LIGSITE(csc): predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation

BACKGROUND: Identifying pockets on protein surfaces is of great importance for many structure-based drug design applications and protein-ligand docking algorithms. Over the last ten years, many geometric methods for the prediction of ligand-binding sites have been developed. RESULTS: We present LIGSITE(csc), an extension and implementation of the LIGSITE algorithm. LIGSITE(csc )is based on the notion of surface-solvent-surface events and the degree of conservation of the involved surface residues. We compare our algorithm to four other approaches, LIGSITE, CAST, PASS, and SURFNET, and evaluate all on a dataset of 48 unbound/bound structures and 210 bound-structures. LIGSITE(csc )performs slightly better than the other tools and achieves a success rate of 71% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of the Connolly surface leads to slight improvements, the prediction re-ranking by conservation to significant improvements of the binding site predictions. A web server for LIGSITE(csc )and its source code is available at scoppi.biotec.tu-dresden.de/pocket

Surface To Surface Map Algorithm For Protein - Small Molecule Matching

Current methods for protein analysis are based on either sequence similarity or comparison of overall tertiary structure. These conserved primary sequences or 3-dimensional structures may imply similar functional characteristics. However, substrate or ligand binding sites usually reside on or near protein surface, so, similarly shaped surface regions could imply similar functions. Our current work includes development of an algorithm that would allow surface matching over specific regions on related proteins with an output equal to the match percentage between two proteins. Initial results indicate that we can successfully match a family of related active sites, and find their similarly shaped surface regions. This method of surface analysis could be extended to help us understand functional surface relationship between the proteins within which there is no relationship in sequence or overall structure

Investigation of Antigen-Antibody Interactions of Sulfonamides with a Monoclonal Antibody in a Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay Using 3D-QSAR Models

A three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) model of sulfonamide analogs binding a monoclonal antibody (MAbSMR) produced against sulfamerazine was carried out by Distance Comparison (DISCOtech), comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA). The affinities of the MAbSMR, expressed as Log10IC50, for 17 sulfonamide analogs were determined by competitive fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). The results demonstrated that the proposed pharmacophore model containing two hydrogen-bond acceptors, two hydrogen-bond donors and two hydrophobic centers characterized the structural features of the sulfonamides necessary for MAbSMR binding. Removal of two outliers from the initial set of 17 sulfonamide analogs improved the predictability of the models. The 3D-QSAR models of 15 sulfonamides based on CoMFA and CoMSIA resulted in q2 cv values of 0.600 and 0.523, and r2 values of 0.995 and 0.994, respectively, which indicates that both methods have significant predictive capability. Connolly surface analysis, which mainly focused on steric force fields, was performed to complement the results from CoMFA and CoMSIA. This novel study combining FPIA with pharmacophore modeling demonstrates that multidisciplinary research is useful for investigating antigen-antibody interactions and also may provide information required for the design of new haptens

Between Algorithm and Model: Different Molecular Surface Definitions for the Poisson-Boltzmann based Electrostatic Characterization of Biomolecules in Solution

The definition of a molecular surface which is physically sound and computationally efficient is a very interesting and long standing problem in the implicit solvent continuum modeling of biomolecular systems as well as in the molecular graphics field. In this work, two molecular surfaces are evaluated with respect to their suitability for electrostatic computation as alternatives to the widely used Connolly-Richards surface: the blobby surface, an implicit Gaussian atom centered surface, and the skin surface. As figures of merit, we considered surface differentiability and surface area continuity with respect to atom positions, and the agreement with explicit solvent simulations. Geometric analysis seems to privilege the skin to the blobby surface, and points to an unexpected relationship between the non connectedness of the surface, caused by interstices in the solute volume, and the surface area dependence on atomic centers. In order to assess the ability to reproduce explicit solvent results, specific software tools have been developed to enable the use of the skin surface in Poisson-Boltzmann calculations with the DelPhi solver. Results indicate that the skin and Connolly surfaces have a comparable performance from this last point of view

GAPDOCK: A genetic algorithm approach to protein docking in CAPRI round 1

As part of the first Critical Assessment of PRotein Interactions, round 1, we predict the structure of two protein-protein complexes, by using a genetic algorithm, GAPDOCK, in combination with surface complementarity, buried surface area, biochemical information, and human intervention. Among the five models submitted for target 1, HPr phosphocarrier protein (B. subtilis) and the hexameric HPr kinase (L. lactis), the best correctly predicts 17 of 52 interprotein contacts, whereas for target 2, bovine rotavirus VP6 protein-monoclonal antibody, the best model predicts 27 of 52 correct contacts. Given the difficult nature of the targets, these predictions are very encouraging and compare well with those obtained by other methods. Nevertheless, it is clear that there is a need for improved methods for distinguishing between correct and plausible but incorrect complexes. Proteins 2003;52:10-14