M., Stein, B., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Rosso, P.: An Evaluation Framework for Plagiarism Detection. In: Proc. of COLING 2010 (2010)Potthast, M., Eiselt, A., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Stein, B., Rosso, P.: Overview of the 3rd International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. In: Proc. of CLEF 2011 (2011)Potthast, M., Gollub, T., Hagen, M., Graßegger, J., Kiesel, J., Michel, M., Oberländer, A., Tippmann, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Gupta, P., Rosso, P., Stein, B.: Overview of the 4th International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. In: Proc. of CLEF 2012 (2012)Potthast, M., Hagen, M., Stein, B., Graßegger, J., Michel, M., Tippmann, M., Welsch, C.: ChatNoir: A Search Engine for the ClueWeb09 Corpus. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2012 (2012)Potthast, M., Gollub, T., Hagen, M., Tippmann, M., Kiesel, J., Rosso, P., Stamatatos, E., Stein, B.: Overview of the 5th International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. In: Proc. of CLEF 2013 (2013)Potthast, M., Hagen, M., Völske, M., Stein, B.: Crowdsourcing Interaction Logs to Understand Text Reuse from the Web. In: Proc. of ACL 2013. ACM (to appear, August 2013b)Rodíguez Torrejón, D.A., Martín Ramos, J.M.: Text Alignment Module in CoReMo 2.1 Plagiarism Detector—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Santosh, K., Bansal, R., Shekhar, M., Varma, V.: Author Profiling: Predicting Age and Gender from Blogs—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Schler, J., Koppel, M., Argamon, S., Pennebaker, J.W.: Effects of Age and Gender on Blogging. In: Proc. of CAAW 2006 (2006)Stamatatos, E.: A Survey of Modern Authorship Attribution Methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 538–556 (2009)Stamatatos, E.: Plagiarism Detection Using Stopword N-grams. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(12), 2512–2527 (2011)Stein, B., Meyer zu Eißen, S., Potthast, M.: Strategies for Retrieving Plagiarized Documents. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2007 (2007)Suchomel, Š., Kasprzak, J., Brandejs, M.: Diverse Queries and Feature Type Selection for Plagiarism Discovery—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Williams, K., Chen, H., Chowdhury, S.R., Giles, C.L.: Unsupervised Ranking for Plagiarism Source Retrieval—Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013. In: Forner, et al. (eds.) [15]Wojnarski, M., Stawicki, S., Wojnarowski, P.: TunedIT.org: System for Automated Evaluation of Algorithms in Repeatable Experiments. In: Szczuka, M., Kryszkiewicz, M., Ramanna, S., Jensen, R., Hu, Q. (eds.) RSCTC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6086, pp. 20–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Zhang, C., Zhang, P.: Predicting Gender from Blog Posts. Technical report, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA (2010

On the Mono- and Cross-Language Detection of Text Re-Use and Plagiarism

Barrón Cedeño, LA. (2012). On the Mono- and Cross-Language Detection of Text Re-Use and Plagiarism [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/16012Palanci