2,835 research outputs found
Tree Regular Model Checking for Lattice-Based Automata
Tree Regular Model Checking (TRMC) is the name of a family of techniques for
analyzing infinite-state systems in which states are represented by terms, and
sets of states by Tree Automata (TA). The central problem in TRMC is to decide
whether a set of bad states is reachable. The problem of computing a TA
representing (an over- approximation of) the set of reachable states is
undecidable, but efficient solutions based on completion or iteration of tree
transducers exist. Unfortunately, the TRMC framework is unable to efficiently
capture both the complex structure of a system and of some of its features. As
an example, for JAVA programs, the structure of a term is mainly exploited to
capture the structure of a state of the system. On the counter part, integers
of the java programs have to be encoded with Peano numbers, which means that
any algebraic operation is potentially represented by thousands of applications
of rewriting rules. In this paper, we propose Lattice Tree Automata (LTAs), an
extended version of tree automata whose leaves are equipped with lattices. LTAs
allow us to represent possibly infinite sets of interpreted terms. Such terms
are capable to represent complex domains and related operations in an efficient
manner. We also extend classical Boolean operations to LTAs. Finally, as a
major contribution, we introduce a new completion-based algorithm for computing
the possibly infinite set of reachable interpreted terms in a finite amount of
time.Comment: Technical repor
Existential witness extraction in classical realizability and via a negative translation
We show how to extract existential witnesses from classical proofs using
Krivine's classical realizability---where classical proofs are interpreted as
lambda-terms with the call/cc control operator. We first recall the basic
framework of classical realizability (in classical second-order arithmetic) and
show how to extend it with primitive numerals for faster computations. Then we
show how to perform witness extraction in this framework, by discussing several
techniques depending on the shape of the existential formula. In particular, we
show that in the Sigma01-case, Krivine's witness extraction method reduces to
Friedman's through a well-suited negative translation to intuitionistic
second-order arithmetic. Finally we discuss the advantages of using call/cc
rather than a negative translation, especially from the point of view of an
implementation.Comment: 52 pages. Accepted in Logical Methods for Computer Science (LMCS),
201
Inductive-data-type Systems
In a previous work ("Abstract Data Type Systems", TCS 173(2), 1997), the last
two authors presented a combined language made of a (strongly normalizing)
algebraic rewrite system and a typed lambda-calculus enriched by
pattern-matching definitions following a certain format, called the "General
Schema", which generalizes the usual recursor definitions for natural numbers
and similar "basic inductive types". This combined language was shown to be
strongly normalizing. The purpose of this paper is to reformulate and extend
the General Schema in order to make it easily extensible, to capture a more
general class of inductive types, called "strictly positive", and to ease the
strong normalization proof of the resulting system. This result provides a
computation model for the combination of an algebraic specification language
based on abstract data types and of a strongly typed functional language with
strictly positive inductive types.Comment: Theoretical Computer Science (2002
Strong normalisation for applied lambda calculi
We consider the untyped lambda calculus with constructors and recursively
defined constants. We construct a domain-theoretic model such that any term not
denoting bottom is strongly normalising provided all its `stratified
approximations' are. From this we derive a general normalisation theorem for
applied typed lambda-calculi: If all constants have a total value, then all
typeable terms are strongly normalising. We apply this result to extensions of
G\"odel's system T and system F extended by various forms of bar recursion for
which strong normalisation was hitherto unknown.Comment: 14 pages, paper acceptet at electronic journal LMC
Strict General Setting for Building Decision Procedures into Theorem Provers
The efficient and flexible incorporating of decision procedures into theorem provers is very important for their successful use. There are several approaches for combining and augmenting of decision procedures; some of them support handling uninterpreted functions, congruence closure, lemma invoking etc. In this paper we present a variant of one general setting for building decision procedures into theorem provers (gs framework [18]). That setting is based on macro inference rules motivated by techniques used in different approaches. The general setting enables a simple describing of different combination/augmentation schemes. In this paper, we further develop and extend this setting by an imposed ordering on the macro inference rules. That ordering leads to a âstrict settingâ. It makes implementing and using variants of well-known or new schemes within this framework a very easy task even for a non-expert user. Also, this setting enables easy comparison of different combination/augmentation schemes and combination of their ideas
Practical Theory Extension in Event-B
Abstract. The Rodin tool for Event-B supports formal modelling and proof using a mathematical language that is based on predicate logic and set theory. Although Rodin has in-built support for a rich set of operators and proof rules, for some application areas there may be a need to extend the set of operators and proof rules supported by the tool. This paper outlines a new feature of the Rodin tool, the theory component, that allows users to extend the mathematical language supported by the tool. Using theories, Rodin users may define new data types and polymorphic operators in a systematic and practical way. Theories also allow users to extend the proof capabilities of Rodin by defining new proof rules that get incorporated into the proof mechanisms. Soundness of new definitions and rules is provided through validity proof obligations.
- âŠ