49 research outputs found

    Analysing trajectory similarity and improving graph dilation

    Get PDF
    In this thesis, we focus on two topics in computational geometry. The first topic is analysing trajectory similarity. A trajectory tracks the movement of an object over time. A common way to analyse trajectories is by finding similarities. The Fr\'echet distance is a similarity measure that has gained popularity in the theory community, since it takes the continuity of the curves into account. One way to analyse trajectories using the Fr\'echet distance is to cluster trajectories into groups of similar trajectories. For vehicle trajectories, another way to analyse trajectories is to compute the path on the underlying road network that best represents the trajectory. The second topic is improving graph dilation. Dilation measures the quality of a network in applications such as transportation and communication networks. Spanners are low dilation graphs with not too many edges. Most of the literature on spanners focuses on building the graph from scratch. We instead focus on adding edges to improve the dilation of an existing graph

    LIPIcs, Volume 261, ICALP 2023, Complete Volume

    Get PDF
    LIPIcs, Volume 261, ICALP 2023, Complete Volum

    LIPIcs, Volume 274, ESA 2023, Complete Volume

    Get PDF
    LIPIcs, Volume 274, ESA 2023, Complete Volum

    LIPIcs, Volume 258, SoCG 2023, Complete Volume

    Get PDF
    LIPIcs, Volume 258, SoCG 2023, Complete Volum

    Oriented Spanners

    Full text link
    Given a point set PP in the Euclidean plane and a parameter tt, we define an \emph{oriented tt-spanner} as an oriented subgraph of the complete bi-directed graph such that for every pair of points, the shortest cycle in GG through those points is at most a factor tt longer than the shortest oriented cycle in the complete bi-directed graph. We investigate the problem of computing sparse graphs with small oriented dilation. As we can show that minimising oriented dilation for a given number of edges is NP-hard in the plane, we first consider one-dimensional point sets. While obtaining a 11-spanner in this setting is straightforward, already for five points such a spanner has no plane embedding with the leftmost and rightmost point on the outer face. This leads to restricting to oriented graphs with a one-page book embedding on the one-dimensional point set. For this case we present a dynamic program to compute the graph of minimum oriented dilation that runs in O(n8)O(n^8) time for nn points, and a greedy algorithm that computes a 55-spanner in O(nlogn)O(n\log n) time. Expanding these results finally gives us a result for two-dimensional point sets: we prove that for convex point sets the greedy triangulation results in an oriented O(1)O(1)-spanner.Comment: conference version: ESA '2

    LIPIcs, Volume 244, ESA 2022, Complete Volume

    Get PDF
    LIPIcs, Volume 244, ESA 2022, Complete Volum

    LIPIcs, Volume 248, ISAAC 2022, Complete Volume

    Get PDF
    LIPIcs, Volume 248, ISAAC 2022, Complete Volum

    On Euclidean Steiner (1+?)-Spanners

    Get PDF
    Lightness and sparsity are two natural parameters for Euclidean (1+?)-spanners. Classical results show that, when the dimension d ? ? and ? > 0 are constant, every set S of n points in d-space admits an (1+?)-spanners with O(n) edges and weight proportional to that of the Euclidean MST of S. Tight bounds on the dependence on ? > 0 for constant d ? ? have been established only recently. Le and Solomon (FOCS 2019) showed that Steiner points can substantially improve the lightness and sparsity of a (1+?)-spanner. They gave upper bounds of O?(?^{-(d+1)/2}) for the minimum lightness in dimensions d ? 3, and O?(?^{-(d-1))/2}) for the minimum sparsity in d-space for all d ? 1. They obtained lower bounds only in the plane (d = 2). Le and Solomon (ESA 2020) also constructed Steiner (1+?)-spanners of lightness O(?^{-1}log?) in the plane, where ? ? ?(log n) is the spread of S, defined as the ratio between the maximum and minimum distance between a pair of points. In this work, we improve several bounds on the lightness and sparsity of Euclidean Steiner (1+?)-spanners. Using a new geometric analysis, we establish lower bounds of ?(?^{-d/2}) for the lightness and ?(?^{-(d-1)/2}) for the sparsity of such spanners in Euclidean d-space for all d ? 2. We use the geometric insight from our lower bound analysis to construct Steiner (1+?)-spanners of lightness O(?^{-1}log n) for n points in Euclidean plane
    corecore