1,795 research outputs found

    Crane collision modelling using a neural network approach

    Get PDF
    The objective of the present work is to find a Collision Detection algorithm to be used in the Virtual Reality crane simulator (UVSimยฎ), developed by the Robotics Institute of the University of Valencia for the Port of Valencia. The method is applicable to box-shaped objects and is based on the relationship between the colliding object positions and their impact points. The tool chosen to solve the problem is a neural network, the multilayer perceptron, which adapts to the characteristics of the problem, namely, non-linearity, a large amount of data, and no a priori knowledge. The results achieved by the neural network are very satisfactory for the case of box-shaped objects. Furthermore, the computational burden is independent from the object positions and how the surfaces are modelled; hence, it is suitable for the real-time requirements of the application and outperforms the computational burden of other classical methods. The model proposed is currently being used and validated in the UVSim Gantry Crane simulator

    ํ•ด์–‘ ์ž‘์—… ์ง€์›์„ ์˜ ์ž์œจ ์šดํ•ญ ๋ฐ ์„ค์น˜ ์ž‘์—… ์ง€์›์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์กฐ์„ ํ•ด์–‘๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2019. 2. ๋…ธ๋ช…์ผ.Autonomous ships have gained a huge amount of interest in recent years, like their counterparts on land{autonomous cars, because of their potential to significantly lower the cost of operation, attract seagoing professionals and increase transportation safety. Technologies developed for the autonomous ships have potential to notably reduce maritime accidents where 75% cases can be attributed to human error and a significant proportion of these are caused by fatigue and attention deficit. However, developing a high-level autonomous system which can operate in an unstructured and unpredictable environment is still a challenging task. When the autonomous ships are operating in the congested waterway with other manned or unmanned vessels, the collision avoidance algorithm is the crucial point in keeping the safety of both the own ship and any encountered ships. Instead of developing new traffic rules for the autonomous ships to avoid collisions with each other, autonomous ships are expected to follow the existing guidelines based on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs). Furthermore, when using the crane on the autonomous ship to transfer and install subsea equipment to the seabed, the heave and swaying phenomenon of the subsea equipment at the end of flexible wire ropes makes its positioning at an exact position is very difficult. As a result, an Anti-Motion Control (AMC) system for the crane is necessary to ensure the successful installation operation. The autonomous ship is highly relying on the effectiveness of autonomous systems such as autonomous path following system, collision avoidance system, crane control system and so on. During the previous two decades, considerable attention has been paid to develop robust autonomous systems. However, several are facing challenges and it is worthwhile devoting much effort to this. First of all, the development and testing of the proposed control algorithms should be adapted across a variety of environmental conditions including wave, wind, and current. This is one of the challenges of this work aimed at creating an autonomous path following and collision avoidance system in the ship. Secondly, the collision avoidance system has to comply with the regulations and rules in developing an autonomous ship. Thirdly, AMC system with anti-sway abilities for a knuckle boom crane remains problems regarding its under-actuated mechanism. At last, the performance of the control system should be evaluated in advance of the operation to perform its function successfully. In particular, such performance analysis is often very costly and time-consuming, and realistic conditions are typically impossible to establish in a testing environment. Consequently, to address these issues, we proposed a simulation framework with the following scenarios, which including the autonomous navigation scenario and crane operation scenario. The research object of this study is an autonomous offshore support vessel (OSV), which provides support services to offshore oil and gas field development such as offshore drilling, pipe laying, and oil producing assets (production platforms and FPSOs) utilized in EP (Exploration Production) activities. Assume that the autonomous OSV confronts an urgent mission under the harsh environmental conditions: on the way to an imperative offshore construction site, the autonomous OSV has to avoid target ships while following a predefined path. When arriving at the construction site, it starts to install a piece of subsea equipment on the seabed. So what technologies are needed, what should be invested