2 research outputs found

    Efficient asymmetric inclusion of regular expressions with interleaving and counting for XML type-checking

    Get PDF
    The inclusion of Regular Expressions (REs) is the kernel of any type-checking algorithm for XML manipulation languages. XML applications would benefit from the extension of REs with interleaving and counting, but this is not feasible in general, since inclusion is EXPSPACE-complete for such extended REs. In Colazzo et al. (2009) [1] we introduced a notion of ?conflict-free REs?, which are extended REs with excellent complexity behaviour, including a polynomial inclusion algorithm [1] and linear membership (Ghelli et al., 2008 [2]). Conflict-free REs have interleaving and counting, but the complexity is tamed by the ?conflict-free? limitations, which have been found to be satisfied by the vast majority of the content models published on the Web.However, a type-checking algorithm needs to compare machine-generated subtypes against human-defined supertypes. The conflict-free restriction, while quite harmless for the human-defined supertype, is far too restrictive for the subtype. We show here that the PTIME inclusion algorithm can be actually extended to deal with totally unrestricted REs with counting and interleaving in the subtype position, provided that the supertype is conflict-free.This is exactly the expressive power that we need in order to use subtyping inside type-checking algorithms, and the cost of this generalized algorithm is only quadratic, which is as good as the best algorithm we have for the symmetric case (see [1]). The result is extremely surprising, since we had previously found that symmetric inclusion becomes NP-hard as soon as the candidate subtype is enriched with binary intersection, a generalization that looked much more innocent than what we achieve here

    Efficient Incremental Validation of XML Documents after Composite Updates

    No full text
    We describe an e#cient method for the incremental validation of XML documents after composite updates. We introduce the class of Bounded-Edit (BE) DTDs and XML Schemas, and give a simple incremental revalidation algorithm that yields optimal performance for them, in the sense that its time complexity is linear in the number of operations in the update. We give extensive experimental results showing that our algorithm exhibits excellent scalability. Finally, we provide a statistical analysis of over 250 DTDs and XML Schema specifications found on the Web, showing that over 99% of them are in fact in BE
    corecore