200 research outputs found

    Continuous-Time Markowitz's Model with Transaction Costs

    Full text link
    A continuous-time Markowitz's mean-variance portfolio selection problem is studied in a market with one stock, one bond, and proportional transaction costs. This is a singular stochastic control problem,inherently in a finite time horizon. With a series of transformations, the problem is turned into a so-called double obstacle problem, a well studied problem in physics and partial differential equation literature, featuring two time-varying free boundaries. The two boundaries, which define the buy, sell, and no-trade regions, are proved to be smooth in time. This in turn characterizes the optimal strategy, via a Skorokhod problem, as one that tries to keep a certain adjusted bond-stock position within the no-trade region. Several features of the optimal strategy are revealed that are remarkably different from its no-transaction-cost counterpart. It is shown that there exists a critical length in time, which is dependent on the stock excess return as well as the transaction fees but independent of the investment target and the stock volatility, so that an expected terminal return may not be achievable if the planning horizon is shorter than that critical length (while in the absence of transaction costs any expected return can be reached in an arbitrary period of time). It is further demonstrated that anyone following the optimal strategy should not buy the stock beyond the point when the time to maturity is shorter than the aforementioned critical length. Moreover, the investor would be less likely to buy the stock and more likely to sell the stock when the maturity date is getting closer. These features, while consistent with the widely accepted investment wisdom, suggest that the planning horizon is an integral part of the investment opportunities.Comment: 30 pages, 1 figur

    Portfolio selection of stochastic differential equation with jumps under regime switching.

    Get PDF
    In this thesis, we are interested in the stochastic differential equation with jumps under regime switching. Firstly, we investigate a continuous-time version of the mean-variance portfolio selection model with jumps under regime switching. The portfolio selection proposed and analyzed for a market consisting of one bank account an d multiple stocks. The random regime switching is assumed to be independent of the underlying Brownian motion and jump processes. Secondly, we consider the problem of pricing contigent claims on a stock whose price process is modeled by a Levy process. Since the market is incomplete and there is not a unique equivalent martingale measure. We study approaches to pricing options. Finally, we investigate a continuous-time version Markowitz's mean-variance portfolio selection problem which is studied in a market with one bank account, one stock and proportional transaction costs. This is a singular stochastic control problem. Via a series of transformations, the problem is turned into a double obstacle problem

    Comparison of portfolios: research on fundamental indices and recurrent indices

    Get PDF
    Treball Final de Grau en Finances i Comptabilitat. Codi: FC1049. Curs acadรจmic: 2021-2022Portfolios constructed on the basis of fundamental metrics have been the subject of research over the years and are an area of great interest in portfolio investment.They have been constructed according to the Market capitalization and the naรฏve portfolio. Moreover, They have been studied and analyzed by different economists as well as compared by investors with the recurrent and most used portfolios. Since there has been a growing interest in this topic in recent years, this research presents different studies by researchers who have conducted empirical studies in which it is compared constructed portfolios by fundamental metrics with the most recurrent portfolios that got different results and therefore different conclusions. So far, there are still disagreements about which of these strategies performs best. That is why the main objective of this project is to find out which portfolio has the best results among all of them that have been analyzed. Hence this project focuses on portfolios based on fundamental factors and compares them with the portfolios used by investors or analysts. The portfolios based on fundamental metrics that have been studied in this work are: portfolio based on Return on Assets, portfolio based on Return on Equity and portfolio based on the fundamental metric Debt to Equity The portfolio is constructed with 35 companies that have been part of the Ibex 35 during the period from 2018 to 2020

    Risk measures and their applications in asset management

    Get PDF
    Several approaches exist to model decision making under risk, where risk can be broadly defined as the effect of variability of random outcomes. One of the main approaches in the practice of decision making under risk uses mean-risk models; one such well-known is the classical Markowitz model, where variance is used as risk measure. Along this line, we consider a portfolio selection problem, where the asset returns have an elliptical distribution. We mainly focus on portfolio optimization models constructing portfolios with minimal risk, provided that a prescribed expected return level is attained. In particular, we model the risk by using Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). After reviewing the main properties of VaR and CVaR, we present short proofs to some of the well-known results. Finally, we describe a computationally efficient solution algorithm and present numerical results.conditional value-at-risk;elliptical distributions;mean-risk;portfolio optimization;value-at-risk

    ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์œ„ํ—˜๊ณผ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ตœ์  ์ „์›๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋„์ถœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ฒฝ์˜ยท๊ฒฝ์ œยท์ •์ฑ…์ „๊ณต, 2020. 8. ์ด์ข…์ˆ˜.Long-term power planning has been focused primarily on cost minimization, which was the same in other countries as in Korea. Since 2000, several studies applied Markowitz's portfolio theory to the portfolio of power generation sources. However, many of the earlier studies only concentrated on finding the efficient frontier of the portfolio, and there has not been a study on the trade-off ratio value between the cost and its volatility. Therefore, in earlier studies, the optimal portfolios from the efficiency frontier were found through scenario analysis, and not the real value of the policymaker's trade-off ratio. The primary aim of this paper is to estimate reasonably the exchange ratio between costs and their volatility in the analysis of the optimal power mix using the mean-variance model. This study started from the microeconomic foundation, which the policy makers used to establish the power plan to maximize their social welfare, estimate the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) between these elements using the time series of the power structure in Korea, and derive the optimal power portfolio from this. The secondary aim of this paper is to include in the analysis model the reliability risks that must be considered in the optimal power generation mix. Several studies describe power generation assets in the same way as securities traded in the capital market, but it is very important to maintain power supply reliability as well as minimize cost, and avoid volatility in real-world power plant investment. In this study, the reliability risk was defined as the loss of load probability, and the mean-variance portfolio model was expanded by including it as an element of the social welfare function of policy-makers in establishing a power plan. The findings of the study are as follows: First, from the perspective of cost and volatility, the ratio of substitution between the two factors gradually changed from 1992 to 2014 to take more volatility risk. This was a major reason for the expansion of combined cycle gas turbine, which was eco-friendly and continuously improved in thermal efficiency since the 1990s, whereas diversifying power sources with nuclear power and coal after the oil shock in the 1970s. Second, the actual power generation portfolio was gradually approaching the optimal portfolio during the analysis period, but the share of LNG combined cycle power generation has increased significantly compared to the optimum level since 2011 when a large-scale power outage occurred in Korea. This can be attributed to the fact that in the early 2010s, the approval for the construction of LNG combined cycle power plants increased significantly to cope with the electricity crisis because of a short construction time. Third, when considering power reliability, the ratio of the optimal power generation portfolio was found to increase in proportion to peak-load generator, especially LNG, as compared to the volatility-risk-only model. This is because the combined power generation technology is composed of several gas turbines and a steam turbine, and the unit capacity per generator is small, which has a considerable diversification effect even in the event of generator failure. Based on these results, it is expected that the proportion of LNG in the power generation portfolio will have to be increased in the future. This is because policy makers are gradually changing the viewpoint of allowing volatility risk in their utility, and LNG CC is superior to other power sources in terms of reliability. In particular, the expansion of renewable power sources, which will increase the risk of reliability, is expected to require more LNG facilities in the future.์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ „์›๊ณ„ํš์€ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋น„์šฉ์ตœ์†Œํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ์™”๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, 2000๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดํ›„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ Markowitz์˜ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ์ด๋ก ์„ ๋ฐœ์ „์„ค๋น„์˜ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ณธ๊ฒฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ํฐ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์„ ํ–‰์˜ ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ฐœ์ „๋น„์šฉ์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ณผ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์˜ ํšจ์œจ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ฃผ๋œ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‘์—ˆ๊ณ , ๊ทธ ๋‘ ์š”์†Œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ตํ™˜๋น„์œจ์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ํšจ์œจ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ตœ์  ์ „์›๊ตฌ์„ฑ์˜ ์ฐพ์•„๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ CAPM ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ์žฅ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ทธ์ณค๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ํ‰๊ท -๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์ตœ์  ์ „์› ๋ฏน์Šค๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•จ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ, ๋น„์šฉ์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ณผ ๊ทธ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ตํ™˜ ๋น„์œจ, ์ฆ‰ trade-off ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ตœ์  ์ „์›๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•จ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ, ์ „๋ ฅ์‚ฐ์—…์—์„œ ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจํ˜•์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ฐœ์ „ ์ž์‚ฐ์ด ๋งˆ์น˜ ์ž๋ณธ์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋˜๋Š” ์œ ๊ฐ€์ฆ๊ถŒ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ํ˜„์‹ค์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์„ค๋น„ ํˆฌ์ž๋Š” ๋น„์šฉ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์™€ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ํšŒํ”ผ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ์ „๋ ฅ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ง€์žฅํ™•๋ฅ (LOLP)๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ „์›๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜๋Š” ์ •์ฑ…๋‹น๊ตญ์ž์˜ ํšจ์šฉํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ท -๋ถ„์‚ฐ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ™•์žฅ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๋ฏธ์‹œ์  ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์œ„ํ—˜๋งŒ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ 1์œ„ํ—˜ ๋ชจํ˜•๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ์˜ LOLPํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์–ป์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ๋น„์šฉ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ •์ฑ…์ž…์•ˆ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ”๋ผ๋ณด๋Š” ๋‘ ์š”์†Œ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋Œ€์ฒด ๋น„์œจ์€ 1992~2014๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ ์ฐจ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์„ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š”1970๋…„๋Œ€ ์˜ค์ผ์‡ผํฌ ์ดํ›„ ์›์ž๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์„ํƒ„์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ „์›์˜ ๋‹ค๊ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ฐ€, 1990๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดํ›„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์นœํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋ฐœ์ „ํšจ์œจ์ด ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ LNG ๋ณตํ•ฉ๋ฐœ์ „์ด ํ™•๋Œ€๋œ๋ฐ ํฐ ์ด์œ ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์‹ค์ œ ์ „์›๊ตฌ์„ฑ์€ ๋ถ„์„๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ ์ฐจ ์ตœ์  ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๊ทผ์ ‘ํ•ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ์ˆœํ™˜์ •์ „์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋˜ 2011๋…„ ์ดํ›„๋กœ LNG ๋ณตํ•ฉ ๋ฐœ์ „์˜ ๋น„์ค‘์ด ์ตœ์ ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” 2010๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดˆ, ์ „๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜๊ธ‰์œ„๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฑด์„ค ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ์งง์€ LNG ๋ณตํ•ฉ๋ฐœ์ „์˜ ๊ฑด์„ค ์Šน์ธ์ด ์ƒ๋‹น์ˆ˜ ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚œ๋ฐ ๊ทธ ์›์ธ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ „๋ ฅ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ตœ์  ์ „์›๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋น„์œจ์€ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ๋งŒ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๋ชจํ˜•๋ณด๋‹ค ํ”ผํฌ๋ฐœ์ „์„ค๋น„, ๊ทธ ์ค‘์—์„œ๋„ ํŠนํžˆ LNG์˜ ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ณตํ•ฉ๋ฐœ์ „ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋Œ€์˜ ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ„ฐ๋นˆ๊ณผ ์ŠคํŒ€ํ„ฐ๋นˆ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ, ๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ๋‹น ๋‹จ์œ„ ๊ธฐ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ž‘์•„ ๊ณ ์žฅ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์—๋„ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ „์›๊ตฌ์„ฑ์—์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์  ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋ฉด, ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ „์›๊ตฌ์„ฑ์—๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ๋ณด๋‹ค LNG์˜ ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๋” ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚˜์•ผ ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ •์ฑ…์ž…์•ˆ์ž์˜ ํšจ์šฉ๋„ ๋น„์šฉ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์ ์ฐจ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ด€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ , ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ๋„ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ „์›์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฐ์›”ํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์˜จ์‹ค๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๋น„์šฉ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์™€ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ฌ ์‹ ์žฌ์ƒ ์ „์›์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์  ํ™•๋Œ€๋Š” ์•ž์œผ๋กœ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ LNG์„ค๋น„๋ฅผ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Objectives 4 1.3 Research Outline 6 Chapter 2. Literature Review 7 2.1 Portfolio Theory 7 2.1.1 Markowitzs Concept 8 2.1.2 Capital Asset Pricing Model 10 2.2 Application to Power Generation Mix 14 2.2.1 Application to Global Case 14 2.2.2 Application to Korean Case 19 2.3 Estimation of the Trade-off Ratio 23 2.4 Limitations of Previous Research and Research Motivation 25 Chapter 3. Methodology 29 3.1 Volatility Risk Only Model (1-risk model) 29 3.1.1 Microeconomic Foundation 29 3.1.2 Econometric Method 35 3.2 Reliability Risk Added Model (2-risk model) 40 3.2.1 Measure of Reliability risk 40 3.2.2 Microeconomic Foundation 45 Chapter 4. Empirical Studies 56 4.1 Data Specification 56 4.1.1 Investment Cost 56 4.1.2 O&M and Fuel cost 59 4.1.3 Total Supply Cost 61 4.2 Estimation of 1-risk Model 63 4.2.1 Estimation of Covariance Matrix 63 4.2.2 Estimation of Share Equation 69 4.2.3 Empirical Results and Discussion 70 4.3 Estimation of 2-risk Model 79 4.3.1 Calculation of LOLP 79 4.3.2 Estimation of Share Equation 84 4.3.3 Empirical Results and Discussion 86 4.4 Implication for Electric Power Industry Policy 94 4.4.1 Revisit to the CAPM 95 4.4.2 Intermittency of Renewable Energy 102 4.4.3 Future Portfolio Including Renewable Energy 107 Chapter 5. Summary and Conclusion 111 5.1 Concluding Remarks and Contribution 111 5.2 Limitation and Future Studies 115 Bibliography 116 Appendix 1 : Deriving Optimal Share Equation 128 Appendix 2 : Deriving Derivatives of LOLP Function 130 Appendix 3 : Data Set 133 Appendix 4 : 8th Basic plan for supply and demand 135 Abstract (Korean) 139Docto

    Efficient and robust estimation for financial returns: an approach based on q-entropy

    Get PDF
    We consider a new robust parametric estimation procedure, which minimizes an empirical version of the Havrda-Charvร t-Tsallis entropy. The resulting estimator adapts according to the discrepancy between the data and the assumed model by tuning a single constant q, which controls the trade-off between robustness and effciency. The method is applied to expected return and volatility estimation of financial asset returns under multivariate normality. Theoretical properties, ease of implementability and empirical results on simulated and financial data make it a valid alternative to classic robust estimators and semi-parametric minimum divergence methods based on kernel smoothing.q-entropy; robust estimation; power-divergence; financial returns

    Efficient and robust estimation for financial returns: an approach based on q-entropy

    Get PDF
    We consider a new robust parametric estimation procedure, which minimizes an empirical version of the Havrda-Charv_at-Tsallis entropy. The resulting estimator adapts according to the discrepancy between the data and the assumed model by tuning a single constant q, which controls the trade-o_ between robustness and e_ciency. The method is applied to expected re- turn and volatility estimation of _nancial asset returns under multivariate normality. Theoretical properties, ease of implementability and empirical re- sults on simulated and _nancial data make it a valid alternative to classic robust estimators and semi-parametric minimum divergence methods based on kernel smoothingq-entropy, robust estimation, power-divergence, _nancial returns

    A Heuristic Approach To The Index Tracking Problem: A Case Study Of The Tehran Exchange Price Index

    Get PDF
    Index tracking, the most popular form of passive fund management, is a portfolio selection problem in which the return of one of the stock market indexes is reproduced by creating a tracking portfolio consisting of a subset of the stocks included in the index. Index tracking has been known as an NP-Hard problem, and sophisticated approaches have been proposed in the literature to solve this problem. This paper presents an easyto-implement heuristic solution to this complex problem. The proposed approach was implemented to develop a tracking portfolio of 438 stocks listed in the Tehran Exchange Price Index. The numerical results indicate that the approach is able to identify quality solutions within reasonable model runtime
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore