IST Austria Thesis

Hybrid automata combine finite automata and dynamical systems, and model the interaction of digital with physical systems. Formal analysis that can guarantee the safety of all behaviors or rigorously witness failures, while unsolvable in general, has been tackled algorithmically using, e.g., abstraction, bounded model-checking, assisted theorem proving. Nevertheless, very few methods have addressed the time-unbounded reachability analysis of hybrid automata and, for current sound and automatic tools, scalability remains critical. We develop methods for the polyhedral abstraction of hybrid automata, which construct coarse overapproximations and tightens them incrementally, in a CEGAR fashion. We use template polyhedra, i.e., polyhedra whose facets are normal to a given set of directions. While, previously, directions were given by the user, we introduce (1) the first method for computing template directions from spurious counterexamples, so as to generalize and eliminate them. The method applies naturally to convex hybrid automata, i.e., hybrid automata with (possibly non-linear) convex constraints on derivatives only, while for linear ODE requires further abstraction. Specifically, we introduce (2) the conic abstractions, which, partitioning the state space into appropriate (possibly non-uniform) cones, divide curvy trajectories into relatively straight sections, suitable for polyhedral abstractions. Finally, we introduce (3) space-time interpolation, which, combining interval arithmetic and template refinement, computes appropriate (possibly non-uniform) time partitioning and template directions along spurious trajectories, so as to eliminate them. We obtain sound and automatic methods for the reachability analysis over dense and unbounded time of convex hybrid automata and hybrid automata with linear ODE. We build prototype tools and compare—favorably—our methods against the respective state-of-the-art tools, on several benchmarks

An abstraction and refinement computational approach to safety verification of discrete time nonlinear systems

This paper addresses safety verification of nonlinear systems through invariant set computation. More precisely, our goal is verifying if the state of a given discrete time nonlinear system will keep evolving within a safe region, starting from a given set of initial conditions. To this purpose, we introduce a conformant PieceWise Affine (PWA) abstraction of the nonlinear system, which is instrumental to computing a conservative approximation of its maximal invariant set within the safe region. If the obtained set covers the set of initial conditions, safety is proven. Otherwise, subsequent refinements of the PWA abstraction are performed, either on the whole safe region or on some appropriate subset identified through a guided refinement approach and containing the set of initial conditions. Some numerical examples demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach

Computer Aided Verification

This open access two-volume set LNCS 10980 and 10981 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV 2018, held in Oxford, UK, in July 2018. The 52 full and 13 tool papers presented together with 3 invited papers and 2 tutorials were carefully reviewed and selected from 215 submissions. The papers cover a wide range of topics and techniques, from algorithmic and logical foundations of verification to practical applications in distributed, networked, cyber-physical, and autonomous systems. They are organized in topical sections on model checking, program analysis using polyhedra, synthesis, learning, runtime verification, hybrid and timed systems, tools, probabilistic systems, static analysis, theory and security, SAT, SMT and decisions procedures, concurrency, and CPS, hardware, industrial applications

Computer Aided Verification

This open access two-volume set LNCS 13371 and 13372 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 34rd International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV 2022, which was held in Haifa, Israel, in August 2022. The 40 full papers presented together with 9 tool papers and 2 case studies were carefully reviewed and selected from 209 submissions. The papers were organized in the following topical sections: Part I: Invited papers; formal methods for probabilistic programs; formal methods for neural networks; software Verification and model checking; hyperproperties and security; formal methods for hardware, cyber-physical, and hybrid systems. Part II: Probabilistic techniques; automata and logic; deductive verification and decision procedures; machine learning; synthesis and concurrency. This is an open access book

Computer Aided Verification

This open access two-volume set LNCS 11561 and 11562 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV 2019, held in New York City, USA, in July 2019. The 52 full papers presented together with 13 tool papers and 2 case studies, were carefully reviewed and selected from 258 submissions. The papers were organized in the following topical sections: Part I: automata and timed systems; security and hyperproperties; synthesis; model checking; cyber-physical systems and machine learning; probabilistic systems, runtime techniques; dynamical, hybrid, and reactive systems; Part II: logics, decision procedures; and solvers; numerical programs; verification; distributed systems and networks; verification and invariants; and concurrency

