797 research outputs found
On the strength of proof-irrelevant type theories
We present a type theory with some proof-irrelevance built into the
conversion rule. We argue that this feature is useful when type theory is used
as the logical formalism underlying a theorem prover. We also show a close
relation with the subset types of the theory of PVS. We show that in these
theories, because of the additional extentionality, the axiom of choice implies
the decidability of equality, that is, almost classical logic. Finally we
describe a simple set-theoretic semantics.Comment: 20 pages, Logical Methods in Computer Science, Long version of IJCAR
2006 pape
Proof-irrelevant model of CC with predicative induction and judgmental equality
We present a set-theoretic, proof-irrelevant model for Calculus of
Constructions (CC) with predicative induction and judgmental equality in
Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with an axiom for countably many inaccessible
cardinals. We use Aczel's trace encoding which is universally defined for any
function type, regardless of being impredicative. Direct and concrete
interpretations of simultaneous induction and mutually recursive functions are
also provided by extending Dybjer's interpretations on the basis of Aczel's
rule sets. Our model can be regarded as a higher-order generalization of the
truth-table methods. We provide a relatively simple consistency proof of type
theory, which can be used as the basis for a theorem prover
Building Decision Procedures in the Calculus of Inductive Constructions
It is commonly agreed that the success of future proof assistants will rely
on their ability to incorporate computations within deduction in order to mimic
the mathematician when replacing the proof of a proposition P by the proof of
an equivalent proposition P' obtained from P thanks to possibly complex
calculations. In this paper, we investigate a new version of the calculus of
inductive constructions which incorporates arbitrary decision procedures into
deduction via the conversion rule of the calculus. The novelty of the problem
in the context of the calculus of inductive constructions lies in the fact that
the computation mechanism varies along proof-checking: goals are sent to the
decision procedure together with the set of user hypotheses available from the
current context. Our main result shows that this extension of the calculus of
constructions does not compromise its main properties: confluence, subject
reduction, strong normalization and consistency are all preserved
Coq Modulo Theory - Short Paper
International audienceCoq Modulo Theory (CoqMT) is an extension of the Coq proof assistant incorporating, in its computational mechanism, validity entailment for user-defined first-order equational theories. Such a mechanism strictly enriches the system (more terms are typable), eases the use of dependent types and provides more automation during the development of proofs. CoqMT improves over the Calculus of Congruent Inductive Constructions by getting rid of various restrictions and simplifying the type-checking algorithm and the integration of first-order decision procedures
- …