1,572 research outputs found

    User experiences of TORPEDO: TOoltip-poweRed Phishing Email DetectiOn

    Get PDF
    We propose a concept called TORPEDO to improve phish detection by providing just-in-time and just-in-place trustworthy tooltips. These help people to identify phish links embedded in emails. TORPEDO's tooltips contain the actual URL with the domain highlighted. Link activation is delayed for a short period, giving the person time to inspect the URL before they click on a link. Furthermore, TORPEDO provides an information diagram to explain phish detection. We evaluated TORPEDO's effectiveness, as compared to the worst case “status bar” as provided by other Web email interfaces. People using TORPEDO performed significantly better in detecting phishes and identifying legitimate emails (85.17% versus 43.31% correct answers for phish). We then carried out a field study with a number of TORPEDO users to explore actual user experiences of TORPEDO. We conclude the paper by reporting on the outcome of this field study and suggest improvements based on the feedback from the field study participants

    Pishing Attacks in Network Security

    Get PDF
    In the last few decays, phishing tricks have swiftly grown posing enormous threat to worldwide Internet security. These days, phishing attacks are one of the utmost common and serious threats over internet whereas cyber attackers are trying to steal users personal information regarding their financial assets by using different malwares and social engineering. The usual way of phishing attacks use some electronic messaging like emails or by providing the links that appears to be legitimate sites but actually these sites are malicious and controlled by the attackers. To detect phishing attack at high accuracy is always a crucial and has been great issue of interest. Recently many detection techniques has been introduced which are specifically designed for the detection of phishing with extreme accuracy. In this report the phishing attacks are discuss with some of the techniques which are proposed in various literature

    Know Your Phish: Novel Techniques for Detecting Phishing Sites and Their Targets

    Get PDF
    Phishing is a major problem on the Web. Despite the significant attention it has received over the years, there has been no definitive solution. While the state-of-the-art solutions have reasonably good performance, they require a large amount of training data and are not adept at detecting phishing attacks against new targets. In this paper, we begin with two core observations: (a) although phishers try to make a phishing webpage look similar to its target, they do not have unlimited freedom in structuring the phishing webpage, and (b) a webpage can be characterized by a small set of key terms, how these key terms are used in different parts of a webpage is different in the case of legitimate and phishing webpages. Based on these observations, we develop a phishing detection system with several notable properties: it requires very little training data, scales well to much larger test data, is language-independent, fast, resilient to adaptive attacks and implemented entirely on client-side. In addition, we developed a target identification component that can identify the target website that a phishing webpage is attempting to mimic. The target detection component is faster than previously reported systems and can help minimize false positives in our phishing detection system.Peer reviewe

    Off-the-Hook: An Efficient and Usable Client-Side Phishing Prevention Application

    Get PDF
    Phishing is a major problem on the Web. Despite the significant attention it has received over the years, there has been no definitive solution. While the state-of-the-art solutions have reasonably good performance, they suffer from several drawbacks including potential to compromise user privacy, difficulty of detecting phishing websites whose content change dynamically, and reliance on features that are too dependent on the training data. To address these limitations we present a new approach for detecting phishing webpages in real-time as they are visited by a browser. It relies on modeling inherent phisher limitations stemming from the constraints they face while building a webpage. Consequently, the implementation of our approach, Off-the-Hook, exhibits several notable properties including high accuracy, brand-independence and good language-independence, speed of decision, resilience to dynamic phish and resilience to evolution in phishing techniques. Off-the-Hook is implemented as a fully-client-side browser add-on, which preserves user privacy. In addition, Off-the-Hook identifies the target website that a phishing webpage is attempting to mimic and includes this target in its warning. We evaluated Off-the-Hook in two different user studies. Our results show that users prefer Off-the-Hook warnings to Firefox warnings.Phishing is a major problem on the Web. Despite the significant attention it has received over the years, there has been no definitive solution. While the state-of-the-art solutions have reasonably good performance, they suffer from several drawbacks including potential to compromise user privacy, difficulty of detecting phishing websites whose content change dynamically, and reliance on features that are too dependent on the training data. To address these limitations we present a new approach for detecting phishing webpages in real-time as they are visited by a browser. It relies on modeling inherent phisher limitations stemming from the constraints they face while building a webpage. Consequently, the implementation of our approach, Off-the-Hook, exhibits several notable properties including high accuracy, brand-independence and good language-independence, speed of decision, resilience to dynamic phish and resilience to evolution in phishing techniques. Off-the-Hook is implemented as a fully-client-side browser add-on, which preserves user privacy. In addition, Off-the-Hook identifies the target website that a phishing webpage is attempting to mimic and includes this target in its warning. We evaluated Off-the-Hook in two different user studies. Our results show that users prefer Off-the-Hook warnings to Firefox warnings.Non Peer reviewe

