Deep learning systems as complex networks

Thanks to the availability of large scale digital datasets and massive amounts of computational power, deep learning algorithms can learn representations of data by exploiting multiple levels of abstraction. These machine learning methods have greatly improved the state-of-the-art in many challenging cognitive tasks, such as visual object recognition, speech processing, natural language understanding and automatic translation. In particular, one class of deep learning models, known as deep belief networks, can discover intricate statistical structure in large data sets in a completely unsupervised fashion, by learning a generative model of the data using Hebbian-like learning mechanisms. Although these self-organizing systems can be conveniently formalized within the framework of statistical mechanics, their internal functioning remains opaque, because their emergent dynamics cannot be solved analytically. In this article we propose to study deep belief networks using techniques commonly employed in the study of complex networks, in order to gain some insights into the structural and functional properties of the computational graph resulting from the learning process.Comment: 20 pages, 9 figure

Integration of Action and Language Knowledge: A Roadmap for Developmental Robotics

“This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder." “Copyright IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.”This position paper proposes that the study of embodied cognitive agents, such as humanoid robots, can advance our understanding of the cognitive development of complex sensorimotor, linguistic, and social learning skills. This in turn will benefit the design of cognitive robots capable of learning to handle and manipulate objects and tools autonomously, to cooperate and communicate with other robots and humans, and to adapt their abilities to changing internal, environmental, and social conditions. Four key areas of research challenges are discussed, specifically for the issues related to the understanding of: 1) how agents learn and represent compositional actions; 2) how agents learn and represent compositional lexica; 3) the dynamics of social interaction and learning; and 4) how compositional action and language representations are integrated to bootstrap the cognitive system. The review of specific issues and progress in these areas is then translated into a practical roadmap based on a series of milestones. These milestones provide a possible set of cognitive robotics goals and test scenarios, thus acting as a research roadmap for future work on cognitive developmental robotics.Peer reviewe

Exploiting multimodality and structure in world representations

An essential aim of artificial intelligence research is to design agents that will eventually cooperate with humans within the real world. To this end, embodied learning is emerging as one of the most important efforts contributed by the machine learning community towards this goal. Recently developing sub-fields concern various aspects of such systems---visual reasoning, language representations, causal mechanisms, robustness to out-of-distribution inputs, to name only a few. In particular, multimodal learning and language grounding are vital to achieving a strong understanding of the real world. Humans build internal representations via interacting with their environment, learning complex associations between visual, auditory and linguistic concepts. Since the world abounds with structure, graph-based encodings are also likely to be incorporated in reasoning and decision-making modules. Furthermore, these relational representations are rather symbolic in nature---providing advantages over other formats, such as raw pixels---and can encode various types of links (temporal, causal, spatial) which can be essential for understanding and acting in the real world. This thesis presents three research works that study and develop likely aspects of future intelligent agents. The first contribution centers on vision-and-language learning, introducing a challenging embodied task that shifts the focus of an existing one to the visual reasoning problem. By extending popular visual question answering (VQA) paradigms, I also designed several models that were evaluated on the novel dataset. This produced initial performance estimates for environment understanding, through the lens of a more challenging VQA downstream task. The second work presents two ways of obtaining hierarchical representations of graph-structured data. These methods either scaled to much larger graphs than the ones processed by the best-performing method at the time, or incorporated theoretical properties via the use of topological data analysis algorithms. Both approaches competed with contemporary state-of-the-art graph classification methods, even outside social domains in the second case, where the inductive bias was PageRank-driven. Finally, the third contribution delves further into relational learning, presenting a probabilistic treatment of graph representations in complex settings such as few-shot, multi-task learning and scarce-labelled data regimes. By adding relational inductive biases to neural processes, the resulting framework can model an entire distribution of functions which generate datasets with structure. This yielded significant performance gains, especially in the aforementioned complex scenarios, with semantically-accurate uncertainty estimates that drastically improved over the neural process baseline. This type of framework may eventually contribute to developing lifelong-learning systems, due to its ability to adapt to novel tasks and distributions. The benchmark, methods and frameworks that I have devised during my doctoral studies suggest important future directions for embodied and graph representation learning research. These areas have increasingly proved their relevance to designing intelligent and collaborative agents, which we may interact with in the near future. By addressing several challenges in this problem space, my contributions therefore take a few steps towards building machine learning systems to be deployed in real-life settings.DREAM CD