for ensuring the autonomous OSV could robustly kilometers from shore, and how can an autonomous OSV be made at least as safe as the conventional ship. In this dissertation, we focus on the above critical activities for answering the above questions. In the general context of the autonomous navigation and crane control problem, the objective of this dissertation is thus fivefold: โ€ข Developing a COLREGs-compliant collision avoidance system. โ€ข Building a robust path following and collision avoidance system which can handle the unknown and complicated environment. โ€ข Investigating an efficient multi-ship collision avoidance method enable it easy to extend. โ€ข Proposing a hardware-in-the-loop simulation environment for the AHC system. โ€ข Solving the anti-sway problem of the knuckle boom crane on an autonomous OSV. First of all, we propose a novel deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm to achieve effective and efficient capabilities of the path following and collision avoidance system. To perform and verify the proposed algorithm, we conducted simulations for an autonomous ship under unknown environmental disturbance iiito adjust its heading in real-time. A three-degree-of-freedom dynamic model of the autonomous ship was developed, and the Line-of-sight (LOS) guidance system was used to converge the autonomous ship to follow the predefined path. Then, a proximal policy optimization (PPO) algorithm was implemented on the problem. By applying the advanced deep RL method, in which the autonomous OSV learns the best behavior through repeated trials to determine a safe and economical avoidance behavior in various circumstances. The simulation results showed that the proposed algorithm has the capabilities to guarantee collision avoidance of moving encountered ships while ensuring following a predefined path. Also, the algorithm demonstrated that it could manage complex scenarios with various encountered ships in compliance with COLREGs and have the excellent adaptability to the unknown, sophisticated environment. Next, the AMC system includes Anti-Heave Control (AHC) and Anti-Sway Control (ASC), which is applied to install subsea equipment in regular and irregular for performance analysis. We used the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control method and the sliding mode control method respectively to achieve the control objective. The simulation results show that heave and sway motion could be significantly reduced by the proposed control methods during the construction. Moreover, to evaluate the proposed control system, we have constructed the HILS environment for the AHC system, then conducted a performance analysis of it. The simulation results show the AHC system could be evaluated effectively within the HILS environment. We can conclude that the proposed or adopted methods solve the problems issued in autonomous system design.ํ•ด์–‘ ์ž‘์—… ์ง€์›์„  (Offshore Support Vessel: OSV)์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ทนํ•œ์˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ถœํ•ญํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด์ƒ์—์„œ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์—์˜ ๋…ธ์ถœ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ž์œจ ์šดํ•ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ์˜ ์ž์œจ ์šดํ•ญ์€ ์„ ๋ฐ•์ด ์ถœ๋ฐœ์ง€์—์„œ ๋ชฉ์ ์ง€๊นŒ์ง€ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ๋„์›€ ์—†์ด ์ด๋™ํ•จ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ž์œจ ์šดํ•ญ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์ถ”์ข… ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์ถฉ๋Œ ํšŒํ”ผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ์„ , ์šดํ•ญ ๋ฐ ์ž‘์—… ์ค‘ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ํ•˜์ค‘ (๋ฐ”๋žŒ, ํŒŒ๋„, ์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ๋“ฑ)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋ฅผ ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ตญ์ œ ํ•ด์ƒ ์ถฉ๋Œ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ ๊ทœ์น™ (Convention of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, COLREGs)์— ์˜ํ•œ ์„ ๋ฐ•๊ฐ„์˜ ํ•ญ๋ฒ• ๊ทœ์ •์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถฉ๋Œ ํšŒํ”ผ ๊ทœ์น™์„ ์ค€์ˆ˜ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์—ฐ๊ทผํ•ด์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํ•ด์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ์„ ๋ฐ•์„ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ํšŒํ”ผํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ํ•ด์„์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์„ ๋ฐ•๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์ด ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ (experience)์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ํŠœ๋‹์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํšŒํ”ผํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์•„์งˆ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ปค์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋˜๊ณ  ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์–‘๊ณผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚˜ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ ์šฉ์ด ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‹จ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์ถ”์ข… ๋ฐ ์ถฉ๋Œ ํšŒํ”ผ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์œจ ์šดํ•ญ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ•ํ™” ํ•™์Šต (Reinforcement Learning: RL) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ํ•ด์„์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ข…ํ•˜๋Š” ์„ ๋ฐ• (agent)์€ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ (environment)๊ณผ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ํ•™์Šต์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. State S_0 (์„ ๋ฐ•์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ฐ์ข… ์ƒํƒœ) ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” agent๋Š” policy (ํ˜„์žฌ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ ์–ด๋–ค ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์„ ํƒํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ธ๊ฐ€)์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ action A_0 (์›€์ง์ผ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ) ์ทจํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์— environment๋Š” agent์˜ ๋‹ค์Œ state S_1 ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์ƒ R_0 (ํ•ด๋‹น ์›€์ง์ž„์˜ ์ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ)์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ agent์—๊ฒŒ ์ „๋‹ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ž‘์—…์„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋ณด์ƒ์ด ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋„๋ก policy๋ฅผ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ, ํ•ด์ƒ์—์„œ ํฌ๋ ˆ์ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์žฅ๋น„์˜ ์ด๋™์ด๋‚˜ ์„ค์น˜ ์ž‘์—… ์‹œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํฌ๋ ˆ์ธ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™ ์ œ์–ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ํ•ด์ƒ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ ๋ฐ•์˜ ์šด๋™์— ์˜ํ•ด ํฌ๋ ˆ์ธ์— ๋งค๋‹ฌ๋ฆฐ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ƒํ•˜ ๋™์š” (heave)์™€ ํฌ๋ ˆ์ธ์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์ขŒ์šฐ ๋™์š” (sway)๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์šด๋™์€ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ง€์—ฐ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ , ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋†“์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ž์นซ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ๊ณผ์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋™์š”๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” Anti-Motion Control (AMC) ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ Anti-Heave Control (AHC)๊ณผ Anti-Sway Control (ASC)์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ•ด์–‘ ์ž‘์—… ์ง€์›์„ ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ AMC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€์ฆ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์ƒํ•˜ ๋™์š”๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํฌ๋ ˆ์ธ์˜ ์™€์ด์–ด ๊ธธ์ด๋ฅผ ๋Šฅ๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” AHC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ œ์–ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฒ€์ฆ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์„ ๋ฐ•์ด๋‚˜ ํ•ด์–‘ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ํ•ด๋‹น ์ œ์–ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์„ค์น˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์—๋Š” ๊ทธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ํž˜๋“ค์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Hardware-In-the-Loop Simulation (HILS) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ AHC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฒ€์ฆ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ASC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ œ์–ด ๋Œ€์ƒ์ด under-actuated ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” sliding mode control ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋‹ค๊ด€์ ˆ ํฌ๋ ˆ์ธ (knuckle boom crane)์˜ ๊ด€์ ˆ (joint) ๊ฐ๋„๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜์—ฌ ์ขŒ์šฐ ๋™์š”๋ฅผ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ASC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Requirements for Autonomous Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.2.1 Path Following for Autonomous Ship . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.2.2 Collision Avoidance for Autonomous Ship . . . . . . . . . 5 1.2.3 Anti-Motion Control System for Autonomous Ship . . . . 6 1.3 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.3.1 Related Work for Path Following System . . . . . . . . . 