47,102 research outputs found

    Essays on noncausal and noninvertible time series

    Get PDF
    Over the last two decades, there has been growing interest among economists in nonfundamental univariate processes, generally represented by noncausal and non-invertible time series. These processes have become increasingly popular due to their ability to capture nonlinear dynamics such as volatility clustering, asymmetric cycles, and local explosiveness - all of which are commonly observed in Macroeconomics and Finance. In particular, the incorporation of both past and future components into noncausal and noninvertible processes makes them attractive options for modeling forward-looking behavior in economic activities. However, the classical techniques used for analyzing time series models are largely limited to causal and invertible counterparts. This dissertation seeks to contribute to the field by providing theoretical tools robust to noncausal and noninvertible time series in testing and estimation. In the first chapter, "Quantile Autoregression-Based Non-causality Testing", we investigate the statistical properties of empirical conditional quantiles of non-causal processes. Specifically, we show that the quantile autoregression (QAR) estimates for non-causal processes do not remain constant across different quantiles in contrast to their causal counterparts. Furthermore, we demonstrate that non-causal autoregressive processes admit nonlinear representations for conditional quantiles given past observations. Exploiting these properties, we propose three novel testing strategies of non-causality for non-Gaussian processes within the QAR framework. The tests are constructed either by verifying the constancy of the slope coefficients or by applying a misspecification test of the linear QAR model over different quantiles of the process. Some numerical experiments are included to examine the finite sample performance of the testing strategies, where we compare different specification tests for dynamic quantiles with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov constancy test. The new methodology is applied to some time series from financial markets to investigate the presence of speculative bubbles. The extension of the approach based on the specification tests to AR processes driven by innovations with heteroskedasticity is studied through simulations. The performance of QAR estimates of non-causal processes at extreme quantiles is also explored. In the second chapter, "Estimation of Time Series Models Using the Empirical Distribution of Residuals", we introduce a novel estimation technique for general linear time series models, potentially noninvertible and noncausal, by utilizing the empirical cumulative distribution function of residuals. The proposed method relies on the generalized spectral cumulative function to characterize the pairwise dependence of residuals at all lags. Model identification can be achieved by exploiting the information in the joint distribution of residuals under the iid assumption. This method yields consistent estimates of the model parameters without imposing stringent conditions on the higher-order moments or any distributional assumptions on the innovations beyond non-Gaussianity. We investigate the asymptotic distribution of the estimates by employing a smoothed cumulative distribution function to approximate the indicator function, considering the non-differentiability of the original loss function. Efficiency improvements can be achieved by properly choosing the scaling parameter for residuals. Finite sample properties are explored through Monte Carlo simulations. An empirical application to illustrate this methodology is provided by fitting the daily trading volume of Microsoft stock by autoregressive models with noncausal representation. The flexibility of the cumulative distribution function permits the proposed method to be extended to more general dependence structures where innovations are only conditional mean or quantile independent. In the third chapter, "Directional Predictability Tests", joint with Carlos Velasco, we propose new tests of predictability for non-Gaussian sequences that may display general nonlinear dependence in higher-order properties. We test the null of martingale difference against parametric alternatives which can introduce linear or nonlinear dependence as generated by ARMA and all-pass restricted ARMA models, respectively. We also develop tests to check for linear predictability under the white noise null hypothesis parameterized by an all-pass model driven by martingale difference innovations and tests of non-linear predictability on ARMA residuals. Our Lagrange Multiplier tests are developed from a loss function based on pairwise dependence measures that identify the predictability of levels. We provide asymptotic and finite sample analysis of the properties of the new tests and investigate the predictability of different series of financial returns.This thesis has been possible thanks to the financial support from the grant BES-2017-082695 from the Ministerio de Economƭa Industria y Competitividad.Programa de Doctorado en Economƭa por la Universidad Carlos III de MadridPresidente: Miguel Ɣngel Delgado GonzƔlez.- Secretario: Manuel Domƭnguez Toribio.- Vocal: Majid M. Al Sadoo

    Testing the martingale difference hypothesis using integrated regression functions

    Get PDF
    An omnibus test for testing a generalized version of the martingale difference hypothesis (MDH) is proposed. This generalized hypothesis includes the usual MDH, testing for conditional moments constancy such as conditional homoscedasticity (ARCH effects) or testing for directional predictability. A unified approach for dealing with all of these testing problems is proposed. These hypotheses are long standing problems in econometric time series analysis, and typically have been tested using the sample autocorrelations or in the spectral domain using the periodogram. Since these hypotheses cover also nonlinear predictability, tests based on those second order statistics are inconsistent against uncorrelated processes in the alternative hypothesis. In order to circumvent this problem pairwise integrated regression functions are introduced as measures of linear and nonlinear dependence. The proposed test does not require to chose a lag order depending on sample size, to smooth the data or to formulate a parametric alternative model. Moreover, the test is robust to higher order dependence, in particular to conditional heteroskedasticity. Under general dependence the asymptotic null distribution depends on the data generating process, so a bootstrap procedure is considered and a Monte Carlo study examines its finite sample performance. Then, the martingale and conditional heteroskedasticity properties of the Pound/Dollar exchange rate are investigated.Publicad

    Generalized spectral tests for the martingale difference hypothesis

    Get PDF
    ^aThis article proposes a test for the Martingale Difference Hypothesis (MDH) using dependence measures related to the characteristic function. The MDH typically has been tested using the sample autocorrelations or in the spectral domain using the periodogram. Tests based on these statistics are inconsistent against uncorrelated non-martingales processes. Here, we generalize the spectral test of Durlauf (1991) for testing the MDH taking into account linear and nonlinear dependence. Our test considers dependence at all lags and is consistent against general pairwise nonparametric Pitman's local alternatives converging at the parametric rate n^(-1/2), with n the sample size. Furthermore, with our methodology there is no need to choose a lag order, to smooth the data or to formulate a parametric alternative. Our approach can be easily extended to specification testing of the conditional mean of possibly nonlinear models. The asymptotic null distribution of our test depends on the data generating process, so a bootstrap procedure is proposed and theoretically justified. Our bootstrap test is robust to higher order dependence, in particular to conditional heteroskedasticity. A Monte Carlo study examines the finite sample performance of our test and shows that it is more powerful than some competing tests. Finally, an application to the S and P 500 stock index and exchange rates highlights the merits of our approach

    Predicting trend reversals using market instantaneous state

    Full text link
    Collective behaviours taking place in financial markets reveal strongly correlated states especially during a crisis period. A natural hypothesis is that trend reversals are also driven by mutual influences between the different stock exchanges. Using a maximum entropy approach, we find coordinated behaviour during trend reversals dominated by the pairwise component. In particular, these events are predicted with high significant accuracy by the ensemble's instantaneous state.Comment: 18 pages, 15 figure

    Generalized spectral tests for the martingale difference hypothesis

    Get PDF
    This article proposes a test for the martingale difference hypothesis (MDH) using dependence measures related to the characteristic function. The MDH typically has been tested using the sample autocorrelations or in the spectral domain using the periodogram. Tests based on these statistics are inconsistent against uncorrelated non-martingales processes. Here, we generalize the spectral test of Durlauf (1991) for testing the MDH taking into account linear and nonlinear dependence. Our test considers dependence at all lags and is consistent against general pairwise nonparametric Pitman's local alternatives converging at the parametric rate n-1/2, with n the sample size. Furthermore, with our methodology there is no need to choose a lag order, to smooth the data or to formulate a parametric alternative. Our approach could be extended to specification testing of the conditional mean of possibly nonlinear models. The asymptotic null distribution of our test depends on the data generating process, so a bootstrap procedure is proposed and theoretically justified. Our bootstrap test is robust to higher order dependence, in particular to conditional heteroskedasticity. A Monte Carlo study examines the finite sample performance of our test and shows that it is more powerful than some competing tests. Finally, an application to the S&P 500 stock index and exchange rates highlights the merits of our approach.Publicad

    Testing the martingale difference hypothesis using integrated regression functions.

    Get PDF
    An omnibus test for testing a generalized version of the martingale difference hypothesis (MDH) is proposed. This generalized hypothesis includes the usual MDH, testing for conditional moments constancy such as conditional homoscedasticity (ARCH effects) or testing for directional predictability. A unified approach for dealing with all of these testing problems is proposed. These hypotheses are long standing problems in econometric time series analysis, and typically have been tested using the sample autocorrelations or in the spectral domain using the periodogram. Since these hypotheses cover also nonlinear predictability, tests based on those second order statistics are inconsistent against uncorrelated processes in the alternative hypothesis. In order to circumvent this problem pairwise integrated regression functions are introduced as measures of linear and nonlinear dependence. The proposed test does not require to chose a lag order depending on sample size, to smooth the data or to formulate a parametric alternative model. Moreover, the test is robust to higher order dependence, in particular to conditional heteroskedasticity. Under general dependence the asymptotic null distribution depends on the data generating process, so a bootstrap procedure is considered and a Monte Carlo study examines its finite sample performance. Then, the martingale and conditional heteroskedasticity properties of the Pound/Dollar exchange rate are investigated.Nonlinear time series; Martingale difference hypothesis; Empirical processes; Exchange rates;

    Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data

    Full text link
    It is often useful in multivariate time series analysis to determine statistical causal relations between different time series. Granger causality is a fundamental measure for this purpose. Yet the traditional pairwise approach to Granger causality analysis may not clearly distinguish between direct causal influences from one time series to another and indirect ones acting through a third time series. In order to differentiate direct from indirect Granger causality, a conditional Granger causality measure in the frequency domain is derived based on a partition matrix technique. Simulations and an application to neural field potential time series are demonstrated to validate the method.Comment: 18 pages, 6 figures, Journal publishe

    Pairwise tests of purchasing power parity

    Get PDF
    Given nominal exchange rates and price data on N + 1 countries indexed by i = 0,1,2,ā€¦, N, the standard procedure for testing purchasing power parity (PPP) is to apply unit root or stationarity tests to N real exchange rates all measured relative to a base country, 0, often taken to be the U.S. Such a procedure is sensitive to the choice of base country, ignores the information in all the other cross-rates and is subject to a high degree of cross-section dependence which has adverse effects on estimation and inference. In this article, we conduct a variety of unit root tests on all possible N(N + 1)/2 real rates between pairs of the N + 1 countries and estimate the proportion of the pairs that are stationary. This proportion can be consistently estimated even in the presence of cross-section dependence. We estimate this proportion using quarterly data on the real exchange rate for 50 countries over the period 1957-2001. The main substantive conclusion is that to reject the null of no adjustment to PPP requires sufficiently large disequilibria to move the real rate out of the band of inaction set by trade costs. In such cases, one can reject the null of no adjustment to PPP up to 90% of the time as compared to around 40% in the whole sample using a linear alternative and almost 60% using a nonlinear alternative
    • ā€¦
    corecore