54 research outputs found

    ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ๊ด€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์™€ ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์‚ฌ๋ฒ”๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ˆ˜ํ•™๊ต์œก๊ณผ, 2023. 2. ๊น€์„œ๋ น.In this thesis, we study m-step competition graphs, (1, 2)-step competition graphs, phylogeny graphs, and competition-common enemy graphs (CCE graphs), which are primary variants of competition graphs. Cohen [11] introduced the notion of competition graph while studying predator-prey concepts in ecological food webs.An ecosystem is a biological community of interacting species and their physical environment. For each species in an ecosystem, there can be m conditions of the good environment by regarding lower and upper bounds on numerous dimensions such as soil, climate, temperature, etc, which may be represented by an m-dimensional rectangle, so-called an ecological niche. An elemental ecological truth is that two species compete if and only if their ecological niches overlap. Biologists often describe competitive relations among species cohabiting in a community by a food web that is a digraph whose vertices are the species and an arc goes from a predator to a prey. In this context, Cohen [11] defined the competition graph of a digraph as follows. The competition graph C(D) of a digraph D is defined to be a simple graph whose vertex set is the same as V (D) and which has an edge joining two distinct vertices u and v if and only if there are arcs (u, w) and (v, w) for some vertex w in D. Since Cohen introduced this definition, its variants such as m-step competition graphs, (i, j)-step competition graphs, phylogeny graphs, CCE graphs, p-competition graphs, and niche graphs have been introduced and studied. As part of these studies, we show that the connected triangle-free m-step competition graph on n vertices is a tree and completely characterize the digraphs of order n whose m-step competition graphs are star graphs for positive integers 2 โ‰ค m < n. We completely identify (1,2)-step competition graphs C_{1,2}(D) of orientations D of a complete k-partite graph for some k โ‰ฅ 3 when each partite set of D forms a clique in C_{1,2}(D). In addition, we show that the diameter of each component of C_{1,2}(D) is at most three and provide a sharp upper bound on the domination number of C_{1,2}(D) and give a sufficient condition for C_{1,2}(D) being an interval graph. On the other hand, we study on phylogeny graphs and CCE graphs of degreebounded acyclic digraphs. An acyclic digraph in which every vertex has indegree at most i and outdegree at most j is called an (i, j) digraph for some positive integers i and j. If each vertex of a (not necessarily acyclic) digraph D has indegree at most i and outdegree at most j, then D is called an hi, ji digraph. We give a sufficient condition on the size of hole of an underlying graph of an (i, 2) digraph D for the phylogeny graph of D being a chordal graph where D is an (i, 2) digraph. Moreover, we go further to completely characterize phylogeny graphs of (i, j) digraphs by listing the forbidden induced subgraphs. We completely identify the graphs with the least components among the CCE graphs of (2, 2) digraphs containing at most one cycle and exactly two isolated vertices, and their digraphs. Finally, we gives a sufficient condition for CCE graphs being interval graphs.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ณ€์ด๋“ค ์ค‘ m-step ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„, (1, 2)-step ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„, ๊ณ„ํ†ต ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„, ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ณต์ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. Cohen [11]์€ ๋จน์ด์‚ฌ์Šฌ์—์„œ ํฌ์‹์ž-ํ”ผ์‹์ž ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ๊ณ ์•ˆํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„๋Š” ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ข…๋“ค๊ณผ ๊ทธ๋“ค์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์ฒด๊ณ„์ด๋‹ค. ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์˜ ๊ฐ ์ข…์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ, ํ† ์–‘, ๊ธฐํ›„, ์˜จ๋„ ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ฐจ์›์˜ ํ•˜๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์ƒ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ข‹์€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ m๊ฐœ์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด๋“ค๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์ง€์œ„(ecological niche)๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ƒํƒœํ•™์  ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ฐ€์ •์€ ๋‘ ์ข…์ด ์ƒํƒœ์  ์ง€์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฒน์น˜๋ฉด ๊ฒฝ์Ÿํ•˜๊ณ (compete), ๊ฒฝ์Ÿํ•˜๋Š” ๋‘ ์ข…์€ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์ง€์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฒน์นœ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ”ํžˆ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์ž๋“ค์€ ํ•œ ์ฒด์ œ์—์„œ ์„œ์‹ํ•˜๋Š” ์ข…๋“ค์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ ์ข…์€ ๊ผญ์ง“์ ์œผ๋กœ, ํฌ์‹์ž์—์„œ ํ”ผ์‹์ž์—๊ฒŒ๋Š” ์œ ํ–ฅ๋ณ€(arc)์„ ๊ทธ์–ด์„œ ๋จน์ด์‚ฌ์Šฌ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์—์„œ Cohen [11]์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(digraph) D์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(competition graph) C(D) ๋ž€ V (D)๋ฅผ ๊ผญ์ง“์  ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‘ ๊ผญ์ง“์  u, v๋ฅผ ์–‘ ๋์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๋ณ€์ด ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๊ผญ์ง“์  w๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜์—ฌ (u, w),(v, w)๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋‘ D์—์„œ ์œ ํ–ฅ๋ณ€์ด ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋™์น˜์ธ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. Cohen์ด ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์˜ ์ •์˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…ํ•œ ์ดํ›„๋กœ ๊ทธ ๋ณ€์ด๋“ค๋กœ m-step ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(m-step competition graph), (i, j)-step ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„((i, j)-step competition graph), ๊ณ„ํ†ต๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(phylogeny graph), ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ณต์ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(competition-common enemy graph), p-๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(p-competition graph), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ง€์œ„๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(niche graph)๊ฐ€ ๋„์ž…๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์‚ผ๊ฐํ˜•์ด ์—†์ด ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ m-step ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋Š” ํŠธ๋ฆฌ(tree)์ž„์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ 2 โ‰ค m < n์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ •์ˆ˜ m, n์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ผญ์ง“์ ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ n๊ฐœ์ด๊ณ  m-step ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๊ฐ€ ๋ณ„๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(star graph)๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋Š” ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋ฅผ ์™„๋ฒฝํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํŠน์ง•ํ™” ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. k โ‰ฅ 3์ด๊ณ  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ง€์–ด์ง„ ์™„์ „ k-๋ถ„ํ•  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(oriented complete k-partite graph)์˜ (1, 2)-step ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ C_{1,2}(D)์—์„œ ๊ฐ ๋ถ„ํ• ์ด ์™„์ „ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃฐ ๋•Œ, C_{1,2}(D)์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ํŠน์ง•ํ™” ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, C_{1,2}(D)์˜ ๊ฐ ์„ฑ๋ถ„(component)์˜ ์ง€๋ฆ„(diameter)์˜ ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 3์ด๋ฉฐ C_{1,2}(D)์˜ ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜(domination number)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ณ„์™€ ์ตœ๋Œ“๊ฐ’์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(interval graph)๊ฐ€ ๋˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฐจ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ œํ•œ๋œ ์œ ํ–ฅํšŒ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(degree-bounded acyclic digraph)์˜ ๊ณ„ํ†ต๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์™€ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ณต์ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์–‘์˜ ์ •์ˆ˜๋“ค i, j์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ (i, j) ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋ž€ ๊ฐ ๊ผญ์ง“์ ์˜ ๋‚ด์ฐจ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ i, ์™ธ์ฐจ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ j์ธ ์œ ํ–ฅํšŒ๋กœ ๊ฐ–์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์ด๋‹ค. ๋งŒ์•ฝ ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ D์— ๊ฐ ๊ผญ์ง“์ ์ด ๋‚ด์ฐจ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ i, ์™ธ์ฐจ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ j ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— D๋ฅผ hi, ji ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. D๊ฐ€ (i, 2) ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์ผ ๋•Œ, D์˜ ๊ณ„ํ†ต๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๊ฐ€ ํ˜„๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(chordal graph)๊ฐ€ ๋˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ D์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์–ป์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(underlying graph)์—์„œ ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ 4์ด์ƒ์ธ ํšŒ๋กœ(hole)์˜ ๊ธธ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถฉ๋ถ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ๋‹ค๊ฐ€ (i, j) ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์˜ ๊ณ„ํ†ต๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์—์„œ ๋‚˜์˜ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(forbidden induced subgraph)๋ฅผ ํŠน์ง•ํ™” ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. (2, 2) ์œ ํ–ฅ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ D์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๊ณต์ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ CCE(D)๊ฐ€ 2๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ณ ๋ฆฝ์ (isolated vertex)๊ณผ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 1๊ฐœ์˜ ํšŒ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–์œผ๋ฉด์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ์€ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์ผ ๋•Œ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, CCE(D)๊ฐ€ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๊ฐ€ ๋˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์˜ ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถฉ๋ถ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Graph theory terminology and basic concepts 1 1.2 Competition graphs and its variants 6 1.2.1 A brief background of competition graphs 6 1.2.2 Variants of competition graphs 8 1.2.3 m-step competition graphs 10 1.2.4 (1, 2)-step competition graphs 13 1.2.5 Phylogeny graphs 14 1.2.6 CCE graphs 16 1.3 A preview of the thesis 17 2 Digraphs whose m-step competition graphs are trees 19 2.1 The triangle-free m-step competition graphs 23 2.2 Digraphs whose m-step competition graphs are trees 29 2.3 The digraphs whose m-step competition graphs are star graphs 38 3 On (1, 2)-step competition graphs of multipartite tournaments 47 3.1 Preliminaries 48 3.2 C1,2(D) with a non-clique partite set of D 51 3.3 C1,2(D) without a non-clique partite set of D 66 3.4 C1,2(D) as a complete graph 74 3.5 Diameters and domination numbers of C1,2(D) 79 3.6 Disconnected (1, 2)-step competition graphs 82 3.7 Interval (1, 2)-step competition graphs 84 4 The forbidden induced subgraphs of (i, j) phylogeny graphs 90 4.1 A necessary condition for an (i, 2) phylogeny graph being chordal 91 4.2 Forbidden subgraphs for phylogeny graphs of degree bounded digraphs 99 5 On CCE graphs of (2, 2) digraphs 122 5.1 CCE graphs of h2, 2i digraphs 128 5.2 CCE graphs of (2, 2) digraphs 134 Abstract (in Korean) 168 Acknowledgement (in Korean) 170๋ฐ•

