Double-shock control bump design optimization using hybridized evolutionary algorithms

This study investigates the application of two advanced optimization methods for solving active flow control (AFC) device shape design problem and compares their optimization efficiency in terms of computational cost and design quality. The first optimization method uses hierarchical asynchronous parallel multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and the second uses hybridized evolutionary algorithm with Nash-Game strategies (Hybrid-Game). Both optimization methods are based on a canonical evolution strategy and incorporate the concepts of parallel computing and asynchronous evaluation. One type of AFC device named shock control bump (SCB) is considered and applied to a natural laminar flow (NLF) aerofoil. The concept of SCB is used to decelerate supersonic flow on suction/pressure side of transonic aerofoil that leads to a delay of shock occurrence. Such active flow technique reduces total drag at transonic speeds which is of special interest to commercial aircraft. Numerical results show that the Hybrid-Game helps an EA to accelerate optimization process. From the practical point of view, applying a SCB on the suction and pressure sides significantly reduces transonic total drag and improves lift-to-drag (L/D) value when compared to the baseline design

Hybrid-Game Strategies for multi-objective design optimization in engineering

A number of Game Strategies (GS) have been developed in past decades. They have been used in the fields of economics, engineering, computer science and biology due to their efficiency in solving design optimization problems. In addition, research in multi-objective (MO) and multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) has focused on developing robust and efficient optimization methods to produce a set of high quality solutions with low computational cost. In this paper, two optimization techniques are considered; the first optimization method uses multi-fidelity hierarchical Pareto optimality. The second optimization method uses the combination of two Game Strategies; Nash-equilibrium and Pareto optimality. The paper shows how Game Strategies can be hybridised and coupled to Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEA) to accelerate convergence speed and to produce a set of high quality solutions. Numerical results obtained from both optimization methods are compared in terms of computational expense and model quality. The benefits of using Hybrid-Game Strategies are clearly demonstrate

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Space Applications

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) has been increasingly studied in aerospace engineering with the main purpose of reducing monetary and schedule costs. The traditional design approach of optimizing each discipline separately and manually iterating to achieve good solutions is substituted by exploiting the interactions between the disciplines and concurrently optimizing every subsystem. The target of the research was the development of a flexible software suite capable of concurrently optimizing the design of a rocket propellant launch vehicle for multiple objectives. The possibility of combining the advantages of global and local searches have been exploited in both the MDO architecture and in the selected and self developed optimization methodologies. Those have been compared according to computational efficiency and performance criteria. Results have been critically analyzed to identify the most suitable optimization approach for the targeted MDO problem

Optimization of the experimental set-up for a turbulent separated shear flow control by plasma actuator using genetic algorithms

Since 1947, when Schubauer and Skramstad established the basis of the technology with its revolutionary work about steady state tools and mechanisms for the flow management, the progress of the flow control technology and the development of devices have progressed constantly. Anyway, the applicability of such devices is limited, and only few of them have arrived to the assembly workshop. The problem is that the range of actuation is still limited. Despite their operability limitations, flow control devices are of great interest for the aeronautical industry. The number of projects investigating this technology demonstrates the relevance of in the Fluid Dynamic field. The scientific interest focus not only on the industrial applications and the improvement of the technology, but also on the deep understanding of the physical phenomena associated to the flow separation, turbulence formation associated to the final drag reduction aim. A clear example of what has been mentioned is the EC MARS research project (MARS project, FP7 project number 266326). Its objectives are aimed to a better understanding of the Reynolds Stress and turbulent flow related to both drag reduction and flow control. The research was carried out through the analysis of several flow control devices and the optimization of the parameters for some of them was an important element of the research. When solving a traditional fluid dynamics optimisation problem numerical flowanalysis are used instead of experimental ones due to their lower cost and shorter needed time for evaluation of candidate solutions. Nevertheless, in the particular case of the selected flow control plasma devices the experimental measurement of the performance of each candidate configuration has been much quicker than a numerical analysis. For this reason, the corresponding optimisation problem has been solved by coupling an evolutionary optimization algorithm with an experimental device. This paper discusses the design quality and efficiency gained by this innovative coupling.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