A Historical Interaction between Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy

This paper delves into AI development’s historical and philosophical dimensions while highlighting the symbiotic relationship between philosophy and AI from a technological perspective: philosophy furnishes foundational concepts, and AI supplies practical tools. The paper posits neurosymbolic AI as a solution to present challenges, sparking discussions encompassing both technical and philosophical considerations. Advocating a multidisciplinary approach calls for merging empirical AI insights with philosophy and cognition science to enrich our comprehension of intelligence and propel AI forward

Proceedings of the ECCS 2005 satellite workshop: embracing complexity in design - Paris 17 November 2005

Embracing complexity in design is one of the critical issues and challenges of the 21st century. As the realization grows that design activities and artefacts display properties associated with complex adaptive systems, so grows the need to use complexity concepts and methods to understand these properties and inform the design of better artifacts. It is a great challenge because complexity science represents an epistemological and methodological swift that promises a holistic approach in the understanding and operational support of design. But design is also a major contributor in complexity research. Design science is concerned with problems that are fundamental in the sciences in general and complexity sciences in particular. For instance, design has been perceived and studied as a ubiquitous activity inherent in every human activity, as the art of generating hypotheses, as a type of experiment, or as a creative co-evolutionary process. Design science and its established approaches and practices can be a great source for advancement and innovation in complexity science. These proceedings are the result of a workshop organized as part of the activities of a UK government AHRB/EPSRC funded research cluster called Embracing Complexity in Design (www.complexityanddesign.net) and the European Conference in Complex Systems (complexsystems.lri.fr). Embracing complexity in design is one of the critical issues and challenges of the 21st century. As the realization grows that design activities and artefacts display properties associated with complex adaptive systems, so grows the need to use complexity concepts and methods to understand these properties and inform the design of better artifacts. It is a great challenge because complexity science represents an epistemological and methodological swift that promises a holistic approach in the understanding and operational support of design. But design is also a major contributor in complexity research. Design science is concerned with problems that are fundamental in the sciences in general and complexity sciences in particular. For instance, design has been perceived and studied as a ubiquitous activity inherent in every human activity, as the art of generating hypotheses, as a type of experiment, or as a creative co-evolutionary process. Design science and its established approaches and practices can be a great source for advancement and innovation in complexity science. These proceedings are the result of a workshop organized as part of the activities of a UK government AHRB/EPSRC funded research cluster called Embracing Complexity in Design (www.complexityanddesign.net) and the European Conference in Complex Systems (complexsystems.lri.fr)

On microelectronic self-learning cognitive chip systems

After a brief review of machine learning techniques and applications, this Ph.D. thesis examines several approaches for implementing machine learning architectures and algorithms into hardware within our laboratory. From this interdisciplinary background support, we have motivations for novel approaches that we intend to follow as an objective of innovative hardware implementations of dynamically self-reconfigurable logic for enhanced self-adaptive, self-(re)organizing and eventually self-assembling machine learning systems, while developing this new particular area of research. And after reviewing some relevant background of robotic control methods followed by most recent advanced cognitive controllers, this Ph.D. thesis suggests that amongst many well-known ways of designing operational technologies, the design methodologies of those leading-edge high-tech devices such as cognitive chips that may well lead to intelligent machines exhibiting conscious phenomena should crucially be restricted to extremely well defined constraints. Roboticists also need those as specifications to help decide upfront on otherwise infinitely free hardware/software design details. In addition and most importantly, we propose these specifications as methodological guidelines tightly related to ethics and the nowadays well-identified workings of the human body and of its psyche