    Structure of directed graphs and hypergraphs

    Get PDF

    The conjugacy problem for automorphism groups of countable homogeneous structures

    Get PDF
    We consider the conjugacy problem for the automorphism groups of a number of countable homogeneous structures. In each case we find the precise complexity of the conjugacy relation in the sense of Borel reducibility

    Spanning eulerian subdigraphs in semicomplete digraphs

    Get PDF
    A digraph is eulerian if it is connected and every vertex has its in-degree equal to its outdegree. Having a spanning eulerian subdigraph is thus a weakening of having a hamiltonian cycle. In this paper, we first characterize the pairs (D, a) of a semicomplete digraph D and an arc a such that D has a spanning eulerian subdigraph containing a. In particular, we show that if D is 2-arc-strong, then every arc is contained in a spanning eulerian subdigraph. We then characterize the pairs (D, a) of a semicomplete digraph D and an arc a such that D has a spanning eulerian subdigraph avoiding a. In particular, we prove that every 2-arc-strong semicomplete digraph has a spanning eulerian subdigraph avoiding any prescribed arc. We also prove the existence of a (minimum) function f (k) such that every f (k)-arc-strong semicomplete digraph contains a spanning eulerian subdigraph avoiding any prescribed set of k arcs. We conjecture that f (k) = k + 1 and establish this conjecture for k โ‰ค 3 and when the k arcs that we delete form a forest of stars. A digraph D is eulerian-connected if for any two distinct vertices x, y, the digraph D has a spanning (x, y)-trail. We prove that every 2-arc-strong semicomplete digraph is eulerianconnected. All our results may be seen as arc analogues of well-known results on hamiltonian paths and cycles in semicomplete digraphs