    Innovations of Phishing Defense: The Mechanism, Measurement and Defense Strategies

    Get PDF
    Now-a-days, social engineering is considered to be one of the most overwhelming threats in the field of cyber security. Social engineers, who deceive people by using their personal appeal through cunning communication, do not rely on finding the vulnerabilities to break into the cyberspace as traditional hackers. Instead, they make shifty communication with the victims that often enable them to gain confidential information like their credentials to compromise cyber security. Phishing attack has become one of the most commonly used social engineering methods in daily life. Since the attacker does not rely on technical vulnerabilities, social engineering, especially phishing attacks cannot be tackled using cyber security tools like firewalls, IDSs (Intrusion Detection Systems), etc. What is more, the increased popularity of the social media has further complicated the problem by availing abundance of information that can be used against the victims. The objective of this paper is to propose a new framework that characterizes the behavior of the phishing attack, and a comprehensive model for describing awareness, measurement and defense of phishing based attacks. To be specific, we propose a hybrid multi-layer model using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques for defending against phishing attacks. The model enables a new prospect in detection of a potential attacker trying to manipulate the victim for revealing confidential information

    Using Context and Interactions to Verify User-Intended Network Requests

    Full text link
    Client-side malware can attack users by tampering with applications or user interfaces to generate requests that users did not intend. We propose Verified Intention (VInt), which ensures a network request, as received by a service, is user-intended. VInt is based on "seeing what the user sees" (context). VInt screenshots the user interface as the user interacts with a security-sensitive form. There are two main components. First, VInt ensures output integrity and authenticity by validating the context, ensuring the user sees correctly rendered information. Second, VInt extracts user-intended inputs from the on-screen user-provided inputs, with the assumption that a human user checks what they entered. Using the user-intended inputs, VInt deems a request to be user-intended if the request is generated properly from the user-intended inputs while the user is shown the correct information. VInt is implemented using image analysis and Optical Character Recognition (OCR). Our evaluation shows that VInt is accurate and efficient

    OSINT-based Email Analyzer for Phishing Detection

    Get PDF
    It is more and more common to receive emails asking for credentials. They usually say that there is some kind of issue that must be solved by accessing the involved service using the link inside the message text. These emails are often malicious, thought to steal users' or employees' credentials and gain access to personal or corporate areas. This scenario is commonly known as phishing, and nowadays it is the most common cause of corporate data breaches. The attacker tries to exploit human vulnerabilities like fear, concern or carelessness to obtain what would be difficult to achieve otherwise. Even if it is easy from an expert point of view to recognize such attempts, it is not so simple to automatize their detection, due to the fact that there are various techniques to elude systematic checks. Nevertheless, WĂŒrth Phoenix wants to improve their cyber defense against any possible threat, and hence they assigned me the task of working on phishing emails detection. This thesis presents a novel program that can analyze all emails delivered to a specifically set up email server without any filtering on incoming traffic, which is then called a "spam-trap-box." Additionally, it is configured with accounts registered for domains owned by failed companies that used to operate in the same industry of WĂŒrth Phoenix customers. This way it is more probable to analyze traffic similar to the one in a real case scenario. The innovative part of the analysis implemented is the use of Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) to compare the most relevant parts of an email with evidence of other phishing attempts indexed on the web, which are generally known as Indicators of Compromise (IoCs). After the inspection, if an email is categorized as malicious, new IoCs are created to feed the WĂŒrth Phoenix Security Operation Center (SOC), which is the service responsible for the protection against cyber threats offered to their customers. The new indicators include more information than the ones used during the analysis, and the findings are inherent to clients' businesses, thus the SOC has more details to use while analyzing their email traffic

    Better Beware: Comparing Metacognition for Phishing and Legitimate Emails

    Get PDF
    Every electronic message poses some threat of being a phishing attack. If recipients underestimate that threat, they expose themselves, and those connected to them, to identity theft, ransom, malware, or worse. If recipients overestimate that threat, then they incur needless costs, perhaps reducing their willingness and ability to respond over time. In two experiments, we examined the appropriateness of individuals\u27 confidence in their judgments of whether email messages were legitimate or phishing, using calibration and resolution as metacognition metrics. Both experiments found that participants had reasonable calibration but poor resolution, reflecting a weak correlation between their confidence and knowledge. These patterns differed for legitimate and phishing emails, with participants being better calibrated for legitimate emails, except when expressing complete confidence in their judgments, but consistently overconfident for phishing emails. The second experiment compared performance on the laboratory task with individuals\u27 actual vulnerability, and found that participants with better resolution were less likely to have malicious files on their home computers. That comparison raised general questions about the design of anti-phishing training and of providing feedback essential to self-regulated learning
    • 

    corecore