2,263 research outputs found
Lock-free Concurrent Data Structures
Concurrent data structures are the data sharing side of parallel programming.
Data structures give the means to the program to store data, but also provide
operations to the program to access and manipulate these data. These operations
are implemented through algorithms that have to be efficient. In the sequential
setting, data structures are crucially important for the performance of the
respective computation. In the parallel programming setting, their importance
becomes more crucial because of the increased use of data and resource sharing
for utilizing parallelism.
The first and main goal of this chapter is to provide a sufficient background
and intuition to help the interested reader to navigate in the complex research
area of lock-free data structures. The second goal is to offer the programmer
familiarity to the subject that will allow her to use truly concurrent methods.Comment: To appear in "Programming Multi-core and Many-core Computing
Systems", eds. S. Pllana and F. Xhafa, Wiley Series on Parallel and
Distributed Computin
The Parallelism Motifs of Genomic Data Analysis
Genomic data sets are growing dramatically as the cost of sequencing
continues to decline and small sequencing devices become available. Enormous
community databases store and share this data with the research community, but
some of these genomic data analysis problems require large scale computational
platforms to meet both the memory and computational requirements. These
applications differ from scientific simulations that dominate the workload on
high end parallel systems today and place different requirements on programming
support, software libraries, and parallel architectural design. For example,
they involve irregular communication patterns such as asynchronous updates to
shared data structures. We consider several problems in high performance
genomics analysis, including alignment, profiling, clustering, and assembly for
both single genomes and metagenomes. We identify some of the common
computational patterns or motifs that help inform parallelization strategies
and compare our motifs to some of the established lists, arguing that at least
two key patterns, sorting and hashing, are missing
AT-GIS: highly parallel spatial query processing with associative transducers
Users in many domains, including urban planning, transportation, and environmental science want to execute analytical queries over continuously updated spatial datasets. Current solutions for largescale spatial query processing either rely on extensions to RDBMS, which entails expensive loading and indexing phases when the data changes, or distributed map/reduce frameworks, running on resource-hungry compute clusters. Both solutions struggle with the sequential bottleneck of parsing complex, hierarchical spatial data formats, which frequently dominates query execution time. Our goal is to fully exploit the parallelism offered by modern multicore CPUs for parsing and query execution, thus providing the performance of a cluster with the resources of a single machine. We describe AT-GIS, a highly-parallel spatial query processing system that scales linearly to a large number of CPU cores. ATGIS integrates the parsing and querying of spatial data using a new computational abstraction called associative transducers(ATs). ATs can form a single data-parallel pipeline for computation without requiring the spatial input data to be split into logically independent blocks. Using ATs, AT-GIS can execute, in parallel, spatial query operators on the raw input data in multiple formats, without any pre-processing. On a single 64-core machine, AT-GIS provides 3× the performance of an 8-node Hadoop cluster with 192 cores for containment queries, and 10× for aggregation queries
A Bulk-Parallel Priority Queue in External Memory with STXXL
We propose the design and an implementation of a bulk-parallel external
memory priority queue to take advantage of both shared-memory parallelism and
high external memory transfer speeds to parallel disks. To achieve higher
performance by decoupling item insertions and extractions, we offer two
parallelization interfaces: one using "bulk" sequences, the other by defining
"limit" items. In the design, we discuss how to parallelize insertions using
multiple heaps, and how to calculate a dynamic prediction sequence to prefetch
blocks and apply parallel multiway merge for extraction. Our experimental
results show that in the selected benchmarks the priority queue reaches 75% of
the full parallel I/O bandwidth of rotational disks and and 65% of SSDs, or the
speed of sorting in external memory when bounded by computation.Comment: extended version of SEA'15 conference pape
GraphX: Unifying Data-Parallel and Graph-Parallel Analytics
From social networks to language modeling, the growing scale and importance
of graph data has driven the development of numerous new graph-parallel systems
(e.g., Pregel, GraphLab). By restricting the computation that can be expressed
and introducing new techniques to partition and distribute the graph, these
systems can efficiently execute iterative graph algorithms orders of magnitude
faster than more general data-parallel systems. However, the same restrictions
that enable the performance gains also make it difficult to express many of the
important stages in a typical graph-analytics pipeline: constructing the graph,
modifying its structure, or expressing computation that spans multiple graphs.
As a consequence, existing graph analytics pipelines compose graph-parallel and
data-parallel systems using external storage systems, leading to extensive data
movement and complicated programming model.
To address these challenges we introduce GraphX, a distributed graph
computation framework that unifies graph-parallel and data-parallel
computation. GraphX provides a small, core set of graph-parallel operators
expressive enough to implement the Pregel and PowerGraph abstractions, yet
simple enough to be cast in relational algebra. GraphX uses a collection of
query optimization techniques such as automatic join rewrites to efficiently
implement these graph-parallel operators. We evaluate GraphX on real-world
graphs and workloads and demonstrate that GraphX achieves comparable
performance as specialized graph computation systems, while outperforming them
in end-to-end graph pipelines. Moreover, GraphX achieves a balance between
expressiveness, performance, and ease of use
- …