Focal Spot, Fall/Winter 2001

https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/focal_spot_archives/1089/thumbnail.jp

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Semantic Memory as a Presymptomatic Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease Risk

Extensive research efforts have been directed toward strategies for predicting risk of developing Alzheimer\u27s disease (AD) prior to the appearance of observable symptoms. Existing approaches for early detection of AD vary in terms of their efficacy, invasiveness, and ease of implementation. Several non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging strategies have been developed for predicting decline in cognitively healthy older adults. This review will survey a number of studies, beginning with the development of a famous name discrimination task used to identify neural regions that participate in semantic memory retrieval and to test predictions of several key theories of the role of the hippocampus in memory. This task has revealed medial temporal and neocortical contributions to recent and remote memory retrieval, and it has been used to demonstrate compensatory neural recruitment in older adults, apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers, and amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients. Recently, we have also found that the famous name discrimination task provides predictive value for forecasting episodic memory decline among asymptomatic older adults. Other studies investigating the predictive value of semantic memory tasks will also be presented. We suggest several advantages associated with the use of semantic processing tasks, particularly those based on person identification, in comparison to episodic memory tasks to study AD risk. Future directions for research and potential clinical uses of semantic memory paradigms are also discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Imaging Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative disease

CAUSAL ANALYSIS THEORY AND APPLICATION TO ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE (AD) AND HEART FAILURE (HF)

Alzheimer\u27s disease (AD) and heart failure (HF) are two complex diseases that are caused by the combination of genetic and epigenetic, environmental and other lifestyle factors. Understanding the relationships between genetic and epigenetic variants and other factors of such complex diseases could assist researchers discover disease mechanisms and develop targeted therapies. Much of the research in genetics/epigenetics studies regarding AD and heart diseases have been focused on association analysis. Many researchers have identified genetic/epigenetics variants and phenotypes that are significantly associated with disease pathology. While most of these studies utilize association analysis as the analytical platform, the signals identified by association studies can only explain a small proportion of the heritability of complex diseases and a large proportion of risk factors remain undiscovered, which is the limitation of genome- wide association studies (GWAS). In addition, the biological system usually functions in a systematic or causal way, thus causation analysis is key to uncover the risk mechanisms of complex diseases. The relationship between association and causation is that causation can be used to infer association, but the reverse cannot be guaranteed. Traditionally, the gold standard for causation analysis is using interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, RCT is not feasible for genetics/epigenetics data for either ethical or technical reasons. The major objective of this research is thus to propose methods to uncover the causal mechanisms between genetic/epigenetic factors and phenotypes such as environmental and lifestyle factors for complex diseases. First, I proposed a bivariate causal discovery method to uncover the pairwise causal relationships between factors. Second, I proposed a network analysis framework to construct the causal network among genetic/epigenetic variants and phenotypic factors. Finally, I applied the bivariate causal discovery method and causal network construction method to the two complex diseases: Alzheimer\u27s disease (AD) and heart failure (HF) data. Simulations and applications results were discussed in the following sections

Patients with Alzheimer's disease dementia show partially preserved parietal 'hubs' modeled from resting-state alpha electroencephalographic rhythms

IntroductionGraph theory models a network by its nodes (the fundamental unit by which graphs are formed) and connections. 'Degree' hubs reflect node centrality (the connection rate), while 'connector' hubs are those linked to several clusters of nodes (mainly long-range connections). MethodsHere, we compared hubs modeled from measures of interdependencies of between-electrode resting-state eyes-closed electroencephalography (rsEEG) rhythms in normal elderly (Nold) and Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) participants. At least 5 min of rsEEG was recorded and analyzed. As ADD is considered a 'network disease' and is typically associated with abnormal rsEEG delta (<4 Hz) and alpha rhythms (8-12 Hz) over associative posterior areas, we tested the hypothesis of abnormal posterior hubs from measures of interdependencies of rsEEG rhythms from delta to gamma bands (2-40 Hz) using eLORETA bivariate and multivariate-directional techniques in ADD participants versus Nold participants. Three different definitions of 'connector' hub were used. ResultsConvergent results showed that in both the Nold and ADD groups there were significant parietal 'degree' and 'connector' hubs derived from alpha rhythms. These hubs had a prominent outward 'directionality' in the two groups, but that 'directionality' was lower in ADD participants than in Nold participants. DiscussionIn conclusion, independent methodologies and hub definitions suggest that ADD patients may be characterized by low outward 'directionality' of partially preserved parietal 'degree' and 'connector' hubs derived from rsEEG alpha rhythms

Patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia show partially preserved parietal ‘hubs’ modeled from resting-state alpha electroencephalographic rhythms

Introduction: Graph theory models a network by its nodes (the fundamental unit by which graphs are formed) and connections. ‘Degree’ hubs reflect node centrality (the connection rate), while ‘connector’ hubs are those linked to several clusters of nodes (mainly long-range connections). Methods: Here, we compared hubs modeled from measures of interdependencies of between-electrode resting-state eyes-closed electroencephalography (rsEEG) rhythms in normal elderly (Nold) and Alzheimer’s disease dementia (ADD) participants. At least 5 min of rsEEG was recorded and analyzed. As ADD is considered a ‘network disease’ and is typically associated with abnormal rsEEG delta (<4 Hz) and alpha rhythms (8–12 Hz) over associative posterior areas, we tested the hypothesis of abnormal posterior hubs from measures of interdependencies of rsEEG rhythms from delta to gamma bands (2–40 Hz) using eLORETA bivariate and multivariate-directional techniques in ADD participants versus Nold participants. Three different definitions of ‘connector’ hub were used. Results: Convergent results showed that in both the Nold and ADD groups there were significant parietal ‘degree’ and ‘connector’ hubs derived from alpha rhythms. These hubs had a prominent outward ‘directionality’ in the two groups, but that ‘directionality’ was lower in ADD participants than in Nold participants. Discussion: In conclusion, independent methodologies and hub definitions suggest that ADD patients may be characterized by low outward ‘directionality’ of partially preserved parietal ‘degree’ and ‘connector’ hubs derived from rsEEG alpha rhythms