Computer Aided Verification

This open access two-volume set LNCS 10980 and 10981 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV 2018, held in Oxford, UK, in July 2018. The 52 full and 13 tool papers presented together with 3 invited papers and 2 tutorials were carefully reviewed and selected from 215 submissions. The papers cover a wide range of topics and techniques, from algorithmic and logical foundations of verification to practical applications in distributed, networked, cyber-physical, and autonomous systems. They are organized in topical sections on model checking, program analysis using polyhedra, synthesis, learning, runtime verification, hybrid and timed systems, tools, probabilistic systems, static analysis, theory and security, SAT, SMT and decisions procedures, concurrency, and CPS, hardware, industrial applications

Computer Aided Verification

This open access two-volume set LNCS 11561 and 11562 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV 2019, held in New York City, USA, in July 2019. The 52 full papers presented together with 13 tool papers and 2 case studies, were carefully reviewed and selected from 258 submissions. The papers were organized in the following topical sections: Part I: automata and timed systems; security and hyperproperties; synthesis; model checking; cyber-physical systems and machine learning; probabilistic systems, runtime techniques; dynamical, hybrid, and reactive systems; Part II: logics, decision procedures; and solvers; numerical programs; verification; distributed systems and networks; verification and invariants; and concurrency

Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems

This open access two-volume set constitutes the proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, TACAS 2021, which was held during March 27 – April 1, 2021, as part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2021. The conference was planned to take place in Luxembourg and changed to an online format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The total of 41 full papers presented in the proceedings was carefully reviewed and selected from 141 submissions. The volume also contains 7 tool papers; 6 Tool Demo papers, 9 SV-Comp Competition Papers. The papers are organized in topical sections as follows: Part I: Game Theory; SMT Verification; Probabilities; Timed Systems; Neural Networks; Analysis of Network Communication. Part II: Verification Techniques (not SMT); Case Studies; Proof Generation/Validation; Tool Papers; Tool Demo Papers; SV-Comp Tool Competition Papers

Remedies for building reliable cyber-physical systems

Cyber-physical systems (CPS) are systems that are tight integration of computer programs as controllers or cyber parts, and physical environments. The interaction is carried out by obtaining information about the physical environment through reading sensors and responding to the current knowledge through actuators. Examples of such systems are autonomous automobile systems, avionic systems, robotic systems, and medical devices. Perhaps the most common feature of all these systems is that they are all safety critical systems and failure most likely causes catastrophic consequences. This means that while testing continues to increase confidence in cyber-physical systems, formal or mathematical proofs are needed at the very least for the safety requirements of these systems. Hybrid automata is the main modeling language for cyber-physical systems. However, verifying safety properties is undecidable for all but very restricted known classes of these automata. Our first result introduces a new subclass of hybrid automata for which bounded time safety model checking problem is decidable. We also prove that unbounded time model checking for this subclass is undecidable which suggests this is the best one can hope for the new class. Our second result in this thesis is a counter-example guided abstraction refinement algorithm for unbounded time model checking of non- linear hybrid automata. Clearly, this is an undecidable problem and that is the main reason for using abstraction refinement techniques. Our CEGAR framework for this class is sound but not complete, meaning the algorithm never incorrectly says a system is safe, but may output unsafe incorrectly. We have also implemented our algorithm and compared it with seven other tools. There are multiple inherent problems with traditional model checking approaches. First, it is well-known that most models do not depict physical environments precisely. Second, the model checking problem is undecidable for most classes of hybrid automata. And third, even when model checking is decidable, controller part in most models cannot be implemented. These problems suggest that current methods of modeling cyber-physical systems and problems might not be the right ones. Our last result focuses on robust model checking of cyber-physical systems. In this part of the thesis, we focus on the implementability issue and show how to solve four different robust model checking problem for timed automata. We also introduce an optimal algorithm for robust time bounded safety model checking of monotonic rectangular automata