9 1.3.2 Related Work for Collision Avoidance System . . . . . . . 9 1.3.3 Related Work for Anti-Heave Control System . . . . . . . 13 1.3.4 Related Work for Anti-Sway Control System . . . . . . . 14 1.4 Configuration of Simulation Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 1.4.1 Application Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 1.4.2 Autonomous Ship Design Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 1.4.3 General Technique Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 1.5 Contributions (Originality) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Chapter 2 Theoretical Backgrounds 20 2.1 Maneuvering Model for Autonomous Ship . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.1.1 Kinematic Equation for Autonomous Ship . . . . . . . . . 20 2.1.2 Kinetic Equation for Autonomous Ship . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.2 Multibody Dynamics Model for Knuckle Boom Crane of Autonomous Ship. . . 25 2.2.1 Embedding Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.3 Control System Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.3.1 Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Control . . . . . . 31 2.3.2 Sliding Mode Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.4 Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.4.1 Value Based Learning Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.4.2 Policy Based Learning Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 2.4.3 Actor-Critic Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 2.5 Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 2.5.1 Integrated Simulation Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Chapter 3 Path Following Method for Autonomous OSV 46 3.1 Guidance System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.1.1 Line-of-sight Guidance System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.2 Deep Reinforcement Learning for Path Following System . . . . . 50 3.2.1 Deep Reinforcement Learning Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.2.2 Neural Network Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 3.2.3 Training Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 3.3 Implementation and Simulation Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 3.3.1 Implementation for Path Following System . . . . . . . . 62 3.3.2 Simulation Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.4 Comparison Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 3.4.1 Comparison Result of PPO with PID . . . . . . . . . . . 83 3.4.2 Comparison Result of PPO with Deep Q-Network (DQN) 87 Chapter 4 Collision Avoidance Method for Autonomous OSV 89 4.1 Deep Reinforcement Learning for Collision Avoidance System . . 89 4.1.1 Deep Reinforcement Learning Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 4.1.2 Neural Network Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 4.1.3 Training Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 4.2 Implementation and Simulation Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 4.2.1 Implementation for Collision Avoidance System . . . . . . 95 4.2.2 Simulation Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 4.3 Implementation and Simulation Result for Multi-ship Collision Avoidance Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 4.3.1 Limitations of Multi-ship Collision Avoidance Method - 1 107 4.3.2 Limitations of Multi-ship Collision Avoidance Method - 2 108 4.3.3 Implementation of Multi-ship Collision Avoidance Method 110 4.3.4 Simulation Result of Multi-ship Collision Avoidance Method 118 Chapter 5 Anti-Motion Control Method for Knuckle Boom Crane 129 5.1 Configuration of HILS for Anti-Heave Control System . . . . . . 129 5.1.1 Virtual Mechanical System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 5.1.2 Virtual Sensor and Actuator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 5.1.3 Control System Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 5.1.4 Integrated Simulation Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 5.2 Implementation and Simulation Result of HILS for Anti-Heave Control System . . . . . . . . 145 5.2.1 Implementation of HILS for Anti-Heave Control System . 145 5.2.2 Simulation Result of HILS for Anti-Heave Control System 146 5.3 Validation of HILS for Anti-Heave Control System . . . . . . . . 159 5.3.1 Hardware Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 5.3.2 Comparison Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 5.4 Configuration of Anti-Sway Control System . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 5.4.1 Mechanical System for Knuckle Boom Crane . . . . . . . 162 5.4.2 Anti-Sway Control System Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 5.4.3 Implementation and Simulation Result of Anti-Sway Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 Chapter 6 Conclusions and Future Works 176 Bibliography 178 Chapter A Appendix 186 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 188Docto

