Adaptive Airborne Separation to Enable UAM Autonomy in Mixed Airspace

The excitement and promise generated by Urban Air Mobility (UAM) concepts have inspired both new entrants and large aerospace companies throughout the world to invest hundreds of millions in research and development of air vehicles, both piloted and unpiloted, to fulfill these dreams. The management and separation of all these new aircraft have received much less attention, however, and even though NASAs lead is advancing some promising concepts for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM), most operations today are limited to line of sight with the vehicle, airspace reservation and geofencing of individual flights. Various schemes have been proposed to control this new traffic, some modeled after conventional air traffic control and some proposing fully automatic management, either from a ground-based entity or carried out on board among the vehicles themselves. Previous work has examined vehicle-based traffic management in the very low altitude airspace within a metroplex called UTM airspace in which piloted traffic is rare. A management scheme was proposed in that work that takes advantage of the homogeneous nature of the traffic operating in UTM airspace. This paper expands that concept to include a traffic management plan usable at all altitudes desired for electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing urban and short-distance, inter-city transportation. The interactions with piloted aircraft operating under both visual and instrument flight rules are analyzed, and the role of Air Traffic Control services in the postulated mixed traffic environment is covered. Separation values that adapt to each type of traffic encounter are proposed, and the relationship between required airborne surveillance range and closure speed is given. Finally, realistic scenarios are presented illustrating how this concept can reliably handle the density and traffic mix that fully implemented and successful UAM operations would entail

How to keep drivers engaged while supervising driving automation? A literature survey and categorization of six solution areas

This work aimed to organise recommendations for keeping people engaged during human supervision of driving automation, encouraging a safe and acceptable introduction of automated driving systems. First, heuristic knowledge of human factors, ergonomics, and psychological theory was used to propose solution areas to human supervisory control problems of sustained attention. Driving and non-driving research examples were drawn to substantiate the solution areas. Automotive manufacturers might (1) avoid this supervisory role altogether, (2) reduce it in objective ways or (3) alter its subjective experiences, (4) utilize conditioning learning principles such as with gamification and/or selection/training techniques, (5) support internal driver cognitive processes and mental models and/or (6) leverage externally situated information regarding relations between the driver, the driving task, and the driving environment. Second, a cross-domain literature survey of influential human-automation interaction research was conducted for how to keep engagement/attention in supervisory control. The solution areas (via numeric theme codes) were found to be reliably applied from independent rater categorisations of research recommendations. Areas (5) and (6) were addressed by around 70% or more of the studies, areas (2) and (4) in around 50% of the studies, and areas (3) and (1) in less than around 20% and 5%, respectively. The present contribution offers a guiding organisational framework towards improving human attention while supervising driving automation.submittedVersio

System elements required to guarantee the reliability, availability and integrity of decision-making information in a complex airborne autonomous system

Current air traffic management systems are centred on piloted aircraft, in which all the main decisions are made by humans. In the world of autonomous vehicles, there will be a driving need for decisions to be made by the system rather than by humans due to the benefits of more automation such as reducing the likelihood of human error, handling more air traffic in national airspace safely, providing prior warnings of potential conflicts etc. The system will have to decide on courses of action that will have highly safety critical consequences. One way to ensure these decisions are robust is to guarantee that the information being used for the decision is valid and of very high integrity. [Continues.

Cooperative and non-cooperative sense-and-avoid in the CNS+A context: a unified methodology

A unified approach to cooperative and noncooperative Sense-and-Avoid (SAA) is presented that addresses the technical and regulatory challenges of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) integration into nonsegregated airspace. In this paper, state-of-the-art sensor/system technologies for cooperative and noncooperative SAA are reviewed and a reference system architecture is presented. Automated selection of sensors/systems including passive and active Forward Looking Sensors (FLS), Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) and Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) system is performed based on Boolean Decision Logics (BDL) to support trusted autonomous operations during all flight phases. The BDL adoption allows for a dynamic reconfiguration of the SAA architecture, based on the current error estimates of navigation and tracking sensors/systems. The significance of this approach is discussed in the Communication, Navigation and Surveillance/Air Traffic Management and Avionics (CNS+A) context, with a focus on avionics and ATM certification requirements. Additionally, the mathematical models employed in the SAA Unified Method (SUM) to compute the overall uncertainty volume in the airspace surrounding an intruder/obstacle are described. In the presented methodology, navigation and tracking errors affecting the host UAS platform and intruder sensor measurements are translated to unified range and bearing uncertainty descriptors. Simulation case studies are presented to evaluate the performance of the unified approach on a representative UAS host platform and a number of intruder platforms. The results confirm the validity of the proposed unified methodology providing a pathway for certification of SAA systems that typically employ a suite of non-cooperative sensors and/or cooperative systems

Developing a Taxonomy of Elements Adversarial to Autonomous Vehicles

As highly automated vehicles reach higher deployment rates, they find themselves in increasingly dangerous situations. Knowing that the consequence of a crash is significant for the health of occupants, bystanders, and properties, as well as to the viability of autonomy and adjacent businesses, we must search for more efficacious ways to comprehensively and reliably train autonomous vehicles to better navigate the complex scenarios with which they struggle. We therefore introduce a taxonomy of potentially adversarial elements that may contribute to poor performance or system failures as a means of identifying and elucidating lesser-seen risks. This taxonomy may be used to characterize failures of automation, as well as to support simulation and real-world training efforts by providing a more comprehensive classification system for events resulting in disengagement, collision, or other negative consequences. This taxonomy is created from and tested against real collision events to ensure comprehensive coverage with minimal class overlap and few omissions. It is intended to be used both for the identification of harm-contributing adversarial events and in the generation thereof (to create extreme edge- and corner-case scenarios) in training procedures.Comment: 18 pages total, 4 pages of references, initial page left blank for IEEE submission statement. Includes 4 figures and 2 tables. Written using IEEEtran document clas

LIDAR obstacle warning and avoidance system for unmanned aerial vehicle sense-and-avoid

The demand for reliable obstacle warning and avoidance capabilities to ensure safe low-level flight operations has led to the development of various practical systems suitable for fixed and rotary wing aircraft. State-of-the-art Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) technology employing eye-safe laser sources, advanced electro-optics and mechanical beam-steering components delivers the highest angular resolution and accuracy performances in a wide range of operational conditions. LIDAR Obstacle Warning and Avoidance System (LOWAS) is thus becoming a mature technology with several potential applications to manned and unmanned aircraft. This paper addresses specifically its employment in Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Sense-and-Avoid (SAA). Small-to-medium size Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are particularly targeted since they are very frequently operated in proximity of the ground and the possibility of a collision is further aggravated by the very limited see-and-avoid capabilities of the remote pilot. After a brief description of the system architecture, mathematical models and algorithms for avoidance trajectory generation are provided. Key aspects of the Human Machine Interface and Interaction (HMI2) design for the UAS obstacle avoidance system are also addressed. Additionally, a comprehensive simulation case study of the avoidance trajectory generation algorithms is presented. It is concluded that LOWAS obstacle detection and trajectory optimisation algorithms can ensure a safe avoidance of all classes of obstacles (i.e., wire, extended and point objects) in a wide range of weather and geometric conditions, providing a pathway for possible integration of this technology into future UAS SAA architectures