7 research outputs found
A cubic-time algorithm for computing the trinet distance between level-1 networks
In evolutionary biology, phylogenetic networks are constructed to represent the evolution of species in which reticulate events are thought to have occurred, such as recombination and hybridization. It is therefore useful to have efficiently computable metrics with which to systematically compare such networks. Through developing an optimal algorithm to enumerate all trinets displayed by a level-1 network (a type of network that is slightly more general than an evolutionary tree), here we propose a cubic-time algorithm to compute the trinet distance between two level-1 networks. Employing simulations, we also present a comparison between the trinet metric and the so-called Robinson-Foulds phylogenetic network metric restricted to level-1 networks. The algorithms described in this paper have been implemented in JAVA and are freely available at (https://www.uea.ac.uk/computing/TriLoNet
Trinets encode tree-child and level-2 phylogenetic networks
Phylogenetic networks generalize evolutionary trees, and are commonly used to
represent evolutionary histories of species that undergo reticulate
evolutionary processes such as hybridization, recombination and lateral gene
transfer. Recently, there has been great interest in trying to develop methods
to construct rooted phylogenetic networks from triplets, that is rooted trees
on three species. However, although triplets determine or encode rooted
phylogenetic trees, they do not in general encode rooted phylogenetic networks,
which is a potential issue for any such method. Motivated by this fact, Huber
and Moulton recently introduced trinets as a natural extension of rooted
triplets to networks. In particular, they showed that level-1 phylogenetic
networks are encoded by their trinets, and also conjectured that all
"recoverable" rooted phylogenetic networks are encoded by their trinets. Here
we prove that recoverable binary level-2 networks and binary tree-child
networks are also encoded by their trinets. To do this we prove two
decomposition theorems based on trinets which hold for all recoverable binary
rooted phylogenetic networks. Our results provide some additional evidence in
support of the conjecture that trinets encode all recoverable rooted
phylogenetic networks, and could also lead to new approaches to construct
phylogenetic networks from trinets
Spaces of phylogenetic networks from generalized nearest-neighbor interchange operations
Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of evolutionary or phylogenetic trees that are used to represent the evolution of species which have undergone reticulate evolution. In this paper we consider spaces of such networks defined by some novel local operations that we introduce for converting one phylogenetic network into another. These operations are modeled on the well-studied nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) operations on phylogenetic trees, and lead to natural generalizations of the tree spaces that have been previously associated to such operations. We present several results on spaces of some relatively simple networks, called level-1 networks, including the size of the neighborhood of a fixed network, and bounds on the diameter of the metric defined by taking the smallest number of operations required to convert one network into another.We expect that our results will be useful in the development of methods for systematically searching for optimal phylogenetic networks using, for example, likelihood and Bayesian approaches
Reconstructing phylogenetic level-1 networks from nondense binet and trinet sets
Binets and trinets are phylogenetic networks with two and three leaves, respectively. Here we consider the problem of deciding if there exists a binary level-1 phylogenetic network displaying a given set T of binary binets or trinets over a taxon set X, and constructing such a network whenever it exists. We show that this is NP-hard for trinets but polynomial-time solvable for binets. Moreover, we show that the problem is still polynomial-time solvable for inputs consisting of binets and trinets as long as the cycles in the trinets have size three. Finally, we present an O(3^{|X|} poly(|X|)) time algorithm for general sets of binets and trinets. The latter two algorithms generalise to instances containing level-1 networks with arbitrarily many leaves, and thus provide some of the first supernetwork algorithms for computing networks from a set of rooted 1 phylogenetic networks
Encoding and constructing 1-nested phylogenetic networks with trinets
Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees that are used in biology to represent reticulate or non-treelike evolution. Recently, several algorithms have been developed which aim to construct phylogenetic networks from biological data using triplets, i.e. binary phylogenetic trees on 3-element subsets of a given set of species. However, a fundamental problem with this approach is that the triplets displayed by a phylogenetic network do not necessarily uniquely determine or encode the network. Here we propose an alternative approach to encoding and constructing phylogenetic networks, which uses phylogenetic networks on 3-element subsets of a set, or trinets, rather than triplets. More specifically, we show that for a special, well-studied type of phylogenetic network called a 1-nested network, the trinets displayed by a 1-nested network always encode the network. We also present an efficient algorithm for deciding whether a dense set of trinets (i.e. one that contains a trinet on every 3-element subset of a set) can be displayed by a 1-nested network or not and, if so, constructs that network. In addition, we discuss some potential new directions that this new approach opens up for constructing and comparing phylogenetic networks