A New Hybrid Optimization Method, Application to a Single Objective Active Flow Control Test Case

Genetic Algorithms (GA) are useful optimization methods for exploration of the search space, but they usually have slowness problems to exploit and converge to the minimum. On the other hand, gradient based methods converge faster to local minimums, although are not so robust (e.g., flat areas and discontinuities can cause problems) and they lack exploration capabilities. This article presents a hybrid optimization method trying to combine the virtues of genetic and gradient based algorithms, and to overcome their corresponding drawbacks. The performance of the Hybrid Method is compared against a gradient based method and a Genetic Algorithm, both used alone. The rate of convergence of the methods is used to compare their performance. To take into account the robustness of the methods, each one has been executed more than once, with different starting points for the gradient based method and different random seeds for the Genetic Algorithm and the Hybrid Method. The performance of the different methods is tested against an optimization Active Flow Control (AFC) problem over a 2D Selig–Donovan 7003 (SD7003) airfoil at Reynolds number 6×104 and a 14 degree angle of attack. Five design variables are considered: jet position, jet width, momentum coefficient, forcing frequency and jet inclination angle. The objective function is defined as minus the lift coefficient (-Cl), so it is defined as a minimization problem. The proposed Hybrid Method enables working with N optimization algorithms, multiple objective functions and design variables per optimization algorithm.This research has been partially supported through the Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence (2019-2023) under the grant CEX2018-000797-S funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. The third author, Jordi Pons-Prats, is a Serra Hunter Fellow.Peer ReviewedObjectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible::13 - Acció per al ClimaObjectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible::9 - Indústria, Innovació i InfraestructuraPostprint (published version

Gnowee: A Hybrid Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithm for Constrained, Black Box, Combinatorial Mixed-Integer Design

This paper introduces Gnowee, a modular, Python-based, open-source hybrid metaheuristic optimization algorithm (Available from https://github.com/SlaybaughLab/Gnowee). Gnowee is designed for rapid convergence to nearly globally optimum solutions for complex, constrained nuclear engineering problems with mixed-integer and combinatorial design vectors and high-cost, noisy, discontinuous, black box objective function evaluations. Gnowee's hybrid metaheuristic framework is a new combination of a set of diverse, robust heuristics that appropriately balance diversification and intensification strategies across a wide range of optimization problems. This novel algorithm was specifically developed to optimize complex nuclear design problems; the motivating research problem was the design of material stack-ups to modify neutron energy spectra to specific targeted spectra for applications in nuclear medicine, technical nuclear forensics, nuclear physics, etc. However, there are a wider range of potential applications for this algorithm both within the nuclear community and beyond. To demonstrate Gnowee's behavior for a variety of problem types, comparisons between Gnowee and several well-established metaheuristic algorithms are made for a set of eighteen continuous, mixed-integer, and combinatorial benchmarks. These results demonstrate Gnoweee to have superior flexibility and convergence characteristics over a wide range of design spaces. We anticipate this wide range of applicability will make this algorithm desirable for many complex engineering applications.Comment: 43 pages, 7 tables, 6 figure

Academic Year 2019-2020 Faculty Excellence Showcase, AFIT Graduate School of Engineering & Management

An excerpt from the Dean\u27s Message: There is no place like the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). There is no academic group like AFIT’s Graduate School of Engineering and Management. Although we run an educational institution similar to many other institutions of higher learning, we are different and unique because of our defense-focused graduate-research-based academic programs. Our programs are designed to be relevant and responsive to national defense needs. Our programs are aligned with the prevailing priorities of the US Air Force and the US Department of Defense. Our faculty team has the requisite critical mass of service-tested faculty members. The unique composition of pure civilian faculty, military faculty, and service-retired civilian faculty makes AFIT truly unique, unlike any other academic institution anywhere