    An advanced risk analysis approach for container port safety evaluation

    Get PDF
    Risk analysis in seaports plays an increasingly important role in ensuring port operation reliability, maritime transportation safety and supply chain distribution resilience. However, the task is not straightforward given the challenges, including that port safety is affected by multiple factors related to design, installation, operation and maintenance and that traditional risk assessment methods such as quantitative risk analysis cannot sufficiently address uncertainty in failure data. This paper develops an advanced Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) approach through incorporating Fuzzy Rule-Based Bayesian Networks (FRBN) to evaluate the criticality of the hazardous events (HEs) in a container terminal. The rational use of the Degrees of Belief (DoB) in a fuzzy rule base (FRB) facilitates the implementation of the new method in Container Terminal Risk Evaluation (CTRE) in practice. Compared to conventional FMEA methods, the new approach integrates FRB and BN in a complementary manner, in which the former provides a realistic and flexible way to describe input failure information while the latter allows easy updating of risk estimation results and facilitates real-time safety evaluation and dynamic risk-based decision support in container terminals. The proposed approach can also be tailored for wider application in other engineering and management systems, especially when instant risk ranking is required by the stakeholders to measure, predict and improve their system safety and reliability performance

    Integrating Building Information Modelling and Firefly Algorithm to Optimize Tower Crane Layout

    Get PDF
    Abstract - Tower crane layout design and planning within construction site is a common construction technical issue and regarded as a complex combinatorial problem. To transport heavy materials, such as rebar, formwork, scaffolding, equipment and steel, tower cranes are needed and should be well located to reduce construction cost and improve safety management. Currently, practitioners in the industry are over-reliance on individual experience and subjective judgment during decision-making process. The purpose of this paper wants to develop a well-defined approach, which integrating Building Information Modelling (BIM) and firefly algorithm to come up with an optimal tower crane layout for construction projects. Firstly, BIM technology is utilized to automatically generate the quantity of materials which need to be transported. Then firefly algorithms are used to determine the locations of tower cranes, supply points and demand points according to transportation requirement, time and cost. Thirdly, the optimal tower crane layout scheme will be visualized by 4-Dimension (4D) BIM to verify its constructability and safety based on computer simulation and individual experience. Finally, a practical case is selected to evaluate the developed approach. In addition, some lessons learned and issues are highlighted that help direct future research and implementation. The optimization results of the example are very promising and it demonstrates the application value of the approach

    Decision Making Analysis for an Integrated Risk Management Framework of Maritime Container Port Infrastructure and Transportation Systems

    Get PDF
    This research proposes a risk management framework and develops generic risk-based decision-making, and risk-assessment models for dealing with potential Hazard Events (HEs) and risks associated with uncertainty for Operational Safety Performance (OSP) in container terminals and maritime ports. Three main sections are formulated in this study: Section 1: Risk Assessment, in the first phase, all HEs are identified through a literature review and human knowledge base and expertise. In the second phase, a Fuzzy Rule Base (FRB) is developed using the proportion method to assess the most significant HEs identified. The FRB leads to the development of a generic risk-based model incorporating the FRB and a Bayesian Network (BN) into a Fuzzy Rule Base Bayesian Network (FRBN) method using Hugin software to evaluate each HE individually and prioritise their specific risk estimations locally. The third phase demonstrated the FRBN method with a case study. The fourth phase concludes this section with a developed generic risk-based model incorporating FRBN and Evidential Reasoning to form an FRBER method using the Intelligence Decision System (IDS) software to evaluate all HEs aggregated collectively for their Risk Influence (RI) globally with a case study demonstration. In addition, a new sensitivity analysis method is developed to rank the HEs based on their True Risk Influence (TRI) considering their specific risk estimations locally and their RI globally. Section 2: Risk Models Simulations, the first phase explains the construction of the simulation model Bayesian Network Artificial Neural Networks (BNANNs), which is formed by applying Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). In the second phase, the simulation model Evidential Reasoning Artificial Neural Networks (ERANNs) is constructed. The final phase in this section integrates the BNANNs and ERANNs that can predict the risk magnitude for HEs and provide a panoramic view on the risk inference in both perspectives, locally and globally. Section 3: Risk Control Options is the last link that finalises the risk management based methodology cycle in this study. The Analytical Hierarchal Process (AHP) method was used for determining the relative weights of all criteria identified in the first phase. The last phase develops a risk control options method by incorporating Fuzzy Logic (FL) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to form an FTOPSIS method. The novelty of this research provides an effective risk management framework for OSP in container terminals and maritime ports. In addition, it provides an efficient safety prediction tool that can ease all the processes in the methods and techniques used with the risk management framework by applying the ANN concept to simulate the risk models
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore