Second-Order Consensus of Networked Mechanical Systems With Communication Delays

In this paper, we consider the second-order consensus problem for networked mechanical systems subjected to nonuniform communication delays, and the mechanical systems are assumed to interact on a general directed topology. We propose an adaptive controller plus a distributed velocity observer to realize the objective of second-order consensus. It is shown that both the positions and velocities of the mechanical agents synchronize, and furthermore, the velocities of the mechanical agents converge to the scaled weighted average value of their initial ones. We further demonstrate that the proposed second-order consensus scheme can be used to solve the leader-follower synchronization problem with a constant-velocity leader and under constant communication delays. Simulation results are provided to illustrate the performance of the proposed adaptive controllers.Comment: 16 pages, 5 figures, submitted to IEEE Transactions on Automatic Contro

The Most Exigent Eigenvalue: Guaranteeing Consensus under an Unknown Communication Topology and Time Delays

This document aims to answer the question of what is the minimum delay value that guarantees convergence to consensus for a group of second order agents operating under different protocols, provided that the communication topology is connected but unknown. That is, for all the possible communication topologies, which value of the delay guarantees stability? To answer this question we revisit the concept of most exigent eigenvalue, applying it to two different consensus protocols for agents driven by second order dynamics. We show how the delay margin depends on the structure of the consensus protocol and the communication topology, and arrive to a boundary that guarantees consensus for any connected communication topology. The switching topologies case is also studied. It is shown that for one protocol the stability of the individual topologies is sufficient to guarantee consensus in the switching case, whereas for the other one it is not