    Spanning eulerian subdigraphs in semicomplete digraphs

    Get PDF
    International audienceA digraph is eulerian if it is connected and every vertex has its in-degree equal to its outdegree. Having a spanning eulerian subdigraph is thus a weakening of having a hamiltonian cycle. In this paper, we first characterize the pairs (D, a) of a semicomplete digraph D and an arc a such that D has a spanning eulerian subdigraph containing a. In particular, we show that if D is 2-arc-strong, then every arc is contained in a spanning eulerian subdigraph. We then characterize the pairs (D, a) of a semicomplete digraph D and an arc a such that D has a spanning eulerian subdigraph avoiding a. In particular, we prove that every 2-arc-strong semicomplete digraph has a spanning eulerian subdigraph avoiding any prescribed arc. We also prove the existence of a (minimum) function f (k) such that every f (k)-arc-strong semicomplete digraph contains a spanning eulerian subdigraph avoiding any prescribed set of k arcs. We conjecture that f (k) = k + 1 and establish this conjecture for k โ‰ค 3 and when the k arcs that we delete form a forest of stars. A digraph D is eulerian-connected if for any two distinct vertices x, y, the digraph D has a spanning (x, y)-trail. We prove that every 2-arc-strong semicomplete digraph is eulerianconnected. All our results may be seen as arc analogues of well-known results on hamiltonian paths and cycles in semicomplete digraphs

    Spectral behavior of some graph and digraph compositions

    Get PDF
    Let G be a graph of order n the vertices of which are labeled from 1 to n and let G1G_1, ยท ยท ยท ,GnG_n be n graphs. The graph composition G[G1G_1, ยท ยท ยท ,GnG_n] is the graph obtained by replacing the vertex i of G by the graph Gi and there is an edge between u โˆˆ GiG_i and v โˆˆ GjG_j if and only if there is an edge between i and j in G. We first consider graph composition G[KkK_k, ยท ยท ยท ,KkK_k] where G is regular and KkK_k is a complete graph and we establish some links between the spectral characterisation of G and the spectral characterisation of G[KkK_k, ยท ยท ยท ,KkK_k]. We then prove that two non isomorphic graphs G[G1G_1, ยท ยท ยทGnG_n] where GiG_i are complete graphs and G is a strict threshold graph or a star are not Laplacian-cospectral, giving rise to a spectral characterization of these graphs. We also consider directed graphs, especially the vertex-critical tournaments without non-trivial acyclic interval which are tournaments of the shape t[Cโ†’k1\overrightarrow{C}_{k_1}, ยท ยท ยท ,Cโ†’km\overrightarrow{C}_{k_m}], where t is a tournament and Cโ†’ki\overrightarrow{C}_{k_i} is a circulant tournament. We give conditions to characterise these graphs by their spectrum.Peer Reviewe

    Permutation monoids and MB-homogeneity for graphs and relational structures

    Get PDF
    In this paper we investigate the connection between infinite permutation monoids and bimorphism monoids of first-order structures. Taking our lead from the study of automorphism groups of structures as infinite permutation groups and the more recent developments in the field of homomorphism-homogeneous structures, we establish a series of results that underline this connection. Of particular interest is the idea of MB-homogeneity; a relational structure M is MB-homogeneous if every monomorphism between finite substructures of M extends to a bimorphism of M. The results in question include a characterisation of closed permutation monoids, a Fraisse-like theorem for MB-homogeneous structures, and the construction of 2โ„ต0 pairwise non-isomorphic countable MB-homogeneous graphs. We prove that any finite group arises as the automorphism group of some MB-homogeneous graph and use this to construct oligomorphic permutation monoids with any given finite group of units. We also consider MB-homogeneity for various well-known examples of homogeneous structures and in particular give a complete classification of countable homogeneous undirected graphs that are also MB-homogeneous

    Sets as graphs

    Get PDF
    The aim of this thesis is a mutual transfer of computational and structural results and techniques between sets and graphs. We study combinatorial enumeration of sets, canonical encodings, random generation, digraph immersions. We also investigate the underlying structure of sets in algorithmic terms, or in connection with hereditary graphs classes. Finally, we employ a set-based proof-checker to verify two classical results on claw-free graph

    Acta Universitatis Sapientiae - Informatica 2010

    Get PDF
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore