CSP-Completeness And Its Applications

We build off of previous ideas used to study both reductions between CSPrefutation problems and improper learning and between CSP-refutation problems themselves to expand some hardness results that depend on the assumption that refuting random CSP instances are hard for certain choices of predicates (like k-SAT). First, we are able argue the hardness of the fundamental problem of learning conjunctions in a one-sided PAC-esque learning model that has appeared in several forms over the years. In this model we focus on producing a hypothesis that foremost guarantees a small false-positive rate while minimizing the false-negative rate for such hypotheses. Further, we formalize a notion of CSP-refutation reductions and CSP-refutation completeness that and use these, along with candidate CSP-refutatation complete predicates, to provide further evidence for the hardness of several problems

The power of sum-of-squares for detecting hidden structures

We study planted problems---finding hidden structures in random noisy inputs---through the lens of the sum-of-squares semidefinite programming hierarchy (SoS). This family of powerful semidefinite programs has recently yielded many new algorithms for planted problems, often achieving the best known polynomial-time guarantees in terms of accuracy of recovered solutions and robustness to noise. One theme in recent work is the design of spectral algorithms which match the guarantees of SoS algorithms for planted problems. Classical spectral algorithms are often unable to accomplish this: the twist in these new spectral algorithms is the use of spectral structure of matrices whose entries are low-degree polynomials of the input variables. We prove that for a wide class of planted problems, including refuting random constraint satisfaction problems, tensor and sparse PCA, densest-k-subgraph, community detection in stochastic block models, planted clique, and others, eigenvalues of degree-d matrix polynomials are as powerful as SoS semidefinite programs of roughly degree d. For such problems it is therefore always possible to match the guarantees of SoS without solving a large semidefinite program. Using related ideas on SoS algorithms and low-degree matrix polynomials (and inspired by recent work on SoS and the planted clique problem by Barak et al.), we prove new nearly-tight SoS lower bounds for the tensor and sparse principal component analysis problems. Our lower bounds for sparse principal component analysis are the first to suggest that going beyond existing algorithms for this problem may require sub-exponential time

From Weak to Strong LP Gaps for All CSPs

We study the approximability of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) by linear programming (LP) relaxations. We show that for every CSP, the approximation obtained by a basic LP relaxation, is no weaker than the approximation obtained using relaxations given by Omega(log(n)/log(log(n))) levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy on instances of size n. It was proved by Chan et al. [FOCS 2013] (and recently strengthened by Kothari et al. [STOC 2017]) that for CSPs, any polynomial size LP extended formulation is no stronger than relaxations obtained by a super-constant levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy. Combining this with our result also implies that any polynomial size LP extended formulation is no stronger than simply the basic LP, which can be thought of as the base level of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy. This essentially gives a dichotomy result for approximation of CSPs by polynomial size LP extended formulations. Using our techniques, we also simplify and strengthen the result by Khot et al. [STOC 2014] on (strong) approximation resistance for LPs. They provided a necessary and sufficient condition under which Omega(loglog n) levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy cannot achieve an approximation better than a random assignment. We simplify their proof and strengthen the bound to Omega(log(n)/log(log(n))) levels

On streaming approximation algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems

In this thesis, we explore streaming algorithms for approximating constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). The setup is roughly the following: A computer has limited memory space, sees a long "stream" of local constraints on a set of variables, and tries to estimate how many of the constraints may be simultaneously satisfied. The past ten years have seen a number of works in this area, and this thesis includes both expository material and novel contributions. Throughout, we emphasize connections to the broader theories of CSPs, approximability, and streaming models, and highlight interesting open problems. The first part of our thesis is expository: We present aspects of previous works that completely characterize the approximability of specific CSPs like Max-Cut and Max-Dicut with $\sqrt{n}$-space streaming algorithm (on $n$-variable instances), while characterizing the approximability of all CSPs in $\sqrt n$ space in the special case of "composable" (i.e., sketching) algorithms, and of a particular subclass of CSPs with linear-space streaming algorithms. In the second part of the thesis, we present two of our own joint works. We begin with a work with Madhu Sudan and Santhoshini Velusamy in which we prove linear-space streaming approximation-resistance for all ordering CSPs (OCSPs), which are "CSP-like" problems maximizing over sets of permutations. Next, we present joint work with Joanna Boyland, Michael Hwang, Tarun Prasad, and Santhoshini Velusamy in which we investigate the $\sqrt n$-space streaming approximability of symmetric Boolean CSPs with negations. We give explicit $\sqrt n$-space sketching approximability ratios for several families of CSPs, including Max-$k$AND; develop simpler optimal sketching approximation algorithms for threshold predicates; and show that previous lower bounds fail to characterize the $\sqrt n$-space streaming approximability of Max-$3$AND.Comment: Harvard College senior thesis; 119 pages plus references; abstract shortened for arXiv; formatted with Dissertate template (feel free to copy!); exposits papers arXiv:2105.01782 (APPROX 2021) and arXiv:2112.06319 (APPROX 2022

Hardness of robust graph isomorphism, Lasserre gaps, and asymmetry of random graphs

Building on work of Cai, F\"urer, and Immerman \cite{CFI92}, we show two hardness results for the Graph Isomorphism problem. First, we show that there are pairs of nonisomorphic $n$-vertex graphs $G$ and $H$ such that any sum-of-squares (SOS) proof of nonisomorphism requires degree $\Omega(n)$. In other words, we show an $\Omega(n)$-round integrality gap for the Lasserre SDP relaxation. In fact, we show this for pairs $G$ and $H$ which are not even $(1-10^{-14})$-isomorphic. (Here we say that two $n$-vertex, $m$-edge graphs $G$ and $H$ are $\alpha$-isomorphic if there is a bijection between their vertices which preserves at least $\alpha m$ edges.) Our second result is that under the {\sc R3XOR} Hypothesis \cite{Fei02} (and also any of a class of hypotheses which generalize the {\sc R3XOR} Hypothesis), the \emph{robust} Graph Isomorphism problem is hard. I.e.\ for every $\epsilon > 0$, there is no efficient algorithm which can distinguish graph pairs which are $(1-\epsilon)$-isomorphic from pairs which are not even $(1-\epsilon_0)$-isomorphic for some universal constant $\epsilon_0$. Along the way we prove a robust asymmetry result for random graphs and hypergraphs which may be of independent interest